Aller au contenu

Photo

I'll Be the First to Complain: What was the point in destroying the Collector Base?


  • Ce sujet est fermé Ce sujet est fermé
1939 réponses à ce sujet

#826
Phaedon

Phaedon
  • Members
  • 8 617 messages

Mesina2 wrote...
I have to disagree, Council is nothing like UN.

Council isn't completely useless.

That's because the UN is the world police only theoretically. The Yugoslavian situation really made them look bad with innocents dying and them not intervening, and the Americans who weren't that innocent either storming without permission. 

Libya is a relatively good example of what the UN can be. They still don't deploy troops, but hey, at least they helped the rebels.

#827
marshalleck

marshalleck
  • Members
  • 15 645 messages

Phaedon wrote...
 And they would probably share the tech with other species, at least to defend against the Reapers.

LIke they were freely willing to share the thanix cannons? 

Yeah, let's keep pretending like the only way Shepard got hold of that was NOT through Garrus calling in a bunch of favors from the Hierarchy.

Modifié par marshalleck, 16 juillet 2011 - 08:31 .


#828
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 425 messages

marshalleck wrote...

Yes. Which is why it's so preposterous for people to champion the Council and demonize Cerberus. 


You have to admit thought the Council doesn't manage to screw up as badly. That's my issue with Cerberus. I have no problems with backstabbers. 

#829
Someone With Mass

Someone With Mass
  • Members
  • 38 560 messages
Cerberus had their chance to study a Reaper, and they blew it. Literally. Moving on.

And considering how much we got out of Sovereign's remains, I don't think there's much to lose if the Collector base goes away in a fiery explosion.

#830
ThePwener

ThePwener
  • Members
  • 2 652 messages

Phaedon wrote...

*snip*


You don't actually believe all of that, do you Phaedon? What kind of fantasy world do YOU play in?

#831
marshalleck

marshalleck
  • Members
  • 15 645 messages

Ryzaki wrote...

marshalleck wrote...

Yes. Which is why it's so preposterous for people to champion the Council and demonize Cerberus. 


You have to admit thought the Council doesn't manage to screw up as badly. 


I have to do no such thing. Council history is one mishap after another, all because of one root cause--they refuse to act on anything, in the interests of anyone other than the big three, until the war has already kicked in their front door. 

#832
Seboist

Seboist
  • Members
  • 11 989 messages

Phaedon wrote...

Seboist wrote...

It's too politically infeasable for the Alliance to deal with the CB due to the whole situation between citadel space and the terminus. It's better for an outlawed "terrorist" organization that many don't know much about to deal with it than risk any political blowback like slavers/mercs attacking Alliance colonies over intrusion into their turf.

Black ops is your answer.


That's why the Alliance has Cerberus. :D

#833
ThePwener

ThePwener
  • Members
  • 2 652 messages

Phaedon wrote...

That's because the UN is the world police only theoretically. The Yugoslavian situation really made them look bad with innocents dying and them not intervening, and the Americans who weren't that innocent either storming without permission. 

Libya is a relatively good example of what the UN can be. They still don't deploy troops, but hey, at least they helped the rebels.


Off-topic.....

Posted Image

#834
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 425 messages

marshalleck wrote...
I have to do no such thing. Council history is one mishap after another, all because of one root cause--they refuse to act on anything, in the interests of anyone other than the big three, until the war has already kicked in their front door. 


AH fine then. :P 

I really do want to run the council, alliance and Cerberus into the ground and build something new. Arrange for an "accident" to all the top people. Reapers did it. :whistle:

#835
Inverness Moon

Inverness Moon
  • Members
  • 1 721 messages

Phaedon wrote...

Black ops is your answer.

And Cerberus just happens to be the black ops arm of the Alliance.

Someone With Mass wrote...

And until you can prove that not taking that path when it comes to Reaper technology equals certain death, I'm just going to laugh every time.

Prove?

The only way to prove that would be to experience it, which is obviously undesirable.

This isn't about "proof" its about risks and which path involves less when it comes to defeating the reapers. Your argument is not credible at all.

If the only thing that would satisfy you is failure against the reapers then there is no point in arguing with you.

#836
Someone With Mass

Someone With Mass
  • Members
  • 38 560 messages

Inverness Moon wrote...

That seems like a silly question to ask. Here is another silly one: why would Shepard care about the other races?

The answer: because having allies in a war improves your chances of success.

Do you think TIM is blind to this? Do you think TIM believes allowing the reapers to pick off each race one at a time is a good idea? I don't.

Waiting until the aliens are weak would just mean less allies to help humanity survive.

If you think TIM can't see the value of allies then you're not looking at him realistically I think.


He seems awfully quick to turn his potential allies into enemies and then just shrug at it, so...no. I don't think he can.

Besides, why would any race work with Cerberus when there are clearly better alternatives, like a real government that has more control and resources?

#837
mauro2222

mauro2222
  • Members
  • 4 236 messages

Phaedon wrote...

Mesina2 wrote...
I have to disagree, Council is nothing like UN.

Council isn't completely useless.

That's because the UN is the world police only theoretically. The Yugoslavian situation really made them look bad with innocents dying and them not intervening, and the Americans who weren't that innocent either storming without permission. 

Libya is a relatively good example of what the UN can be. They still don't deploy troops, but hey, at least they helped the rebels.

Yeap, helping rebels (with goals that we don´t even know) to defeat a dictator who was brought to power by them, so he went rogue and now the UN doesn´t allow his murders because now they don´t gain nothing from the opression of someone who doesn´t follow their orders, so they start a civil war in the country to change a puppet for another puppet.

Modifié par mauro2222, 16 juillet 2011 - 08:43 .


#838
Bnol

Bnol
  • Members
  • 239 messages

Ryzaki wrote...

marshalleck wrote...

Yes. Which is why it's so preposterous for people to champion the Council and demonize Cerberus. 


You have to admit thought the Council doesn't manage to screw up as badly. That's my issue with Cerberus. I have no problems with backstabbers. 


Uplift Krogan to fight Rachni, neuter Krogan afterwards.  Deny help to Quarians in Morning War and deny Quarians a planet afterwards.  Ignore Geth/Reapers and almost get destroyed (or get destroyed for the Renegades).  Hmmm, not a great history of massive success when dealing with problems.

#839
Someone With Mass

Someone With Mass
  • Members
  • 38 560 messages

Inverness Moon wrote...
And Cerberus just happens to be the black ops arm of the Alliance.


Or not, since TIM clearly renounced his allegiance with the Alliance before creating Cerberus.

They have spies in the Alliance. Nothing more.

#840
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 425 messages

Bnol wrote...
Uplift Krogan to fight Rachni, neuter Krogan afterwards.  Deny help to Quarians in Morning War and deny Quarians a planet afterwards.  Ignore Geth/Reapers and almost get destroyed (or get destroyed for the Renegades).  Hmmm, not a great history of massive success when dealing with problems.


Ignore Reapers because there really wasn't any proof of them? Yes how utterly preposterous. (The geth threat shouldn't have been ignored however). And yet they dealt with te Krogan and Rachni without needing Shep janitor to solve their issues. 

#841
ThePwener

ThePwener
  • Members
  • 2 652 messages
Why does everyone worry what TIM will do with the base? I myself have been hoping to kill him off since ME2 started. He isn't the owner of the base, I am. He's only keeping an eye on it for me. You people seriously think he's going to get the chance to use it?

In ME3, Cerberus goes rogue. At some point, we'll go after TIM. after he's dead, who do you think will have the run of the place? Shepard obviously. It's a bit of metagaming, but it still works.

#842
Phaedon

Phaedon
  • Members
  • 8 617 messages

Inverness Moon wrote...
I'm sure they could produce something significant. But if they don't believe in the reapers, what will they do with it? Will they just allow the base to sit behind mountains of red tape? Will they fret over who gets what technology?

I don't expect them to realize the truth until the reapers kick their doors in.

I don't think that's possible if you reveal the CB to all councilors at the same time. And red tape? The council likes power, they wouldn't just have the CB lying there.



The Council has already hindered Shepard at every step before, I don't expect them to stop now.

There's nothing to hinder. Shepard has no use for the CB, better give it to a powerful unionship of races so that they can become more powerful before the attack.

Cerberus is not the sole beneficiary of whatever it develops. That technology goes to the Alliance, because they represent humanity's power in the galaxy.

Shepards who destroy the base question that in the cutscene with TIM. Still, it's one race. We need to protect as many races as possible.

Are you suggesting that the Alliance getting better technology would suddenly drive allies? Why? That is assuming information on upgrades are made public.

I only doubt that they can make a pseudo-Reaper out of this. They'd need to reverse engineer the tech. to make the ship controllable.

And I'm just saying it makes no sense, so I don't think there is a point to talking about it.

Okay.

What exactly could they gain, if even a single Reaper wouldn't be enough?

As I said previously, Cerberus would not be the sole beneficiary.

The Cerberus isn't the Alliance. At least not anymore. I doubt Cerberus would hand the tech to the Alliance.
And again, at best they would create one Reaper. Just one Reaper wouldn't make a difference in the war, unless your enemy are the aliens.



Considering a reaper flagship is merely a fantasy of mine, this isn't a problem.

Well, I am just merely pointing out one of the potential complications of that hypothetical scenario.

That seems like a silly question to ask. Here is another silly one: why would Shepard care about the other races?

The answer: because having allies in a war improves your chances of success.

Do you think TIM is blind to this? Do you think TIM believes allowing the reapers to pick off each race one at a time is a good idea? I don't.

Here's the flaw in that theory;
It assumes that the superweapon would help against the war, but not enough to not require the aliens.

Therefore, considering that the Citadel Fleet only took down Sovereign due to Shepard, more fleets couldn't take down more Reapers. Only the superweapon can do that.

So, if the superweapon is good enough, it will be harmful towards the Reapers without needing the assistance of aliens or the Alliance, or it will only be powerful enough to be harmful towards organic races, but not the Reapers.


Unlike the protheans we have a relatively intact base used for reaper construction to go through.

If the protheans had access to a mass relay factory I doubt it would have taken nearly as long for them. And remember that the mass relays are specifically designed to be used but not understood.

I don't know. Harbinger controlled the Collector General, there is no reason for there to actually be blueprints laying around.

Modifié par Phaedon, 16 juillet 2011 - 08:45 .


#843
Dave of Canada

Dave of Canada
  • Members
  • 17 484 messages

Phaedon wrote...

I don't know. Harbinger controlled the Collector General, there is no reason for there to actually be blueprints laying around.


EDI managed to gather the Collector Base schematics from the base itself, it's not proposterous to assume there's more in the base.

Modifié par Dave of Canada, 16 juillet 2011 - 08:44 .


#844
ThePwener

ThePwener
  • Members
  • 2 652 messages

Ryzaki wrote...

Ignore Reapers because there really wasn't any proof of them? Yes how utterly preposterous. (The geth threat shouldn't have been ignored however). And yet they dealt with te Krogan and Rachni without needing Shep janitor to solve their issues. 


Wrong, right and wrong.

Modifié par ThePwener, 16 juillet 2011 - 08:45 .


#845
marshalleck

marshalleck
  • Members
  • 15 645 messages

Ryzaki wrote...

marshalleck wrote...
I have to do no such thing. Council history is one mishap after another, all because of one root cause--they refuse to act on anything, in the interests of anyone other than the big three, until the war has already kicked in their front door. 


AH fine then. :P 

I really do want to run the council, alliance and Cerberus into the ground and build something new. Arrange for an "accident" to all the top people. Reapers did it. :whistle:


Enlightened self-interest. That's all I'm asking for. Help yourself by helping others. Help the quarians settle a new world (or diplomatically arrange for them to resettle Rannoch) and reap the benefits of their AI and engineering expertise. Establish diplomatic relations with the geth and help resolve the heretic problem to secure our colonies from geth attack in the traverse. Help Wrex with his efforts in building a viable, sustainable krogan civilization, rather than bombing them from orbit and repeatedly sterilizing them, keeping them in a perpetual dark age of tribalism and warlords, and gain a military with infantry to be feared throughout the galaxy. Etc. etc. 

The Council just let problems fester until the pus sac is so swollen it bursts, spewing filth all over the galaxy. They are beyond incompetent. They are, aside from the Reapers themselves, the single greatest threat to galactic civilization. And I am not exaggerating my opinion of them. Screw the Council. Humanity should take the lead in providing the galaxy with real leadership.

Modifié par marshalleck, 16 juillet 2011 - 08:50 .


#846
Inverness Moon

Inverness Moon
  • Members
  • 1 721 messages

Phaedon wrote...

And they would probably share the tech with other species, at least to defend against the Reapers.

Are you serious? The only reason we got the Thanix Canon was because of Garrus.

They don't believe in the reapers, they're not going to be sharing anything until it is possibly too late.

Someone With Mass wrote...

He seems awfully quick to turn his potential allies into enemies and then just shrug at it, so...no. I don't think he can.

Potential allies, like who? Certainly not any of the galactic governments that deny the existence of the reapers.

Beyond that, I'm sure part of the reason he brought back Shepard was because Shepard can bridge the gaps that Cerberus can't.

Besides, why would any race work with Cerberus when there are clearly better alternatives, like a real government that has more control and resources?

If that race actually understands the magnitude of the threat the reapers pose, they'll work with Cerberus whether they like it or not. It's that simple.

This isn't a fight where you have the luxury of being picky about your allies.

#847
Iakus

Iakus
  • Members
  • 30 414 messages

ThePwener wrote...

Why does everyone worry what TIM will do with the base? I myself have been hoping to kill him off since ME2 started. He isn't the owner of the base, I am. He's only keeping an eye on it for me. You people seriously think he's going to get the chance to use it?


Yes.  

In ME3, Cerberus goes rogue. At some point, we'll go after TIM. after he's dead, who do you think will have the run of the place? Shepard obviously. It's a bit of metagaming, but it still works.


But as you said, it's metagaming.

#848
Phaedon

Phaedon
  • Members
  • 8 617 messages

ThePwener wrote...

Why does everyone worry what TIM will do with the base? I myself have been hoping to kill him off since ME2 started. He isn't the owner of the base, I am. He's only keeping an eye on it for me. You people seriously think he's going to get the chance to use it?

In ME3, Cerberus goes rogue. At some point, we'll go after TIM. after he's dead, who do you think will have the run of the place? Shepard obviously. It's a bit of metagaming, but it still works.

Even if you kill TIM in the second mission of the game, months will have passed with him controlling the base. 

#849
Phaedon

Phaedon
  • Members
  • 8 617 messages

Inverness Moon wrote...
Are you serious? The only reason we got the Thanix Canon was because of Garrus.

They don't believe in the reapers, they're not going to be sharing anything until it is possibly too late.

I was saying that if hypothetically they believed what you say about the Reapers, they would share the tech. After all it will take decades for the Reapers to take everyone out.

#850
ThePwener

ThePwener
  • Members
  • 2 652 messages

iakus wrote...

But as you said, it's metagaming.


Because it's just a game. And it's only been a few months since the SM. That's hardly any time to reverse engineer anything.

Modifié par ThePwener, 16 juillet 2011 - 08:53 .