Fixers0 wrote...
What's hard to understand, Bioware is afraid that General Audiances confuse two games set in the same universe.
He says, still completely missing the point.
Fixers0 wrote...
What's hard to understand, Bioware is afraid that General Audiances confuse two games set in the same universe.
Modifié par Kaiser Shepard, 25 juillet 2011 - 01:24 .
didymos1120 wrote...
Fixers0 wrote...
What's hard to understand, Bioware is afraid that General Audiances confuse two games set in the same universe.
He says, still completely missing the point.
Kaiser Shepard wrote...
Humanity will persevere. We are nothing if not resilient.
Fixers0 wrote...
But hey, now you've got Tali, what's not to like about that?
Guest_Arcian_*
Says the Zulu-fanboy.Fixers0 wrote...
Point,.
Fanboys are so ignorent that they can't understand basic storytelling themes.
Fixers0 wrote...
Point,.
Fanboys are so ignorent that they can't understand basic storytelling themes.
Fixers0 wrote...
Let me ask you a question, what has the Alliance to gain by pointlessly sending it's fleet to their doom?
Fixers0 wrote...
Someone With Mass wrote...
I don't think Zulu or Fixers0 can write anything better than what BioWare's writers can.
Not to mention that the story would be so biased, it's not even funny.
Considering that i don't have a marketing team to worry, i think it's safe to assume that it isn't hard to surpass Bioware's writing team.
But hey, now you've got Tali, what's not to like about that?
Modifié par MDT1, 25 juillet 2011 - 01:33 .
Ieldra2 wrote...
I agree that saving Earth shouldn't overshadow the entire game. That's not the point I wanted to make. I'm just arguing against the opposing viewpoint that Earth doesn't matter a great deal for humanity.Bourne Endeavor wrote...
I have no real qualms rescuing Earth from the Reapers if that becomes one of the eventual goals. What would bother me is if it overshadowed the entire game, which some of speculated since ME3 could very well be the case. Such is where I have become quite adamant in my campaigns against story angles with Earth as the focal point. Admittedly, there is a portion of me that would like to see Earth destroyed if only to witness how BioWare would approach such an enormous undertaking from a narrative perspective. Few games ever are quite so bold as to put Earth is jeopardy, to the point it may actually lose. Thus fair I commend BioWare for going forward with seemingly that precise objective.Well, I do care - that is, most of my Shepards do. Others, not so much. It would be an interesting option for an ending but I wouldn't like be forced into it. Just as I wouldn't like into an ending that equals understanding Reaper technology with an extremist version of human domination.With regards to humanity and their potential after the galactic showdown? I frankly could not care less if humans lose their stand. In fact, it could very well be an intriguing conclusion and utterly contrast to the frequent reiterated, "Humans are special" trope that plagues the majority of games. Likewise, Bioware may utilize an ending like this to further develop the series. What has become of humanity generations following their heroic sacrifice for the salvation of the galaxy? Shepard would be long dead and a new series or trilogy could arise from the wake. Seems quite appealing as a rough sketch for subsequent entries into the series.
Candidate 88766 wrote...
People keep going on about how many plotholes there are in ME2, but I honestly don't see that many. There are just as many, if not more, in ME1.
Fixers0 wrote...
Someone With Mass wrote...
I don't think Zulu or Fixers0 can write anything better than what BioWare's writers can.
Not to mention that the story would be so biased, it's not even funny.
Considering that i don't have a marketing team to worry, i think it's safe to assume that it isn't hard to surpass Bioware's writing team.
But hey, now you've got Tali, what's not to like about that?
Modifié par Bourne Endeavor, 25 juillet 2011 - 01:35 .
Modifié par Dragoonlordz, 25 juillet 2011 - 01:31 .
Fixers0 wrote...
Fanboys are so ignorent that they can't understand basic storytelling themes.
Fixers0 wrote...
MDT1 wrote...
Fixers0 wrote...
Ieldra2 wrote...
@Fixers0:
It is correct that it is neither possible nor viable as a strategy to evacuate billions of humans from out under the Reapers' noses. I expect a significant population loss before the war is ended. All I'm saying is that if Earth is lost, whether by ultimate necessity or by callous abandonment by people like Zulu, then humanity will be destroyed as a power.
For me that's an accaptable loss, considereing that most of the Alliance backing and resources comes from corporations and colonies outside of the solar system, i'm willing to take the risk.
Where did you get your information? All codex entries I found about that subject suggest otherwise.
Unlike you I'm not a ZULUfanboy so I have no unlimited faith in his prophecies. I need sources so please quote yours.
Let me ask you a question, what has the Alliance to gain by pointlessly sending it's fleet to their doom?
Mesina2 wrote...
1st Fleet is already at Earth since it's their job to protect Earth
2nd they are retreating and trying to save as much as they can since it's their job
3rd it's their job
jamesp81 wrote...
Nothing in particular. There's a big difference, however, in temporarily ceding Earth to the Reapers and abandoning it entirely. At some point, the fleet will be used to retake, or attempt to retake, the homeworld. That's what humanity has a fleet for. If the fleet does not ultimately attempt to do this, there's no REASON to even have a fleet.
And no self-respecting military force is going standby indefinitely while their homes are ravaged by space monsters.
Modifié par Dragoonlordz, 25 juillet 2011 - 01:41 .
Kaiser_Wilhelm wrote...
With the majority of Alliance military funding, production, and leadership coming from Earth's major powers, of course it would lead to the demise of humanity as any formidable force in the galaxy.
Saphra Deden wrote...
rolson00 wrote...
no we wouldn't there would be no diversityWizz wrote...
Humans are special, you will be surprised how fast they will recover even 99% of them will be wiped out.
We'd recover eventually, but it would take centuries, maybe even thousands of years. That's assuming the galaxy isn't consumed by the Reaper's ghosts anyway.
Fixers0 wrote...
Sure, it's a plothole.
jamesp81 wrote...
I'm not sure we would. Consider that many of the thug regimes of the Terminus systems reside in the galactic north east. In terms of where the Reapers enter the galaxy and their general direction, this would be one of the last places to be hit by them.
Even if a few scattered human outposts survive, they would be incapable of defending themselves and would be conquered in short order by such thug regimes. Many of which have an axe to grind with humans.
You and I also know that the council wouldn't lift a damned finger to stop it, either.
Fixers0 wrote...
Hackett knows about the Reapers, an i'm pretty he isn't going to let his fleet of ships being crushed by the reapers.
Also in unrelated news, i support a military coup within the Alliance.
Modifié par Mesina2, 25 juillet 2011 - 01:47 .
jamesp81 wrote...
I'm not sure we would. Consider that many of the thug regimes of the Terminus systems reside in the galactic north east. In terms of where the Reapers enter the galaxy and their general direction, this would be one of the last places to be hit by them.
Even if a few scattered human outposts survive, they would be incapable of defending themselves and would be conquered in short order by such thug regimes. Many of which have an axe to grind with humans.
You and I also know that the council wouldn't lift a damned finger to stop it, either.
Fixers0 wrote...
Someone With Mass wrote...
Fixers0 wrote...
Sure, it's a
*snip*
Eh, how?
Just because you (or the f*cknugget Zulu for that matter) don't like it doesn't make it a plothole.
Because no sane Admiral ever starts a pointless battle, unless he was written to do so.