Aller au contenu

Photo

Why is the Alliance helping to evacuate earth?


863 réponses à ce sujet

#301
Guest_Saphra Deden_*

Guest_Saphra Deden_*
  • Guests

Candidate 88766 wrote...

Firstly, try and keep it civil.


Use your brain and it will be civil.

Candiate 88766 wrote...

Secondly, the only chance of saving people is while the Reapers are still arriving and being resisted by the fleets.


No, we will save them when we return and kick the Reapers off the planet.

#302
Guest_Saphra Deden_*

Guest_Saphra Deden_*
  • Guests

Candidate 88766 wrote...

The Alliance doesn't know that. As far as they're concerned an overwhelming hostile force has arrived on Earth and is killing everyone.


They've got Shepard, Hackett, and Cerberus telling them what the Reapers want.

If they're eradicating us on sight there's nothing we can do anyway.

Nothing changes. My strategy is still the best one.

Keep your forces intact, retreat, and formulate a plan to take back your planet. Time is of the essence so we can't afford to wait around.

#303
Candidate 88766

Candidate 88766
  • Members
  • 3 422 messages

Saphra Deden wrote...

Candidate 88766 wrote...

Firstly, try and keep it civil.


Use your brain and it will be civil.

Candiate 88766 wrote...

Secondly, the only chance of saving people is while the Reapers are still arriving and being resisted by the fleets.


No, we will save them when we return and kick the Reapers off the planet.


You missed the point of my second, er, point: if the Reapers are given more time on Earth then they have time to fortify their position as it were. That will put the Alliance at a massive disadvantage if they mount a counter-attack; their only chance of saving people is while they still have at least some kind of foothold on Earth, which is during the very early stages.

You also missed my third point - how does the Alliance know there'll be anyone left to save by the time they mount a rescue?

#304
Zulu_DFA

Zulu_DFA
  • Members
  • 8 217 messages

Arijharn wrote...

Zulu_DFA wrote...

Arijharn wrote...

Humanity's trial.

Makes no sense.

Nothing about Arrival does though...

Of course it does (humanity's trial I mean).

Shephard is the political scapegoat here, but it's trailed on Earth because Batarian's apparently have the capability to effectively wage war on humanity (judging by the fact that they are highly industrialised and that they otherwise have no Council related 'responsibilities', i.e., no treaty of farixen to worry about). It's probably going to be less about Shephard than how the other races perceive how humanity goes about handling it's business.

To me it seems that if there is a batarian delegation, it will demand blood (meaning Shephard's), if the trial otherwise would declare Shephard as otherwise cleared of all charges, then the Batarians will see it as proof that humanity is 'corrupt' and wage war. If the court otherwise declares Shephard guilty, then the Batarians will still win because Shephard is the first human Spectre, thus he's a symbol etc, etc. If a Spectre is found at fault, then a whole new slew of headaches for the Council would threaten to open up (because Saren was still handled 'in house').

It's a question whether Humanity has the necessary intellectual maturity to take centre stage of interstellar politics in other words.

In the beginning of Arrival Hackett tells you it's a black op, and that the Alliance wants to avoid any responsibility.

In the end, with all the evidence and the crime scene itself obliterated, the Alliance suddenly wants to take the responsibility.

Sorry, but that makes no sense.

Modifié par Zulu_DFA, 24 juillet 2011 - 01:04 .


#305
Candidate 88766

Candidate 88766
  • Members
  • 3 422 messages

Saphra Deden wrote...

Candidate 88766 wrote...

The Alliance doesn't know that. As far as they're concerned an overwhelming hostile force has arrived on Earth and is killing everyone.


They've got Shepard, Hackett, and Cerberus telling them what the Reapers want.

If they're eradicating us on sight there's nothing we can do anyway.

Nothing changes. My strategy is still the best one.

Keep your forces intact, retreat, and formulate a plan to take back your planet. Time is of the essence so we can't afford to wait around.

None of them know what the Reapers want with humanity. Even we, the gamers, don't actually know. We guess they want to harvest them, but since the loss of the Collector Base the Reapers may have decided a Human Reaper isn't worth the effort and are instead just going to wipe out humanity.

Also, if 'time is of the essence' then why wait around to save the people? Why not save them when you're already on Earth? You just contradicted yourself hugely.

#306
Candidate 88766

Candidate 88766
  • Members
  • 3 422 messages

Zulu_DFA wrote...

In the beginning of Arrival Hackett tells you it's a black op, and that the Alliance wants to avoid any responsibility.

Exactly. Being tried on Arcturus, an Alliance ship, would imply that the Alliance is involved and is taking responsibilty. If they hold it on Earth in a non-Alliance court it gives the impression that Shepard's actions had nothing whatsoever to do with the Alliance.

#307
Fixers0

Fixers0
  • Members
  • 4 434 messages

Candidate 88766 wrote...

Zulu_DFA wrote...

In the beginning of Arrival Hackett tells you it's a black op, and that the Alliance wants to avoid any responsibility.

Exactly. Being tried on Arcturus, an Alliance ship, would imply that the Alliance is involved and is taking responsibilty. If they hold it on Earth in a non-Alliance court it gives the impression that Shepard's actions had nothing whatsoever to do with the Alliance.


Tell that again when there is a big Alliance symbol in the court room.

Modifié par Fixers0, 24 juillet 2011 - 12:59 .


#308
LOLandStuff

LOLandStuff
  • Members
  • 3 107 messages

Saphra Deden wrote...

Candidate 88766 wrote...

The Alliance doesn't know that. As far as they're concerned an overwhelming hostile force has arrived on Earth and is killing everyone.


They've got Shepard, Hackett, and Cerberus telling them what the Reapers want.

If they're eradicating us on sight there's nothing we can do anyway.

Nothing changes. My strategy is still the best one.

Keep your forces intact, retreat, and formulate a plan to take back your planet. Time is of the essence so we can't afford to wait around.


Yes, they'll broadcast through the entire planet how the Reapers just want to farm everyone and not just kill them, so there's no point to panic.They should get back to their homes and wait. Really, running through the streets just makes you an easier target. Just like picking flowers.

 Your strategy is lulzy.

#309
Candidate 88766

Candidate 88766
  • Members
  • 3 422 messages

Fixers0 wrote...

Candidate 88766 wrote...

Zulu_DFA wrote...

In the beginning of Arrival Hackett tells you it's a black op, and that the Alliance wants to avoid any responsibility.

Exactly. Being tried on Arcturus, an Alliance ship, would imply that the Alliance is involved and is taking responsibilty. If they hold it on Earth in a non-Alliance court it gives the impression that Shepard's actions had nothing whatsoever to do with the Alliance.


Tell that again when there is a big Alliance symbol in the court room.

Yeah there probably will be won't there <_<. Meh, doesn't bother me too much either way.

#310
Zulu_DFA

Zulu_DFA
  • Members
  • 8 217 messages

Saphra Deden wrote...

That said, the most populous and developed planet in Alliance space is not "a money sink". It is the complete opposite. They give you money by buying up all that crap you dig out of the ground out in the colonies.

Where do they get those money from?
Who gives money to the geth?


Saphra Deden wrote...

It absurd to think that the Earth is a parasite not worth defending when it is the entire reason the Alliance exists in the first place and the single human world with the biggest economy.

The Alliance exists because it wants to.


ReconTeam wrote...

Seems like a complete waste of effort to evacuate the planet. In fact, I would suggest that everybody with a private ship on earth start flying around to give the reapers too many targets to shoot at, possibly allowing some warships to get lucky.

This.

The problem is not exactly that there are Alliance craft of Earth. They should be there, especially around Shepard on trial.

The problem is the total lack of private vehicles, National Guard gunships, Cord-Hislop corporate shuttles, etc. in the picture.


Phaedon wrote...

Kodiak shuttles have FTL capability

No, they don't.

BioWare has been too lazy and greedy to do it properly.

#311
LOLandStuff

LOLandStuff
  • Members
  • 3 107 messages

Candidate 88766 wrote...

You also missed my third point - how does the Alliance know there'll be anyone left to save by the time they mount a rescue?


There'll be a resistance hidding underground, waiting for the perfect moment to strike back at the enemy.

#312
Candidate 88766

Candidate 88766
  • Members
  • 3 422 messages

Zulu_DFA wrote...

Phaedon wrote...

Kodiak shuttles have FTL capability

No, they don't.

BioWare has been too lazy and greedy to do it properly.

Yes it does. You literally see the shuttle jump to FTL speeds in the game. It happens on the screen in front of you whilst playing the game.

#313
Candidate 88766

Candidate 88766
  • Members
  • 3 422 messages

LOLandStuff wrote...

Candidate 88766 wrote...

You also missed my third point - how does the Alliance know there'll be anyone left to save by the time they mount a rescue?


There'll be a resistance hidding underground, waiting for the perfect moment to strike back at the enemy.

There may well be, but the Alliance can't assume that. The Reapers are so powerful that they bypass Earth's defences in minutes. for all the Alliance knows, there will be no life left on Earth by the end of the first week.

#314
LOLandStuff

LOLandStuff
  • Members
  • 3 107 messages

Candidate 88766 wrote...

LOLandStuff wrote...

Candidate 88766 wrote...

You also missed my third point - how does the Alliance know there'll be anyone left to save by the time they mount a rescue?


There'll be a resistance hidding underground, waiting for the perfect moment to strike back at the enemy.

There may well be, but the Alliance can't assume that. The Reapers are so powerful that they bypass Earth's defences in minutes. for all the Alliance knows, there will be no life left on Earth by the end of the first week.


I was being sarcastic. Just following the cliche where everyone gets cramped in a bunker and living like bums.

#315
Zulu_DFA

Zulu_DFA
  • Members
  • 8 217 messages

Candidate 88766 wrote...

Zulu_DFA wrote...

Phaedon wrote...

Kodiak shuttles have FTL capability

No, they don't.

BioWare has been too lazy and greedy to do it properly.

Yes it does. You literally see the shuttle jump to FTL speeds in the game. It happens on the screen in front of you whilst playing the game.


No it doesn't.

BioWare cut this corner, it's obvious to anyone but a fanboy.

It's like the boobs in space, really.

#316
Candidate 88766

Candidate 88766
  • Members
  • 3 422 messages

Zulu_DFA wrote...

Candidate 88766 wrote...

Zulu_DFA wrote...

Phaedon wrote...

Kodiak shuttles have FTL capability

No, they don't.

BioWare has been too lazy and greedy to do it properly.

Yes it does. You literally see the shuttle jump to FTL speeds in the game. It happens on the screen in front of you whilst playing the game.


No it doesn't.

BioWare cut this corner, it's obvious to anyone but a fanboy.

It's like the boobs in space, really.

Obvious answer: the toy model was misnamed. The Kodiak Shuttle in ME2 is the one that is used in the game to ferry Shepard around, and we see that do FTL speeds.

Its not cutting a corner, they just had several designs for the Kodiak Shuttle and decided on the one we see in the game. 

#317
Zulu_DFA

Zulu_DFA
  • Members
  • 8 217 messages

Candidate 88766 wrote...

LOLandStuff wrote...

Candidate 88766 wrote...

You also missed my third point - how does the Alliance know there'll be anyone left to save by the time they mount a rescue?

There'll be a resistance hidding underground, waiting for the perfect moment to strike back at the enemy. 

There may well be, but the Alliance can't assume that. The Reapers are so powerful that they bypass Earth's defences in minutes. for all the Alliance knows, there will be no life left on Earth by the end of the first week.

Yes, and the Alliance can evacuate maybe 0.1% of Earth's population. At the expense of all of it's logistical capabilities.

#318
Candidate 88766

Candidate 88766
  • Members
  • 3 422 messages

Zulu_DFA wrote...

Candidate 88766 wrote...

LOLandStuff wrote...

Candidate 88766 wrote...

You also missed my third point - how does the Alliance know there'll be anyone left to save by the time they mount a rescue?

There'll be a resistance hidding underground, waiting for the perfect moment to strike back at the enemy. 

There may well be, but the Alliance can't assume that. The Reapers are so powerful that they bypass Earth's defences in minutes. for all the Alliance knows, there will be no life left on Earth by the end of the first week.

Yes, and the Alliance can evacuate maybe 0.1% of Earth's population. At the expense of all of it's logistical capabilities.

If the Alliance is fleeing Earth anyway then why shouldn't they at least try to take some people with them?

#319
Someone With Mass

Someone With Mass
  • Members
  • 38 560 messages

Saphra Deden wrote...

They've got Shepard, Hackett, and Cerberus telling them what the Reapers want.

If they're eradicating us on sight there's nothing we can do anyway.

Nothing changes. My strategy is still the best one.

Keep your forces intact, retreat, and formulate a plan to take back your planet. Time is of the essence so we can't afford to wait around.


Shepard and Cerberus? The Alliance have no reason to listen to them, because they're branded traitors.

Especially Shepard.

#320
Someone With Mass

Someone With Mass
  • Members
  • 38 560 messages

Zulu_DFA wrote...

No it doesn't.

BioWare cut this corner, it's obvious to anyone but a fanboy.

It's like the boobs in space, really.


You are so dense...

It has a element zero core. Guess what it does, idiot.

But you're going on about how much a butthurt trolltard you are because BioWare is not making the game according to your utterly retarded assumptions.

Do the whole world a favor and delete your account and rid this forum of your stupidity.

Modifié par Someone With Mass, 24 juillet 2011 - 01:21 .


#321
Zulu_DFA

Zulu_DFA
  • Members
  • 8 217 messages

Candidate 88766 wrote...

Zulu_DFA wrote...

Candidate 88766 wrote...

Zulu_DFA wrote...

Phaedon wrote...

Kodiak shuttles have FTL capability

No, they don't.

BioWare has been too lazy and greedy to do it properly.

Yes it does. You literally see the shuttle jump to FTL speeds in the game. It happens on the screen in front of you whilst playing the game.


No it doesn't.

BioWare cut this corner, it's obvious to anyone but a fanboy.

It's like the boobs in space, really.

Obvious answer: the toy model was misnamed. The Kodiak Shuttle in ME2 is the one that is used in the game to ferry Shepard around,

The obvious answer is in the Codex for the Kodiak: it's a "drop shutle". It's a Higgins' boat of the future.



Candidate 88766 wrote...



and we see that do FTL speeds.

We see BioWare blatantly cutting this corner and putting the Kodiak where the real shuttle should have been. Because BioWare didn't wan't to spend time and resources on a fully scaled and rendered model which would be used in just a couple of short cuscenes. Who can blame BioWare though, if the fanboys are ready to eat anything they are given?



Candidate 88766 wrote...

Its not cutting a corner, they just had several designs for the Kodiak Shuttle and decided on the one we see in the game. 

Please cite one single in-game source confirming that the Kodiak has the FTL capability.

Little hint: cutscenes don't count. They are too full of anti-lore crap (like no twin for the Omega-4 relay on the C-Base side, etc.).

Modifié par Zulu_DFA, 24 juillet 2011 - 01:24 .


#322
Russalka

Russalka
  • Members
  • 3 867 messages
Is this all that much of a stretch?

#323
Zulu_DFA

Zulu_DFA
  • Members
  • 8 217 messages

Someone With Mass wrote...

Zulu_DFA wrote...

No it doesn't.

BioWare cut this corner, it's obvious to anyone but a fanboy.

It's like the boobs in space, really.


You are so dense...

You are so bright... I can't see you.



Someone With Mass wrote...



It has a element zero core. Guess what it does, idiot.

The Mako has Element Zero core. The skycabs have them. Guess what they do, genius.



Someone With Mass wrote...



But you're going on about how much a butthurt trolltard you are because BioWare is not making the game according to your utterly retarded assumptions.

Um, you see, I'm kinda proud to be butthurt, when BioWare takes a good game and dumbs it down to be accessible to people like you.



Someone With Mass wrote...



Do the whole world a favor and delete your account and rid this forum of your stupidity.

Do Tali a favor, limit your posting to the Tali thread. It's up to you to keep Tali alive! Hey, maybe BioWare still makes her permanent squaddie if you reach the 1,000,000 posts mark by the end of the summer!

#324
Zulu_DFA

Zulu_DFA
  • Members
  • 8 217 messages

Candidate 88766 wrote...

What is the point of having a military if not to defend the people?

Did you know? The military are government employees.

#325
celuloid

celuloid
  • Members
  • 277 messages

Zulu_DFA wrote...

Saphra Deden wrote...

That said, the most populous and developed planet in Alliance space is not "a money sink". It is the complete opposite. They give you money by buying up all that crap you dig out of the ground out in the colonies.

Where do they get those money from?

They do not have to get the money. They simply have it.
Company ownership is on Earth. The profits stay on Earth and are distributed among shareholders who live there and salaries are spent by colonists mainly on luxury goods which stem from Earth. The money stays in Alliance economy.
Really, it's all Economics 101.

Who gives money to the geth?

You tell me. You obviously made some sort of point here, but I am not Oracle to guess which one.