This is, under some circumstances, futile.*watches her wishes for civil discourse spontaneously combust and plumment into a ravine*
...Well, dammit.
Modifié par Xilizhra, 16 octobre 2011 - 11:46 .
This is, under some circumstances, futile.*watches her wishes for civil discourse spontaneously combust and plumment into a ravine*
...Well, dammit.
Modifié par Xilizhra, 16 octobre 2011 - 11:46 .
Seboist wrote...
Kaiser Shepard wrote...
Oh Laecraft, stop fooling yourself into thinking there is more than one possible interpretation, more than one path in these games. If only the team would realise they have minimised rolaplaying so much that they might as well do the obvious and just try to compete with GoW.
Yeah, let's not kid ourselves into thinking this isn't just GoW with a Disney morality system and a conversation simulator. Playing a real man's rpg like the two Wtichers really shows how shallow the supposed "deep socio-political" lore of ME is, what little there is that doesn't get overshadowed by boring one-dimesional ancient evil and one note mercs and collectors anyhow.
At this point expecting Bioware to create a game with a mature and grey socio-political lore is like expecting Square-Enix to come up with a Final Fantasy that doesn't involve coming of age stories with androgynous teenage ladyboys.
Xilizhra wrote...
Yes, I'm certain in your Witcher pisshole you can can play an unstable speciesist moron with the tact of a bulldozer with no consequences whatsoever. But if that is in fact the case, stop yammering about it here because it's not on damned topic.Yeah, let's not kid ourselves into thinking this isn't just GoW with a Disney morality system and a conversation simulator. Playing a real man's rpg like the two Wtichers really shows how shallow the supposed "deep socio-political" lore of ME is, what little there is that doesn't get overshadowed by boring one-dimesional ancient evil and one note mercs and collectors anyhow.
Also, whomever invented the phrase "real man" is an utter dolt.
And I might even care if A. this was a Witcher thread, B. I was capable of enjoying Witcher instead of being shafted by having to play a protagonist I can't get into, and C. you hadn't thrown in that bit of sexism. As it stands now, however...Seboist wrote...
Xilizhra wrote...
Yes, I'm certain in your Witcher pisshole you can can play an unstable speciesist moron with the tact of a bulldozer with no consequences whatsoever. But if that is in fact the case, stop yammering about it here because it's not on damned topic.Yeah, let's not kid ourselves into thinking this isn't just GoW with a Disney morality system and a conversation simulator. Playing a real man's rpg like the two Wtichers really shows how shallow the supposed "deep socio-political" lore of ME is, what little there is that doesn't get overshadowed by boring one-dimesional ancient evil and one note mercs and collectors anyhow.
Also, whomever invented the phrase "real man" is an utter dolt.
Geralt displays great intelligence with a keen knowledge of politics and warfare and a big LOL to "No consequences". Yeah, there's no e-mails or cameos that don't appear because you didn't play the dev's preferred path if that's what you mean. There's entire missions, character interactions, enemies/allies,outcomes,etc that are the result of real choices and outcomes and you see it within the same game you're playing.
That I enjoyed playing on the paths of the faction that I oppose on a personal and political level (Scoia'tael) as much as the ones I support (Blue Stripes and Order) shows how much Witcher wipes the floor with ME with a real morally grey story. All factions have their pros and cons with legitimate motivations and grievences. There's no mary sue faction (Asari) or a one note antagonist whipping boy (Batarian) for convenient missions/plots.
What morally grey socio-political story is there in ME? Is Shepard potrayed as being concerned that freeing the Rachni Queen might endanger humanity's chances of ascending into the council or risking anti-human reprisals from antagonised Krogans? Nope, it's about being feeling warm and fuzzy by freeing her vs giving her an acid bath for the lulz.
I'm itching to do another Witcher 1+2 playthrough after I finish Deus Ex....
Ultai wrote...
I'm mostly just getting ME3 to complete the story, after that I probably won't be playing much of Bioware's games anymore. I've got Obsidian, Bethesda, Eidos to some extent and CD Projekt Red to fall back on. However I might make an exception for a game involving more stuff with TIM, since he's one of my favorites.
Make that three of us.Seboist wrote...
Ultai wrote...
I'm mostly just getting ME3 to complete the story, after that I probably won't be playing much of Bioware's games anymore. I've got Obsidian, Bethesda, Eidos to some extent and CD Projekt Red to fall back on. However I might make an exception for a game involving more stuff with TIM, since he's one of my favorites.
Same here, I'm done with Bioware after ME3.
Oh, you so silly.Xilizhra wrote...
The amount of Witcher comparisons has reached critical mass for me. Additionally, Seboist using a gender-specific term as something value-positive instead of value-neutral is bloody idiotic and manages to make the whole post an insult against all women and those men who happen to like Bioware.
Modifié par Kaiser Shepard, 17 octobre 2011 - 12:24 .
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Guest_wiggles_*
No consequences whatsoever?Yes, I'm certain in your Witcher pisshole you can can play an unstable speciesist moron with the tact of a bulldozer with no consequences whatsoever.
Bethesda and grey socio-political lore?Ultai wrote...
Seboist wrote...
At this point expecting Bioware to create a game with a mature and grey socio-political lore is like expecting Square-Enix to come up with a Final Fantasy that doesn't involve coming of age stories with androgynous teenage ladyboys.
I'm mostly just getting ME3 to complete the story, after that I probably won't be playing much of Bioware's games anymore. I've got Obsidian, Bethesda, Eidos to some extent and CD Projekt Red to fall back on. However I might make an exception for a game involving more stuff with TIM, since he's one of my favorites.
Modifié par IsaacShep, 17 octobre 2011 - 04:29 .
The war against the Reapers, not Cerberus.Hah Yes Reapers wrote...
If Cerberus weren't made into the butt of all ME jokes and actually a legitimately successful organization, you'd be right.GodWood wrote...
Oout of character: You're metagaming.Xilizhra wrote...
Oh, I very much doubt I'll lose the war. Despite TIM's best efforts.
In character: You're delusional.
HissAnd the end-game decision might actually be... a decision.
Guest_laecraft_*
Additionally, Seboist using a gender-specific term as something value-positive instead of value-neutral is bloody idiotic and manages to make the whole post an insult against all women and those men who happen to like Bioware.
And I might even care if
Modifié par laecraft, 17 octobre 2011 - 07:04 .
laecraft wrote...
I'm super civil, here. See, Ashwraith? I don't want to disappoint you. Tell me this was super civil, because I can't tell.
Modifié par Ashwraith, 17 octobre 2011 - 07:10 .
Ashwraith wrote...
Do not make me get the spray bottle, people, I will do it.
IsaacShep wrote...
Bethesda and grey socio-political lore?Who plays Bethesda's games for their writing lol?
Agree on Obsidian & Eidos Montreal though, great writing in their games (1 game in case of EM). CDP too but then "Look gamers! We've got ****** for you yay!" kind of spoils the image.
But I'm not gonna be 'abandoning' BioWare. When it comes to writing, I prefer Obs, but BioWare still creates good games/world that provide me tons of fun. And one screwup named DA2 ain't gonna make all their amazing track record suddenly invalid.
Modifié par Seboist, 17 octobre 2011 - 07:38 .
Lotion Soronnar wrote...
TIM haters are funny...Tehy STILL hapr abouthim not realyl caring about humantiy or people...even after been proven wrong. I quote:
"He will do anything for the sake of humanity in the game, even the horrible things sometimes, if that’s what’s necessary."
He will do anything for the sake of humanity. That sentance alone completely destroys all of hte haters who insists he does it for his own power and crap like that.
Guest_laecraft_*
Modifié par laecraft, 17 octobre 2011 - 08:51 .
Guest_laecraft_*
Ultai wrote...
I wish I could find the interview that was done recently, but from what I gathered from one of Mac Walter's responses is that he won't be done with TIM anytime soon. I'll just have to keep digging for it. I can't say I like how he goes about things, but I'd be pretty disappointed if he was killed off in some way.
Seboist wrote...
Even Bioware's own DA:O had better handled choices than ME. There wasn't this nonsense of Shepard being able to play both sides of a conflict and still ending up having his cake and eating it since everything exists in a bubble. There you faced a dilemma of who to support between werewolves vs elves, templar vs mages, the two opposing dwarf factions,etc and then you fight alongside your chosen ally against their enemy. I wish we would have a situation like that with Geth vs Quarian but I'm not counting on it...
I also liked how certain squadmates like Wynne and Leliana would actually turn against the Warden if s/he screwed them and what they hold dear over. That's contrary to what we have in ME where the squadmates amount to being a gaggle of b*tches who submit to Shepard's every whim no matter how much s/he screws them or their people over (ex. Wrex,Zaeed and Tali).
laecraft wrote...
The lack of choices is very relevant to having to fight Cerberus which is related to TIM.
Barquiel wrote...
laecraft wrote...
The lack of choices is very relevant to having to fight Cerberus which is related to TIM.
I suppose you complained about the lack of choices in ME2 as well (...and how much "effort" was put into railroading us into working with Cerberus)?