whywhywhywhy wrote...
While I agree the writing sucked and the storyline is horrid in ME2, I can't write it off the VS's (ash in my case) actions so simply. One thing is clear despite the player not being able to actually decide anything meaningful in me2, the point of the scene is that Ash doesn't give you a Chance to explain. Regardless how the scene is handle this is what Ashley's character is now and Sheperd was blindsighted. When he woke up the first thing he did was ask about his team, when Ash first sees him she greets then attacks him. Why Should Sheperd be the one to convince Her she's wrong ? Even if better written and I could convince her I don't know if I would if Traitor is part of her dialog.
Exactly. The entire scene takes on an air of unreality. I can't understand why the VS goes off on Shepard the way he/she does when they already know from firsthand experience what carzy sh...stuff Shepard has done in the past to save the galaxy. The only way I feel it can be resolved in a way that makes any sense at all is if something else is going on that Shepard (and maybe the VS) don't know about. Otherwise, it's simply bad, bad writing.
And to all the others saying people who don't like the VS are "butthurt" or wanted her/him to "bow down" you couldn't be further from the truth. It isn't about Sheperd at all it's about the reapers an the VS survivor knows that but goes crazy because Cerberus wants to fight the Collectors/Reapers. They've shown that they are unreliable and since I never considered Ash a LI but liked her as a Soldier her now questionable judgement she's useless to me.
As I've said
I have no problem with the VS not being recruitable
I have no problem with them disapproving of working with Cerberus
I DO have a problem with them freaking out and calling me a traitor.
But at the same time, Bioware's attempt to drive a wedge between Shepard and the VS is so pathetically obvious I am instinctively digging my heels in:D