Inverness Moon wrote...
You sure like your buzz words, don't you?
Just as much as you like trying to justify all their actions, no matter how sadistic and nonsensical they are.
Inverness Moon wrote...
You sure like your buzz words, don't you?
Someone With Mass wrote...
And you know this, how...?
Oh, wait. You don't. You're just pulling that out of your ass to try and justify giving Cerberus more doomsday devices.
Modifié par Dave of Canada, 15 juillet 2011 - 09:01 .
It was being used to build a reaper. That is really all that needs to be said.EsterCloat wrote...
I'd really like to know what this magical awesome tech the pro-keeping the base crowd thinks the base holds. From what I saw, the thing just floated there with no defensive systems at all(aside from the Oculus, which were just flying AI lasers). We have the Collector beam tech, we have the thanix cannon off of Sovereign's corpse, we have the Reaper IFF. I don't see what that base offers if you keep it aside from liquifying people tech, paralyzing bug corpses, collector corpses, and I guess organic-metal base construction. None that I see are that useful against an armada of advanced living spaceships.
The derelict reaper was shot with a powerfule enough weapon to carve a canyon into a planet visible from space. You really don't know what causes indoctrination, so you can't know at what point it stops working without testing.Here's how I see it: everytime I've come up to whole Reaper tech it's tried to kill me directly and/or indirectly. Thus, I've adopted a very simple precept: do not deal with Reaper tech until it's been blown up completely and/or shot at sufficiently.
Are you being sarcastic? Everyone is always clammouring about how the collector base must be a reaper indoctrination trap and all that.Someone With Mass wrote...
Because Collector technology is so much like Reaper technology, right?
As far as Cerberus's actions are concerned, if it makes the difference between winning or losing against the reapers, then that is justification enough for me.Someone With Mass wrote...
Just as much as you like trying to justify all their actions, no matter how sadistic and nonsensical they are.
Dave of Canada wrote...
I'll type it slowly.
It's a factory.
Filled with Collector Tech.
Run by Collectors.
To build Reapers.
Using Reaper tech.
You know, I didn't think I had to spell it out for you. You keep surprising me.
Someone With Mass wrote...
Because, Harbinger can't store valuable data somewhere else and access it only when needed, just like Legion, right?
And if you're talking about this thing, in case you didn't notice, we blew that thing up.
Modifié par Mr. Gogeta34, 15 juillet 2011 - 09:11 .
One of the better case scenarios would be seeker swarms rapidly sweeping clean entire cities or even planets of anything that even remotely resembles a husk, saving the lives of many a soldier. Now, whether that would be worth the prize of the weapon in question probably getting used against other non-humans down the line is up to you.EsterCloat wrote...
I'd really like to know what this magical awesome tech the pro-keeping the base crowd thinks the base holds.
Hellbound555 wrote...
ok guys lets try looking at it this way.
lets pretend the collector base was instead a nuclear bomb.
would you give a nuclear bomb to a terrorist group?
Pepper4 wrote...
We must build our own future.
Pepper4 wrote...
We must build our own future.
Pretending the collector base is something else isn't a way to make a credible argument.Hellbound555 wrote...
ok guys lets try looking at it this way.
lets pretend the collector base was instead a nuclear bomb.
would you give a nuclear bomb to a terrorist group?
You say that, yet I doubt you'd be advocating people give up mass effect technology if you lived in that universe.Pepper4 wrote...
We must build our own future.
Except that is completely wrong for reasons I explained several times already.Hellbound555 wrote...
Pepper4 wrote...
We must build our own future.
thats another thing. the reapers left the relays so the mass effect galaxy's tech would evolve in a specific way that they can counter. using the reaper tech on the collector base would only further their plan to have us rely on their tech.
Modifié par Inverness Moon, 15 juillet 2011 - 09:16 .
Inverness Moon wrote...
Pretending the collector base is something else isn't a way to make a credible argument.Hellbound555 wrote...
ok guys lets try looking at it this way.
lets pretend the collector base was instead a nuclear bomb.
would you give a nuclear bomb to a terrorist group?
Modifié par Hellbound555, 15 juillet 2011 - 09:18 .
Dave of Canada wrote...
We also blew up Sovereign and got a lot of knowledge from it's remains, a Reaper-in-building can also provide a lot of knowledge if you ignore everything else about the Base.
EsterCloat wrote...
I'd really like to know what this magical awesome tech the pro-keeping the base crowd thinks the base holds.
I already explained why "the part where reapers want us using their tech" is a silly defense. (In short: they don't want us to be as powerful as them).Hellbound555 wrote...
what im trying to get at is, the collector base DOES have advanced technology on it. why would you give all that leverage to a terrorist group? besides the part where reapers want us using their tech, this is another reason not to give cerberus that base.
You're correct that we don't automatically have a means of countering them. Except no one was suggesting that. Saving the base leaves open the possibility of discovering a means of countering them from whatever might be left on it, which is the the entire point. Blowing it up just removes any possibility of that. It is short-sighted.Someone With Mass wrote...
The difference is that Sovereign was a full-grown Reaper. That guy was far from completion.
And even if we know how they're made doesn't mean we automatically have a means of countering them. We don't know their battle strategies and we certainly can't just pull a anti-Reaper weapon out of nowhere.
Because that'd be anticlimactic.
What, you're not counting on possibly having a handful of dei ex machina in Mass 3's finale?Someone With Mass wrote...
Dave of Canada wrote...
We also blew up Sovereign and got a lot of knowledge from it's remains, a Reaper-in-building can also provide a lot of knowledge if you ignore everything else about the Base.
The difference is that Sovereign was a full-grown Reaper. That guy was far from completion.
And even if we know how they're made doesn't mean we automatically have a means of countering them. We don't know their battle strategies and we certainly can't just pull a anti-Reaper weapon out of nowhere.
Because that'd be anticlimactic.
Dave of Canada wrote...
Reverse-engineer or become knowledgable about any number of these things and we're capable of applying them for many uses in the coming Reaper invasion.
- Reaper blueprints.
- Remains of the Human Reaper.
- Seeker swarms.
- More tech on particle weaponry.
- More tech on regenerative plating.
- A plague that can be built to target specific species / targets.
- Research into indocrination.
- Research into Husks / Praetorians / Scions.
- Something to track down targets.
- Something to shut down the power / communications of entire colonies (possibly more large scale?)
- .. and more.
For a few applications of the tech (not the research) if we're successfully capable of reverse engineering it:
- Seeker swarms to shut down entire indocrinated colonies / cities.
- Shutting down the power / communications of indocrinated colonies / cities.
- Turning the dead from the Reaper invasion into husks / praetorians / scions fighting the Reapers.
- Using the plague to wipe out indocrinated colonies / cities.
Modifié par Someone With Mass, 15 juillet 2011 - 09:25 .