I'd loose Thessia if it was a forced choice. As stated, they are the most spread out, and therefor would take the least overall hit from the loss of their home-world.
Also, as Saphra Deden stated, the Asari are a culturally subversive nation, and are really the prime obstacle to human advancement. People are too easily enamored with the Asari's apparent penchent for diplomacy over the use of force, and fail to realize that they are as competitive as any of the other species, but in a more insidious manner.
You forgot "Earth is still divided among nation-states, though all are affiliated beneath the overarching banner of the Systems Alliance.
While every human enjoys longer and better life then ever, the gap
between rich and poor widens daily. Advanced nations have eliminated
most genetic disease
and pollution. Less fortunate regions have not progressed beyond 20th
century technology, and are often smog-choked, overpopulated slums.
Your pursuit of equality is more destructive of the inequality that you abhor. Every human has benefited from the advancements and colonization. Some have benefited more than others. Just because the gap is widening does not mean that the standards of living of the poor are degrading. Factually, the opposite is true. Even though the gap is widening, it is because the top is doing better, not because the bottom is doing worse.
Also, you would remove the opportunity for these poor people to advance themselves by colonizing worlds, and you would even allow them to be killed, just because the rich are rich, and they are not. Your proposed course of action is more damaging to those you claim to act on the behalf of than the people you nominally oppose.
Even the poorest nations are about as well off as modern day Europe. This is not a bad thing, considering that the poorest modern nations are not as well off as 16th centruy Europe.
Modifié par SandTrout, 26 juillet 2011 - 03:36 .