Modifié par Stormrider 15, 20 juillet 2011 - 01:31 .
"Cerberus Effect" - The plot device that got out of hand?
#226
Posté 20 juillet 2011 - 01:28
#227
Posté 20 juillet 2011 - 01:29
Modifié par Stormrider 15, 20 juillet 2011 - 01:31 .
#228
Posté 20 juillet 2011 - 02:40
Bad King wrote...
Phaedon wrote...
Absolutely not.
Cerberus was being set up as the villain in both of the previous games. Especially ME2 where we discover the role of TIM. We need a human enemy to sort of, "connect" to, you know, an easy one to hate. It's pretty hard to do that with sentient starships.
TIM will take a similar role that Saren took in ME1, and well, I think that TIM is infinitely more deep than Saren was. I couldn't think of a better antagonist.
Mass Effect 2 left a completely different impression on me. I saw Cerberus as allies who were morally questionable and who you could never fully trust- to me there was almost nothing to imply that Cerberus were going to be antagonists in ME3 (apart from Kaidan/Ashley's silly theory that Cerberus were behind the colony attacks and TIM's evil smile).
I have a feeling that Cerberus being antagonists in ME3 wasn't planned until after ME2 was released (mainly as a means to gain a new enemy other than just husks).
Bioware said that they already had made the whole story even before the first book came out. It might seem that bioware is throwing us crap left and right just to make a story but they have had this planned a long time ago. They know what there doing, it does how ever mean that there will be small changes here and there but as far as the main plot there will be little or no change at all.
#229
Posté 20 juillet 2011 - 06:04
#230
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Posté 20 juillet 2011 - 06:21
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
KevShep wrote...
Bioware said that they already had made the whole story even before the first book came out.
They're full of ****.
#231
Posté 20 juillet 2011 - 06:43
#232
Posté 20 juillet 2011 - 06:44
ME1: Introduce Reapers.DukeOfNukes wrote...
I think there was an outline before the first book came out...
ME2: Stuff...
ME3: Defeat Reapers
From what I remember the Pope was b*tching about what the salarians did to the krogans during the krogan rebellions.Mesina2 wrote...
Someone explained killing of pope?
I'm pretty sure I would remember that.
This was hurting relations between humanity and the salarians so Cerberus assassinated him to shut him up.
Seems reasonable to me.
#233
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Posté 20 juillet 2011 - 06:44
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Mr. Gogeta34 wrote...
The general story was planned out... but not all of the details and variables.
Yeah, the general story is this: Shepard stops the Reapers.
#234
Posté 20 juillet 2011 - 06:48
Saphra Deden wrote...
Mr. Gogeta34 wrote...
The general story was planned out... but not all of the details and variables.
Yeah, the general story is this: Shepard stops the Reapers.
You're oversimplefying it. There we're probably more variable such as Cerberus involvement throughout the series, quarian-geth relations, humanity's upcoming role in the galaxy after the Reaper attack as paragon or renegade.
#235
Posté 20 juillet 2011 - 06:48
GodWood wrote...
ME1: Introduce Reapers.DukeOfNukes wrote...
I think there was an outline before the first book came out...
ME2: Stuff...
ME3: Defeat ReapersFrom what I remember the Pope was b*tching about what the salarians did to the krogans during the krogan rebellions.Mesina2 wrote...
Someone explained killing of pope?
I'm pretty sure I would remember that.
This was hurting relations between humanity and the salarians so Cerberus assassinated him to shut him up.
Seems reasonable to me.
That's what makes Cerberus awesome, even the freakin pope is not above getting whacked over endangering human interests.
#236
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Posté 20 juillet 2011 - 06:52
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
pablodurando wrote...
There we're probably more variable such as Cerberus involvement throughout the series
No, I guarantee you they had no plans for Cerberus. If they'd been planning for Cerberus to play a large role they'd have been given more attention and development in ME1.
The Collectors are clearly something they pulled out of their ass as well as the "Reapers are organic constructs".
Modifié par Saphra Deden, 20 juillet 2011 - 06:52 .
#237
Posté 20 juillet 2011 - 06:52
#238
Posté 20 juillet 2011 - 06:56
Mr. Gogeta34 wrote...
ME2 didn't really focus on any positives that Cerberus may have done (or positive aspects to the results of their actions)... so ME2 always did have the feel of 'working with an enemy to stop a greater enemy.'
There was some minor focus on their positives like the mission complete reports that said Cerberus was providing aid to the Horizon colony and helping the relief effort of the survivors of the Hugo Gernsback. Then there were things like Project Overlord which besides the whole David issue had a noble objective of trying to avert war with the Geth.
#239
Posté 20 juillet 2011 - 06:57
F--k yeah, 'berus!
#240
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Posté 20 juillet 2011 - 07:01
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Seboist wrote...
Mr. Gogeta34 wrote...
ME2 didn't really focus on any positives that Cerberus may have done (or positive aspects to the results of their actions)... so ME2 always did have the feel of 'working with an enemy to stop a greater enemy.'
There was some minor focus on their positives like the mission complete reports that said Cerberus was providing aid to the Horizon colony and helping the relief effort of the survivors of the Hugo Gernsback. Then there were things like Project Overlord which besides the whole David issue had a noble objective of trying to avert war with the Geth.
There's also the references to Mass Effect: Galaxy and... wait for it.... THE ENTIRE MAIN PLOT OF THE DAMN GAME!
#241
Posté 20 juillet 2011 - 07:02
Saphra Deden wrote...
pablodurando wrote...
There we're probably more variable such as Cerberus involvement throughout the series
No, I guarantee you they had no plans for Cerberus. If they'd been planning for Cerberus to play a large role they'd have been given more attention and development in ME1.
The Collectors are clearly something they pulled out of their ass as well as the "Reapers are organic constructs".
Whoa, I didn't know you were a writer or developer for Mass Effect.
My opinion is against the norm, but I thought they introduced Cerberus quite well in me1. That organization that somehow keeps popping up and is involved in several different topics. Really paints a portrait of mystique for me.
The collecters, meh.
Modifié par pablodurando, 20 juillet 2011 - 07:02 .
#242
Posté 20 juillet 2011 - 07:12
Saphra Deden wrote...
Seboist wrote...
Mr. Gogeta34 wrote...
ME2 didn't really focus on any positives that Cerberus may have done (or positive aspects to the results of their actions)... so ME2 always did have the feel of 'working with an enemy to stop a greater enemy.'
There was some minor focus on their positives like the mission complete reports that said Cerberus was providing aid to the Horizon colony and helping the relief effort of the survivors of the Hugo Gernsback. Then there were things like Project Overlord which besides the whole David issue had a noble objective of trying to avert war with the Geth.
There's also the references to Mass Effect: Galaxy and... wait for it.... THE ENTIRE MAIN PLOT OF THE DAMN GAME!
Yeah that too.
#243
Posté 20 juillet 2011 - 07:13
Massadonious1 wrote...
Political assinations? Awesome!
F--k yeah, 'berus!
You do realize Shepard was/is part of a galactic secret police force that puts the gestapo and stasi to shame, no?
#244
Posté 20 juillet 2011 - 07:15
I don't recall ever being given the option to "silence" someone, mafia style, however.
#245
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Posté 20 juillet 2011 - 07:15
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
pablodurando wrote...
Whoa, I didn't know you were a writer or developer for Mass Effect.
I'm not, I just have a lot of common sense and an analytical mind.
The Mass Effect series has been too sloppy to have been planned out ahead of time.
I do think Cerberus was introduced well in ME1... without considering ME2. However once we factor in ME2 Cerberus' role in ME1 is way too small.
If Bioware had planned all along that they'd play a big role and we'd have eto work for them they'd have made sure Cerberus had a more prominent role in the firs game as well. That way the whole "working for the enemy aspect" would have a bigger impact. Instead Cerberus was an enemy in ME1, sure, but they weren't a main adversary after us or who stood in our way on our mission to stop Saren. They were a side diversion that we had to pursue.
It wouldn't have been hard either. Cerberus is already linked to Binary-Helix and ExoGeni, so with a few small rewrites they could be antagonists in at least two of the main missions in ME1.
I mean, imagine it like this: instead of asari commandoes Benezia shows up with Cerberus commandoes or maybe Cerberus are providing the scientists and security personnel for Peak 15. On Feros it could be similar, maybe with Ethan Jeong being a Cerberus operative. Perhaps things could come to a head on Virmire where we find Cerberus scientists and personnel in the base...
(and at a few points in the game we should at least have the Illusive Man name-dropped)
Then in ME2 we can find out how after Virmire and the Battle of the Citadel TIM learned the truth about what Saren was doing and so now they're no our side.
#246
Posté 20 juillet 2011 - 07:17
Massadonious1 wrote...
Of course I do.
I don't recall ever being given the option to "silence" someone, mafia style, however.
http://masseffect.wi...The_Negotiation
http://masseffect.wi...ostile_Takeover
http://masseffect.wi...UNC:_Major_Kyle
Modifié par Seboist, 20 juillet 2011 - 07:19 .
#247
Posté 20 juillet 2011 - 07:26
2. The situation seems a little different. From reading the wiki, it seems like you were sent to kill him anyway, and the "Pope" seems a little far removed from being an arrogant jackass like Darius.
It's like dropping bombs on protesters because they don't approve of the war effort. But hey, as long as "humanities" interests are served, right?
#248
Posté 20 juillet 2011 - 07:32
Massadonious1 wrote...
1. Never obtained the proper amount of Renegade points to ever do that mission.
2. The situation seems a little different. From reading the wiki, it seems like you were sent to kill him anyway, and the "Pope" seems a little far removed from being an arrogant jackass like Darius.
It's like dropping bombs on protesters because they don't approve of the war effort. But hey, as long as "humanities" interests are served, right?
When billions of human lives are in the balance against major alien powers that can put humanity on it's knees then yes an uppity pope mouthing off against an potential ally must be "dealt with".
#249
Posté 20 juillet 2011 - 08:19
Seboist wrote...
Mr. Gogeta34 wrote...
ME2 didn't really focus on any positives that Cerberus may have done (or positive aspects to the results of their actions)... so ME2 always did have the feel of 'working with an enemy to stop a greater enemy.'
There was some minor focus on their positives like the mission complete reports that said Cerberus was providing aid to the Horizon colony and helping the relief effort of the survivors of the Hugo Gernsback. Then there were things like Project Overlord which besides the whole David issue had a noble objective of trying to avert war with the Geth.
Seems like they touched on it in a text most people skip over or avoid reading. They could've presented this in the main narrative... show that Cerberus does actually help people from time to time instead of building a reputation of always having something go wrong and nothing right.
#250
Posté 20 juillet 2011 - 09:09
Saphra Deden wrote...
pablodurando wrote...
Whoa, I didn't know you were a writer or developer for Mass Effect.
I'm not, I just have a lot of common sense and an analytical mind.





Retour en haut




