Is the main/side quests more enjoyable compared to 3?
Tough to say. For me, 3 adds up to a more satisfying whole even though some of the parts are pretty ho-hum, mainly because I found it easier to get into character as the Lone Wanderer and the environment feels more post-apocalyptic. If you gave each quest a "grade," however, the average grade for NV would probably be higher than for 3.
Is the writing and VA better?
Writing, yes, though see above. I don't have a particularly good ear for VA quality.
Are there more likable and/or memorable characters compared to 3?
Yes, the NPCs are a definite strong point for NV.
Is NV more "emotional" than 3?
I'd say no, though again this has more to do with being able to roleplay the LW in pretty much exactly the way I wanted than with my reactions to other characters. The Courier ends up being nosier and more ruthless than I'd have preferred in order to make the game progress.
Are the graphics less bland than 3?
Not really - it's pretty much the same style for both games.
Is the music better?
I don't especially like the music on the radio in either game, though there's one song in NV that I like ("Texas Red," I think?). For atmospheric background music, I prefer 3 - it had that lonely, desolate feel that isn't as prevalent in NV.
Are there more "WTF" moments?
If you mean wackiness, probably, especially if you use the "Wild Wasteland" perk or do the Old World Blues DLC. If you mean surprise or bewilderment, not necessarily. Again, it partly comes down to your role-playing style - the Courier isn't a complete newcomer the way the Lone Wanderer is.





Retour en haut







