Aller au contenu

Photo

Brotherhood of Cerberus - The Illusive Man Discussion/Support Thread


  • Ce sujet est fermé Ce sujet est fermé
6970 réponses à ce sujet

#826
Dave of Canada

Dave of Canada
  • Members
  • 17 484 messages

Xilizhra wrote...

With the Collectors beaten, Cerberus serves no useful purpose.


Reapers?

Though I sympathize; TIM lured you into suffocating darkness and then abandoned you. You were nothing more than another tool in another game, and here because you allowed yourself to be.


Except TIM doesn't discard tools unless something is severely wrong  and the game he's playing involves stopping the Reapers, a mutual goal with methods which my Shepard happens to approve of.

There's little to no reason why Shepard wouldn't be able to join Cerberus in ME3 unless they're indoctrinated or the only way to stop the Reapers involves killing Shepard.

#827
Xilizhra

Xilizhra
  • Members
  • 30 873 messages

Reapers?

Well, yes, Cerberus is serving a useful purpose for the Reapers.

Except TIM doesn't discard tools unless something is severely wrong and the game he's playing involves stopping the Reapers, a mutual goal with methods which my Shepard happens to approve of.

It would appear that something has shifted his game plan, at any rate.

#828
Guest_laecraft_*

Guest_laecraft_*
  • Guests

Kaiser Shepard wrote...

laecraft wrote...

Oh I'll spare you guys my rants.

Please, do continue. It's not like anyone who really cares about the game disagrees with what you say.


The only way I can justify myself is because it's a support thread, and it's made for things like that, to contain all that frustration and prevent it from spilling out on the other threads. People who don't like to read this don't have to click it and listen to their enemies' useless rants. Unless they get a kick out of it - and who could blame them? What's more pleasant to the ear than your defeated enemy's helpess curses?

Oh, but it's only me who feels defeated. My Shepard's fine. He doesn't understand why I'm so upset. He tries to console me, says that TIM was acting fishy at the end.

"I've got nothing against TIM and his noble goals," my avatar says. "But he seems a little distracted by all that Reaper tech and its potential power. I fear he'll forget that we still have the Reapers on our hands. But that's why I'm here - that's why he brought me from the dead. I've got his back. We'll divide our efforts: I'll fight for humanity's survival, and he'll fight for humanity's supremacy. I hope our efforts won't clash."

Me: Shepard, I've got bad news for you. Really, really bad news. I don't think TIM's going to stand out of our way.

Shepard: Then we'll gun him down. What seems to be the problem?

Me: But that would break my heart! I don't want to!

Shepard: Then I'll try not to gun him down, unless there's no other way.

Me: You're so cold and unemotional. How can you be so insensitive? Show some empathy for the spirit controlling your avatar.

Shepard: *uncomfortably* I'm just focused on the mission. Can't let my feelings interfere with the objective. Trillions of lives are at stake, etc.

Me: :crying: I don't want to save the galaxy if I have to fight Cerberus and you don't even act sad about this.

Shepard: *quickly* All right! *locks his hands together behind his back and straightens* All right, I'll try to show some emotion. *stretches his lips into a grotesque smile" How's that?

Me: *shudder* Better. Ugh, but I wanted to see some sadness.

Shepard: *lowers his eyes obediently and hangs his head*

(He looks murderous and preparing to a charge rather than sad, but I appreciate the effort.)

Me: I don't want to fight Cerberus. This sucks.

Shepard: Then we'll ally with them.

Me: You don't seem to understand. That's impossible.

Shepard: That has never stopped me before. I'm always willing to do the impossible.

Me: The very gods are against you!

Shepard: Who, the Reapers? We fight or we -

Me: Do NOT finish that line. No, I mean - the Creators themselves won't let us ally with Cerberus.

Shepard: *staring at his toes, trying hard to look sad* Then I'll speak of Cerberus with respect, if it pleases you. And I'll even challenge to a duel anyone who insults TIM in front of me, if I have that option. *thoughtfully* I don't think anyone would be dumb enough to duel me, though, so I'll just punch the offender, instead. And I'll do it fast, before she runs away.

Me: (Oh, I'm going to find a way to make him feel sad. We better be in the same emotional boat, here. And I will see some real tears.)

Me: Enough about me, Shepard, what about you? The Alliance renounced you. The Council denounced you. That's their gratitude for you saving the galaxy for the second time. You're being brought to the trial in irons.

Shepard: *his face darkens, and he rubs his wrists. He does not appreciate the reminder*

Me: *silkily* And now, your only true ally turns against you, too. Don't you see just how very SAD this is?

Shepard: *he is silent. his face reflects nothing - it's like a stone wall*

Me: Do these people even want to be saved? Do they deserve to be? Imagine a person who hangs on a precipice, ready to fall any time. But he pushes away the hand offered to him. And after he's dragged to safety despite his best resistence, he stands up and curses his savior, and puts him on trial for saving his life. Does such a person deserve to be saved again?

Shepard: No. He doesn't deserve to be. I'd let him plunge to his death the next time, if that's what he wants.

Me: *presses ruthlessly* Then why do you persist in saving the galaxy and humanity again and again? Where was the Council when human colonies were disappearing? Where was the Earth when the Alliance tried to offer your head to the batarians? You, their greatest champion, their only hope, are nothing to them. Where do you find the strength to go on? Name a least one person in this galaxy worth fighting for!

Shepard: *is silent for a long moment. Then, without his expression changing whatsoever...*

Shepard: You're right. The galaxy doesn't deserve to be saved. And neither does humanity. I'm joining the Reapers, instead.

Me: Whoa, wait here! (this isn't want I wanted at all!) We're yet to see the Earth's response to the trial. And maybe we'll meet some new people you'd appreciate you. James looks all right.

Shepard: Who's that?

Me: You'll see. And did I tell you that VS is coming back?

Shepard: Can I show VS to the airlock?

Me: I've no idea if we have the option, but we will certainly try. And even if we can't, imagine how we're going to annoy all that Alliance staff by praising Cerberus. If we have such an option. Maybe we can have Mordin back on our crew. Maybe some new interesting events will happen. Maybe we can speak to TIM and ask him "what the hell?" Maybe he'll even answer. Maybe we can even communicate with him throught the game - and not like with Saren, but more frequently and in a less hostile manner, if we have that option. Maybe we can finally meet TIM in person, and not to shoot him, but to save him, instead. There's still some hope! Something worth fighting for.

Shepard: So we fight?

Me: Yeah, we fight. (figures that's all he'd hear from my speech. I feel like I've just been manipulated by my own avatar.)

Shepard: *presses* Or we die?

Me: *grits teeth* We fight or we die.

Shepard: That's the plan.

#829
Kaiser Shepard

Kaiser Shepard
  • Members
  • 7 890 messages
 Aw, poor Lae... :(

*hugs*

It really looks like one needs to have gone through this at least once to empathise with others; of course Xilizhra doesn't care, her group got what they wanted after all their extensive whining and name-calling, and thusly are content with whatever product BW will ultimately deliver, whereas I've gone through pretty much the same with Dragon Age: Awakening.

Sigh, if only I was a PC gamer: in that case it would've been rather easy to find an alternative, most likely in the Witcher series. Doesn't seem like there's anything similar to Mass Effect, though, at least not when it comes to the setting. I suppose AP comes close gameplay-wise, but the setting is totally different.

At any rate, don't hesitate to complain about stuff like this in other topics as well, as long as it's somehow relevant to them.

Modifié par Kaiser Shepard, 20 septembre 2011 - 04:44 .


#830
Seboist

Seboist
  • Members
  • 11 989 messages

Kaiser Shepard wrote...

 Aw, poor Lae... :(

*hugs*

It really looks like one needs to have gone through this at least once to empathise with others; of course Xilizhra doesn't care, her group got what they wanted after all their extensive whining and name-calling, and thusly are content with whatever product BW will ultimately deliver, whereas I've gone through pretty much the same with Dragon Age: Awakening.

Sigh, if only I was a PC gamer: in that case it would've been rather easy to find an alternative, most likely in the Witcher series. Doesn't seem like there's anything similar to Mass Effect, though, at least not when it comes to the setting. I suppose AP comes close gameplay-wise, but the setting is totally different.

At any rate, don't hesitate to complain about stuff like this in other topics as well, as long as it's somehow relevant to them.


Yep, Xili's crowd got what they wanted, TIM is now a b-movie assclown villain running an organization made of Play-Doh who are now as big a threat as the Reapers themselves. They'll have their warm and fuzzy experience with everybody and their mothers singing kumbaya as they destroy Cerberus and the Reapers while Renegade/Pro-Cerberus players end up with a gimped version of what they recieved.

You know, I'm starting to think that Bioware doesn't really expect players to think as hard or take the choices as seriously as us hardcore players do in that Paragon is really just the "feel good" choice while Renegade is just trolling for the lulz. Drew Karpyshyn being "shocked" that people actually agree with TIM/Cerberus really illustrates it.

Oh and the Witcher series is awesome. I finished playing through the first one a few days ago and I enjoyed it far more than DA:O. There's no bs morality system,three equally viable paths to take and you actually get to see the repercussions of your choices within the actual game.  The second looks to be even better but I haven't played through it yet since I'm waiting on the next patch to come out at the end of the month.

#831
Xilizhra

Xilizhra
  • Members
  • 30 873 messages

It really looks like one needs to have gone through this at least once to empathise with others; of course Xilizhra doesn't care, her group got what they wanted after all their extensive whining and name-calling, and thusly are content with whatever product BW will ultimately deliver, whereas I've gone through pretty much the same with Dragon Age: Awakening.

I'd be more sympathetic if Lae's situation didn't have this undercurrent of "everyone who doesn't show me sufficient appreciation deserves to die." Or maybe that's an overcurrent. Is your Shepard really just in this for the glory? To be lauded as a hero? Is the lack of that so painful that you would abandon the galaxy?
Yes, people are stupid and shortsighted and petty and all that. That's a given. Did you somehow not realize this beforehand? **** happens and people are fickle, but you can't please everyone and trying to do so is a fool's errand. It's what you know about what you're doing being right, that counts. And as bad as people can be, it's not universal and it's not always permanent. I understand if the experience is depressing, but your knowledge and power over this whole situation has given you a responsibility. You can fulfill it or shirk it as you choose... but I don't think any Shepard who'd shirk it would ever have been Shepard at all.

#832
Guest_laecraft_*

Guest_laecraft_*
  • Guests

Xilizhra wrote...

Perhaps from your own absolutist point of view regarding human dominance, it isn't. Though I sympathize; TIM lured you into suffocating darkness and then abandoned you. You were nothing more than another tool in another game, and here because you allowed yourself to be.

Tying yourself so closely to the opinions of others, to only one possibility of people being worth anything, does lead into darkness. That's why my own Shepard keeps faith in her own cause, and in the people of the galaxy in general, and that they have a right to life. That flame, that candle of inner faith, must be lit from within, for if it's held by another, you never know when they might snuff it, and you, out.


Where did I say that my Shepard defined himself by TIM's ideas? He was always humanity-first. I was speaking of the light of support, not ideas. TIM didn't "lure" me anywhere. He simply summoned me when the night descended on the galaxy, in humanity's darkest hour. For a while, he stood beside me, and he did his best to provide me with a safe haven to draw my strength from for a fight. But now, I stand alone.

Fighting for all the people in general. What a convenient goal. What's important that it's so abstract, and not concrete. The stakes are non-existent. Your Shepard is untouchable. She has no reason at all to care about any of the species in particular. So what if one species gets destroyed? That light continues to shine...elsewhere. So what if someone betrays her? Hey, she never cared about that person at all. So what if the Reapers devastate the galaxy? As long as a single species still survives - even if it's a species she's never even heard about - she still wins. She'll never feel threatened. And even if the Reapers win - well, she was never invested into any of the species in particular. No big loss, there are species out there who are nearing the advancement, so life goes on.

Do you even care about anything in the game in particular, or is it all just an intellectual exercise to you? Or are you just afraid of picking a side, for fear that the game will not play out in your favour, and then the same thing would happen to you as it did to me, and that wouldn't feel so good?

And from that emotionally untouchable position of cowardice, you presume to lecture the people who had the courage to invest their emotions into an unpopular faction and lost. And who didn't switch sides to the majority immediately afterwards, to remain on the winning side, like your Shepard does.

And I have bad news for you. You won't be able to roleplay as "fighting for all the life in general". Shepard fights for humanity. For the Earth. Yes, even the Paragon Shepard. Canonically so. Otherwise, he'd have no motivations at all.

There'd be no reason to feel the pressing need to bring help to Earth in time. No reason to gain the loyalty of other species - you just need to strengthen them, is all. No reason to even fight for humanity, since they're the minority, and those fleets better be saved to protect "the rest" of the galaxy - the most numerous one, that is. The majority.

Hey, Thessia is under attack? How many fleets will it take to save them? What, wait, how many? That's too much, and the risk is too great, I better preserve those resources to save....the rest of the galaxy.

And Sur'Kesh is lost? Well, they were overran with the Reapers, and I couldn't take away my resources from the Citadel. If we lost the Citadel, the war would've been lost. That's the sacrifice I had to make to save the...rest of the galaxy.

Wait. No homeworlds remain? The galaxy is lost? What are we fighting for again?

I have to wonder why you even chose to fight the Reapers. Both sides fight for their survival. Every single Reaper represents the last of its species, so it'd be like killing the rachni queen again and again. So what if they're machines - geth are machines too, they're still sentient species, and picking sides based on species is xenophobic, is it not? If the Reapers don't make sure the cycle continues, they won't survive. They deserve to live as much as the galaxy does! So if the Reapers were the majority, you'd join them? You always pick the most powerful side in
a confrontation? That's highly immoral. Your shining candle is the darkest backhole to my Shepard's eyes.

#833
Seboist

Seboist
  • Members
  • 11 989 messages
I was originally neutral/ambivalent about Cerberus but the realization of how lopsided things were against Renegades and the news of how Cerberus were being morphed into Play-Doh as the convenient enemies of ME3 were two major reasons why I ended up becoming 100% Pro-Cerberus.

In your face Bioware your plan backfired on me and had the opposite effect!

Modifié par Seboist, 20 septembre 2011 - 06:30 .


#834
Xilizhra

Xilizhra
  • Members
  • 30 873 messages

Fighting for all the people in general. What a convenient goal. What's important that it's so abstract, and not concrete. The stakes are non-existent. Your Shepard is untouchable. She has no reason at all to care about any of the species in particular. So what if one species gets destroyed? That light continues to shine...elsewhere. So what if someone betrays her? Hey, she never cared about that person at all. So what if the Reapers devastate the galaxy? As long as a single species still survives - even if it's a species she's never even heard about - she still wins. She'll never feel threatened. And even if the Reapers win - well, she was never invested into any of the species in particular. No big loss, there are species out there who are nearing the advancement, so life goes on.

What's intellectually determined doesn't completely define her. She feels personal attachments to humans and asari, and would, admittedly, feel worse about losing them than other species. And every death from any species is another loss, another failure. She obviously can't contemplate each one individually, that would be paralyzing. But she does feel death.

And I have bad news for you. You won't be able to roleplay as "fighting for all the life in general". Shepard fights for humanity. For the Earth. Yes, even the Paragon Shepard. Canonically so. Otherwise, he'd have no motivations at all.

For clarity's sake... yes, my Shepard does fight for humanity. And asari. And turians, salarians, quarians, geth, volus, hanar, elcor, vorcha, batarians, krogan, rachni, AIs, raloi, yahg, those biotic insect colonies that appeared in CDN, the ghost ship virtual people, and... anyone else I may have missed. Every individual is as important as every other individual (though the concept is shaky with geth, I admit), and I care for them all.

I have to wonder why you even chose to fight the Reapers. Both sides fight for their survival. Every single Reaper represents the last of its species, so it'd be like killing the rachni queen again and again. So what if they're machines - geth are machines too, they're still sentient species, and picking sides based on species is xenophobic, is it not? If the Reapers don't make sure the cycle continues, they won't survive. They deserve to live as much as the galaxy does!

Unfortunately true. I can't really take any joy in killing, even Reapers. However, one way or another, there will be battle and genocide will be committed. I can't change that, and so I've chosen to fight for those under attack, who did nothing to provoke their aggressors. And who happen to share the same species as myself, plus that of my probable life partner and future children.

#835
Kaiser Shepard

Kaiser Shepard
  • Members
  • 7 890 messages

Seboist wrote...

Oh and the Witcher series is awesome. I finished playing through the first one a few days ago and I enjoyed it far more than DA:O. There's no bs morality system,three equally viable paths to take and you actually get to see the repercussions of your choices within the actual game.  The second looks to be even better but I haven't played through it yet since I'm waiting on the next patch to come out at the end of the month.

It's a shame the first one wasn't released on consoles, as then I wouldn't have to put up with DA2's flaws. I'm mighty sure that the second game will impress me just fine on itself, though, based on what I've heard and read: apparently, the entire second act of the game will be completely different based on a big decision in the previous one. I've also read a blog by Knight of Phoenix on the interfactional politics, and luckily have forgotten the plot details since, but I remember the complexity of it surpassing anything I've seen BioWare do so far. 


Xilizhra wrote...

I'd be more sympathetic if Lae's situation didn't have this undercurrent of "everyone who doesn't show me sufficient appreciation deserves to die."

That's quite the bold overstatement. As I understand it, Lae is pissed off / disappointed with the fact that she was promised choices, a certain amount of freedom, while ultimately BioWare doesn't deliver on any of it. And rightfully so, as not one choice should more valid than any other.

Of course, once we start arguing actual choice and consequence, then all choices should suddenly have equal results, because one of your choices might lead to what you expected of it.



Yes, people are stupid and shortsighted and petty and all that. That's a given. Did you somehow not realize this beforehand? **** happens and people are fickle, but you can't please everyone and trying to do so is a fool's errand. It's what you know about what you're doing being right, that counts.

Then they should have presented us the Cerberus path in the first place, simple as that. Do something good, or don't so it at all. But don't promise a customer something, only to not live up to it...

And it's not like it would be that difficult to incorporate the results of earlier choices, nor hard to keep track of, as you'd assume that there's a reason why all major choices are presented to you at the end of their respective main missions.

Say what you will about Alpha Protocol's gameplay mechanics, as they were only on about the same level as Mass 1 without the biotics, Obsidian did indeed live up to the whole "Your weapon is choice". Every choice, no matter how major or minute, had a logical result. There's even choices you don't consciously make because they weren't presented as obviously as we've been conditioned to recognize choices. Hell, the very order in which you do the hubs, as well the allies and enemies you make in each, have varying results.

laecraft wrote...

Do you even care about anything in the game in particular, or is it all just an intellectual exercise to you?

Romances, I suspect.


Xilizhra wrote...

Unfortunately true. I can't really take any joy in killing, even Reapers. However, one way or another, there will be battle and genocide will be committed. I can't change that, and so I've chosen to fight for those under attack, who did nothing to provoke their aggressors. And who happen to share the same species as myself, plus that of my probable life partner and future children.


What makes us worthy of survival, then? Is it not thanks to those very Reapers you oppose that humanity - and every other current species - got as far as they did? We'd likely all be either dead or enslaves by now if they didn't cull the Protheans, or every other species before is. What doesn't give them the right to not simply keep and do away with us whenever they feel like it, just like humanity is apparently allowed to every "inferior" species?

Modifié par Kaiser Shepard, 20 septembre 2011 - 06:59 .


#836
Xilizhra

Xilizhra
  • Members
  • 30 873 messages

What makes us worthy of survival, then? Is it not thanks to those very Reapers you oppose that humanity - and every other current species - got as far as they did? We'd likely all be either dead or enslaves by now if they didn't cull the Protheans, or every other species before is. What doesn't give them the right to not simply keep and do away with us whenever they feel like it, just like humanity is apparently allowed to every "inferior" species?

I don't see that as a relevant point. One could say that they have a right to take whatever actions they need to survive, yes, but so do we.

#837
Aeowyn

Aeowyn
  • Members
  • 1 988 messages
@Laecraft: Oh don't worry. Xil will put all her efforts on saving Thessia and every asari out there. If it was between Earth and Thessia she'd choose the latter.

Also, hello, I'm a long time lurker and TIM/Cerberus admirer. And I'm pretty peeved that BioWare seems incapable of writing good morally grey characters.

#838
Seboist

Seboist
  • Members
  • 11 989 messages

Aeowyn wrote...

@Laecraft: Oh don't worry. Xil will put all her efforts on saving Thessia and every asari out there. If it was between Earth and Thessia she'd choose the latter.

Also, hello, I'm a long time lurker and TIM/Cerberus admirer. And I'm pretty peeved that BioWare seems incapable of writing good morally grey characters.


Great to have another Cerberus blood brother/sister onboard! And yes Bioware seems very incapable of handling any  non-politically correct character, faction or choice properly. The first evidence of this was with the Terra Firma side question in ME1 where the very name is "our own worst enemy" and all the "investigate" questions has Shepard sounding like a hostile PC establishment robot.

Modifié par Seboist, 20 septembre 2011 - 07:11 .


#839
Seboist

Seboist
  • Members
  • 11 989 messages

Kaiser Shepard wrote...

Seboist wrote...

Oh and the Witcher series is awesome. I finished playing through the first one a few days ago and I enjoyed it far more than DA:O. There's no bs morality system,three equally viable paths to take and you actually get to see the repercussions of your choices within the actual game.  The second looks to be even better but I haven't played through it yet since I'm waiting on the next patch to come out at the end of the month.

It's a shame the first one wasn't released on consoles, as then I wouldn't have to put up with DA2's flaws. I'm mighty sure that the second game will impress me just fine on itself, though, based on what I've heard and read: apparently, the entire second act of the game will be completely different based on a big decision in the previous one. I've also read a blog by Knight of Phoenix on the interfactional politics, and luckily have forgotten the plot details since, but I remember the complexity of it surpassing anything I've seen BioWare do so far.


I have something to look forward to then. It sounds like I'll be able to secure human dominance in the Witcher just fine. :D

#840
Kaiser Shepard

Kaiser Shepard
  • Members
  • 7 890 messages

Xilizhra wrote...

I don't see that as a relevant point. One could say that they have a right to take whatever actions they need to survive, yes, but so do we.

Just checking where your in-universe motivation and priorities ultimately lie.

#841
Guest_wiggles_*

Guest_wiggles_*
  • Guests

based on what I've heard and read: apparently, the entire second act of the game will be completely different based on a big decision in the previous one.

This is true. It's so different that it wasn't until my second playthrough I found out something pretty major about one of the game's main characters.

#842
Terraforming

Terraforming
  • Members
  • 88 messages

Aeowyn wrote...
Also, hello, I'm a long time lurker and TIM/Cerberus admirer. And I'm pretty peeved that BioWare seems incapable of writing good morally grey characters.


Have to say I agree. I don't know how the game will actually play out, but it is still disappointing to read about Cerberus being regressed to what they were in ME1. I went into ME2 with the intention of being unshakably pissed off at working for Cerberus, but I ended up appreciating how Bioware fleshed out (sort of) the organization, gave some of the people actual faces and personalities, and made some of them more than just standard mercs or shady, unscrupulous scientists. I also liked the conflict of feeling some comradery for a Cerberus crew, while also remembering the cell which killed Kohaku and Shepard's squad on Akuze. I can't say that my actions in ME2 really coincided with Cerberus goals,  but it was interesting not being so hit over the head with black-and-white morality.
Hopefully ME3 won't be as bad about Cerberus and TIM as I'm thinking? That's probably stupidly optimistic though.Image IPB

Modifié par Terraforming, 20 septembre 2011 - 08:00 .


#843
Ieldra

Ieldra
  • Members
  • 25 189 messages

Seboist wrote...
I was originally neutral/ambivalent about Cerberus but the realization of how lopsided things were against Renegades and the news of how Cerberus were being morphed into Play-Doh as the convenient enemies of ME3 were two major reasons why I ended up becoming 100% Pro-Cerberus.

In your face Bioware your plan backfired on me and had the opposite effect!

Yeah. Almost the same for me. As soon as I realized Cerberus will have lost their double-face and mutate into a 100% villainous organization I felt betrayed. I like TIM's ambiguity (and Miranda's) and while I don't play full Renegades I find the Renegade options of the big endgame decisions much more plausible.

No, I won't follow Bioware anvilicious moralizing. If I can't play a smart, morally ambiguous Shepard who sees the benefits and drawbacks of all things including Cerberus, then I opt for cold reason over morality. I'd rather play a ruthless Shepard than a stupid one. 

This:
Image IPB
NOT WITH ME!

I'm still not exactly a fan of Cerberus. But almost all of my Shepards have become more Renegade since ME1, and my canon Shepards support human advancement, even if not exactly in the shape Cerberus appears to envision.

I am, however, a fan of the Illusive Man as he's presented in ME2 (not the books). I think that while not exactly likeable (he's too complex for such a simple characterization), together with Miranda (as long as she doesn't get chickified) he's the most interesting character in the ME universe.

Modifié par Ieldra2, 20 septembre 2011 - 09:23 .


#844
olymind1

olymind1
  • Members
  • 84 messages
probably TIM is after us, cerberus troops are indoctrinated (by whom, by the reapers or by TIM himself?), we are figthing against them in 40% of the game, the question is:

after completing half or 2/3 of the game, will we encounter TIM and will we get options to choose from?

-Arrest TIM
-Kill TIM
-Let TIM go/live
-Join TIM

AND

-Destroy Cerberus
-Use Cerberus by Shepard, or by loyal Miranda
-leave Cerberus as it is in TIM's hand.

if they could/would implement this, there would be a lot of options for everyone own taste. Imagine the possibilities:

You arrest TIM, but secretly take the role to continue Cerberus activies even if you soften them a bit, if they indoctrinated they will follow you commands and ethics.
Or you let TIM live, take over Cerberus for yourself, but keep TIM as an advisor.
Or you kill TIM, take over Cerberus and appoint loyal Miranda to lead it.
Or you kill TIM, and destroy Cerberus altogether.
Or you join to TIM, you use Alliance/Council resources to aid Cerberus, and make humanity even stronger politically and militarily.

And so on... and everyone would be happy.

#845
Seboist

Seboist
  • Members
  • 11 989 messages

Ieldra2 wrote...

Yeah. Almost the same for me. As soon as I realized Cerberus will have lost their double-face and mutate into a 100% villainous organization I felt betrayed. I like TIM's ambiguity (and Miranda's) and while I don't play full Renegades I find the Renegade options of the big endgame decisions much more plausible.

No, I won't follow Bioware anvilicious moralizing. If I can't play a smart, morally ambiguous Shepard who sees the benefits and drawbacks of all things including Cerberus, then I opt for cold reason over morality. I'd rather play a ruthless Shepard than a stupid one. 

This:
Image IPB
NOT WITH ME!

I'm still not exactly a fan of Cerberus. But almost all of my Shepards have become more Renegade since ME1, and my canon Shepards support human advancement, even if not exactly in the shape Cerberus appears to envision.

I am, however, a fan of the Illusive Man as he's presented in ME2 (not the books). I think that while not exactly likeable (he's too complex for such a simple characterization), together with Miranda (as long as she doesn't get chickified) he's the most interesting character in the ME universe.


Like I've said, I really think Bioware just sees the choices as boiling down to feel good warm and a fuzzy outcomes vs trolling for the lulz. The system is too two dimensional and doesn't allow for us to roleplay beyond the arbitary rationales it presents us.

My canon Shepard is a Renegon according to game mechanics but in actuality she's a full renegade. Here's a list of some "paragon" choices she made with full renegade intent.

Feros:  I saved the colony not just because I wanted to save lives but due to wanting to preserve a human foothold in the Galaxy.

Rachni Queen: I spared her not because I had any qualms with wiping out her species but due to wanting to use them as a human ally against the three council races.

Rewriting the Heretic Geth: My Shepard is pro-Quarian and considers Tali her BFF, so she absolutely HATES the idea of empowering the Geth but she does it anyway because she feels she needs all the manpower she can get against the Reapers and who knows? Maybe they can also become a human ally against the three council races as well.

Kept Genophage Data: While my Shepard is favorable towards the Krogan and considers Wrex a good friend she's skeptical that his reforms will last, so she keeps the data as leverage in a worst case scenario or at best to create a strong human ally against the three council races.

Took David out of Overlord: Apart from the treatment of David she was convinced that the project was far too dangerous. She didn't do this to undermine Cerberus(TIM didn't authorize David being hooked up to the clockwork orange machine after all) and supports the idea of creating a weapon against the Geth that minimizes casualties via manipulating them.

Unfortunately I'm afraid the game will end up treating my Shepard as doing all this because she's apparently a blubbering do-gooder idealist who wants to feel good about herself.

#846
Guest_laecraft_*

Guest_laecraft_*
  • Guests

Xilizhra wrote...

For clarity's sake... yes, my Shepard does fight for humanity. And asari. And turians, salarians, quarians, geth, volus, hanar, elcor, vorcha, batarians, krogan, rachni, AIs, raloi, yahg, those biotic insect colonies that appeared in CDN, the ghost ship virtual people, and... anyone else I may have missed. Every individual is as important as every other individual (though the concept is shaky with geth, I admit), and I care for them all.


You said that you're willing to sacrifice humanity to let the other species survive. That means that your Shepard does NOT fight for humanity. She fights for something else, instead. She will fight for humanity only until the certain conditions are met. Then, she will choose someone else first. Fighting for humanity is not the core of her beliefs. And ultimately, she has no core beliefs. "Everyone" means "no one."

Is there anything you can clearly define that your Shepard will never surrender? And no amount of logic can convince her to do so? Or is there nothing, at the core?

My Shepard knows exactly what he's fighting for. He will never surrender humanity, under any conditions. This is his core belief - something he will stand for until the death and beyond, something he will never surrender. That means his principles are more defined than your Shepard's. If humanity's gone, the battle's over for him. He has no reason to fight anymore.

It also means that everybody in the galaxy understands him, because everybody is fighting for their own kind as well - that's what the evolution intended. So they know how he will behave, and they can trust him, because they know what to expect from him. That's why they'd ally with him. They know what he wants - to save the Earth. And he will do anything for them to get their help.

Xilizhra wrote...
Unfortunately true. I can't really take any joy in killing, even Reapers. However, one way or another, there will be battle and genocide will be committed. I can't change that, and so I've chosen to fight for those under attack, who did nothing to provoke their aggressors. And who happen to share the same species as myself, plus that of my probable life partner and future children.


Ah, so it's okay for you to destroy a species to let your own kind survive. But it's not okay for humans to do the same? It's all right for you to put your own kind first. But humans can't do the same?

And if you wait until things become inevitable, well, it might be too late. Shepard didn't wait. He killed Sovereign before it could open the gates.

And if I already chose my side, what's the point in waiting until my people are pushed to the brink of survival? Why not to gain enough ground to secure our dominance? To ensure that our children and females are always safe. Why wait until more human lives are lost?

Since I already decided that I would sacrifice entire species for my kind if necessary, and I will stop at nothing to save my people...what am I waiting for? If I wait and humans die, their blood is on my hands. And that would mean I acted against my core beliefs through my inaction or hesitation, or just because I didn't have the guts to do what's necessary - in which case, I should've left the job to someone else, who has the guts for it (like TIM).

If you pick your side, what's the point of stopping halfway? Or are your principles not good enough to follow through with them to the end? Or are you simply not firm enough in your convictions?

If I decided to put humanity first, why help the species who will always be aggressive or neutral hostiles to humanity, no matter what, and who proved to be unreliable in the past? Why not ally ourselves with the species who I managed to make connections with, and who I managed to put greatly into my debt? Even if those species are greatly frowned upon or feared by the rest of the galaxy. I don't care what the majority thinks. If they help humanity, I'll stand by them. We shall prosper together, because we can benefit from each other. And humanity will help them rise to glory from the ashes, and the galaxy will be a better place with the krogan and the vorcha properly advanced and assimilated and balanced at last.

And that will happen because I put my own kind first.

And if the galaxy is such a place that the only way for my kind to survive and to prosper would be to destroy everyone else in it - then so be it.

And if the galaxy is such a place that the only way for my kind to rise to glory and to thrive would be to live in peace with every single species in it and to help them to the best of our ability - so be it.

You see, it depends completely on the other species. Not just on humanity.

The Reapers and the galaxy, both sides are completely justified by evolution. Fighting for survival and advancement of one's own kind is the only "right" side. Sacrificing your own kind to let the others survive, however, is the act of ultimate treachery. It's like the evolutional branch culminating in self-destruction. It's just wrong.

And I simply don't believe that your Shepard can honestly care for all the species she knows essentially nothing about. What if they cannibalize their youth or plotting to massacre the galaxy? What if they have a dark genetic secret that, if certain conditions are met, will unleash them upon the galaxy in a raging desire to murder through sex? What if they enjoy torturing people and subduing them into slavery with horrific inplants, and their every citizen will buy two such slaves, and they all think it's perfectly normal? You'd really choose such species over your own kind?

Frankly, my Shepard simply doesn't know enough about other species to put them first before his own kind. Maybe your Shepard had travelled the galaxy at her leisure and lived among all the other species and studied them in depth, to the point of being able to rely to them as if she were one of their own kind. But my Shepard's been kinda busy with his military training. He knows humanity best. He was brought up by humans, and grew up among humans. He is human himself. It's in his blood.

He obviously has faith in humanity. He's proud of his kind. He believes they have worth. He has all the necessary information about humanity to decide that. He knows everything - history, culture, language, the way they look and move, the way they think, what drives them, what's the very essence of them - he knows it all. He loves them. You cannot love someone you don't know. You can't truly care about someone you don't know. You can't care about something abstract as "all life everywhere". Love is in the details. So is life. It has many shapes and forms - and the Reapers are one of those.

I'd much rather ally myself with someone who fights for his own species, because I can understand and respect that, and I'll know what to expect - it's a mutually beneficial arrangement. You help our kind, I'll help yours. You'll fight for us, and so I'll fight for you. If you betray me and leave my people to die to save yourself, I will not fight for you anymore, and I might extract my revenge on your people, so you'd think twice before doing that. If your species is greatly endangered, I will know to expect you to be desperate and agitated, and will plan accordingly to save my people or help you if everybody else turned their back on you.

Now, if I enter an alliance with someone who fights "for all life everywhere," how do I know they won't betray me if they decide they'd rather defend the majority, some kind of abstract life elsewhere, and leave me to my fate? How do I know they won't get distracted by an interesting and numerous new species, or just by a bright butterfly, who is so alive? How do I protect my kind from treachery if my ally doesn't have any particular species she will never surrender? Such alliance has no glue.

Speaking of aggression, if the only way for you to gain the loyalty of either the geth or the quarians would be to destroy one of these species, would you do this?

Because if you wouldn't, then your Shepard would just be useless during the war. Someone has to make hard decisions.

And if you would, well, you're not the one to speak about aggression and judge "my kind first" view as morally inferior. Don't be a hypocrite. Are you the same as TIM? Would you destroy one of those "innocent, non-aggressive" species to give your own kind advantage in the war?

My Shepard would. For the good of the galaxy, of course. B) Which also happens to have my own kind living in it - but that's insignificant details.

Oh, but I'm sure we'll never be faced with such a choice in the game. Doubtless it would be possible to forge peace between the quarians and the geth. And if it's possible - well, then, it's because the galaxy is such a place. Not because I'm, like TIM, completely on the dark side for putting my kind first.

#847
Guest_laecraft_*

Guest_laecraft_*
  • Guests
There is also one more species that my Shepard will fight for by default, no questions asked. Guess who? The Protheans. Shepard's essentially a Prothean, himself.

Hmm, I suppose that Shepards who have regular mind sex with asari are also sort of "asari" themselves. Since they've got an indepth peek into their essence, culture, et cetera. (wonder if you can learn their language this way?)

However, to get a more objective insight in the asari, such Shepards need to have more sex, with different asari - and the more, the better. What a way to gather information about them...

A sudden, uncanny thought occurred to me. TIM has sex with that asari Matriarch. Regularly, in fact. Does that mean she knows everything about his plans!

Anyway, it makes absolutely no sense to fight for asari. Their kind is not threatened in the slightest. They are the lifeblood of ME universe. Even the Reapers won't be able to eradicate them. So no point in wasting soldiers and resources on protecting them.

#848
Ieldra

Ieldra
  • Members
  • 25 189 messages
@laecraft:
I really hate to argue against you in a debate with Xilizhra of all things, but I have to point out a few flaws in your reasoning:

(1) Everyone has a hierarchy of loyalties, but also principles that determine actions. The hierarchy of loyalties would apply when conflict arise within your social sphere, which is in Xil's case galactic civilization as a whole. But when the whole is threatened, it's perfectly reasonable to act according to the principle "I save the highest number of individuals, regardless of the cost to specific species". It is also perfectly reasonable to act according to "I will act so that no species will become extinct, regardless if that results in a greater number of overall casualties". One is the principle of fairness applies to individuals, the other the same principle applied to species. It is factually wrong that any one of these amounts to having "no beliefs" or "no principles".

(2) Yes, we are wired to care more about "our own". But that that is natural doesn't mean it is also best. In fact, our notions of who are "our own" are highly malleable. It is unlikely that our immediate family and our species are not part of it but that happens, on an individual and a cultural level both. One concept is not inherently superior to the other.

So, if you decide to value people's survival according to your hierarchy of loyalties, that is natural and understandable, but I would feel very uncomfortable with such a stance because it is also intrinsically unfair, and while both are valid and proven moral concepts, personally I value fairness more than group loyalty, apparently so does Xilizhra. So I would give my own species a slight preference and yes, I would want humanity to become the politically dominant power in the galaxy, but I would not want to drive every other species to the brink of extinction just so that humanity survives relatively unscathed. That is too high a price. On the other hand, I would not sacrifice humanity for the sake of saving the most individuals of any species, but I would do it if it was the only way the Reapers could be defeated. My Shepard would probably kill himself afterwards, but he'd still do it. Better to be dead than Reaperized. Or so it seems at the moment.

Modifié par Ieldra2, 20 septembre 2011 - 12:31 .


#849
Seboist

Seboist
  • Members
  • 11 989 messages

laecraft wrote...

There is also one more species that my Shepard will fight for by default, no questions asked. Guess who? The Protheans. Shepard's essentially a Prothean, himself.

Hmm, I suppose that Shepards who have regular mind sex with asari are also sort of "asari" themselves. Since they've got an indepth peek into their essence, culture, et cetera. (wonder if you can learn their language this way?)

However, to get a more objective insight in the asari, such Shepards need to have more sex, with different asari - and the more, the better. What a way to gather information about them...

A sudden, uncanny thought occurred to me. TIM has sex with that asari Matriarch. Regularly, in fact. Does that mean she knows everything about his plans!

Anyway, it makes absolutely no sense to fight for asari. Their kind is not threatened in the slightest. They are the lifeblood of ME universe. Even the Reapers won't be able to eradicate them. So no point in wasting soldiers and resources on protecting them.


He wouldn't be called the Illusive man if an Asari could gather his plans through "mating". :happy:

Which reminds me, my femshep will be pissed to hear that he's been screwing a freakin Asari instead of her. :unsure:

#850
Guest_laecraft_*

Guest_laecraft_*
  • Guests
And what is it that the galaxy has done to deserve to live so much more than humanity has? Was that an asari who stopped Saren from opening the gates? Maybe it was the Council, and not Cerberus, who bought the second reprieve for everyone in the galaxy with its own money, resources, and blood? Or perhaps the salarian Councilor listened to Shepard at last, when Shepard was repeating "The Reapers are coming"? Or maybe it's a hanar who's now being put on trial in irons for saving the galaxy for the second time?

Why is it that humanity has to be the one to always pay the price? Twice now...thrice? The rachni paid the price for the Council species to survive. So did the krogan. The Council species has never hesitated to use other species as cannon fodder! They always put their own kind first. They "accept this sacrifice." Their lives are built on the bones of species driven to extinction and near extinction, and still it's not enough, and now you're letting humanity pay the ultimate price for their survival?

THEY DO NOT DESERVE IT!

If they want to survive, they should fight for it! If they want to live, they should pay the price - with their own people, and their own soldiers. Not with someone else's lives! That's not how it's done. And as long as my Shepard breathes, that's not how it will be done. The galaxy is not driving to their survival and advancement on the carriage built from human bones. Just no.

What's unfair is emerging unscathed from the war at the expense of the only species who's ever done anything to win it.