Aller au contenu

Photo

WTF are omni-blades anyway?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
149 réponses à ce sujet

#126
Psearo

Psearo
  • Members
  • 250 messages

Praetor Shepard wrote...

Image IPB


If the blade has a crystalline structure like a ceramic, and is as hard or harder than diamond, then it might not need mass effect fields to brace it to the forearm and be effective against body armor and synthetics.

But ME fields would be necessary to even consider making the blade in the first place.



It reminds me more of the magblade from Space Siege.

#127
LGTX

LGTX
  • Members
  • 2 590 messages

Inutaisho7996 wrote...
People

LGTX wrote...

You guys are probably putting more thought in this then the developers themselves. Which is wrong.

They're more-or-less explainable and look cool to an average player. That's all there is to it, opinions aside.


Or the marketing team doesn't think putting the codex entry for omni-blades in advertisments is a good idea.



People are wound up about the omni-blade here, not the marketing. I wouldn't want to involve myself at discussing the marketing...



Xarathox wrote...

Just getting annoyed at all the assh*les lately.
"why r u discoosing tings an web f0rumz desined to discu tings??1!!!1 trolololo" <_<


By your logic, disagreeing with a topic is not discussion (seriously?), and insulting members is by all means permitted. I kind of fail to see how I'm the one breaking the "rules" above described.

#128
Phaedon

Phaedon
  • Members
  • 8 617 messages
Patrick Weekes had confirmed that it was a monomolecular diamond blade, but now he has blocked his tweets.

#129
Phaedon

Phaedon
  • Members
  • 8 617 messages

Gatt9 wrote...
Suspension of disbelief only occurs when you choose a subject that isn't well known to the viewer.  Magic works because we cannot rule out the possibility that there are forms of energy we haven't yet discovered,  and because we've seen Magicians.  

FTL works because most people don't understand physics,  and because some science indicates Warping space might be possible. 

A Holographic lightsaber doesn't work because we've all played with them at our science centers,  and more than a few of us played arcade games that were Holographic.  We know it doesn't hurt,  just like we know that water won't burn a hole in your stomach with one gulp. 

It gets especially worse when you spent the last two entries defining it as harmless.


Hey, you guys, I'll say that the story is ruined due to lack of suspension of disbelief, but I'll also mention lightsaber to berate it, not realizing that it defeats my argument since Star Wars is universally considered a great sci-fi series.

Purely holographic? Are you serious? 

Do you realize that not only we have seen tons of functions that would require non-holographic components in the previous two games but also that...

Omni-tools WOULDN'T work if they only consisted of holographic components?

But no, let's just disregard the fact that omni-tools are NOT purely holographic, that we have seen them have several different functions in the previous games and books, but let's use our own facts because we dislike the look of omni-blades, and plus, this is BSN, one of the places on the web were constructing arguments on fake "facts" and disregarding other facts is acceptable.

Modifié par Phaedon, 26 juillet 2011 - 11:57 .


#130
Daiyus

Daiyus
  • Members
  • 503 messages

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

Am I the only one who find the omni-tools and the blade stupid?

They are like a smudge on a beautifull image of the universe (to me at least).


I personally find Biotics more of a stretch of imagination, alongside the very nature Eezo. However, it's not my universe, so physics must be a little different there. I accept Eezo and it's effects as base material for the universe BioWare has built to work, just as I accept gravity and magnetism in my own world, despite the fact nobody really knows why these phenomenons happen.

People forget that Omni-Tools aren't purely holographic, they're wrist mounted projectors, with a built in minifacturing unit. It took me a long time to get my head around that fact playing ME1. It's effectively a nanoforge, a device that can replicate items from a base material (in this case, Omnigel). Hence you don't run out of materials for Tech Grenades. I'll be honest, that concept is not highly based in reality. It's an extremely hard thing to do, but in the Mass Effect universe it's eas easy as throwing people around with your mind.

Suspension of disbelief is also in the mind of the user. If you try to apply real world physics to the Mass Effect universe it will fall apart, just as I know magic don't exist, and people can't be immortal, but I accept it when I read/watch Lord of the Rings. That said an element of realism must still exist. As a creator it's the developers/authors/directors duty to provide enough realism. Something Tolkien does well, and I think BioWare has also.

So the Omni-Blade is a crystalline diamond blade with a holographic overlay, that is created and dissassembled by a wrist mounted nanoforge. I can work with that as much as I can work with Element Zero Drive Cores, and almost every alien known being humanoid.

#131
Pride Demon

Pride Demon
  • Members
  • 1 342 messages
I believe one of the devs answered with the molecular blade explanation, though I don't remember the details...

If you insist about the hologram thing, I already thought out a way for it to work somehow...
Let me quote myself from TWO previous thread about the same topic, hope I'm not making a fool out of myself... :P

Pride Demon wrote...

Well, an hologram is light bended to a
peculiar shape using either mirrors or electricity and magnetic fields,
given what we know of ME technology it's not unfeasable to think one
could overclock the magnetic field as to become seamingly semi-solid:
Tech Armour does this, the Shadow Broker Omni-shield did this, he*l even
normal kinetic barriers (vulgarly known as shields) do this all the
time...

It's the magnetic field that does all the work, the light
shape is probably only for show and to allow the user to see where
he/she is hitting (considering magnetic fields are generally invisible
to the human eye)

The fact it's not actually a solid object
explains how easily it penetrates armour... Then it probably discharges
some sort of electric shock that burns the target nervous system,
perfect one hit kill...


Apparently is not always one hit kill, but the general concept stands...
And magnetic fields, while usually failing if the current producing them stops existing, don't generally break... :P

#132
RGFrog

RGFrog
  • Members
  • 2 011 messages

Praetor Shepard wrote...

Someone With Mass wrote...

Praetor Shepard wrote...

I hope we can still throw a few as a Vanguard and Soldier. :D


The new "normal" melee, both with pistols and rifles, looks much better than the elbow spam.

I know, but I'd like to see some elbows mixed in to the animations, all the same. ^_^


Yeah, forget the omni-blade, I want the elbow blade!!!

#133
Lotion Soronarr

Lotion Soronarr
  • Members
  • 14 481 messages

Phaedon wrote...

Hey, you guys, I'll say that the story is ruined due to lack of suspension of disbelief, but I'll also mention lightsaber to berate it, not realizing that it defeats my argument since Star Wars is universally considered a great sci-fi series.


It might be popular, but I sure as hell wouldn't use the SW universe as an example pf a well-crafted and excellent universe.



People forget that Omni-Tools aren't purely holographic, they're wrist
mounted projectors, with a built in minifacturing unit. It took me a
long time to get my head around that fact playing ME1. It's effectively a
nanoforge, a device that can replicate items from a base material (in
this case, Omnigel). Hence you don't run out of materials for Tech
Grenades. I'll be honest, that concept is not highly based in reality.
It's an extremely hard thing to do, but in the Mass Effect universe it's
eas easy as throwing people around with your mind.


Well, I did say Omni-tools themselves bug me. Nano-forge? That can construct items in a fraction of a second? with large storage of medi-gel...erm..where exactly? Where do you fit all that?

IMHO; hte unvierse would be better off without omni-tools and omin-blades.

#134
Praetor Knight

Praetor Knight
  • Members
  • 5 772 messages

Pride Demon wrote...

I believe one of the devs answered with the molecular blade explanation, though I don't remember the details...


From what I've read it was Patrick Weekes who mentioned it on twitter.

And the tweet was regarding a "diamond monoblade created from canonically present omni-tool fabrication tech". Iakus has a blog entry in his sig, and here's a link.

#135
BLACK SHEPERD

BLACK SHEPERD
  • Members
  • 18 messages

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

Persoinally I don't like them. They smell (stink) os a cheap gimmick for hte Gears of War/Gods of War, etc.. crowd.

But what ARE they? Omni-tools use a holographic interface..that yelllowish thing that appears around the hand with bottuns and stuff.
How the hell do you kill someone with a hologram??????

with magic :)

#136
Phaedon

Phaedon
  • Members
  • 8 617 messages

Lotion Soronnar wrote...
It might be popular, but I sure as hell wouldn't use the SW universe as an example pf a well-crafted and excellent universe.

Well-crafted is often used as a different name for the Star Wars extended series.



Well, I did say Omni-tools themselves bug me. Nano-forge? That can construct items in a fraction of a second? with large storage of medi-gel...erm..where exactly? Where do you fit all that?

IMHO; hte unvierse would be better off without omni-tools and omin-blades.

Omni-tools make perfect sense. They are haptic interfaces and holograms projected by a machine that is placed (presumably) on your hand. And they can, in fact, be broken. A turian in the VIP section of Afterlife say so.

They have wireless connection because of a specific component, can take photographs because of another, act like flashlights by another, etc.

#137
Xarathox

Xarathox
  • Members
  • 1 287 messages

LGTX wrote...

Inutaisho7996 wrote...
People

LGTX wrote...

You guys are probably putting more thought in this then the developers themselves. Which is wrong.

They're more-or-less explainable and look cool to an average player. That's all there is to it, opinions aside.


Or the marketing team doesn't think putting the codex entry for omni-blades in advertisments is a good idea.



People are wound up about the omni-blade here, not the marketing. I wouldn't want to involve myself at discussing the marketing...



Xarathox wrote...

Just getting annoyed at all the assh*les lately.
"why r u discoosing tings an web f0rumz desined to discu tings??1!!!1 trolololo" <_<


By your logic, disagreeing with a topic is not discussion (seriously?), and insulting members is by all means permitted. I kind of fail to see how I'm the one breaking the "rules" above described.


Your assertion that those of us who like to think about these kinds of things is, in your own words, wrong comes off as an extremely asinine remark, and that you hold a position to dictate what we can and cannot discuss on a forum that you quite clearly do not own nor operate.

If you didn't intend for your comment to come off as such, then I apologize.

But my comment about the assh*les of these forums still stands. I'm tired of them. They seem to be spreading to even the most obscure places these days. <_<

#138
RandomInquisitor

RandomInquisitor
  • Members
  • 180 messages

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

Phaedon wrote...

Hey, you guys, I'll say that the story is ruined due to lack of suspension of disbelief, but I'll also mention lightsaber to berate it, not realizing that it defeats my argument since Star Wars is universally considered a great sci-fi series.


It might be popular, but I sure as hell wouldn't use the SW universe as an example pf a well-crafted and excellent universe.



People forget that Omni-Tools aren't purely holographic, they're wrist
mounted projectors, with a built in minifacturing unit. It took me a
long time to get my head around that fact playing ME1. It's effectively a
nanoforge, a device that can replicate items from a base material (in
this case, Omnigel). Hence you don't run out of materials for Tech
Grenades. I'll be honest, that concept is not highly based in reality.
It's an extremely hard thing to do, but in the Mass Effect universe it's
eas easy as throwing people around with your mind.


Well, I did say Omni-tools themselves bug me. Nano-forge? That can construct items in a fraction of a second? with large storage of medi-gel...erm..where exactly? Where do you fit all that?

IMHO; hte unvierse would be better off without omni-tools and omin-blades.



Its not size which matters.... look at a swiss knife
If they have spaceships with mass effect cores, biotics, and who knows what else, why not a mass knife ?

Either way... I like the looks...

#139
Gatt9

Gatt9
  • Members
  • 1 748 messages

Phaedon wrote...

Gatt9 wrote...
Suspension of disbelief only occurs when you choose a subject that isn't well known to the viewer.  Magic works because we cannot rule out the possibility that there are forms of energy we haven't yet discovered,  and because we've seen Magicians.  

FTL works because most people don't understand physics,  and because some science indicates Warping space might be possible. 

A Holographic lightsaber doesn't work because we've all played with them at our science centers,  and more than a few of us played arcade games that were Holographic.  We know it doesn't hurt,  just like we know that water won't burn a hole in your stomach with one gulp. 

It gets especially worse when you spent the last two entries defining it as harmless.


Hey, you guys, I'll say that the story is ruined due to lack of suspension of disbelief, but I'll also mention lightsaber to berate it, not realizing that it defeats my argument since Star Wars is universally considered a great sci-fi series.

Purely holographic? Are you serious? 

Do you realize that not only we have seen tons of functions that would require non-holographic components in the previous two games but also that...

Omni-tools WOULDN'T work if they only consisted of holographic components?

But no, let's just disregard the fact that omni-tools are NOT purely holographic, that we have seen them have several different functions in the previous games and books, but let's use our own facts because we dislike the look of omni-blades, and plus, this is BSN, one of the places on the web were constructing arguments on fake "facts" and disregarding other facts is acceptable.


1.  Perhaps you missed the part where Bioware described it as Holographic?

2.  Perhaps you'd like to actually deal with the subject I posted instead of strawmanning?

Your constant inability to actually deal with post content is getting tiring.  As well as your tendency to make things up.

#140
Iakus

Iakus
  • Members
  • 30 285 messages

Praetor Shepard wrote...

Pride Demon wrote...

I believe one of the devs answered with the molecular blade explanation, though I don't remember the details...


From what I've read it was Patrick Weekes who mentioned it on twitter.

And the tweet was regarding a "diamond monoblade created from canonically present omni-tool fabrication tech". Iakus has a blog entry in his sig, and here's a link.


Correct.  My main gripe about omniblades is appearance, rather than function.

#141
Il Divo

Il Divo
  • Members
  • 9 752 messages

Gatt9 wrote...

Phaedon wrote...

Gatt9 wrote...
Suspension of disbelief only occurs when you choose a subject that isn't well known to the viewer.  Magic works because we cannot rule out the possibility that there are forms of energy we haven't yet discovered,  and because we've seen Magicians.  

FTL works because most people don't understand physics,  and because some science indicates Warping space might be possible. 

A Holographic lightsaber doesn't work because we've all played with them at our science centers,  and more than a few of us played arcade games that were Holographic.  We know it doesn't hurt,  just like we know that water won't burn a hole in your stomach with one gulp. 

It gets especially worse when you spent the last two entries defining it as harmless.


Hey, you guys, I'll say that the story is ruined due to lack of suspension of disbelief, but I'll also mention lightsaber to berate it, not realizing that it defeats my argument since Star Wars is universally considered a great sci-fi series.

Purely holographic? Are you serious? 

Do you realize that not only we have seen tons of functions that would require non-holographic components in the previous two games but also that...

Omni-tools WOULDN'T work if they only consisted of holographic components?

But no, let's just disregard the fact that omni-tools are NOT purely holographic, that we have seen them have several different functions in the previous games and books, but let's use our own facts because we dislike the look of omni-blades, and plus, this is BSN, one of the places on the web were constructing arguments on fake "facts" and disregarding other facts is acceptable.


1.  Perhaps you missed the part where Bioware described it as Holographic?

2.  Perhaps you'd like to actually deal with the subject I posted instead of strawmanning?

Your constant inability to actually deal with post content is getting tiring.  As well as your tendency to make things up.


No offense, but your rather weak interpretation of "suspension of disbelief" and very loose claims to science don't really leave much to work with. You would have been better off referencing unobtanium to illustrate your point, as opposed to scientific theory and science centers.

Modifié par Il Divo, 26 juillet 2011 - 11:32 .


#142
Davie McG

Davie McG
  • Members
  • 725 messages
This topic came up a while ago, in fact I think my first post was on this topic.

Omni tools and blades may seem sci-fi and unrealistic, to paraphrase Mark Twain, real life is stranger than science fiction.

Companies are working at this very moment on technology that isn't a massive leap away from omni tools.
Its made from this stuff and this is the kind of thing people could do with it.

I'm not saying omni blades are made from graphene technology, their made from a sci-fi writers imagination.

My point is that even though it is fiction it's not that far away from plausible, especialy considering it's set in the distant future and similar inventions could hit the market in the next few decades.

Also, it's a sci-fi video game, I'll never understand people who get so worked up about this kind of stuff.

Modifié par Davie McG, 27 juillet 2011 - 12:17 .


#143
RandomInquisitor

RandomInquisitor
  • Members
  • 180 messages

Davie McG wrote...

This topic came up a while ago, in fact I think my first post was on this topic.

Omni tools and blades may seem sci-fi and unrealistic, to paraphrase Mark Twain, real life is stranger than science fiction.

Companies are working at this very moment on technology that isn't a massive leap away from omni tools.
Its made from this stuff and this is the kind of thing people could do with it.

I'm not saying omni blades are made from graphene technology, their made from a sci-fi writers imagination.

My point is that even though it is fiction it's not that far away from plausible, especialy considering it's set in the distant future and similar inventions could hit the market in the next few decades.

Also, it's a sci-fi video game, I'll never understand people who get so worked up about this kind of stuff.


^this

Im glad I found someone who shares my opinion (not saying there are no others, you just got my attention)

#144
Daiyus

Daiyus
  • Members
  • 503 messages

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

Phaedon wrote...

Hey, you guys, I'll say that the story is ruined due to lack of suspension of disbelief, but I'll also mention lightsaber to berate it, not realizing that it defeats my argument since Star Wars is universally considered a great sci-fi series.


It might be popular, but I sure as hell wouldn't use the SW universe as an example pf a well-crafted and excellent universe.



People forget that Omni-Tools aren't purely holographic, they're wrist
mounted projectors, with a built in minifacturing unit. It took me a
long time to get my head around that fact playing ME1. It's effectively a
nanoforge, a device that can replicate items from a base material (in
this case, Omnigel). Hence you don't run out of materials for Tech
Grenades. I'll be honest, that concept is not highly based in reality.
It's an extremely hard thing to do, but in the Mass Effect universe it's
eas easy as throwing people around with your mind.


Well, I did say Omni-tools themselves bug me. Nano-forge? That can construct items in a fraction of a second? with large storage of medi-gel...erm..where exactly? Where do you fit all that?

IMHO; hte unvierse would be better off without omni-tools and omin-blades.



Well, that's your opinion, and I won't be obnoxious enough to tell you you're wrong. I still struggle to see how someone can completely accept Eezo theory and Biotics, but still have a problem with the Tech side of things. If anything Nano-Forge and Holographic Technology are more realistic (they can happen, theoretically).

However, I accept your preferences. I personally like the Omni-Tools, then again I play an Engineer so Tech is the stuff that draws me in Mass Effect. The theory of wrist mounted Minifacturing Units and Holographic interfaces does intrigue me, and that includes a "how do they do that?" way. I agree, "where do they fit all that?". Their technology is far more advanced than ours is (thus my limited scientific knowledge really isn't enough), and on top of that, it's a world with different physics anyway (already nullifying a lot of my scientific knowledge). Not to mention the developers probably don't know exactly how it all works, they throw limited science at it, and that's enough for most people.

As somebody above said, it is a Sci-Fi game, so that will involve some element of fantasy. I take Biotics with a pinch of salt, but they're still great from a gameplay and lore perspective, even if they make no sense in realation to my own reality. I consider Tech exactly the same.

#145
Nashiktal

Nashiktal
  • Members
  • 5 584 messages
Wait patrick weeks blocked his twitter account? Why?

I loved his Citadel Noir series... I go on vacation and look what happens. :(

#146
Praetor Knight

Praetor Knight
  • Members
  • 5 772 messages

Daiyus wrote...

The theory of wrist mounted Minifacturing Units and Holographic interfaces does intrigue me, and that includes a "how do they do that?" way. I agree, "where do they fit all that?". Their technology is far more advanced than ours is (thus my limited scientific knowledge really isn't enough), and on top of that, it's a world with different physics anyway (already nullifying a lot of my scientific knowledge). Not to mention the developers probably don't know exactly how it all works, they throw limited science at it, and that's enough for most people.


Well, Bioware does a great job with the descriptions. From what I know and look at, they are certainly on-top of things in terms of keeping a solid consistency with the Tech, but sometimes it's left to us to fill in any potential blanks.


I frequently peruse the Codex, and the wiki has a new section for the ME2 Research upgrades that can be checked now outside the game. Very helpful since many questions can be answered by looking there.

#147
Destroy Raiden_

Destroy Raiden_
  • Members
  • 3 408 messages
I'm liking the overall idea of it after all way back when people where saying I want knives and other players were saying how horrible it was and then the third group said why not do the arm knives so BW gave us the omni blade which is very similar to the arm sword/blade things most people decided they liked so yeah I'm looking forward to smashing some too friendly bad guys with it in 3.

#148
Captain Kibosh

Captain Kibosh
  • Members
  • 260 messages
As I've mentioned in a separate thread, the omni-blade is the NutraSweet to the sci-fi sugar that is the lightsaber. 'Nuff said.

#149
RGFrog

RGFrog
  • Members
  • 2 011 messages

Captain Kibosh wrote...

As I've mentioned in a separate thread, the omni-blade is the NutraSweet to the sci-fi sugar that is the lightsaber. 'Nuff said.


Hardly...

Omni-blade is based and explainable within the ME universe's technology.

Light saber is a cylinder with a power-cell and a magic crystal. It has no basis in the technology of the universe.

If you were to compare and omni-blade to something in the SW universe it would be the vibro-blade, not the lightsaber...

#150
Someone With Mass

Someone With Mass
  • Members
  • 38 552 messages
I honestly have more problems with the vast and sometimes nonsensical utility of mass effect fields than the omni-blade.