RIP norwegian people....
#26
Posté 25 juillet 2011 - 06:21
#27
Posté 25 juillet 2011 - 07:07
It's just so disgusting and, *sigh* I just don't get it.
#28
Posté 25 juillet 2011 - 07:46
Gterror wrote...
R.I:P all of them.
One thing tho amazes is the police reaction time, no helicopters and hour and a half later after the shooting started they finally got a damn boat and half way there theyre engine stops working so they had to almost swim there.
I guess noone ever thought that this situation could occur.
A bomb went off in Oslo, it was meant to distract the police to buy himself time to take the main target, the camp. I hope he never walk free, though he wouldn't be safe with all the people wanting to see him dead.
I've looked a bit at his manifesto and watched his video, nothing makes any sense at all other than conveying how twisted his mind is.Eranen wrote...
I don't think I will ever understand why someone would do something like this. Ever.
It's just so disgusting and, *sigh* I just don't get it.
Modifié par Gisle Aune, 25 juillet 2011 - 07:49 .
#29
Posté 25 juillet 2011 - 07:55
RIP Norwegian victims of that madman.
#30
Posté 25 juillet 2011 - 08:01
#31
Posté 26 juillet 2011 - 01:43
Nodscouter wrote...
Oh, beautiful. More crying over the norwegians. I was hoping that it wouldn't come here.
*Insert Horrible tasteless Joke Here*
Seriously though, How can you say that?
people simply want to give their Condoliences over a horrible situation.
sure, the people who lost their families aren't gonna read this, but we're just giving our thoughts over this, and why we believe this is horrible.
Anyway, R.I.P norwegian people.
Que Dios Bendiga a las Familias de las victimas y a los heridos del incidente, y que hagan pagar al pedazo de Basura que hizo esto.
how many people Died Exactly? just wanted to know.
also, i can't believe they're actually blaming Gaming for this, the A**hole is just throwing more and more S**t to the image of gaming, one that isn't very good already.
#32
Posté 26 juillet 2011 - 02:02
And for the record, I find being so sad about the norwegians to be incredibly inconsistent and hypocritical. I chose to be consistent, I don't care about these people, and seeing as they're gone, they're not hurting anymore. And for the record, the reason I don't care, is because worse things are happening all over the world, 68 people is just a little footnote, the difference being this is outside of the slums in a civilized country and it involves flashy explosions. That's why the media likes it so much.
Either be sad all the time about people dying of hunger and disease, or don't be sad about this. Being sad about this and nothing else, is hypocritical and terribly inconsistent.
I wish these people didn't have to die, but I've accepted the fact that people do die, and this isn't so much.
#33
Posté 26 juillet 2011 - 02:05
Nodscouter wrote...
Let's see, about 68 people died according to the newest estimate.
And for the record, I find being so sad about the norwegians to be incredibly inconsistent and hypocritical. I chose to be consistent, I don't care about these people, and seeing as they're gone, they're not hurting anymore. And for the record, the reason I don't care, is because worse things are happening all over the world, 68 people is just a little footnote, the difference being this is outside of the slums in a civilized country and it involves flashy explosions. That's why the media likes it so much.
Either be sad all the time about people dying of hunger and disease, or don't be sad about this. Being sad about this and nothing else, is hypocritical and terribly inconsistent.
I wish these people didn't have to die, but I've accepted the fact that people do die, and this isn't so much.
Yikes. Thats some reasoning you got there.
#34
Posté 26 juillet 2011 - 02:12
Nodscouter wrote...
Let's see, about 68 people died according to the newest estimate.
And for the record, I find being so sad about the norwegians to be incredibly inconsistent and hypocritical. I chose to be consistent, I don't care about these people, and seeing as they're gone, they're not hurting anymore. And for the record, the reason I don't care, is because worse things are happening all over the world, 68 people is just a little footnote, the difference being this is outside of the slums in a civilized country and it involves flashy explosions. That's why the media likes it so much.
Either be sad all the time about people dying of hunger and disease, or don't be sad about this. Being sad about this and nothing else, is hypocritical and terribly inconsistent.
I wish these people didn't have to die, but I've accepted the fact that people do die, and this isn't so much.
I'm all for cold-hearted apathy but that is a stretch.
#35
Posté 26 juillet 2011 - 02:19
Nodscouter wrote...
Let's see, about 68 people died according to the newest estimate.
And for the record, I find being so sad about the norwegians to be incredibly inconsistent and hypocritical. I chose to be consistent, I don't care about these people, and seeing as they're gone, they're not hurting anymore. And for the record, the reason I don't care, is because worse things are happening all over the world, 68 people is just a little footnote, the difference being this is outside of the slums in a civilized country and it involves flashy explosions. That's why the media likes it so much.
Either be sad all the time about people dying of hunger and disease, or don't be sad about this. Being sad about this and nothing else, is hypocritical and terribly inconsistent.
I wish these people didn't have to die, but I've accepted the fact that people do die, and this isn't so much.
You make a reasonable point - hundreds of people around the world die every day in circumstances just as bad or worse as what occurred in Norway. The difference is, the media doesn't choose to focus on those deaths.
I think most people are content to not think about the horrors of the world, unless the media shoves them in their face. Kind of like how people don't really think about cows getting their heads sliced off when they eat a steak.
At any rate - that doesn't make the deaths in Norway any less of a tragedy. It should just be noted that there are larger amounts of suffering going on around the world every single day that nobody pays much attention to.
Modifié par Boiny Bunny, 26 juillet 2011 - 02:19 .
#36
Posté 26 juillet 2011 - 02:59
Nodscouter wrote...
Let's see, about 68 people died according to the newest estimate.
And for the record, I find being so sad about the norwegians to be incredibly inconsistent and hypocritical. I chose to be consistent, I don't care about these people, and seeing as they're gone, they're not hurting anymore. And for the record, the reason I don't care, is because worse things are happening all over the world, 68 people is just a little footnote, the difference being this is outside of the slums in a civilized country and it involves flashy explosions. That's why the media likes it so much.
Either be sad all the time about people dying of hunger and disease, or don't be sad about this. Being sad about this and nothing else, is hypocritical and terribly inconsistent.
I wish these people didn't have to die, but I've accepted the fact that people do die, and this isn't so much.
I just wish more people in the world thought like this. I agree completely. I remember during the Columbine high school shootings I told everyone that nobody would've given a damn if this were from some ghetto school and it's true.
Modifié par Turnip Root, 26 juillet 2011 - 03:01 .
#37
Posté 26 juillet 2011 - 05:44
Nodscouter wrote...
Let's see, about 68 people died according to the newest estimate.
And for the record, I find being so sad about the norwegians to be incredibly inconsistent and hypocritical. I chose to be consistent, I don't care about these people, and seeing as they're gone, they're not hurting anymore. And for the record, the reason I don't care, is because worse things are happening all over the world, 68 people is just a little footnote, the difference being this is outside of the slums in a civilized country and it involves flashy explosions. That's why the media likes it so much.
Either be sad all the time about people dying of hunger and disease, or don't be sad about this. Being sad about this and nothing else, is hypocritical and terribly inconsistent.
I wish these people didn't have to die, but I've accepted the fact that people do die, and this isn't so much.
As harsh as this sounds, he actually raises a legitimate point.
#38
Posté 26 juillet 2011 - 06:12
Nodscouter wrote...
Let's see, about 68 people died according to the newest estimate.
And for the record, I find being so sad about the norwegians to be incredibly inconsistent and hypocritical. I chose to be consistent, I don't care about these people, and seeing as they're gone, they're not hurting anymore. And for the record, the reason I don't care, is because worse things are happening all over the world, 68 people is just a little footnote, the difference being this is outside of the slums in a civilized country and it involves flashy explosions. That's why the media likes it so much.
Either be sad all the time about people dying of hunger and disease, or don't be sad about this. Being sad about this and nothing else, is hypocritical and terribly inconsistent.
I wish these people didn't have to die, but I've accepted the fact that people do die, and this isn't so much.
I agree with your point. The media pays attention to an event like this because it was mass murder. But the icing on the cake is that it is in a heavily urbanized sector of the world. So news sources which lack credibility jump on the bandwagon and make the general public feel sorry.
But I am sad about the attacks. Are you really inhumane enough to say that death does not faze you. And no, I'm not just saying this because of being brainwashed by the media. I pay close attention to news and see every day just how much the world has deteriorated. I see crisis, gunshot, mortal wounds all over the world and it fazes me. So why wouldn't this attack faze me?
Modifié par pablodurando, 26 juillet 2011 - 06:12 .
#39
Posté 26 juillet 2011 - 06:22
Nodscouter wrote...
Let's see, about 68 people died according to the newest estimate.
And for the record, I find being so sad about the norwegians to be incredibly inconsistent and hypocritical. I chose to be consistent, I don't care about these people, and seeing as they're gone, they're not hurting anymore. And for the record, the reason I don't care, is because worse things are happening all over the world, 68 people is just a little footnote, the difference being this is outside of the slums in a civilized country and it involves flashy explosions. That's why the media likes it so much.
Either be sad all the time about people dying of hunger and disease, or don't be sad about this. Being sad about this and nothing else, is hypocritical and terribly inconsistent.
I wish these people didn't have to die, but I've accepted the fact that people do die, and this isn't so much.
on the other hand, its better to feel something than nothing. Even if all you can see is your own little corner of the world.
#40
Posté 26 juillet 2011 - 06:54
You make a fair point, but know that this is during peacetime and done by one individual. Norway don't have many murders per year and he did what is expected of two full years. Nobody expected him, nobody expected terror to take place in Norway.Nodscouter wrote...
Let's see, about 68 people died according to the newest estimate.
And for the record, I find being so sad about the norwegians to be incredibly inconsistent and hypocritical. I chose to be consistent, I don't care about these people, and seeing as they're gone, they're not hurting anymore. And for the record, the reason I don't care, is because worse things are happening all over the world, 68 people is just a little footnote, the difference being this is outside of the slums in a civilized country and it involves flashy explosions. That's why the media likes it so much.
Either be sad all the time about people dying of hunger and disease, or don't be sad about this. Being sad about this and nothing else, is hypocritical and terribly inconsistent.
I wish these people didn't have to die, but I've accepted the fact that people do die, and this isn't so much.
This is the worst massacre in Norway since WW2.
Modifié par Gisle Aune, 26 juillet 2011 - 07:47 .
#41
Posté 26 juillet 2011 - 12:34
#42
Posté 26 juillet 2011 - 12:38
#43
Posté 26 juillet 2011 - 12:45
#44
Posté 26 juillet 2011 - 03:39
What I really want to say is that even though you maybe don't care about this particular accident, some people do. And for that I think it's worth to at least acknowledge it as a terrible and sad thing, and maybe give condolences to the people involved, instead of ignoring it completely just because you can't be personally (or physically) engaged in every sad situation that's happening in the world right now.
And to the Norwegian people (where some of the youngsters that got killed maybe were a part of this site): Jag tänker på er och hoppas att ni inte förlorar er härliga, glada och öppna attityd mot omvärlden på grund av en enda galning. Kärlek till er alla från en av grannarna till höger <3
#45
Posté 26 juillet 2011 - 04:41
Nodscouter wrote...
Oh, beautiful. More crying over the norwegians. I was hoping that it wouldn't come here.
You make me sick.
Nobody deserves to die such a unjustified death, my condolences are with there loved ones.
#46
Posté 26 juillet 2011 - 04:47
#47
Posté 26 juillet 2011 - 05:00
Nodscouter wrote...
Would you mind reading the rest of the thread after that post?
I did.
I care about anyone that has died a unjustifed death, no matter the race, social class ect. Yes, they're dead, they suffer no more pain. But there families do, I wouldn't want to be in there situation, so I choose to show my sympathy.
I give to charities, so I try to play my part in helping the poor, sick ect. I care about every innocent who dies unjustified and the sick. So I dont see how I am a hypocrite becuase I show sympathy, yes it's all over the news, but I care about this, and the people who dont get the attention they need.
Modifié par Funkcase, 26 juillet 2011 - 05:05 .
#48
Posté 26 juillet 2011 - 05:01
Nodscouter wrote...
Så nu ska vi börja prata svenska i en engelsk tråd? Det är ingen bra ide, det kan jag garantera.
Well, you dind't have to answer in Swedish if you don't like it. Point taken anyhow, sticking to english from now on...
And generally, it's not about me not actually caring, as I don't actually care about any tragedy in the world, I just think this is getting undeserved attention just because it had flashy explosions and happened in a western country. It's a sad thing, sure, but worse things do happen and are happening right now.
I see. I can agree on that this has gotten more attention than it maybe deserves. But things like this make the newspapers sell many copies, so we will hear of this for a long time now.
Anyhow, I just realised that this isn't the topic of the thread so I will not discuss this matter here anymore.
#49
Posté 26 juillet 2011 - 05:39
Nodscouter wrote...
Show sympathy for those who need it more is what I'd say.
I show sympathy to all. Is this a competition of who has it worse? Categorising of what people should and should not feel sorry about is disrespectful to anyone whom you put in it.
Modifié par Russalka, 26 juillet 2011 - 05:54 .
#50
Posté 26 juillet 2011 - 06:42
Nodscouter wrote...
Let's see, about 68 people died according to the newest estimate.
And for the record, I find being so sad about the norwegians to be incredibly inconsistent and hypocritical. I chose to be consistent, I don't care about these people, and seeing as they're gone, they're not hurting anymore. And for the record, the reason I don't care, is because worse things are happening all over the world, 68 people is just a little footnote, the difference being this is outside of the slums in a civilized country and it involves flashy explosions. That's why the media likes it so much.
Either be sad all the time about people dying of hunger and disease, or don't be sad about this. Being sad about this and nothing else, is hypocritical and terribly inconsistent.
I wish these people didn't have to die, but I've accepted the fact that people do die, and this isn't so much.
plz take your **** out of this thread..the titles says it all: R I P, condolences..what is it you dont get?





Retour en haut







