Brotherhood of Cerberus - The Illusive Man Discussion/Support Thread
#1026
Posté 23 septembre 2011 - 11:28
Me: Be upfront with me, Shepard. What's your real reason for not using it?
Avatar: I don't trust TIM. He really wants that tech. Whatever he wants, it can't be good.
Me: So you're just being confrontational? You define your principles by TIM's? You have no convictions of your own?
Avatar: He's the absolute evil. Everybody tells me that. A million of lemmings can't be wrong. So I figured that if I act contradictory to him, I'm the absolute good.
Me: And if we can't win without it?
Avatar: Look at me. I'm a Paragon. I'm getting away with everything. You can't go wrong with me.[/quote]
[/quote]
[smilie]../../../images/forum/emoticons/lol.png[/smilie][smilie]../../../images/forum/emoticons/lol.png[/smilie] So very true. I've seen many players talk exactly like that.
#1027
Posté 23 septembre 2011 - 11:36
#1028
Posté 23 septembre 2011 - 11:37
Ieldra2 wrote...
laecraft wrote...
Me: Be upfront with me, Shepard. What's your real reason for not using it?
Avatar: I don't trust TIM. He really wants that tech. Whatever he wants, it can't be good.
Me: So you're just being confrontational? You define your principles by TIM's? You have no convictions of your own?
Avatar: He's the absolute evil. Everybody tells me that. A million of lemmings can't be wrong. So I figured that if I act contradictory to him, I'm the absolute good.
Me: And if we can't win without it?
Avatar: Look at me. I'm a Paragon. I'm getting away with everything. You can't go wrong with me.So very true. I've seen many players talk exactly like that.
It was interesting to see that a lot of people considered TIM to be a bigger threat than the Reapers
Modifié par Aeowyn, 23 septembre 2011 - 11:38 .
#1029
Posté 23 septembre 2011 - 11:44
Aeowyn wrote...
Ieldra2 wrote...
laecraft wrote...
Me: Be upfront with me, Shepard. What's your real reason for not using it?
Avatar: I don't trust TIM. He really wants that tech. Whatever he wants, it can't be good.
Me: So you're just being confrontational? You define your principles by TIM's? You have no convictions of your own?
Avatar: He's the absolute evil. Everybody tells me that. A million of lemmings can't be wrong. So I figured that if I act contradictory to him, I'm the absolute good.
Me: And if we can't win without it?
Avatar: Look at me. I'm a Paragon. I'm getting away with everything. You can't go wrong with me.So very true. I've seen many players talk exactly like that.
It was interesting to see that a lot of people considered TIM to be a bigger threat than the Reapers
I really think the TIM hate stems in large part to him hurting their ego stroking power fantasy from the way he treats Shepard as a subordinate and how it's clear s/he's nowhere near his level.
#1030
Posté 23 septembre 2011 - 11:46
Aeowyn wrote...
It was interesting to see that a lot of people considered TIM to be a bigger threat than the Reapers
He doesn't have to be a bigger threat than the Reapers. Most people argued that giving the Illusive Man so much power will just strengthen his insanity (using reaper tech against our allies etc.), and subsequently reduce our chances of victory against the reapers.
#1031
Guest_laecraft_*
Posté 23 septembre 2011 - 11:51
Guest_laecraft_*
Dave of Canada wrote...
In addition to this, I've watched Interstella 5555 which is mostly Daft Punk music with a movie attached to it. One of the scenes has Aerodynamic playing in the backround as it shows mysterious figures knocking out the alien species and kidnapping key individuals (in this case, the band) and getting out.
I couldn't stop thinking of Cerberus possibly doing this, except... for political targets instead of music groups.
Watch it here.
Aahhh, is that the Normandy at 3:13?
Okay, THIS is how the retrieval of the krogan female should've went in Renegade path. Quick and efficient. "The krogan has been acquired." I want to be among those Mooks. I want my Shepard to be the one with the crossbow! And he's not in a hurry - deliberate and in control of the battlefield. And he's backed up by Cerberus, which is great - just like old times.
This video is making me all dreamy and nostalgic.
EDIT: And the music is really good. Now this is my new favourite song.
Modifié par laecraft, 23 septembre 2011 - 12:21 .
#1032
Posté 23 septembre 2011 - 12:31
Barquiel wrote...
Aeowyn wrote...
It was interesting to see that a lot of people considered TIM to be a bigger threat than the Reapers
He doesn't have to be a bigger threat than the Reapers. Most people argued that giving the Illusive Man so much power will just strengthen his insanity (using reaper tech against our allies etc.), and subsequently reduce our chances of victory against the reapers.
I wasn't talking about if you give him the base or not. I was talking about people actually talking as if TIM was the bigger threat.
#1033
Posté 23 septembre 2011 - 01:49
laecraft wrote...
@Hah Yes Reapers: Oohhh, you didn't like it?Good. That was the intention. Now you know how it feels when people are having a go at the character you support.
As a Jack fan, trust me, I know that feeling all too well.
#1034
Posté 23 septembre 2011 - 01:51
No, I think that effect is minor at best.Seboist wrote...
I really think the TIM hate stems in large part to him hurting their ego stroking power fantasy from the way he treats Shepard as a subordinate and how it's clear s/he's nowhere near his level.
It's rather that Cerberus' more excessive experiments are a human-sized evil which you can intuitively grasp and which goes right past any rational faculty to trigger an emotional response, while the Reapers are beyond that scale and as a consequence are perceived more like a natural disaster. Or even more, like predators - you fight them and eradicate them if you can, but as a rule you don't hate them because they aren't part of your sphere.
A second aspect is that these experiments are done by humans. The players and their characters are also human, and they don't want to have any common element with another individual capable of doing these things, no matter how justified they may be or not. Thus, the frequent tendency to classify certain people "inhuman", disgarding that effectively, every human is capable of anything, including themselves, given the right circumstances. The Reapers, on the other hand, already are alien enough that no common element exists that can be intuitively grasped.
Modifié par Ieldra2, 23 septembre 2011 - 01:57 .
#1035
Posté 23 septembre 2011 - 01:59
Ieldra2 wrote...
No, I think that effect is minor at best.Seboist wrote...
I really think the TIM hate stems in large part to him hurting their ego stroking power fantasy from the way he treats Shepard as a subordinate and how it's clear s/he's nowhere near his level.
It's rather that Cerberus' more excessive experiments are a human-sized evil which you can intuitively grasp and which goes right past any rational faculty to trigger an emotional response, while the Reapers are beyond that scale and as a consequence are perceived more like a natural disaster.
A second aspect is that these experiments are done by humans. The players and their characters are also human, and they don't want to have any common element with another individual capable of doing these things, no matter how justified they may be or not. Thus, the frequent tendency to classify certain people "inhuman", disgarding that effectively, every human is capable of anything, including themselves, given the right circumstances. The Reapers, on the other hand, already are alien enough that no common element exists that can be intuitively grasped.
Oh certainly, I've talked about how the Reapers are just natural disasters that can talk and a reason that they made Cerberus the enemy in ME3 was to draw an emotional response from the player that the former couldn't.
#1036
Posté 23 septembre 2011 - 02:00
Or at least that's how it should have played out...
#1037
Posté 23 septembre 2011 - 02:07
jtav wrote...
I am no fan of TIM, his goals, or his means. That said, the Reapers take priority. For the purpose of comparison, TIM isn't space-Hitler, but space-Stalin. Monstrous, to be sure, but a monster that wants to kill the same monster I do. We can have the ME version of the Cold War later.
Or at least that's how it should have played out...
TIM is not a monster, he's a GOOD man who's looking out for the interests and security of his people. He saw first hand what happens when humans are at the mercy of alien scum at Shanxi and doesn't wish for it to happen again.
He's an unsung hero in my book.
#1038
Posté 23 septembre 2011 - 02:25
I say Pragia and Akuze. I can justify everything else, but those were excessive, and I'm not sure if we can really discount them as rogue cells. We hear that TIM likes to retain close oversight...Seboist wrote...
jtav wrote...
I am no fan of TIM, his goals, or his means. That said, the Reapers take priority. For the purpose of comparison, TIM isn't space-Hitler, but space-Stalin. Monstrous, to be sure, but a monster that wants to kill the same monster I do. We can have the ME version of the Cold War later.
Or at least that's how it should have played out...
TIM is not a monster, he's a GOOD man who's looking out for the interests and security of his people. He saw first hand what happens when humans are at the mercy of alien scum at Shanxi and doesn't wish for it to happen again.
He's an unsung hero in my book.
I like the man. He's cool and incredibly competent, a true Magnificent Bastard. But it looks like he falls a little beyond a line I wouldn't cross.
#1039
Posté 23 septembre 2011 - 02:32
Seboist wrote...
TIM recieves so much over the top hate that's it's downright hilarious. Absolutely nobody in the ME universe recieves anywhere near the amount of hate he does to the point where supposed lawful good Paragons go into elaborate detail about how they plan to torture and kill him.
All that means is the character is working as intended. That's one of the more humorous sides of these fan discussions, really. Indifference is the more damning response to a character, especially one like TIM. If lots of people hate him and resent him, then everything is fine.
Modifié par flemm, 23 septembre 2011 - 02:32 .
#1040
Posté 23 septembre 2011 - 02:37
Ieldra2 wrote...
I say Pragia and Akuze. I can justify everything else, but those were excessive, and I'm not sure if we can really discount them as rogue cells. We hear that TIM likes to retain close oversight...Seboist wrote...
jtav wrote...
I am no fan of TIM, his goals, or his means. That said, the Reapers take priority. For the purpose of comparison, TIM isn't space-Hitler, but space-Stalin. Monstrous, to be sure, but a monster that wants to kill the same monster I do. We can have the ME version of the Cold War later.
Or at least that's how it should have played out...
TIM is not a monster, he's a GOOD man who's looking out for the interests and security of his people. He saw first hand what happens when humans are at the mercy of alien scum at Shanxi and doesn't wish for it to happen again.
He's an unsung hero in my book.
I like the man. He's cool and incredibly competent, a true Magnificent Bastard. But it looks like he falls a little beyond a line I wouldn't cross.
Like I've said, we know next to nothing about Akuze other than the delirious ramblings of some shellshocked soldier and as for Pragia, it's unknown what TIM did or didn't know.
On the subject of Akuze, it's sad how underutilized the Sole Survivor background is in ME2, not only is nothing ellaborated on it but Shepard isn't able to confront Cerberus about it. There isn't any SS unique dialogue with Grunt's loyalty mission either (that I'm aware of).
It would have made for a great anti-Cebrerus playthrough(or one hell of a pro-Cerberus one) and I would have gone ahead and created it like I've considered...
#1041
Posté 23 septembre 2011 - 02:40
flemm wrote...
Seboist wrote...
TIM recieves so much over the top hate that's it's downright hilarious. Absolutely nobody in the ME universe recieves anywhere near the amount of hate he does to the point where supposed lawful good Paragons go into elaborate detail about how they plan to torture and kill him.
All that means is the character is working as intended. That's one of the more humorous sides of these fan discussions, really. Indifference is the more damning response to a character, especially one like TIM. If lots of people hate him and resent him, then everything is fine.
That's certainly true. I don't call him the greatest character in ME for nothing.
#1042
Posté 23 septembre 2011 - 02:42
Seboist wrote...
Ieldra2 wrote...
I say Pragia and Akuze. I can justify everything else, but those were excessive, and I'm not sure if we can really discount them as rogue cells. We hear that TIM likes to retain close oversight...Seboist wrote...
jtav wrote...
I am no fan of TIM, his goals, or his means. That said, the Reapers take priority. For the purpose of comparison, TIM isn't space-Hitler, but space-Stalin. Monstrous, to be sure, but a monster that wants to kill the same monster I do. We can have the ME version of the Cold War later.
Or at least that's how it should have played out...
TIM is not a monster, he's a GOOD man who's looking out for the interests and security of his people. He saw first hand what happens when humans are at the mercy of alien scum at Shanxi and doesn't wish for it to happen again.
He's an unsung hero in my book.
I like the man. He's cool and incredibly competent, a true Magnificent Bastard. But it looks like he falls a little beyond a line I wouldn't cross.
Like I've said, we know next to nothing about Akuze other than the delirious ramblings of some shellshocked soldier and as for Pragia, it's unknown what TIM did or didn't know.
On the subject of Akuze, it's sad how underutilized the Sole Survivor background is in ME2, not only is nothing ellaborated on it but Shepard isn't able to confront Cerberus about it. There isn't any SS unique dialogue with Grunt's loyalty mission either (that I'm aware of).
It would have made for a great anti-Cebrerus playthrough(or one hell of a pro-Cerberus one) and I would have gone ahead and created it like I've considered...
That's correct. My canon is a Sole Survivor. Like I mentioned in the other thread, I believe that the Alliance Brass knew about Akuze and might have been involved somehow since Toombs was killing off former Alliance scientists.
#1043
Posté 23 septembre 2011 - 03:03
Not relevant to the universe itself. No one can see where the "choice points" are in-universe.Yes....but both with Nassana and Arrival you don't have a choice. Where you have one, Paragons always have the option to have their cake and eat it.
Thinking about politics and psychology for a moment, I rather think I can. But it's irrelevant because it's still not the best result, and the best result can be obtained with either Paragon or Renegade points.And btw, no, you cannot say that telling the truth is Renegade because it will break the unity of the Migrant fleet. That result cannot be foreseen at all.
From six cruisers? They lost those against a bunch of geth dropships, and the only reason those were a threat to the Destiny Ascension was because it was alone and couldn't use its main gun. The ships attacking it weren't terribly powerful.Saving the Council: Paragon saves them AND destroys Sovereign with minimal losses. There's no indicator humans are militarily weaker and Shepard recieves no heat from the Alliance brass or people back home(especially relatives of those personnel lost in those ships to save the council). You also get to see the council and get your "hah yes reapers" moment. Nothing but sunshine and bunnies with this one.
Balak's a rogue even by Hegemony standards. I doubt he has any support anymore.Bringing Down the Sky: Save hostages and Balak is simply "at large" in the next game, doesn't seem like a big deal that he's on the loose.
I don't really give much of a **** if I have his loyalty or not, but all this means is that Zaeed is more willing to forgive Shepard than you'd like, for some reason.Zaeed's LM: Want Zaeed's loyalty without sacrificing the civilians? Don't worry, you can turn Zaeed into a neutered whimpering pup and talk-jutsu him into subission while you save them.
Yes, the Renegade option is just plain stupid and I don't know why there was even a choice there, unless Shepard is an anti-quarian douchebag.Veetor: There's ZERO reason to pick the renegade path as it provides the same intel the alternative does. Heck, the Paragon one ends up being more pro-Cerberus since it improves relations with the Quarians.
Why would you tell the krogan anyway? And I'm still not sure it wouldn't just make a lot of them eager for another fight.Saving Rachni Queen: It turns out the Rachni are completely blameless for their previous wars and are going to provide you with assistance in the next game(which she never even offered before). Also, you don't have to worry about pissing off the Krogans since it exists in a vacuum(they sure remember Shepard destroying Saren's genophage cure though).
Yes, malnourished colonists under mind control with no military training aren't much of a personal threat. What a shocking revelation.Feros: Want to save the colonists but don't want to risk yourself doing it? The game has you covered, not only are the colonists feeble enemies but the grenades take them out faster! And as a free bonus they also insta-kill the creepers!
I suspect it'll be angelic in form.But watch it, now they're going to augment him into an avatar, and give people that challenging boss fight with TIM they've been craving.
Here's a thought. Instead of coming up with these conversations in your own mind, why don't you "interview" me as someone with an actual Paragon Shepard?Here's how my disastrous attempt to recruit Paragon Shepard went down.
#1044
Posté 23 septembre 2011 - 07:33
My memory of how the scene plays out is pretty rusty but it seems pretty logical to me.Xilizhra wrote...
Yes, the Renegade option is just plain stupid and I don't know why there was even a choice there, unless Shepard is an anti-quarian douchebag
Shepard is aware of the animosity between the quarians and Cerberus and doesn't trust the quarians to give him the intel that Veetor has if he sends him back to the fleet imediately.
Thus he has Cerberus take him so he can ensure he'll get the information he needs.
#1045
Posté 23 septembre 2011 - 08:21
Well, I don't know. Doesn't Tali say you'll get the intel? Not trusting the other quarians is one thing, but not trusting Tali? I don't find that convincing. Tali is uncommonly dependable and she trusts Shepard.GodWood wrote...
My memory of how the scene plays out is pretty rusty but it seems pretty logical to me.Xilizhra wrote...
Yes, the Renegade option is just plain stupid and I don't know why there was even a choice there, unless Shepard is an anti-quarian douchebag
Shepard is aware of the animosity between the quarians and Cerberus and doesn't trust the quarians to give him the intel that Veetor has if he sends him back to the fleet imediately.
Thus he has Cerberus take him so he can ensure he'll get the information he needs.
But this is getting seriously OT. We were talking about the Magnificent Bastard that TIM is...
Modifié par Ieldra2, 23 septembre 2011 - 08:22 .
#1046
Posté 23 septembre 2011 - 08:26
I care to disagree: the best solution to that situation is clearly the non-Intimidate Renegade option.Xilizhra wrote...
Thinking about politics and psychology for a moment, I rather think I can. But it's irrelevant because it's still not the best result, and the best result can be obtained with either Paragon or Renegade points.And btw, no, you cannot say that telling the truth is Renegade because it will break the unity of the Migrant fleet. That result cannot be foreseen at all.
#1047
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Posté 23 septembre 2011 - 08:33
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Well, I don't know. Doesn't Tali say you'll get the intel? Not trusting the other quarians is one thing, but not trusting Tali? I don't find that convincing. Tali is uncommonly dependable and she trusts Shepard. [/quote
I trust Tali, but she's just one quarian. I'd prefer to utilize TIM's methods and that means going with what you know. If we take Veetor ourselves we can interrogate him and make sure we get what we need.
#1048
Posté 23 septembre 2011 - 08:39
In the orignal off-topic excursion of this thread I was talking only about the non-persuasion choices. The persuasion choices are ridiculous because in any remotely realistic situation they shouldn't work at all. I use the Renegade persuade because that reaction fits most of my Shepards, but it really shouldn't work.Kaiser Shepard wrote...
I care to disagree: the best solution to that situation is clearly the non-Intimidate Renegade option.Xilizhra wrote...
Thinking about politics and psychology for a moment, I rather think I can. But it's irrelevant because it's still not the best result, and the best result can be obtained with either Paragon or Renegade points.And btw, no, you cannot say that telling the truth is Renegade because it will break the unity of the Migrant fleet. That result cannot be foreseen at all.
And to bring this thread on topic again:
Modifié par Ieldra2, 23 septembre 2011 - 08:40 .
#1049
Posté 23 septembre 2011 - 08:42
Modifié par Ieldra2, 23 septembre 2011 - 08:43 .
#1050
Posté 23 septembre 2011 - 08:46
Ieldra2 wrote...
And to bring this thread on topic again:
Great picture of him, my femsheps would love to have it framed and placed in their quarters. <3
It certainly would help during lonely nights....




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut





