[quote]Eromenos wrote...
So you thought this queer would go cry, instead of matching you word-for-word. Guess you're the one who couldn't finish what you started.
[/quote]
Oh I fully expect you to go cry between reading my posts before coming back with some more chest-beating nonsense.
[quote]
Supposedly my "rantings" count for nothing, so in that case I figure you'd have no trouble moving on. And yet you're here? Graceful parting shots about PM now, after what we've done to each other? I think not, since this is going quite well. Feel free to stay as long as you're able to. I need to keep my rhetoric sharp.
[/quote]
Supposedly? Your rantings DO count for nothing. The only reason I'm still here is because I'm stubborn and think maybe something can get past your thick skull. Rhetoric? That's all your good for, repeating the same nonsense only supported in your head over and over again. Oh and considering you've fled from our PM argument I'd hope you wouldn't bother repeating some of those lines.
[quote]
Surprise, I live around straights, not in a gay ghetto. Surprise, this is also me everywhere I go. I'm not the political neophyte here, I'm afraid you are.
[/quote]
Oh but don't you believe some nonsense about them being all bisexual to some extent or another? But I suppose you've got to be capable of not spewing your "heterosexuals are the cause of all of my problems" nonsense in real life.
[quote]
What
homosexual romance in DAO? Which one is this you speak of?
[/quote]
A male romance with Zevran.
[quote]
Kindness, no. Your twisted version of the truth paints BioWare like angels when in fact they made no such effort until DA2. We are all entitled to not being treated like pets just so someone like you can feel safe. I'd rather we be the ones who are safe while you learn to live with being less special than you assume.
[/quote]
Twisted version of the truth? Your vision of reality is so twisted you don't understand truth. You are entitled to absolutely
nothing. What do you fail to understand about this? You aren't special because you sleep with men and aren't entitled to quotas or content suited to your whims.
[quote]
You say "critics" as if the gaming sites and mags weighed-in, here at BSN. Whether or not they did, your efforts at credibility are getting worse and worse. What we have over there are simply customers, definitely lots of them biphobic like yourself, and thus none worth entertaining. DA2's team already knew what they were getting into.
[/quote]
My efforts at credibility? You've already proven that you and your views have no credibility. The fact remains that a large portion of customers didn't like DA2. You think you're worth entertaining but they are not because they are "biphobic"? That is arrogance, pure and simple. By the way I'd suggest you go to Metacritic and compare both games. Even official reviewer scores give DA:O something of an edge.
[quote]
I'm the one who's actually amazed that you would think DAO were some treasure. Aside for the sorry maps, DA2 had an actual framerate, actual combat, interesting political movements, and definitely all-bisexual LIs who were vocally involved every step of the journey. Protagonist even has a nominal psychological profile.
[/quote]
DA:O didn't have an actual framerate? We'll I'm sorry your computer had problems with it, the game work fined for me. Plus DA:O had actual combat that required some strategy and planning, introduced this whole new setting that wasn't largely confined to a single city, and had interesting party members and LIs who weren't all bisexual in order to meet the ego of individuals like yourself. Sometimes a more defined protagonist is a good thing (though you would rant and scream if their sexuality was defined as straight), but DA:Os was certainly more customizable.
[quote]
As I've said before, I need no responsibility from
you. BioWare's implementations are my only concern, and now that M/M is on the record as incoming for ME3, you being yourself is much more fun to me during the meantime.
[/quote]
And if the ME3 development team is sane they won't go with the "everybody's bisexual" route because David Gaider champions it and fanboys like you feel entitled to it. If you're so confident why don't you run back to the S/S group topic? Or let me guess... they aren't worthy of your presence because they are all grateful for what Bioware has done for the.
[quote]
I've no doubt you did read it, except now you just don't want to risk having to quote me mentioining several times how you tried and failed to exploit sociology, race, and the influence of queer gamers in your efforts to derail me.
[/quote]
Derail you? You've derailed from the topic from the start, and it is you who has been trying and failing to use sociology, race, and your so called "influence" to justify your absurd sense of entitlement. So don't come in here and try to accuse me of what you're guilty of.
[quote]
Do tell. Are you active, a veteran, or just some aficionado? Do tell, what these "standards" are. My automatic assumption is of course that you're pulling this out of your...ok, now you're just giftwrapping this to me. First you tried implying that even with DADT dead there might still be stuff on the books that would save your mind from witnessing a situation of American military M/M. Now you're just saying that it's an "American military cultural thing." Hate to break it to you, but you can't pretend to have it both ways. Your latter claim is the only one with any hint of merit to it, and only because the death of DADT is just a recent thing. This latter claim also has less weight than you imagine, seeing as how the majority of surveyed troops commented feeling "no issues against" serving alongside out queer soldiers/sailors/marines/pilots/crew. Now then, ME is an Americanized military centuries later in the future,
without your DADT in anybody's way. It just ain't your daddy's military.
[/quote]
Wait... are you seriously implying that a soldier could have a homosexual romance with another soldier or officer and not be discharged or severely punished for it? That's not the way it works. It is both regulations on the books and a military culture that does not encourage such behavior. Polls also found that combat personnel where largely against the decision. Tolerance of homosexuals does not mean anybody would tolerate two soldiers having a romance with each other or some soldier behaving flamboyant manner and bothering other soldiers, causing disruption in the unit, etc. Even centuries from now such a scenario where everybody would look the other way at such a romance would not occur. But I love how you live under the impression that your vision of society will come true in the future.
[quote]
Why, what changed? You certainly allowed yourself to keep reading when you still
assumed you could take me in front of everybody. You also assumed I wouldn't punch holes in every facet of your queer-hating belief-system.[/quote]
I realized that I had wasted well upwards of an hour debating a fanatic. Punch holes in my "queer-hating belief-system"? All you've given me is rhetoric and repetition. Care to mix it up a bit?
Modifié par ReconTeam, 21 juillet 2011 - 04:12 .
Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut
