do you think the mattock should be nerfed whilst under adrenaline rush?
#26
Posté 07 juillet 2011 - 12:41
However the DLC weapons are intended to be overpowered. I don't really support nerfing stuff on single player games. Since you can make your own house rules and not use a certain power/weapon.
#27
Guest_Arcian_*
Posté 07 juillet 2011 - 12:46
Guest_Arcian_*
"THIS IS TOO POWERFUL, NERF IT!"
"THIS IS TOO WEAK, BUFF IT!"
No one's forcing you to use the Mattock. It's great disadvantage as opposed to the other ARs is that it has a ridiculously low ammo capacity. If you reduce the damage done or the accuracy, it becomes useless.
#28
Posté 07 juillet 2011 - 12:48
dujh wrote...
and feed back from the people who play their games help them do their jobsLeoism wrote...
I think you need to wait and see i'm sure they will be going over all the weapons anyhow and they will make adjustments if they deem it necessary. Let the "Professionals" do their jobs ;D
Not when you're stating the obvious. Everyone know's the Mattock was too strong made all other weapons useless except for the heavy's.
-edit- And just so you know i wasen't having a go at anyone in the first post i was just stating my opinion the guys over at Bioware know what's what. Like what "Strive" said, they make DLC weapons more powerful deliberatly, what would be the point in downloading them otherwise? It's all about money making
Modifié par Leoism, 07 juillet 2011 - 12:55 .
#29
Posté 07 juillet 2011 - 12:52
Arcian wrote...
It's like the World of Warcraft forums all over again.
"THIS IS TOO POWERFUL, NERF IT!"
"THIS IS TOO WEAK, BUFF IT!"
No one's forcing you to use the Mattock. It's great disadvantage as opposed to the other ARs is that it has a ridiculously low ammo capacity. If you reduce the damage done or the accuracy, it becomes useless.
I totally agree It's why i quit WoW After killing LK 25 - Did the main "Story" so to speak and was happy
#30
Posté 07 juillet 2011 - 12:53
If you think it is to powerfull just don't use it...
#31
Posté 07 juillet 2011 - 12:56
More like:Arcian wrote...
It's like the World of Warcraft forums all over again.
"THIS IS TOO POWERFUL, NERF IT!"
"THIS IS TOO WEAK, BUFF IT!"
No one's forcing you to use the Mattock. It's great disadvantage as opposed to the other ARs is that it has a ridiculously low ammo capacity. If you reduce the damage done or the accuracy, it becomes useless.
"Omg wtf soldier is so op and vanguard charge is imba, nerf nerf nerf. Also, adepts are for n00bs. 3ng1n33rs for life! I will now continue whining, however."
#32
Posté 07 juillet 2011 - 12:57
THE AVENGER'S TO WEK, BUFF IT!Arcian wrote...
It's like the World of Warcraft forums all over again.
"THIS IS TOO POWERFUL, NERF IT!"
"THIS IS TOO WEAK, BUFF IT!"
No one's forcing you to use the Mattock. It's great disadvantage as opposed to the other ARs is that it has a ridiculously low ammo capacity. If you reduce the damage done or the accuracy, it becomes useless.
#33
Posté 07 juillet 2011 - 12:57
#34
Posté 07 juillet 2011 - 12:59
#35
Guest_Arcian_*
Posté 07 juillet 2011 - 01:03
Guest_Arcian_*
"I WILL CANCEL MY PREORDER IF THIS DOESN'T CHANGE."Phaedon wrote...
More like:Arcian wrote...
It's like the World of Warcraft forums all over again.
"THIS IS TOO POWERFUL, NERF IT!"
"THIS IS TOO WEAK, BUFF IT!"
No one's forcing you to use the Mattock. It's great disadvantage as opposed to the other ARs is that it has a ridiculously low ammo capacity. If you reduce the damage done or the accuracy, it becomes useless.
"Omg wtf soldier is so op and vanguard charge is imba, nerf nerf nerf. Also, adepts are for n00bs. 3ng1n33rs for life! I will now continue whining, however."
#36
Posté 07 juillet 2011 - 01:04
#37
Posté 07 juillet 2011 - 01:06
i hope they do something like that especially since all classes can get it in me3TheOtherTheoG wrote...
Give it a smaller ammo capacity than it already has got, if you really want to nerf it.
#38
Posté 07 juillet 2011 - 01:07
that's a good thing as it would force you to use your other weapons an or powers to get through tough fights instead of just using the one gunLeoism wrote...
Or you can buff other weapons with bit more dmg or accuracy, sounds more fair considering the insanely low ammo capacity it already has would make it almost useless as you'll be constantly running out of ammo mid fights.
#39
Posté 07 juillet 2011 - 01:09
Phaedon wrote...
More like:Arcian wrote...
It's like the World of Warcraft forums all over again.
"THIS IS TOO POWERFUL, NERF IT!"
"THIS IS TOO WEAK, BUFF IT!"
No one's forcing you to use the Mattock. It's great disadvantage as opposed to the other ARs is that it has a ridiculously low ammo capacity. If you reduce the damage done or the accuracy, it becomes useless.
"Omg wtf soldier is so op and vanguard charge is imba, nerf nerf nerf. Also, adepts are for n00bs. 3ng1n33rs for life! I will now continue whining, however."
This.
#40
Posté 07 juillet 2011 - 01:09
no matter what they do there is no way i'll be canceling my n7 preorder, they can take it when they pry it from my cold dead handsArcian wrote...
"I WILL CANCEL MY PREORDER IF THIS DOESN'T CHANGE."Phaedon wrote...
More like:Arcian wrote...
It's like the World of Warcraft forums all over again.
"THIS IS TOO POWERFUL, NERF IT!"
"THIS IS TOO WEAK, BUFF IT!"
No one's forcing you to use the Mattock. It's great disadvantage as opposed to the other ARs is that it has a ridiculously low ammo capacity. If you reduce the damage done or the accuracy, it becomes useless.
"Omg wtf soldier is so op and vanguard charge is imba, nerf nerf nerf. Also, adepts are for n00bs. 3ng1n33rs for life! I will now continue whining, however."
#41
Posté 07 juillet 2011 - 01:10
I love semi-automatic assault rifles and it really annoys how much Mattock is overpowered.
Nerf it, or add another semi-automatic AR that is not.
#42
Posté 07 juillet 2011 - 01:12
#43
Posté 07 juillet 2011 - 01:14
That's right, BioWare,Arcian wrote...
"I WILL CANCEL MY PREORDER IF THIS DOESN'T CHANGE."
I am not renewing by subscription either!
I mean, pre-order.
Damn it, I blew it, didn't I?
#44
Posté 07 juillet 2011 - 01:19
#45
Posté 07 juillet 2011 - 01:21
budzai wrote...
of course it should be nerfed. who say otherwise is an idiot or a noob...
No you!
(same kind of argument..)
#46
Posté 07 juillet 2011 - 01:24
EDIT: No, don't nerf guns nerf nerfing
Modifié par comrade8472, 07 juillet 2011 - 01:27 .
#47
Posté 07 juillet 2011 - 01:40
#48
Posté 07 juillet 2011 - 01:40
budzai wrote...
of course it should be nerfed. who say otherwise is an idiot or a noob...
Wow, how insightful of you that I'm an "idiot noob" since I don't agree about nerfing the Mattock...<_<
#49
Posté 07 juillet 2011 - 01:42
i dont mean a patch for me2 i mean make it weaker in me3ErichHartmann wrote...
Nerfing in a single player game? Just no.
#50
Posté 07 juillet 2011 - 02:06
ErichHartmann wrote...
Nerfing in a single player game? Just no.
Saying that, it seems like don't understand "nerfing" or "balance" mean, or why they exist, if you say that. It has nothing to do with multiplayer. It has everything to do with making a fun game.
If the M-920 Cain had infinite ammo, or only cost 1 ammo/shot or something, that would make ME2 a worse game, even though it's single-player. That's an extreme example, but the Mattock is similar. It's ridiculously more powerful than the other ARs for any class. That makes for a bad game, because there's one "real" AR choice and the rest are all "fake", "noob" or "roleplaying" choices, effectively.
If you don't like the idea of it being "nerfed", then two things need to be done:
1) Other ARs need their damage increased and shot-grouping tightened so that they're more comparable to it. Some also need larger clip sizes, because the Mattock actually has a very good clip size/damage ratio - better than most ARs. One way or another, it needs to be in-line. So you can "buff" the other ARs.
2) The bug that means that makes the Mattock OP in Adrenaline Rush needs to be fixed.
This would make for a better game.





Retour en haut






