It's not hypocritical. Making the call to completely obliterate an entire species and anything that could possibly be learned from them or their memory is far worse in the long run. And reintegrating the geth with the most intimate knowledge of the Reapers into the main collective is an excellent way to bolster the galaxy's defenses against the Reapers.Kratan wrote...
Xilizhra wrote...
You've badly misunderstood the purpose of the Spectres. They exist so that they don't have to run back to the Council to consult them on every decision. It would have been nice to do so for the rachni, but I had no option to do so. And I did have the legal power to do so, and to do everything in ME2, as I was reinstated as a Spectre and was basically given free rein so long as I didn't cause trouble for the Council in particular.These are all moves that were done without consulting the council or any authority on the matters (keep in mind, Shepard is only a commander. Even if s/he is the PC and possibly a SpecTRe, those decisions should not have been made by him/her).
I see it as abuse of power. Shepard throws the entire universe into unbalance. The SpecTRes are there to act on behalf of the council, but Shepard takes it upon himself to make big decisions that don't preserve galactic stability. Killing the Rachni would have maintained the status quo, same for destroying the geth, but releasing and reprogramming both without knowing the consequences is just pragmatic. Calling that paragon is hypocritical. Tela Vasir made good points when paragon Shepard tried to defend his or her actions.
Paragon doesn't mean "always follows the rules." One could say that it's about doing what's right, but more specifically, it involves preserving life and making allies, not trying to match the Council in everything.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut






