Aller au contenu

Photo

Please list your video card and game performance


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
73 réponses à ce sujet

#1
Alabeat

Alabeat
  • Members
  • 5 messages
I'm running a GeForce 8500GT 512MB on a 32 bit Vista box. If I turn textures on high and graphic quality to medium, I get a paltry 10-12 FPS. (Don't know the resolution off the top of my head, but it's mid-range 4:3 ratio in full screen mode)

I'm trying to determine if my card is just junk, or I need to tweak some settings that I've missed. Turning the graphics settings to low helps to some degree (additional 5 FPS), but I'm still not getting anywhere near the 30-40 FPS I'd like to be seeing.

Please list your graphics cards and the settings you're playing on and what kind of frame rate you're seeing.

Thanks for your help.

#2
Destalen

Destalen
  • Members
  • 19 messages
Geforce 8800 GT 512MB and I run the game on max textures resolution (It looks great on my 42 inch TV), max antialising, etc.. and I haven't lagged ever.



The biggest help for FPS is turning antialising(SP) off.



Have you updated your graphics card drivers? That can make a significant difference if not.

#3
Haasth

Haasth
  • Members
  • 4 412 messages
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M.

Settings are as maxed out as humanly possible, resolution 1920x1200.



I do not know my FPS for sure as I do not normally have anything running that is checking it, but at least 30 FPS (Which is on average how far the human eye can follow, IIRC). Goes completely smooth at all times, basically.

#4
Alabeat

Alabeat
  • Members
  • 5 messages
Yes, anti-aliasing is turned off and latest drivers installed (They just released new drivers in the past month, the ones prior had equally poor performance). The game is playable and I love it, it's just a little jumpy in battles and I can't really crank everything up.

EDIT ****

I recently slapped another 2GB of RAM in the machine to make 4GB thinking maybe it was a memory issue. The CPU usage is still pretty heavy and the extra memory didn't help the FPS much.

Modifié par Alabeat, 20 novembre 2009 - 09:34 .


#5
Sloth Of Doom

Sloth Of Doom
  • Members
  • 4 620 messages
Nvidia 9600GT 512MB.



1680x1050 run at max settings, not a single hiccup so far.

#6
Destalen

Destalen
  • Members
  • 19 messages
Have you ever cleaned the inside of you computer out? Compressed air style? Also, how much RAM, and how fast is your CPU?



The next thing would be to tone down the resolution a bit.

#7
anonygoose

anonygoose
  • Members
  • 83 messages
8800gt, 5200+ X2 processor, 1gb ram (from what I remember. Could be 2gb (posting from laptop, not pc))



Game runs fine on whatever it defaults to for this system. I don't prioritise graphics, but it still looks nice. Only ever performance issues are in Denerim and seems to get worse and worse once I visit there until I restart.

#8
Eurypterid

Eurypterid
  • Members
  • 4 668 messages
GTX 260 Core 216. 1920 x 1200 resolution. High settings on everything. No issues.



Your card is 'junk', unfortunately. When dealing with the old nvidia number system, as far as gaming goes, you want to aviod cards with a 1,2,3,4,5, or 7 as the second number. The 8500 is basically a business class card and not designed to handle gaming.



Haasth: there's a lot of argument about it, but if you delve into the issue, it appears that the 30 FPS rule with regards to the human eye only applies to film/tv (due to motion blur) and not gaming.

#9
Wyllowe

Wyllowe
  • Members
  • 133 messages




ATI 4890 on a Win 7 x64 OS (quad core CPU and 8 GB memory) @ 1650x1080 resolution, highest details and textures enabled. Never slows down, not even under the most demanding special effects in battle sequences.

#10
Seifz

Seifz
  • Members
  • 1 215 messages
For once, you might want to consider the CPU as well. This game benefits greatly from a quad-core chip!

Geforce GTX 295, Intel Core i7 260, 8GB DDR3@1333, RAID5 disks

I have my settings all set as high as they'll go, including AA, and I play on my 1080p TV.  Works flawlessly.  The RAID5 disks really makes loading a new area fast!

Modifié par Seifz, 20 novembre 2009 - 09:39 .


#11
SheffSteel

SheffSteel
  • Members
  • 1 231 messages
Card: GTX 260
Performance: generally very good (maxed 1920x1080)

Modifié par SheffSteel, 20 novembre 2009 - 09:39 .


#12
Haasth

Haasth
  • Members
  • 4 412 messages

Eurypterid wrote...

Haasth: there's a lot of argument about it, but if you delve into the issue, it appears that the 30 FPS rule with regards to the human eye only applies to film/tv (due to motion blur) and not gaming.


That is very much possible. I am not an expert on the issue. I basically just used it as a 'runs completely smooth as far as I can tell'.

#13
Chris_Really_Rocks

Chris_Really_Rocks
  • Members
  • 371 messages
Cards -- 2 GTX 280s. Performance -- never noticed anything less than totally smooth until the final boss fight.

#14
Trajan60

Trajan60
  • Members
  • 592 messages
Q9450 quad CPU @ 2.66 Ghz

4.00 GB DDR3

9800GX2

Windows 7 64-bit RC



Max settings @ 1920x1200 res and 2x AA



Getting no framerate issues whatsoever.

#15
Shadeling

Shadeling
  • Members
  • 168 messages
Nvidia Geforce GTX 275. Game runs smooth as silk with settings maxed.

#16
orionlocke

orionlocke
  • Members
  • 47 messages
I'm running a Nvidia GTX 285 (Zotac Amp OC'ed) edition with a core i7 920 overclocked to 3.4 GHz, 6GB of DDR3 1333MHz Ram on Windows 7.

I'm not sure exactly what frame rates I'm getting off hand but I have all video settings maxed out with resolution 1680x1050 and the game runs as smooth as can be even when there is a lot going on (lots of battling and magic going on)

#17
Alabeat

Alabeat
  • Members
  • 5 messages
Since Christmas is coming up, any video card recommendations for $120 or less?

#18
Landozelig

Landozelig
  • Members
  • 130 messages
I built my PC 2 years ago (Nov 2007) It was expensive and top of the line back then, but it runs Crysis and DA:O flawlessly at 1920x1200 resolution with all the highest settings including 8xAA.

CPU: Intel 3.0GHz Quad Core Extreme X9650
RAM: 8GB DDR3
GPU: nVidia GeForce 8800 Ultra (768MB)
OS: Windows 7 Ultimate x64 (clean install)

Its never worth it to build a cheap PC :whistle:

#19
miltos33

miltos33
  • Members
  • 1 054 messages
Maxed out settings @ 1920x1080 on the following specs:

AMD Phenom II x4 955 BE, Kingston 4GB Ram DDR3, ATI Radeon HD 5870.

#20
Denlath Vestor

Denlath Vestor
  • Members
  • 354 messages
Running all Max settings at 1680x1050 on GeForce 220GT 1GB RAM, AMD Quad @ 2.6GHz, 4GB RAM. Don't know my fps, but I've never noticed even the slightest stutter and I've been in some busy battle areas.

Modifié par Denlath Vestor, 20 novembre 2009 - 09:50 .


#21
Borilius

Borilius
  • Members
  • 23 messages
Sapphire ATI 4850 512 RAM - game runs flawless. The only gripe i have is with my CPU, which runs at 100% all the time - still waiting for a fix...

#22
Chris_Really_Rocks

Chris_Really_Rocks
  • Members
  • 371 messages
@Alabeat



If only you'd be willing to spend 145.00, I'd recommend -- http://www.newegg.co...N82E16814121351



If not try this:

http://www.newegg.co...N82E16814125298 (110.00 after rebate)








#23
eazy morph

eazy morph
  • Members
  • 1 messages
nvidia geforce 9800 gtx2 (1go)

core 2 Quad Q9450 overclock at 3.00ghz

4go corsaire dominator

Vista 64 bit

#24
Dam Wookie

Dam Wookie
  • Members
  • 130 messages
Dual Core Phenom II 550 3.6 Ghz. Ati 4890. 4GB ram. Everything maxed 1080p. With vsync on fraps reads a steady 58 fps on 60hz tv for most areas. So I doubt the game benefits from more than 2 cores.

#25
lv12medic

lv12medic
  • Members
  • 1 796 messages
Running 2 ATI 4870's in CrossfireX with a Q9550 @ 3GHz (slightly overclocked it for fun) and 4GB of RAM. Game settings are all set as high as they go with Vsync with a 1920x1080 resolution and I run a constant 60 fps unless theres lots of smoke or something on screen and sends the frame rate into the 40's for a second or two.

***edit: Also, running Win 7 Home Premium 64-bit***

Modifié par lv12medic, 20 novembre 2009 - 09:56 .