Confess-A-Bear wrote...
Meh I liked three a good deal.
FINALLY someone here that also liked Fallout 3.
I don't think 3's story was bad, either. New Vegas was better quality in dialogue and depth w/ C&C, but I liked the main story of FO3 better.
Things like that Bible passage being the premise of the main conflict. The final code to activate PP being the number of that passage. Your character's birthday being a reference to another Bible passage in Revelations that echoes of nuclear war. The whole Jesus role your character had going on. The irony in the concept of Megaton and the Lincoln Memorial being controlled by slavers. THAT was good stuff.
Also the radio and Three-Dog were better. If I have to hear "Johnny Guitar" again I'm going burn an elementary school down.
I actually vastly prefered the Mojave's design to the Capital Wasteland.
I didn't. A lot of the Mojave was railroaded with cliffs and invisible walls. Confusing interiors were an issue in many places. Navigating to and even inside the strip was incredibly frustrating without fast-travel locations in it. An entire segment of the east side of the map was cut off from you. Towns outside of the strip and Jacobstown were much less distinctive. And the vast majority of the Mojave was just an orange-tinted Capital Wasteland.
gameplay mechanics are far better.
Care to elaborate on this? The gameplay in NV was pretty much more of the same of FO3 with new weapons and perks. Ironsights were a huge plus, though. But really the gameplay being a little better wouldn't be that much of a surprise because Obsidian was using Bethesda's established systems and template. It can only get better from there and Obsidian didn't really do anything impressive with it.
Modifié par Blacklash93, 09 juin 2012 - 10:56 .