REgentleman wrote...
Again, the redundant generator was IIRC something so many people were working on figuring out, and, well, Cerberus finally did it. It may have been "common sense," but supposedly it was a pretty hard idea to enable with "common sense" alone.
Mass Effect 2 simply did a ****** poor job of psuedo-retconning Mass Effect 1. Nearly every upgrade you get in ME2 is a skill in ME1. Shield Boost is Redundant Field Generator. The technology existed 2 years prior. So what is the significance of Cerberus's "breakthrough"? They made it automatic? Whoopty-do.
REgentleman wrote...
May have to agree on the smart targeting thing, given smart targeting itself is not their invention, but had anybody else applied it to light firearms?
Yes, in ME1 it was standard software on every weapon. It is what accounts for the "target assist" option under settings. There is a codex entry and everything.
REgentleman wrote...
I think our points may be mismatched, and regardless I'm not exactly sure what you're asking of Cerberus.
I'm asking nothing of them. You are the one claiming weapons R&D is their saving grace. I merely disagree.
REgentleman wrote...
As far as I'm concerned, any upgrade has the potential to change the way things play out simply by being one more variable, even if only by the slimmest of margins. Simply the fact that Cerberus is the one to make these upgrades seems that it should demonstrate some level of competence, but you seem to think that's not enough because they didn't reinvent everything they touch at every step.
Given the unethical things they do you would expect positive practical results. Otherwise, what is the point? They cause all this suffering and have nothing to show for it. Are they just a group of sadists? When you fail that hard and such failure is the rule, not the exception, how should a rational person perceive you? The incompetence displayed by Cerberus is cartoonish at this point. How can they never learn from their many many mistakes?
People like to bring up the Normandy SR-2 as a Cerberus success. This is incorrect. The Alliance and the Heirarchy developed the Normandy class frigates. Cerberus took that design and modified it.
The only success they have had is Lazarus, but that had to succeed for the plot to continue. And even that could be seen as a failure in terms of Cerberus's long term goals (depending on the player). It's not even a practical technology. I got those ME comics for free so I'll see it reveals exactly where they got the tech from. I assume it's from Dragon's Teeth.
REgentleman wrote...
Are you looking for a specific kind of practical outcome from their research, or what? Because given my sub-adequate knowledge of the workings of the ME universe outside what Shepard does, I might find that rather difficult to respond to.
Yes, very difficult indeed.
1. 1st study into biotic = lots of dead kids. No practical benefit gained.
2. Study rachni = blew up in their faces. Rachni are now out there in the galaxy. No benefit gained.
3. 1st attempt to study huskification process = colony wiped out and turned into husks. No benefit gained.
4. Study Thorian creepers = Science team all dead. No benefit gained.
5. 2nd Study into biotics = lots of folks died. No practical benefit gained.
6. 2nd attempt to study huskification process using tech from Collector bodies = Lots of people died. No benefit gained.
7. Study geth AI = lots of people dead. Would have caused galaxy wide technological apocalypse if not for Shepard. No benefits gained to date.
8. Doing something beyond Omega 4 relay = Alot of people are going to die. Expecting no benefits.
Modifié par The Twilight God, 16 juillet 2011 - 06:09 .





Retour en haut




