JediMaster_Murph wrote...
wow my bad, i legitley mistaked you for the pwener, many apologies:blink:
Im over her.... bro.
JediMaster_Murph wrote...
wow my bad, i legitley mistaked you for the pwener, many apologies:blink:
Biotic Sage wrote...
VolusvsReaper wrote...
GodWood wrote...
Movie is going to fail
Only thing that made sense in this thread.
Probably, but you can't make an omelet without cracking a few eggs first...let's just hope that this turns out to be the omelet and not another cracked egg in a LONG list of cracked eggs, most recently being Prince of Persia.
I'd rather them try and fail than not try; if it sucks, I'll just pretend it doesn't exist like I do with the second two Matrix films.
Aris Ravenstar wrote...
I love when people go "They made The Dark Knight!" as opposed to, say, "They made Superman Returns / Lady In The Water / 10,000 BC / Jonah Hex!""First, EA/Bioware is not making this movie. They never were, and never will. They are a video game production company, not a film studio. LEGENDARY PICTURES has the movie rights to Mass Effect. They are the same company that produced The Dark Knight, Inception, 300, and many more. ..."
the playthrough in a nutshell partMassadonious1 wrote...
JediMaster_Murph wrote...
Massadonious1 wrote...
It wouldn't take away from my experience. This is Legendary's/Avi Arad's/director's playthrough in a nutshell.
And I'm willing to wager that a good 80-90% of the people who will end up seeing this movie will have no idea what the ME universe is about aside from the information they can glean off a quick Google search.
This production became less about us the second BioWare partnered with a major movie studio.
Well gee, thanks for that.
And which is just my opinion, man?
I'm pretty sure it's not the last part because I would think they have every intention of trying to turn this in to a profitiable movie franchise. Unless I have the whole notion of captialism wrong.
JediMaster_Murph wrote...
wow my bad, i legitley mistaked you for the pwener, many apologies:blink:chester013 wrote...
JediMaster_Murph wrote...
bro, from the very beginning i stated i was going to see this movie, im just sayin it might not be the best to have it about shepards story in me1because for some people not everyone(littlezack) it will take away from the experiencechester013 wrote...
Felt the need to post this from the IMDB boards, written by SupR G over there:
"First, EA/Bioware is not making this movie. They never were, and never will. They are a video game production company, not a film studio. LEGENDARY PICTURES has the movie rights to Mass Effect. They are the same company that produced The Dark Knight, Inception, 300, and many more. Ray Muzyka, Greg Zeschuck and Casey Hudson of EA/Bioware are credited as 'executive' producers, and will have a say in some pre-production aspects (story, script), but ultimately it falls on Legendary and their chosen Director. So enough whining and crying about "Bioware needs to do this, and that" because you are barking up the wrong tree.
Second, they are not making this movie just for you die-hard fans. Get over it, and get over yourselves. Many of you feel that as fans of the game, you are entitled to something and that all your wants and needs must be answered. A true fan knows that this is a great action-adventure story, rivaling that of Star Wars, and should be shared with the rest of the world. You might think that you are their primary market, and you would be wrong. The actual gamers probably make up less then 10% of the potential film goers. Hell, DOOM had a bigger market, and look how that film turned out. "
I think that sums things up nicely, thanks SupR G
This wasn't aimed at anyone in particular, else I would have quoted an ongoing discussion within this thread.
And don't call be bro, guy.
Aris Ravenstar wrote...
I love when people go "They made The Dark Knight!" as opposed to, say, "They made Superman Returns / Lady In The Water / 10,000 BC / Jonah Hex!""First, EA/Bioware is not making this movie. They never were, and never will. They are a video game production company, not a film studio. LEGENDARY PICTURES has the movie rights to Mass Effect. They are the same company that produced The Dark Knight, Inception, 300, and many more. ..."
Rockworm503 wrote...
Biotic Sage wrote...
ThanesSniper wrote...
masseffectfan00 wrote...
It's not about you guys, it's about the hundreds of millions of people havent played ME series
Well if they see it and like it, why would they buy the game if they already know what happens?
Why whould they buy the game if they don't see a ME movie if they haven't by now? I don't know about you, but if I saw a kickass movie and learned there was a game for it that let you make choices based in that universe, I would be pretty down for it.
Plus, what about people who don't play video games like Mass Effect? (i.e. the vast majority of the people in the world)
Yeah the majority doesn't get to go see a kick ass movie every weekend. There are hardly ever enough action movies these days. So lets take our beloved Mass Effect and hollywoodize it. I heard Micheal Bay is free. Anyone interested in Shia Labouf playing shepard? YEA you might be excited for this but the very concept is a slap in the face to everyone who plays the game whether you realize it or not.
a true fan has the balls to criticize what he is a fan ofThePwener wrote...
Rockworm503 wrote...
I'm having a hard time thanking anyone for the fact that the movie is being made at all.
Oh boy its ME1 where it will be played by some action start that wont resemble any of my shepards..... Only way I would've watched this is if they stayed away from the games but I guess that was too much to ask for to.
Im actually glad it's about the trilogy and not about the First Contact War. Im very curious to see what form it will take. I don't care if the characters don't look alike or that the narrative is off. It's ME people, forget about the damn canon and just be happy with it.
Some "fans" are so irritating.
JediMaster_Murph wrote...
the playthrough in a nutshell part
littlezack wrote...
Rockworm503 wrote...
Biotic Sage wrote...
ThanesSniper wrote...
masseffectfan00 wrote...
It's not about you guys, it's about the hundreds of millions of people havent played ME series
Well if they see it and like it, why would they buy the game if they already know what happens?
Why whould they buy the game if they don't see a ME movie if they haven't by now? I don't know about you, but if I saw a kickass movie and learned there was a game for it that let you make choices based in that universe, I would be pretty down for it.
Plus, what about people who don't play video games like Mass Effect? (i.e. the vast majority of the people in the world)
Yeah the majority doesn't get to go see a kick ass movie every weekend. There are hardly ever enough action movies these days. So lets take our beloved Mass Effect and hollywoodize it. I heard Micheal Bay is free. Anyone interested in Shia Labouf playing shepard? YEA you might be excited for this but the very concept is a slap in the face to everyone who plays the game whether you realize it or not.
Because Hollywood doesn't make anything good, right? Only Michael Bay and Shia Lebouf are in movies.
Massadonious1 wrote...
Aris Ravenstar wrote...
I love when people go "They made The Dark Knight!" as opposed to, say, "They made Superman Returns / Lady In The Water / 10,000 BC / Jonah Hex!""First, EA/Bioware is not making this movie. They never were, and never will. They are a video game production company, not a film studio. LEGENDARY PICTURES has the movie rights to Mass Effect. They are the same company that produced The Dark Knight, Inception, 300, and many more. ..."
Not every movie can end up profitable/crticially accliamed, but that doesn't mean that's not their goal from the outset.
10,000 BC actually netted them a $100+ million dollar profit based on worldwide sales. I would think most movie studios would take that any day.
i never said it was irrational, i just dont agreeMassadonious1 wrote...
JediMaster_Murph wrote...
the playthrough in a nutshell part
Well, maybe so, but I certainly don't think it's an irrational one.
If they used one of your playthroughs for the movie, I would think exactly the same thing.
That's what I think too.InkognitoY wrote...
My only issue that the movie will only improve the story visually. Every other department will be lacking, especially since they can't fit everything plot wise in ME1 into a movie.
I'm talking about quality, not profitability. Basically I'm saying that bringing up TDK is not reassuring that the movie won't be terrible. A movie needs more than a good production company behind it to be good.Massadonious1 wrote...
Not every movie can end up profitable/crticially accliamed, but that doesn't mean that's not their goal from the outset.
10,000 BC actually netted them a $100+ million dollar profit based on worldwide sales. I would think most movie studios would take that any day.
Modifié par Aris Ravenstar, 04 août 2011 - 05:53 .
Rockworm503 wrote...
littlezack wrote...
Rockworm503 wrote...
Biotic Sage wrote...
ThanesSniper wrote...
masseffectfan00 wrote...
It's not about you guys, it's about the hundreds of millions of people havent played ME series
Well if they see it and like it, why would they buy the game if they already know what happens?
Why whould they buy the game if they don't see a ME movie if they haven't by now? I don't know about you, but if I saw a kickass movie and learned there was a game for it that let you make choices based in that universe, I would be pretty down for it.
Plus, what about people who don't play video games like Mass Effect? (i.e. the vast majority of the people in the world)
Yeah the majority doesn't get to go see a kick ass movie every weekend. There are hardly ever enough action movies these days. So lets take our beloved Mass Effect and hollywoodize it. I heard Micheal Bay is free. Anyone interested in Shia Labouf playing shepard? YEA you might be excited for this but the very concept is a slap in the face to everyone who plays the game whether you realize it or not.
Because Hollywood doesn't make anything good, right? Only Michael Bay and Shia Lebouf are in movies.
Rarely has hollywood made anything good from video games... Good job missing my point.
Modifié par Massadonious1, 04 août 2011 - 05:55 .
Xarathox wrote...
The only 2 video game movies I thought were good to watch was Hitman and Max Payne.
Neither followed the video games to the letter. Hitman was more action-ey than the games were and Max Payne barely followed the plot of the original game, but when viewed from the outside both stood on their own merits.
littlezack wrote...
Rockworm503 wrote...
littlezack wrote...
Rockworm503 wrote...
Biotic Sage wrote...
ThanesSniper wrote...
masseffectfan00 wrote...
It's not about you guys, it's about the hundreds of millions of people havent played ME series
Well if they see it and like it, why would they buy the game if they already know what happens?
Why whould they buy the game if they don't see a ME movie if they haven't by now? I don't know about you, but if I saw a kickass movie and learned there was a game for it that let you make choices based in that universe, I would be pretty down for it.
Plus, what about people who don't play video games like Mass Effect? (i.e. the vast majority of the people in the world)
Yeah the majority doesn't get to go see a kick ass movie every weekend. There are hardly ever enough action movies these days. So lets take our beloved Mass Effect and hollywoodize it. I heard Micheal Bay is free. Anyone interested in Shia Labouf playing shepard? YEA you might be excited for this but the very concept is a slap in the face to everyone who plays the game whether you realize it or not.
Because Hollywood doesn't make anything good, right? Only Michael Bay and Shia Lebouf are in movies.
Rarely has hollywood made anything good from video games... Good job missing my point.
You didn't have a point.
Aris Ravenstar wrote...
Avi Arad is the one who shoe-horned Venom into the third Spider-Man movie and then kept trying to get him a spin-off franchise where he'd be a hero, right? Gah.
Aris Ravenstar wrote...
Avi Arad is the one who shoe-horned Venom into the third Spider-Man movie and then kept trying to get him a spin-off franchise where he'd be a hero, right? Gah.
It didn't. On a $105 million budget and $270 million gross, it made them perhaps about $50-$70 million. You forget that theatres take about 50% of the ticket price. With international gross, the studio's share is even smaller due to distributors' share. 10,000 BC didn't flop and the studio didn't lose money, but it wasn't a stellar success.Massadonious1 wrote...
10,000 BC actually netted them a $100+ million dollar profit based on worldwide sales. I would think most movie studios would take that any day.
Rockworm503 wrote...
Just because you chose to ignore it doesn't mean I don't have one.
Modifié par ThePwener, 04 août 2011 - 05:58 .
Rockworm503 wrote...
Just because you chose to ignore it doesn't mean I don't have one.