Aller au contenu

Photo

Brotherhood of Cerberus - The Illusive Man Discussion/Support Thread


  • Ce sujet est fermé Ce sujet est fermé
6970 réponses à ce sujet

#3351
Dave of Canada

Dave of Canada
  • Members
  • 17 484 messages

Saphra Deden wrote...

Why do you meta-game like this?


It's all she can do.

#3352
Xilizhra

Xilizhra
  • Members
  • 30 873 messages

Yes they did.

Hmmm. Interestingly, this also means that the current Council didn't do that either, if the incident happened at the turn of the century. Only Tevos might have been involved; Velarn probably wasn't born yet and the salarian certainly wasn't. I do wish we knew how often Councilors were replaced...

So they "nip it in the bud" by doing nothing when hostile synthetics invade the region and attack worlds "officially" protected by the Citadel? You realize Ekuna happened before humans were even on the scene, right?

I admit to screwing up the timeline, but it also means that the current Council is innocent of it as well, and seems to have done nothing at all to hurt the quarians.

The Council didn't know because the Council didn't care. They deliberately don't know. Their deliberate ignorance on the matter is a shallow attempt to keep their hands clean. They're culpable. This sort of behavior is encouraged by them. Tela Vasir is another example.

Tela Vasir is slightly different in that she was trying to protect the Council and the galaxy as a whole. Saren was just exercising his own sadism.

That just isn't practical. Humanity is only race, it will never outweigh all the others put together. If it stands alone at the top it will always be on a smaller peak than the old Council. All the races together can challenge it, or at least make things difficulty. Thus the human Council will forever be more concerned with their welfare than the old Couuncil was as a matter of practicality.

The original Council has had far longer to spread itself around. It may take a while before a human Council could squash everyone else, but I have no doubt it would try.

Why do you meta-game like this?

Well, for the most part it was just not wanting to kill ten thousand people and screw with galactic politics in general, which I could know without metagaming.

#3353
Sebby

Sebby
  • Members
  • 11 993 messages
The Renegade (lack of) council is one of the biggest cut corners in ME2.

#3354
Xilizhra

Xilizhra
  • Members
  • 30 873 messages

Seboist wrote...

The Renegade (lack of) council is one of the biggest cut corners in ME2.

Reassuring to note, though, that humans are just as (apparently) useless as nonhumans in that position.

#3355
Sebby

Sebby
  • Members
  • 11 993 messages

Xilizhra wrote...

Seboist wrote...

The Renegade (lack of) council is one of the biggest cut corners in ME2.

Reassuring to note, though, that humans are just as (apparently) useless as nonhumans in that position.


Says a lot about an alien council that's just as "effective" as a non-existant human one.

#3356
Xilizhra

Xilizhra
  • Members
  • 30 873 messages

Seboist wrote...

Xilizhra wrote...

Seboist wrote...

The Renegade (lack of) council is one of the biggest cut corners in ME2.

Reassuring to note, though, that humans are just as (apparently) useless as nonhumans in that position.


Says a lot about an alien council that's just as "effective" as a non-existant human one.

At least the old Council will listen to you, even if they don't agree. Their reliability is questionable, but I remain hopeful.

#3357
HiroVoid

HiroVoid
  • Members
  • 3 697 messages
Was it ever actually made clear if the renegade council is human-led or completely human?

#3358
Guest_Saphra Deden_*

Guest_Saphra Deden_*
  • Guests
Without knowing exactly how the Council functions I don't you can write them off as innocent of anything. They're still responsible for past rulings and past policy unless they formally renounces it. The terminus systems haven't moved in the last century (aside from getting a little bigger), so if Eden Prime is too dangerous to protect then how can they protect Ekuna? The writing is on the wall here.

Xilizhra wrote...

Tela Vasir is slightly different in that she was trying to protect the Council and the galaxy as a whole. Saren was just exercising his own sadism.


Oh, I see.

Xilizhra wrote...

The original Council has had far longer to spread itself around. It may take a while before a human Council could squash everyone else, but I have no doubt it would try.


I don't think you understand what I'm talking about here. The old Council was three very large and powerful species standing together. This made it practically impossible for anyone else to challenge them because all the "lesser" races were so much weaker. Even all standing together they could barely challenge the Council, if at all. Humanity standing on top as the sole Council species is not nearly as big as the old one. It is just one species and the old Council species, even if they have lost influence, are still forces to be reckoned with, both by themselves and united together. Thus the human Council is not untouchable like the old one.

Xilizhra wrote...

Well, for the most part it was just not wanting to kill ten thousand people and screw with galactic politics in general, which I could know without metagaming.


Uh huh, sure thing.

#3359
Sebby

Sebby
  • Members
  • 11 993 messages

HiroVoid wrote...

Was it ever actually made clear if the renegade council is human-led or completely human?


There's conflicting information about it throughout ME2. If I had to guess, it's a human-led one.

#3360
Dave of Canada

Dave of Canada
  • Members
  • 17 484 messages

Seboist wrote...

HiroVoid wrote...

Was it ever actually made clear if the renegade council is human-led or completely human?


There's conflicting information about it throughout ME2. If I had to guess, it's a human-led one.


Wanting all-human myself.

Modifié par Dave of Canada, 31 octobre 2011 - 07:58 .


#3361
Sebby

Sebby
  • Members
  • 11 993 messages

Dave of Canada wrote...

Seboist wrote...

HiroVoid wrote...

Was it ever actually made clear if the renegade council is human-led or completely human?


There's conflicting information about it throughout ME2. If I had to guess, it's a human-led one.


Wanting all-human myself.


Don't we all? But since we don't see or hear from them then the three little pigs could be running the council for all my Shepard knows.

#3362
Guest_laecraft_*

Guest_laecraft_*
  • Guests

Seboist wrote...

Xilizhra wrote...

Seboist wrote...

The Renegade (lack of) council is one of the biggest cut corners in ME2.

Reassuring to note, though, that humans are just as (apparently) useless as nonhumans in that position.


Says a lot about an alien council that's just as "effective" as a non-existant human one.


Give us a few more years without the Reapers, and we will rebuild this galaxy for the better. This galaxy badly need fresh blood, enough of asari stagnation.

Modifié par laecraft, 31 octobre 2011 - 08:13 .


#3363
Barquiel

Barquiel
  • Members
  • 5 854 messages

HiroVoid wrote...

Was it ever actually made clear if the renegade council is human-led or completely human?


The books and comics have a multispecies council. I guess there is no all-human council.

#3364
Dave of Canada

Dave of Canada
  • Members
  • 17 484 messages

laecraft wrote...

Give us a few more years without the Reapers, and we will rebuild this galaxy for the better. This galaxy badly need fresh blood, enough of asari stagnation.


We'll need to manipulate the war to our advantage, though. A destroyed Earth isn't going to help us at all and we can't allow the Turian supremists to rule unopposed, we'd need to influence their casualties and make sure the Asari can't diplomatically turn everybody against the weakened Alliance.

#3365
Guest_laecraft_*

Guest_laecraft_*
  • Guests

Xilizhra wrote...

Actually, by this standard, you should be forever loyal to your parents, regardless of their character, for giving you life in the first place. This is... frequently, dangerous and nonsensical.


Parents don't bring back from the dead a mature person who stood for humanity in its darkest hour, they simply give life. And it doesn't cost them billions of credits while the entire Earth has to contribute to the reconstruction of a destroyed body. And they don't bring a person from beyond the grave to enable him to fight the greatest threat of humanity's brief existence.

Issues of ME fantasy world don't work if you rip them out of their context and try to apply them to RL. This is why I dislike any RL comparisons, they don't take into consideration ME's unique setting and fictional circumstances. At best, such comparions show deliberate misdirecting intend to win an argument by changing its context. At worst, they show the arguer's inability to tell the fantasy apart from reality.

Usually I don't grace such arguments with an answer. But I thought I'd use this example to illustrate my point in general. "Parents giving life" is a more neutral example than comparisons to the RL politics which some people still occasionally make on this thread.

#3366
Guest_laecraft_*

Guest_laecraft_*
  • Guests

Dave of Canada wrote...

We'll need to manipulate the war to our advantage, though. A destroyed Earth isn't going to help us at all and we can't allow the Turian supremists to rule unopposed, we'd need to influence their casualties and make sure the Asari can't diplomatically turn everybody against the weakened Alliance.


I wouldn't put it past the asari and the turians to try and use humanity as a cannon fodder in the war. Doubtless they'd use this opportunity to try and get rid of us, they've been waiting for a chance ever since ME1. Or at least weaken us greatly until we are no longer a competition for them. We need to protect ourselves. We need to act first...before they do that to us.

I am unsure, however, how useful the human Council is going to be in this regard during the war. Their position is still very precarious. What if they're assassinated if they make unpopular decisions, and then their deaths are blamed on the Reapers or on indoctrinated agents? What if they're declared indoctrinated and then forced to step down?

But we still have the force that's out of their reach - Cerberus. The old Council can't touch TIM. Oh, they tried. They tried repeatedly. It's impossible to miss just how fervently focused on Cerberus the turians are, while they should be focused on the Reapers. There is a reason for that. Cerberus is the only active human faction in space that they cannot dictate to. They want it gone.

TIM did say that he's going to secure our dominance against the Reapers and beyond. I wonder if that's exactly what he's going to be doing. This is a reasonable approach. What if humanity buys a victory at such a high price that it would be exactly like defeat? If we destroy the Reapers but would be too weakened to survive our neighbours, if we suffer too great losses to recover, then what's the point?

Shepard strikes me as a bit nearsighted at the end of ME2. Or perhaps he's just too focused on the Reapers. Focus is good, but we need to keep the bigger picture in mind. Other speices certainly do. It would appear that the krogan and the quarians are not going to give a damn about the Reapers until Shepard solves the problem of their survival and prosperity, making sure that they have a future to fight for. Why shouldn't humanity do the same?

Hopefully this happens in ME3: Shepard is going to fight the Reapers (hostile aliens), and TIM is going to ensure that humanity survives our "friends". That's a nice separation of duties, and TIM's got the harder job.

Modifié par laecraft, 31 octobre 2011 - 10:29 .


#3367
General User

General User
  • Members
  • 3 315 messages
Why was the Council willing to send 'the Fleet!" into the Terminus to evict quarian refugees, but was unwilling to send it into the Traverse to fight an actual geth incursion?

That's easy: geth shoot back.

#3368
aiDvEoN

aiDvEoN
  • Members
  • 249 messages

General User wrote...

Why was the Council willing to send 'the Fleet!" into the Terminus to evict quarian refugees, but was unwilling to send it into the Traverse to fight an actual geth incursion?

That's easy: geth shoot back.


Truer words never spoken

#3369
Barquiel

Barquiel
  • Members
  • 5 854 messages

General User wrote...

Why was the Council willing to send 'the Fleet!" into the Terminus to evict quarian refugees, but was unwilling to send it into the Traverse to fight an actual geth incursion?

That's easy: geth shoot back.


I don't think Ekuna is in the Terminus Systems. I mean...the elcor colonized it.

#3370
aiDvEoN

aiDvEoN
  • Members
  • 249 messages

Barquiel wrote...

General User wrote...

Why was the Council willing to send 'the Fleet!" into the Terminus to evict quarian refugees, but was unwilling to send it into the Traverse to fight an actual geth incursion?

That's easy: geth shoot back.


I don't think Ekuna is in the Terminus Systems. I mean...the elcor colonized it.


Its in the Hades Nexus, so the absoute edge of Citadel space.  The Council tried to weasel out of helping human colonies there that were suffering Geth attacks on the grounds that we took a risk by settling there, and any fleet action would antagonise the Terminus.

In other words, the borders of Citadel space are wherever the hell the Council needs them to be to suit them best.

#3371
General User

General User
  • Members
  • 3 315 messages
Word.

Remember Garvug? War went on for months and the Council just stood around looking worried, but when it was revealed that there was a prothean technology cache involved, they put the boot in... hard.

Modifié par General User, 31 octobre 2011 - 01:49 .


#3372
Guest_laecraft_*

Guest_laecraft_*
  • Guests
I wonder if the Council would defend Illium if it came under attack. Illium is very close to the Terminus Systems, in fact it's highly profitable to the asari because of that, all those illegal goods that come from the lucrative trade with Terminus that you won't find anywhere else...

I bet that if Illium was endangered, the corporations would kick the Council into action immediately. But let's not risk the war with Terminus, let them die.

#3373
General User

General User
  • Members
  • 3 315 messages
Just as yesterday's "terrorists" have a way of becoming today's "local tribal leaders", I too would be surprised if the "ruthless corporatists"of Illium didn't end up becoming "pillars of the local business community" in that scenario.

Dean once called Illium and Noveria the places where the Council does all the things they like pretend are illegal.  I agree.

Modifié par General User, 31 octobre 2011 - 01:56 .


#3374
Guest_laecraft_*

Guest_laecraft_*
  • Guests
TIM is about to cleanse the Terminus from the criminal element. It's going to become very safe to move the fleet in - human fleet, that is. Human dominance is off to a good start. We're going to spread Good across the galaxy.

#3375
BlueMagitek

BlueMagitek
  • Members
  • 3 583 messages

Xilizhra wrote...

Only one colony was in fact attacked, so the Council was completely right in its assumption that Saren would have to go stealthily after his cover was blown. A fleet could have perhaps destroyed the geth hitting Feros, but that would actually have been worse, because the colony would have remained under the Thorian's control in all likelihood and the Cipher would never be found.

The Council murdered no one, only threatened to attack.

I don't think so. It was only an opportunity loss, as opposed to the loss of freedom/sanity/life Cerberus has freely inflicted.

The Council destroyed the vast majority of geth forces beyond the Veil, and the geth haven't launched any major attacks in years.

If Cerberus performed an imitation of a Council act that would be utterly pointless if used against volus or batarians, yes.

I won't kill ten thousand people to usher in a less grateful set of successors who won't reform the government at all. And Terra Firma is worthless, not even commanding Cerberus' circumstantially useful resources.
And I don't plan on attacking, for reasons previously mentioned.

The krogan brought it on themselves, and continue to necessitate it with a continuously violent culture. Unless, of course, they'd rather be wiped out entirely...

If their situations are incomparable, don't compare them. You started this.

You lack Seboist's turgid evil, then. Good for you.


It's still completely irresponsible.  The investigation on Noveria, sure, that requires stealth.  Going to those Prothean ruins, sure, a few people.  But Virmire or Feros?  They deserved a fleet (I'll forgive Virmire because of faulty communication, but still).  

A threat that was taken seriously, if the Quarian reaction is any proof.  Out of spite, they then gave "their" planet to another species which already has a good amount, at least compared to the Quarians.  And no, the Council murders people all the time.

An opportunity loss?  Given how many times we see the Quarians attempt to recolonize, that's less of an opportunity loss and more of a slap to the face.  Cerberus' crimes are miniscule in comparison.

Sure, why not.

As opposed to letting everyone in the galaxy die?  That's rather horrid of you.  Those people on the DA are military; if they didn't want to put themselves in danger, they wouldn't have joined their military (or not taken such a prestigious position of guarding the Citadel). 
It matters not; it is one of the few times that Shep is allowed to use his influence.
Sounds racist. :whistle:

Ah yes, the entire cultural warfare thing.  Let me guess, you'll also convince the Batarians to give up their slaveholding ways?  It isn't like the Krogan's hatred of the genocide caused any backlash against the Council, right? 

Their situations are comparable.  You're just placing ridiculous restrictions on them to defend your mindset.

You're calling someone evil?  You support terrorists. >_>