laecraft wrote...
If by "threatening galactic stability" you mean "threatening the Council's galactic dominance," then yes, I agree with you. Asari have Justicars, who are allowed to shoot anyone in their way, even policemen. Nobody knows what's in that codex they follow. Salarians have STG, who are allowed to commit "gentle genocide" for the good of the galaxy. Who's to say the galaxy doesn't decide tomorrow that humanity should be destroyed for the good of the galaxy? I say humanity should be allowed to have our own "we follow no law" operatives. For balance and galactic stability.
Humanity or the alliance would have its own version of the STG and the spectres both government sanctioned groups unlike Cerberus a non government sanctioned group, as for Justicars they operate freely in Asari society and are accepted as such, this is pointed out to you in me2 and the reasoning behind why Samara is arrested and why her actions can cause problems basically the whole point of her recruitment mission.
If Cerberus was a direct alliance controlled group carrying out alliance directives then you may have a point, they aren't though, they are operating independent of the alliance which by definition makes them a terrorist group and their agenda threatens galactic stability because their goal is Humanity above everyone else, something none of the examples you give fit into.
Cerberus is sponsored by the Earth. That endless funding doesn't come out of TIM's bottomless pocket. This is a shadow organization backed up by humanity. This is not democracy, no. But it's close to oligarchy.
You think there could be an official organization representing humanity? It's going to be squashed by the Council in an instant. Look what they did to the Alliance. The Alliace doesn't dare to act against the Council for fear of angering them. Cerberus does all the dirty job for humanity, and the Alliance can say "it's not us, it's them - we never authorized this, they're terrorists!"
If we do nothing to protect ourselves, nothing to secure our power, humanity's going to be wiped out by the batarians. And the Council will just stand by and say, "regrettable, but this is Terminus Systems." And the Alliance will just do nothing, as usual. And we will have deserved it, because we're not willing to fight for our own survival. We need new colonies. The Earth can't house us forever. I'm not letting humanity suffer the same fate as krogan or quarians.
Cerberus is not sponsored by the Earth its sponsord by certain indviduals that agree with its goals and its methods, it is not officially sanctioned by any government.
The alliance is allowed to carry out or have its own organisations carry out missions that benefit humanity what it isn't allowed is to just do whatever it wants with no regards to any other species in the galaxy. As for the alliance not daring to act against the council, why would it? not only is it part of the council but it agrees with most of the goals of the council in the first place.
The only reason the council would squash an alliance organisation would be if that organisation was deliberately doing things that put the whole galaxy at risk, something the alliance as part of the council aren't going to do.
As for the batarians and the council not acting against them and whether or not they should, they kinda pretty much explained the whole terminus system political structure to us during me2. Its not council controlled space, no other council race is trying to take it over or risking war with the batarians there so why should the council after telling the alliance not to do so then just ignore their own directive and go in to help humans who shouldn't be there in the first place.
I know it because I read TIM's thoughts in the book.
Or did you, you read thoughts that were attributed to TIm but whose to say those thoughts didn't come from somewhere else and weren't in fact the whispering of the reapers.
But even if your right it still doesn't conflict with anything i've said since i've mentioned countless times that indoctrination doesn't eliminate free will until its complete.
The game's not out yet. Until then, I don't know the full picture.
Thats completely true, all i was saying was that certain devs have suggested things.
Yes, I believe it. The war is hopeless. A single Reaper nearly brought down the entire Council fleet. We have hundreds of them now. Without an understanding of Reaper tech, we have no chance. Mind you, whether you destroyed the base or not, Cerberus gets the tech anyway. It means it's going to be crucial to the game.
Or it means nothing we have no idea how we're going to beat the reapers, other than a few basic outlines such as uniting the galaxies races and things like that. But to suggest that just because Cerberus gets the tech anyway that means its going to be crucial to beating the reapers is amazing foresight on your part.
We shall see.
Indeed we shall but i think a trilogy featuring Shepard as the main protagonist over 3 games may very well end with that very same protagonist being the person that defeats the enemy
40 percent of the enemies we will fight in ME3 will be Cerberus. I'd say the game is going to be about Cerberus.
Yes just because 40% of the enemies we face are Cerberus that means the game is going to be about Cerberus, it has absolutely nothing to do with the reapers invasion or Shepard whatsoever, why didn't i see that before. All this time i assumed that i was playing a game about a sentient machine race trying to wipe out all life and a hero rising to stop them when in fact its been about Cerberus all this time^_^