Indeed it's comforting to accept whatever you're told and not question anything at all. I bet monkeys in the zoo find Humans funny as hell too.Blacklash93 wrote...
Cerberus was never morally grey. It's amusing how sore the renegade fanboys are getting because now even they can't deny it anymore. It's not as funny as watching them try to justify torturing and killing children or trying to enslave sentient races or poisoning unborn babies, but still.
Brotherhood of Cerberus - The Illusive Man Discussion/Support Thread
#4451
Guest_iOnlySignIn_*
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 03:15
Guest_iOnlySignIn_*
#4452
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 03:46
I guess punching the reporter is kind of a douche move too.
#4454
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 06:12
Yes the majority.Killjoy Cutter wrote...
The majority? Hardly.
I assume you mean this?As for your question, let's start with every juvenile human-supremacist rant and quip, such as response to the two Asari stranded by C-Sec's TSA-parady stupidity on the Citadel.
Seems more like a smartarse remark in response to genuine racism to me.
But ok, that's one, surely you can think of more then just one dialogue snip from a side mission?
#4455
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 07:09
So you disagree that Bioware didn't do a good job at showing Illusive man as having the best and worst traits of humanity? Because that's what they said they were intending to do.Blacklash93 wrote...
Yes they can. See Dragon Age.Seboist wrote...
Like I've said in a group, Bioware couldn't come up with a mature morally grey story if their lives depended on it and ME3 proves it.
Cerberus was never morally grey. It's amusing how sore the renegade fanboys are getting because now even they can't deny it anymore. It's not as funny as watching them try to justify torturing and killing children or trying to enslave sentient races or poisoning unborn babies, but still.
#4456
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 07:35
Well first things first I should start with a bad joke since it's what I do and my thing of sorts, I think TIM comes off like this guy both are really lazy and bad at their plans and they make zombies do all the work(but I am happy TIM is not as fat but sad he does not have as good a laugh).<_<
Okay serious time, real opinion I see TIM as very different from your normal racist, "nationalist", terrorist since most people like that hate their enemies out of fear and ignorance, TIM? he is not scared(much) or stupid about his enemies. He knows what they can do and that is why he wants humans(or himself) on the top, he is power hungry but not in the most cliché way and I like that, hell I have two Shepards who want to have humans and aliens more united but only through human hands and they see TIM as the best man to help with it.
So anyway TIM is a very interesting character and works great in a video game world such as Mass Effect but if I saw him in real life I would kill him dead.
Oh yeah also if he is only "evil" because of the Reapers I will get mad he should not be the way he is cuz of big evil robots, that would make a bad story same thing if dies by our hands or the Reapers, if he has to die it should be because of his own mistakes(well that is just my opinion).
I am sure someone will hate this post since I am not very black or white about TIM but to end this post I want to say Martin Sheen for the win.
#4457
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 08:10
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Kmead15 wrote...
Hmm, I think the most douchey renegade moment was probably turning in Mouse. There's no good reason for it. The guy you just dragged into a police station probably isn't going to forgive you for it, and you're giving up a potential source.
It is a douche bag moment to turn in a criminal?
That's being responsible, not dickish. Though it is perhaps inconsistent. At times Renegade takes bribes after all.
#4458
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 08:13
Being Renegade is a lot like being a "bad cop" type so it's not all that inconsistent in my view.Saphra Deden wrote...
Kmead15 wrote...
Hmm, I think the most douchey renegade moment was probably turning in Mouse. There's no good reason for it. The guy you just dragged into a police station probably isn't going to forgive you for it, and you're giving up a potential source.
It is a douche bag moment to turn in a criminal?
That's being responsible, not dickish. Though it is perhaps inconsistent. At times Renegade takes bribes after all.
#4459
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 08:30
HiroVoid wrote...
So you disagree that Bioware didn't do a good job at showing Illusive man as having the best and worst traits of humanity? Because that's what they said they were intending to do.
I tweeted that very question to Mac Walters, about when are they gonna start showing the best traits of humanity in regards to TIM awhile ago. This was the response twitter.com/#!/macwalterslives/status/126768687658188801
So I'm curious as to what HE thinks TIM's best traits are (did these traits fly over my head?), because I'm not sure what to make of it. Going by the ridiculousness of ME3, I've had to have missed them, right?
#4460
Guest_laecraft_*
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 01:16
Guest_laecraft_*
Seboist wrote...
BlueMagitek wrote...
It really doesn't matter who Shepard has been in bed with if the Reapers are defeated. ~_^
Being in bed with TIM matters more to my femshep than you think.
I've said that before, but I thought I'd summarize why I think TIM is the ultimate LI here.
If TIM were a LI, properly written, we could experience the romance that is finally relevant and even essential to the story, flows effortlessly together with the narrative, firmly entwined with it, intesifying the emotional engagement with the plot, adds tension and personal stake to all the events, builds up to a dramatic culmination, and possibly alters the final choice. The amount of conflict and drama would've been unbelievable. It wouldn't even require changing the plot events, just some dialogues, yet it would completely alter the game experience.
"True love conquers Fate" is a wonderful premise, when done in a proper manner, with a fair amount of sacrifices to be sufficiently believable and satisfying.
Current romances, for all the attention they're recieving, are extremely shallow, have little content, and exist completely isolated from the plot. Whether they're here or not, it doesn't change anything essential. While it makes development easier, it makes the gaming experience much less satisfying.
Furthermore, if TIM were a LI, femshep would finally be involved with her equal, instead of her subordinates. TIM is the only one in the entire game who has the same motivation and ideas that Renegade femshep does.
All other characters are not here to fight the Reapers. They're not here to fight for humanity. They either follow the Alliance's orders (any orders, no matter how little sense they make - VS), or fighting for their own survival (Jack), or enjoy the battle (Grunt), or seeking redemption (Mordin), or feeling suicidal (Thane), or looking to get laid and have kids (Wrex), or on a personal power trip (Tali), or don't have any consistent motivation, or scheme to keep their own species in power without getting into too much trouble (alien Council)...the list goes on.
If you ask for the people who are in this to save humanity and overpower the Reapers, only two names would fit the requirement - Shepard and TIM. They're a perfect match.
Plus, Shepard doesn't have anyone to anthropomorphize humanity for her. This is a big mistake the devs made. As a result, many players don't give a damn about humanity and the Earth. They have no connection to it. They want to fight for the species of their alien LIs. Have little blue kids with Liara, give Tali her homeworld, cure Thane, save Garrus' family...this is the way humans work. Anthropomorphizing is important. When Shepard is fighting for humanity, who is she fighting for?
They are trying to fix that in ME3, with that little kid (but dead don't inspire as much as alive do, they just depress), and Anderson (but Anderson didn't trust me enough in ME2, and there is no fixing that.) VS doubted you in ME2, this isn't an inspiration for me. Other human LIs in ME2 are simple trysts, too shallow to create a real bond.
Now, TIM - he brings you back from the dead and sponsors your fight against the enemy. That's what I call a real involvement. He inspires me to fight for humanity. Making him a LI would've created a real personal motivation for a Renegade femshep. Instead, they had to destroy and poison that potential.
Also, if Renegade femshep got her own, unique story, that would've increased replayability greatly. The lack of TIM romance in the game is everyone's loss.
Modifié par laecraft, 19 novembre 2011 - 01:26 .
#4461
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 01:36
#4462
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 01:49
#4463
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 01:57
Ravensword wrote...
Can a Paragon FemShep still romance TIM?
Sure, if said femshep is into autoerotic asphixiation then she'll enjoy him strangling her for destroying the base.
#4464
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 01:58
Seboist wrote...
Ravensword wrote...
Can a Paragon FemShep still romance TIM?
Sure, if said femshep is into autoerotic asphixiation then she'll enjoy him strangling her for destroying the base.
Oh, no. That's not how I see. My FemShep is master seductress. TIM will be too enthralled to harm her.
#4465
Guest_laecraft_*
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 02:19
Guest_laecraft_*
Seboist wrote...
Ravensword wrote...
Can a Paragon FemShep still romance TIM?
Sure, if said femshep is into autoerotic asphixiation then she'll enjoy him strangling her for destroying the base.
LOL. Absolutely agree with Seboist. <3 TIM romance must be exclusive to Renegade femshep. And if people want to experience it in all its breathtaking glory, then they should create a femshep, play Renegade, and keep the base. There's a perfect reward for playing Renegade that the Paragons can never hope to get....
It's all for the sake of replayability.
#4466
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 02:21
#4467
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 02:21
#4468
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 02:28
Ravensword wrote...
What if you have a Paragon FemShep that does everything Paragon except destroying the base?
She needs to keep David in Overlord and send Cerberus the Rawlings data on top of not destroying the base. TIM's love is conditional!
#4469
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 02:35
#4470
Guest_laecraft_*
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 02:38
Guest_laecraft_*
Dean_the_Young wrote...
Is that perfect reward pregnancy?
I was thinking more about saving TIM and the Earth at the end through whatever means necessary, overthrowing the old Council, and establishing human / vorcha / krogan / quarian dominance in the galaxy with the use of Reapers tech side by side with TIM, while humanity leads everyone to glory at the helm, and uncovers all the secrets of existence, and the laws of the universe bend to our will, and stars themselves tremble in our wake. Don't limit your imagination.
Ravensword wrote...
What if you have a Paragon FemShep that does everything Paragon except destroying the base?
I think that keeping the base should be a necessary condition, but not a sufficient one. I loath P/R system, and I think there should be a bar to measure femshep's loyalty to Cerberus, instead. It's possible to take pro-Cerberus actions in ME2 in several quests and verbally support them, they should record that. Romancing TIM would require the perfect Cerberus loyalty score.
I didn't like what they did with Samara romance, where they measured your Paragon bar to determine her response, not sure but I think even a single Paragon point is enough to tip her into attraction, too simplistic.
#4471
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 02:40
Dude. (Chick?)laecraft wrote...
Dean_the_Young wrote...
Is that perfect reward pregnancy?
I was thinking more about saving TIM and the Earth at the end through whatever means necessary, overthrowing the old Council, and establishing human / vorcha / krogan / quarian dominance in the galaxy with the use of Reapers tech side by side with TIM, while humanity leads everyone to glory at the helm, and uncovers all the secrets of existence, and the laws of the universe bend to our will, and stars themselves tremble in our wake. Don't limit your imagination.
The creation of life itself.
That's head and sholders above making fancier Reaper-tech toaster-ovens.
#4472
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 02:42
laecraft wrote...
Ravensword wrote...
What if you have a Paragon FemShep that does everything Paragon except destroying the base?
I think that keeping the base should be a necessary condition, but not a sufficient one. I loath P/R system, and I think there should be a bar to measure femshep's loyalty to Cerberus, instead. It's possible to take pro-Cerberus actions in ME2 in several quests and verbally support them, they should record that. Romancing TIM would require the perfect Cerberus loyalty score.
Shouldn't they also have a Council bar and an Alliance bar to measure your loyalty to those organizations based on your actions as well?
Modifié par Ravensword, 19 novembre 2011 - 02:42 .
#4473
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 02:42
#4474
Guest_laecraft_*
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 02:46
Guest_laecraft_*
Fiery Phoenix wrote...
Samara's "romance" depends on which bar is higher, if I'm not mistaken. That is, if you're predominantly Paragon, you get her. If Renegade, she basically says she will shoot you on sight should you cross paths after the mission (i.e. you can't get intimate with her).
Yes, that's what I meant. If you're, say, 51 Renegade and 50 Paragon, she wants to kill you. If you're 50 Renegade and 51 Paragon, she loves you. That's silly. It should be more than numerical. I'm thinking progressive, where the progress of your relationship depends on how you do the quests, and it could halt any time.
#4475
Posté 19 novembre 2011 - 02:51
But... but it's easier to program it that way!laecraft wrote...
Yes, that's what I meant. If you're, say, 51 Renegade and 50 Paragon, she wants to kill you. If you're 50 Renegade and 51 Paragon, she loves you. That's silly. It should be more than numerical. I'm thinking progressive, where the progress of your relationship depends on how you do the quests, and it could halt any time.Fiery Phoenix wrote...
Samara's "romance" depends on which bar is higher, if I'm not mistaken. That is, if you're predominantly Paragon, you get her. If Renegade, she basically says she will shoot you on sight should you cross paths after the mission (i.e. you can't get intimate with her).
Seriously, though, I don't think Samara should have been an option to begin with. But that's probably just me.
Modifié par Fiery Phoenix, 19 novembre 2011 - 02:51 .




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut





