Eat My Shorts Last Darkness
. All ready went over it. I didn't rezlie I had that in the heading. The calculations are only based off a single hit from one hand. The sentence about DPS over 5 seconds was removed because of that issue. I was trying to make the point that Warriors can go under the max Speed cap, while Rogues can get close, this was actually to counter the Rogue Bonus to Backstab damage to which Rogues have access. That was a huge mistake. I'm not exactly the editor type, I'm good at checking math, but not proof reading what I write (as is evidenced by my mistake of mixing the bonuses of DA2 stats with DA:O stats earlier). That being said, Ihave no problem with people pointing out my errors in writing. But seriously, I'm not going to go in deeper than those basic stats; its a comparison of perfect situations, I know, but it's also setup that way for the warrior. I did backstabs v crits yes, this is both high end power I know the game doesn't operate like that all the time. I guess a better title for the comparison is Critical damage of the DW War v. Rog, but I really don't know how you want to compare these classes. Overall DPS almost seems situational and based of the party makeup for both classes.
Math isn't skewed also, I gave favoritism to warriors with FoF, and the dagger stats are base because I didn't want to do anymore work. I started the whole calculation with full gear but this was taking too much time as it was. I said 0 armor because again, I didn't want to put that much time into this (it's taking into my very limited Bioware addiction as is). So I guess you can make that an argument as a "bias" but it was unintentional, moreso laziness. If you want to do an armor comparison, make the damage for the warrior 0 and the rogue -.25 (as most rogues will have 150 ATK v 200 DEF), if you want to go beyond that and talk about Vun hex, then you have to consider Telekinetic Weapons (Now you can see why I didn't add other class abilities into the mix) You can redo it with items w/ stats and armor if you want, and if your calculations come out different, post it, I'm not going to take offense to something disproving me with my own mathematics.
Requiesta De Silencia sorry for taking the fun out of the game for you, I was just backing up my theories. The Duel Haste thing wasn't in the actual DPS calculations, they are for hitting on once. I was just demonstrating that the Rogue could hit .5 attack speed animation but the warrior could go under.
(BTW, BF+Momentum =.4 not .5,
YOUR DONE, YOU'VE LOST ALL CREDIBILITY AT THIS POINT)
I tease.
So here's what I'll say: On paper, the Rogue creates higher DPS and this is my personal opinion, based off these calculations in addition to my personal game experience. In personal opinions and game experience of Zahe and Last Darkness, the Warrior is better for DPS. Obviously, if there is this much of a heated discussion on the issue than the differences are minute and situational. I'm sure for every video or statistic that each of us will post, there will be a counter-argument or counter-video throwing out accusations or situationality, or you did this, or that, or whatever. So, make your choice based off playstyle.
If you like standup fighting, attacking from the front and spamming the DW tree, choose a Warrior. If you like buffing/debuffing and tactical play, play a Rogue.
Anyway, I'm done debating this. I'm not trying to convince people set on their own opinions, simply trying to help the OP. We're obviously coming up with enough reasons for both arguments to why a certain build is better and now both sides have called out credibility as an issue. (Zahe, my bad dude, I got a little too impassioned, but me being a Mathematician, I just am a stickler for physical proof of something) And I think this discussion has obviously deviated from that.
Modifié par mosesofwar, 14 juillet 2011 - 06:14 .
Retour en haut
the majority of the time practically. That is strictly the better build.
I tried asking a friend about it and he said that there are two possibilites:
