Harbinger and his trash talking are awesome. He made the Collector battles more entertaining for me.
I hope I don't have to kill him in ME3 and I can make him into my Shepard's SR-3.
Sir Smack talk! aka Harbinger support changing him into a real badguy thread
Débuté par
Destroy Raiden_
, juil. 06 2011 05:21
Retour en haut
#27
Posté 07 juillet 2011 - 04:21
ladyvader
-
- Members
- 3 524 messages
LOL. One of my favorite Joker quotes from ME2.Gyroscopic_Trout wrote...
I preferred the Reapers when they were beautiful but silent. Now it's like there's this thing I don't wanna talk to. Like villain cancer. >.>
#28
Posté 07 juillet 2011 - 04:30
Repearized Miranda
-
- Members
- 1 253 messages
Hah Yes Reapers wrote...
Repearized Miranda wrote...
^ What is with the malignant attitude towards contrivance? In case no one's noticed, nothing is not contrived story-telling wise. Folks throw that word around way too much. It's lost it's meaning. It's a "buzz-word" and we just can't stand those.
They could have written him better, but the other enemy. types were just as corny if you think about it. Hell, your squadmates were quite corny as well. Sovereign was great with dialogue, but did we fight him? We did not. Harbinger was corny in ME2 (better in LotSB); however, if you have to fight the guy for an hour, no need to listen to a two-hour thesis before hand.
A philosophical adventure is fine, but I don't want an adventure regarding philosophy.
Not a hard concept to grasp.
In ME2, he is annoying and unintimidating.
In ME3, his character randomly does a 180 to something like Sovereign because fans complain he's annoying.
Such a change = contrivance.
So why ***** then? I agree they shouldn't change things for the sake of changing them, but given your logic, ME2 never should've came to be let alone 3 as changes were made because they didn't ignore the fanbase who wanted those changes. Again, is there anything that is NOT a contrivance by your logic?
Fighting Cerberus. How is that contrived since they've been villifed since the first game? If anything, people are just pissed because it's another obstacle to leap over before even saying "hello" to the Reapers.
#29
Guest_iOnlySignIn_*
Posté 07 juillet 2011 - 07:58
Guest_iOnlySignIn_*
Guest_iOnlySignIn_*
-
- Guests
Destroy Raiden wrote...
Sure I know 99% of the population on board hates this guy
What board on you on? Harby is one of the most popular characters ever! At least for anyone who's enjoyed the great works of MandaloreMovies! My favorite:
#30
Posté 07 juillet 2011 - 10:30
Drone223
-
- Members
- 6 659 messages
Harbinger was heaps better in Arrival than most of ME 2 but I do find some of his taunts funny 
Anyway Arrival harbinger should be in ME 3
Anyway Arrival harbinger should be in ME 3
#31
Posté 07 juillet 2011 - 07:42
Grand Admiral Cheesecake
-
- Members
- 5 704 messages
Complete character 180?Hah Yes Reapers wrote...
Repearized Miranda wrote...
^ What is with the malignant attitude towards contrivance? In case no one's noticed, nothing is not contrived story-telling wise. Folks throw that word around way too much. It's lost it's meaning. It's a "buzz-word" and we just can't stand those.
They could have written him better, but the other enemy. types were just as corny if you think about it. Hell, your squadmates were quite corny as well. Sovereign was great with dialogue, but did we fight him? We did not. Harbinger was corny in ME2 (better in LotSB); however, if you have to fight the guy for an hour, no need to listen to a two-hour thesis before hand.
A philosophical adventure is fine, but I don't want an adventure regarding philosophy.
Not a hard concept to grasp.
In ME2, he is annoying and unintimidating.
In ME3, his character randomly does a 180 to something like Sovereign because fans complain he's annoying.
Such a change = contrivance.
Harbinger is the Reaper version of Liara!
#32
Posté 07 juillet 2011 - 08:26
Repearized Miranda
-
- Members
- 1 253 messages
Grand Admiral Cheesecake wrote...
Complete character 180?Hah Yes Reapers wrote...
Repearized Miranda wrote...
^ What is with the malignant attitude towards contrivance? In case no one's noticed, nothing is not contrived story-telling wise. Folks throw that word around way too much. It's lost it's meaning. It's a "buzz-word" and we just can't stand those.
They could have written him better, but the other enemy. types were just as corny if you think about it. Hell, your squadmates were quite corny as well. Sovereign was great with dialogue, but did we fight him? We did not. Harbinger was corny in ME2 (better in LotSB); however, if you have to fight the guy for an hour, no need to listen to a two-hour thesis before hand.
A philosophical adventure is fine, but I don't want an adventure regarding philosophy.
Not a hard concept to grasp.
In ME2, he is annoying and unintimidating.
In ME3, his character randomly does a 180 to something like Sovereign because fans complain he's annoying.
Such a change = contrivance.
Harbinger is the Reaper version of Liara!
Don't incite please!
