Mexico absorbed both.marshalleck wrote...
Wait, the US absorbed Canada? Hah, owned.
Why is the Alliance helping to evacuate earth?
#101
Posté 23 juillet 2011 - 11:01
#102
Posté 23 juillet 2011 - 11:02
marshalleck wrote...
It's almost as though people expect human's sense of national identity to vanish in the ~28 years humanity has been aware of a greater galactic civilization beyond the bounds of our corner of the Milky Way.
Though the time may vary, I belive the concept of humans loosing their sence of national identity in this ME example makes sence to a degree.
I use the example of how people in the USA just like 100 years ago would have put more pationage towards their respective states then the nation as a whole. Like how people would say "Im a Virginian, Im a Carolinin, Im from New York" first during those days, But over time as people communicated and came together they started to loose that feeling a bit, though it dident tottaly go away.
The concept could evolve from national focus, to perhaps supranational focus, overtime. Just gotta keep pushing it, politics 101;P.
#103
Posté 23 juillet 2011 - 11:03
Phaedon wrote...
Mexico absorbed both.marshalleck wrote...
Wait, the US absorbed Canada? Hah, owned.
FFFFUUUUUU--
#104
Posté 23 juillet 2011 - 11:03
Zulu_DFA wrote...
In the situation in question - the massive Reaper invasion of Earth - if the Alliance attempts to evacuate as many people off Earth as possible, the Alliance will be destroyed.
Okay, let's just say that the Alliance ignores Earth, and everyone there dies, and then the Reapers are taking over all Earth's resources and everything of importance in the cluster, like the shipyards and all the strategic information that might be there. Then what?
Is humanity just supposed to believe in Shepard's ability to save them?
#105
Posté 23 juillet 2011 - 11:04
Someone With Mass wrote...
Zulu_DFA wrote...
In the situation in question - the massive Reaper invasion of Earth - if the Alliance attempts to evacuate as many people off Earth as possible, the Alliance will be destroyed.
Okay, let's just say that the Alliance ignores Earth, and everyone there dies, and then the Reapers are taking over all Earth's resources and everything of importance in the cluster, like the shipyards and all the strategic information that might be there. Then what?
Is humanity just supposed to believe in Shepard's ability to save them?
Yes, that is the point of such tales...
#106
Posté 23 juillet 2011 - 11:05
Phaedon wrote...
The Alliance has facilities both off and on-world. Why would they hold the court martial at their HQ?
Considering they're using Shepard as a scapegoat to appease the Batarians, dragging him to the Citadel and having him put on trial there would be the most logical path (because then the Batarians could play more of a part in it and it looks like the Alliance and the Council doesn't support Shepard's actions).
Though if it were to be hosted somewhere else, symbolically it would be better if the Alliance headquarters (and government) themselves trialed Shepard rather than one of their facilities on Earth. Batarians might not like either, though I feel they might hate it more if he/she is dragged to Earth away from Batarian eyes.
Modifié par Dave of Canada, 23 juillet 2011 - 11:06 .
#107
Posté 23 juillet 2011 - 11:05
Dave of Canada wrote...
Which should've been hosted at Arcturus Station.
What difference does it make? Oh, right. None.
#108
Posté 23 juillet 2011 - 11:06
marshalleck wrote...
Ajosraa wrote...
Wich is the nowadays G20, minus Mexico and Canada, because they were absorbed into the United North American States.
Wait, the US absorbed Canada? Hah, owned.
Fallout did it too... poor Canada.
#109
Posté 23 juillet 2011 - 11:06
Fixers0 wrote...
Cainne Chapel wrote...
eh...Dont think that really Constitutes as a "Retcon" Zulu...oversight maybe? *shrug* But still why wouldnt the systems alliance....help the home system?
Because the Alliance has absolutly no interest in defending earth.
I'm sorry, but that is the dumbest statement I have read in a long time.
#110
Posté 23 juillet 2011 - 11:06
If you have a human organization with spaceships and weapons that exists to protect humans, then it's called the Alliance.Zulu_DFA wrote...
In the situation in question - the massive Reaper invasion of Earth - if the Alliance attempts to evacuate as many people off Earth as possible, the Alliance will be destroyed.
If you have a human organization with spaceships and weapons that claims to protect humans, but doesn't care about anyone but their soldiers then it's called Cerberus.
#111
Posté 23 juillet 2011 - 11:06
Ajosraa wrote...
marshalleck wrote...
It's almost as though people expect human's sense of national identity to vanish in the ~28 years humanity has been aware of a greater galactic civilization beyond the bounds of our corner of the Milky Way.
Though the time may vary, I belive the concept of humans loosing their sence of national identity in this ME example makes sence to a degree.
I use the example of how people in the USA just like 100 years ago would have put more pationage towards their respective states then the nation as a whole. Like how people would say "Im a Virginian, Im a Carolinin, Im from New York" first during those days, But over time as people communicated and came together they started to loose that feeling a bit, though it dident tottaly go away.
The concept could evolve from national focus, to perhaps supranational focus, overtime. Just gotta keep pushing it, politics 101;P.
I was using "national" more in the sense of a biological nation on a species-wide level, not the sociopolitical sense.
I don't know a better word to describe it, so I'm slightly expanding the definition a bit to reflect the greater "species awareness" of humans in the ME future, which began to dissolve the old ethnic and cultural distinctions as humanity was introduced not to just one alien culture, but a multitude of them throughout the galaxy.
Modifié par marshalleck, 23 juillet 2011 - 11:12 .
#112
Posté 23 juillet 2011 - 11:06
Zulu_DFA wrote...
If we discount the plotholes in some ME2's planet descriptions, the figure of ~30 million in the colonies would be more accurate.Cainne Chapel wrote...
The earth is home to 11 BILLION humans.
The Colonies maybe home to a few hundred million.
But the population of the Geth "realm" is 0 (zero). Strangely, it is quite formidable.
Yes the Population IS 0. Probably because they dont see the Geth as Organic Living beings... which they aren't. They're programs essentially Mobile Platforms So that 0 denomination makes sense.
As for the 30 million sure we can go with that, I was erring on the side of larger numbers just in case, which makes the comparision and need to protect earth even greater. Why protect less than 1% of your species if you cant protect more?Because they can't. It's the Reapers we're talking about. Sacrificing fleets in a banzai attack will solve nothing.Cainne Chapel wrote...
Why WOULDNT the alliance protect the BULK of humanity from space-borne invanders? It would stand to reason they have the most ships and space borne fire power, why WOULDNT they chip in to protect the majority of the species?
Yes but attacking the reapers has nothing to do with it, protecting the largest source of Humanity however, Does. Cant have an army or an Alliance with... no humans now can ya?First of all, let me remind you that the deafault Sheploo is apparently more practical about advising to sacrifice the Alliance fleet. Namely, he doesn't do that.Cainne Chapel wrote...
If they'd sacrifice 8 cruisers to save 3 council members why wouldnt they at least ATTEMPT to save 11 billion humans?
And secondly, in your rainbow bunny paragon universe, the Alliance is weakened due saving the Council. By extrapolation, you can conjectrure that sacrificing more ships in pursuing more idealistic goals will result in more weakness for the Alliance.
In the situation in question - the massive Reaper invasion of Earth - if the Alliance attempts to evacuate as many people off Earth as possible, the Alliance will be destroyed.
But why wouldnt they?? Sure there will be casualties but if they can save more than will be sacrificed they would most definately try, its the home planet of the SPECIES, where 99% of the species still remains, you think the alliance can be effect with the 30 million people you theorized would exist if the sol system got wiped out? Surely youc an't be that daft. Besides if they cant protect their home planet or at least try... then why bother being a military force in the galaxy at large? What purpose or sense of power would they have at all then?
#113
Posté 23 juillet 2011 - 11:07
#114
Posté 23 juillet 2011 - 11:07
Dave of Canada wrote...
Considering they're using Shepard as a scapegoat to appease the Batarians, dragging him to the Citadel and having him put on trial there would be the most logical path (because then the Batarians could play more of a part in it and it looks like the Alliance and the Council doesn't support Shepard's actions).
Though if it were to be hosted somewhere else, symbolically it would be better if the Alliance headquarters (and government) themselves trialed Shepard rather than one of their facilities on Earth.
Just like USA refuses to let their war criminals being tried at the international court like everyone else who actually signed that treaty?
I guess if the alliance court finds him guilty he would probably be turned over to Council justice, maybe sending him further along to a trial by Batarians if found guilty.
Modifié par nhsk, 23 juillet 2011 - 11:08 .
#115
Posté 23 juillet 2011 - 11:11
No, that's what makes no sense. At all.Dave of Canada wrote...
Considering they're using Shepard as a scapegoat to appease the Batarians, dragging him to the Citadel and having him put on trial there would be the most logical path (because then the Batarians could play more of a part in it and it looks like the Alliance and the Council doesn't support Shepard's actions).
If Shepard is a spectre, then the Alliance would have to find evidence (that is shoddy at best, by the way) to have the Council revoke Shepard's Spectre status and drag him or her back into the Citadel. There was an eye witness who witnessed Saren murder someone from three feet away. And the Council didn't revoke Saren's status.
If Shepard isn't a Spectre, then that makes no sense what-so-ever.
Shepard is an Alliance soldier or citinzen in both cases. An Alliance court martial is the only thing that makes sense.
You have yet to explain why it's a retcon or a plothole that they decided not to host the trial there.
Symbolically? Earth is the best place, then, symbolically, because it shows that all humanity wants Shepard down, not just Alliance HQ.Though if it were to be hosted somewhere else, symbolically it would be better if the Alliance headquarters (and government) themselves trialed Shepard rather than one of their facilities on Earth. Batarians might not like either, though I feel they might hate it more if he/she is dragged to Earth away from Batarian eyes.
Modifié par Phaedon, 23 juillet 2011 - 11:11 .
#116
Posté 23 juillet 2011 - 11:13
Modifié par Mister Mida, 23 juillet 2011 - 11:13 .
#117
Posté 23 juillet 2011 - 11:13
Now what would be the point of the Alliance if it just let a huge alien fleet just pass by Arcturus Station and take over or wipe out all life on Earth?
"Hey look at that! An impossibly large fleet is heading for Earth!"
"Not our problem, our capital is here on Arcturus Station. Protecting this 5km wide installation is more important than saving billions of human lives on Earth."
"Your right Sir, sorry."
Survival of the human race is more important than political jurisdiction. Edit: Even though it is the Alliance's jurisdiction to protect humanity from alien threats.
Modifié par Balek-Vriege, 23 juillet 2011 - 11:15 .
#118
Posté 23 juillet 2011 - 11:13
#119
Posté 23 juillet 2011 - 11:13
So if an attacking armada reaches Earth and begins laying siege to it, it only makes sense that the Systems Alliance would be the ones to respond to it, to try to fight it off or to save as many civilians as possible otherwise.
As to why the trial is on Earth rather than Arcturus Station, I don't know. Maybe it'll be explained in ME3.
#120
Posté 23 juillet 2011 - 11:14
Zulu_DFA wrote...
Wrong.Bnol wrote...
The OP is either a genius troll or just lacks all common sense. I guess I will bite.
Whether it is because of the political ties of Earth's nations belonging to the Alliance, social ties of Earth being the human homeworld and possessing the vast majority of the human population, or the economic ties of the great corporations and industrial infrastructure that produce most of the Alliance funding/production being based on Earth, it is in the Alliance's best interest to help Earth.
Industrial infrastructure that produce most of the Alliance funding/production is based in the colonies.
The Alliance fleets are constructed at the Arcturus Station. The there is no Eezo in the Solar system. Most factories and mining stations are completely automated. It's the future. Wake up.
The colonies provide raw materials that are funneled back to Earth. Lets just quote the codex: "The homeworld and capital of humanity is entering a new golden age. The resource wealth of a dozen settled colonies and a hundred industrial outposts flows back to Earth, fueling great works of industry, commerce, and art."
I wonder what those 11 billion people do all day.
Modifié par Bnol, 23 juillet 2011 - 11:14 .
#121
Posté 23 juillet 2011 - 11:16
#122
Posté 23 juillet 2011 - 11:17
Bnol wrote...
I wonder what those 11 billion people do all day.
Watch Jerry Springer's head in a jar host daytime trash talkshows, and get fat. According to Zulu, anyway.
#123
Posté 23 juillet 2011 - 11:18
Modifié par GreenDragon37, 23 juillet 2011 - 11:20 .
#124
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Posté 23 juillet 2011 - 11:19
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
The nations and corporations on Earth are what fund the Alliance and make it possible for the Alliance to do anything in the first place. This is supported several times in the game.
The examples are any time you see an Earth-based company operation outside of Earth as well as the Shadow Broker investment which talks about tariffs on Earth-produced goods.
The Earth is a producer, not a consumer. The Earth gives the Alliance money and people and in return the Alliances makes sure those people can extract resources around other stars. That wealth then flows to Earth and then right back into the Systems Alliance to keep the cycle going.
Earth produces and it produces more than the colonies because it has more people and more infrastructure. It is also more stable because it is not open to pirate or geth attack.
A significant portion of humanity's industrial output comes from Earth.
If the Alliance loses Earth then humanity's footprint on the galaxy will become smaller, granting the Alliance less influence. Worse yet, it will no longer be able to keep expanding because it will have nobody to expand with. Humanity's growth has been in large part to the speed with which they snatch up new territory and resources. Without a population to draw colonists from that won't happen.
The Alliance will shrink. With most of its funding gone it will not be able to afford new ships or be able to pay people to pilot them.
Codex
The resource wealth of a dozen settled colonies and a hundred industrial outposts flows back to Earth, fueling great works of industry, commerce...
Investment Opportunity - Smear Campaign
“A corrupt politician is trying to levy heavy taxes on all Earth-manufactured goods coming into his system in exchange for kickbacks from local businesses. Ruin the politician's reputation with a smear campaign so that his proposal doesn't pass.”
Do you know why this resource wealth flows back to Earth, Zulu? It's because Earth has a much bigger economy. You could insist on all of that going back to your colonies, but with such small populations they represent tiny markets.
#125
Posté 23 juillet 2011 - 11:19
GreenDragon37 wrote...
I think Zulu is just trolling. We lose Earth, we lose over 90% of the Human population. We'd be screwed.
More like 99.75%.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut





