Why is the Alliance helping to evacuate earth?
#401
Posté 24 juillet 2011 - 09:12
#402
Posté 24 juillet 2011 - 09:15
Malanek999 wrote...
I'm not quite sure I understand this. Has the alliance moved it's fleet in after the reapers arrive to evacuate or are the alliance forces on and around earth evacuating? The former would be pretty stupid, the latter very obvious.
According to this trailer, the Alliance stationed a massive fleet above Earth in preparation for the Reapers arrival.
#403
Posté 24 juillet 2011 - 09:15
"The obscure we see eventually. The completely obvious, it seems, takes longer."Malanek999 wrote...
I'm not quite sure I understand this. Has the alliance moved it's fleet in after the reapers arrive to evacuate or are the alliance forces on and around earth evacuating? The former would be pretty stupid, the latter very obvious.
#404
Posté 24 juillet 2011 - 09:20
Mass Effect 2 - After Lazarus Project - Speak to Jacob and Miranda - Cut to Minuteman Station.Zulu_DFA wrote...
No, they don't.Phaedon wrote...
Kodiak shuttles have FTL capability
BioWare has been too lazy and greedy to do it properly.
I like how you didn't answer any of my points, by the way.
Modifié par Phaedon, 24 juillet 2011 - 09:20 .
#405
Posté 24 juillet 2011 - 09:22
#406
Posté 24 juillet 2011 - 09:31
It also makes sense that the alliance has a large station on Earth. :x I think we're underestimating the size of the Alliance.
#407
Posté 24 juillet 2011 - 09:31
Someone With Mass wrote...
Malanek999 wrote...
I'm not quite sure I understand this. Has the alliance moved it's fleet in after the reapers arrive to evacuate or are the alliance forces on and around earth evacuating? The former would be pretty stupid, the latter very obvious.
According to this trailer, the Alliance stationed a massive fleet above Earth in preparation for a possible Batarian invasion.
Fixed that for you.
The Alliance doesn't believe in the reapers, the Council doesn't believe in the Reapers nor 99.9% of the rest of the galaxy. Why would they prepare for an invasion for an enemy everyone believes to be a fairytale?
Preparing for an invasion from the Batarians after Shepard nuked 300k of them, is by far the only conclusion.
#408
Posté 24 juillet 2011 - 09:32
Zulu_DFA wrote...
No, they don't.Phaedon wrote...
Kodiak shuttles have FTL capability
BioWare has been too lazy and greedy to do it properly.
Yes, they do, though range is probably limited. The fact that it is used as a drop-shuttle in no way negates the possibility of FTL.
There are multiple cases of the Kodiak demonstrating FTL in the game.
1) The transport from Lazarus to Minuteman.
2) Using the shuttle to get to your next mission during the Collector's IFF ambush. The Normandy was in deep-space at the time, meaning that FTL would be required to get anywhere in a reasonable amount of time.
#409
Posté 24 juillet 2011 - 09:34
Edit: Xarothox brings up the batarians which is the only variable not discussed because we were busy fighting about the Kodiak:bandit:
Modifié par Humanoid_Typhoon, 24 juillet 2011 - 09:40 .
#410
Posté 24 juillet 2011 - 09:38
Xarathox wrote...
Fixed that for you.
The Alliance doesn't believe in the reapers, the Council doesn't believe in the Reapers nor 99.9% of the rest of the galaxy. Why would they prepare for an invasion for an enemy everyone believes to be a fairytale?
Preparing for an invasion from the Batarians after Shepard nuked 300k of them, is by far the only conclusion.
I don't think they'd pull back thousands of ships to Earth just to protect it from some lousy batarian fleet. Especially when a much smaller force kicked the batarian's asses hard during the Skyllian Blitz.
#411
Posté 24 juillet 2011 - 09:40
#412
Posté 24 juillet 2011 - 09:41
Someone With Mass wrote...
Xarathox wrote...
Fixed that for you.
The Alliance doesn't believe in the reapers, the Council doesn't believe in the Reapers nor 99.9% of the rest of the galaxy. Why would they prepare for an invasion for an enemy everyone believes to be a fairytale?
Preparing for an invasion from the Batarians after Shepard nuked 300k of them, is by far the only conclusion.
I don't think they'd pull back thousands of ships to Earth just to protect it from some lousy batarian fleet. Especially when a much smaller force kicked the batarian's asses hard during the Skyllian Blitz.
Actually no they killed pirates and criminal warlords asses in the Skyllian Blitz. The Batarians only funded those factions. The Alliance never really fought a conventional war with the batarians.
#413
Posté 24 juillet 2011 - 09:50
GunMoth wrote...
Well considering an ex-member of the alliance committed one of the largest acts of genocide in quite some time, it makes sense that a good portion of the alliance is present for Shepard's trial.
It also makes sense that the alliance has a large station on Earth. :x I think we're underestimating the size of the Alliance.
Considering that the Alliance is roughly the same size as todays U.S forces, they wouldn't be that impressive in size. Formidable? yes. All incompasing Galactic Empire ala Star Wars? no.
They would have about 500k ground forces (at max). Fighter craft would number in the hundreds, Frigates/Destroyers/Dreadnaughts would be even fewer in number, decending in order as listed. The codex even states that all militarized council races can only build and maintain very few Dreadnaughts, with the exception going to the Turians.
I think some of you are overestimating the Alliance.
#414
Posté 24 juillet 2011 - 10:09
IRLXarathox wrote...
GunMoth wrote...
Well considering an ex-member of the alliance committed one of the largest acts of genocide in quite some time, it makes sense that a good portion of the alliance is present for Shepard's trial.
It also makes sense that the alliance has a large station on Earth. :x I think we're underestimating the size of the Alliance.
Considering that the Alliance is roughly the same size as todays U.S forces, they wouldn't be that impressive in size. Formidable? yes. All incompasing Galactic Empire ala Star Wars? no.
They would have about 500k ground forces (at max). Fighter craft would number in the hundreds, Frigates/Destroyers/Dreadnaughts would be even fewer in number, decending in order as listed. The codex even states that all militarized council races can only build and maintain very few Dreadnaughts, with the exception going to the Turians.
I think some of you are overestimating the Alliance.
"As of 30 September 2010, 1,430,895 people were on active duty" (US Armed Forces)
"Earth population is currently 6,775,235,700."
In Mass Effect
"According to Mass Effect: Incursion, the exact human population of Earth in 2183 is 11,490,225,106."
Where are you getting this information? There is no way in hell the alliance is the same size as today's U.S. forces considering the increase in population. Not only that, but not every human lives on Earth - we also have the colonists and citizens of the Terminus systems.
"The Alliance maintains an impressive navy consisting of over 200 vessels ranging from small hundred meter frigates to imposing kilometer long dreadnoughts and carriers. It is one of the greater forces in Citadel space and a serious rival to that of the turians"
D;
#415
Posté 24 juillet 2011 - 10:10
#416
Posté 24 juillet 2011 - 10:14
How did someone get that it's an independent nation and thus wouldn't care what happens to the Earth at all?
#417
Posté 24 juillet 2011 - 10:16
#418
Posté 24 juillet 2011 - 10:21
The Council regards the Alliance as a "sleeping giant" as only 3% of humans volunteer for military service.
Considering that the population of Earth alone, not counting the Colonies, is ~ 11.4 billion, that would imply that the total military establishment, the majority of which would be within the Alliance, is about 342 million humans.
#419
Posté 24 juillet 2011 - 10:22
Someone With Mass wrote...
Well, about 3% of the humans are volunteering for the military service in the Alliance. Only that puts their numbers in the hundreds of millions.
Over 330 000 000 to be more precise.
How big is Chinese army today?
#420
Posté 24 juillet 2011 - 10:33
#421
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Posté 24 juillet 2011 - 10:53
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Zulu_DFA wrote...
Ever heard of a thing called "trade deficit"? It's not a good thing.
Then you must be relieved to know you don't have one with Earth. They buy up lots of the crap you dig out of the ground, sell you excess goods they produce, give you colonists so you can keep up the pace of rapid expansion, and fund the Alliance military so it can prevent your colonies from being raided by pirates, slavers, and other nasties.
That's not a trade deficit, Zulu, it's a mutually beneficial economic arrangement.
Zulu_DFA wrote...
Geth, again. They don't consume anything. They just process. And produce. Those scary metal bastards!
YOU. ARE. NOT. A. GETH!
Zulu_DFA wrote...
Crap. There are loads of examples througout the series that as of 2183, the colonies produce all kinds of goods too. And construction. And food. And ships.
The colonies produce things, yes, just like Earth, and just like Earth, they also consume a lot of it. What's your point? Do you just hate knowing that Earth wants to buy up the excess **** you can't consume yourself? Why does this bother you so much? The **** you sell to Earth is **** you don't need.
You can make colonists the natural way, but to make enough of them to continue expanding as rapidly as you want will decade centuries. What are you going to do, mandate that every couple has four kids? How will you pay for all those kids? Are you gonna resort to cloning? How will you pay for clones? How will you pay for robots? How will you pay for ships? How will you pay for new mining and refinery facilities? How will you pay for factories? How will you pay for soldiers?
This has nothing to do with fairness and morals, Zulu, and everything to do with common sense and an understanding of economics.
You've jumped off a damn bridge here.
Zulu_DFA wrote...
Right, the Alliance doesn't need this extra joint to fund itself.
Oh, and why doesn't it, pray tell?
What are you so certain the real industrial might is off Earth and not still on it? Even if a slight majority of it is, what makes you think losing Earth won't totally cripple your expansion and economy? You'll have lost the biggest market for your goods.
You should get a job with Umbrella Inc, Zulu. You are the kind of madman who thinks it is profitable to kill all of your paying customers.
#422
Posté 24 juillet 2011 - 10:54
Are you counting people of a non-combatant age i.e. the young and the old here?SandTrout wrote...
The Council regards the Alliance as a "sleeping giant" as only 3% of humans volunteer for military service.
Considering that the population of Earth alone, not counting the Colonies, is ~ 11.4 billion, that would imply that the total military establishment, the majority of which would be within the Alliance, is about 342 million humans.
#423
Posté 24 juillet 2011 - 10:54
MajorStranger wrote...
Yakko77 wrote...
Cainne Chapel wrote...
Fixers0 wrote...
Cainne Chapel wrote...
eh...Dont think that really Constitutes as a "Retcon" Zulu...oversight maybe? *shrug* But still why wouldnt the systems alliance....help the home system?
Because the Alliance has absolutly no interest in defending earth.
Hmm so the Alliance should protect a colony like Eden Prime, but with the Homeworld of the "SPECIES" is attacked it should just twiddle its thumbs?
Good logic.
Yeah, I don't understand the issue some have with the Alliance in this situation. I mean, why WOULDN'T the Alliance defend Earth? What's the point of the Alliance if they don't act to defend the home and biggest concentration of humanity. The Alliance is more or less like NATO. An attack on one is an attack on them all. Also, NATO is more than just a military alliance. It is political and economic as well.
That is incorrect. While NATO's sole goal is the defense of Europe and North-America. The same countries involved in NATO use different organisation for political and economical problem. (NAFTA for North America, European Union for Europe. They also have the G8 and G20. NATO is only about military alliance.
Yeah, I mistook the NATO Parliamentary Assembly and it's various committees as an official part of NATO.
#424
Posté 24 juillet 2011 - 11:11
GreenDragon37 wrote...
I think Zulu is just trolling. We lose Earth, we lose over 90% of the Human population. We'd be screwed.
This. The Alliance is responisible for Humanity in space, however everyone is going to be doing anything they can to save as many humans as they can to keep their race alive. As Humans, and for any race really, we unconciously are pro-human and loosing that many people means you lost. And nobody wants to lose.
People would really care less about politics when their whole planet and species is in danger. It would just be the right thing to do. If I was head of the Systems Alliance I would still order our spacecraft to go down and save people. I could care less what government says what.
#425
Posté 24 juillet 2011 - 11:16
The Turians could likely lose their homeworld but still be in the fight. They've been in space long enough to likely have a population in the upper double digit billions. Their economy is also larger then Humanity's so they could go into war time production on other large colony worlds that would have populations akin to billions of people.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut





