alperez wrote...
1. We have evidence that exploring reaper tech, artifacts, derelict ships etc. that this can lead to really bad consequences.
2. We have an organisation Cerberus that have been shown to disregard the negative consequences because the potential benefit far outweighs any consequences in their opinion.
We're then faced with the choice to either completely remove any potential negative consequence by destroying the base or aim for the potential postive consequences and hand it over to cerberus.
If what we're dealing with was just normal tech and had no potential to completely bite us in the ass or if we had an option to control the access to that tech ourselves, then most people's decision could have been different.
But faced with a black and white choice, a choice where if you know the first 2 things to be true or believe them to be, then that informs your choice and is why you decide to destroy the base.
1) CAN lead to bad consequences. But thing is - you know it. You know where the base is. Cerberus screwup can tehrefore be predicted and contained/solved rahter easily.
2) They don't disregard negative consequences as much as push forward despite them.
Also,everything has the potential to bite you in the ass.
Lotion disregards both of these in his choice and instead creates option 3.
3. danger of working with reaper tech is less than potential gain and danger of cerberus misusing or fouling it up is a price worth paying.
I don't disregard anything.
Unless you missed it yourself, they are BOTH covered in choice 3, by your own words.

In fact, it is you who disregard everything but the two points above.
I alredy explained before why the danger isn't as great. Several time. I proven it in fact, that the potential benefits outstrip the potential negatives.
Practiciality and reason go out the window. Mistrust of Cerberus is the prime motivator here. Not logic.
Both of these arguments are equally logical, however Lotion rather than accept this, instead believes only in his own argument and refuses any suggestion whatsoever that he could be wrong.
When anyone attempts to point out why he could be or how he could be, instead of accepting a different viewpoint he turns into Charlie Sheen and believes he is winning.
He tears down arguments in a single bound while drinking Tigers Blood and woe betide the person who argues with the Warlock.
Insults will get you nowhere. Good arguments will.
Arguments you don't have b.t.w. Which is why you turn to insults. A demonstration of your impotencein this debate and frustration.