2463 réponses à ce sujet

[HunterX6]

KingNothing125 wrote...

OP is clearly indoctrinated.

lol i thought so too XD

[Humanoid_Typhoon]

Someone With Mass wrote...

Saphra Deden wrote...

I don't see what the big deal would be since you'd still get to see your choices unfold.

At the end of the day none of your choices actually matter anyway. They are just window dressing.

Oh, that would certainly motivate me to play the game even more.

Except for the part where ME3 is where all your decisions impact...Everyone wants to play "Lets spend hours upon hours to lose!"

[Fixers0]

Humanoid_Typhoon wrote...

Their argument is that there should only be 1 ending and that BW is wrong.

I rather have only 1 ending that is both consistant lore and that is supported by logic the 10 endings full off ' coolsz bros dudz'' crap.

[Someone With Mass]

Humanoid_Typhoon wrote...
Their argument is that there should only be 1 ending and that BW is wrong.

Which contradicts just about everything about the games.

Humanoid_Typhoon wrote...
Except for the part where ME3 is where all your decisions impact...Everyone wants to play "Lets spend hours upon hours to lose!"

Yep. I know I'd be pissed.

Modifié par Someone With Mass, 27 juillet 2011 - 07:17 .

[Humanoid_Typhoon]

Someone With Mass wrote...

Humanoid_Typhoon wrote...
Their argument is that there should only be 1 ending and that BW is wrong.

Which contradicts just about everything about the games.

Maybe BW should just have the biggest retcon ever and a wormhole upons up over earth and out of it comes.....wait for it...................Forward Unto Dawn!  and the Master Chief saves us all.

That way they can cry retcon.

[Someone With Mass]

Fixers0 wrote...

I rather have only 1 ending that is both consistant lore and that is supported by logic the 10 endings full off ' coolsz bros dudz'' crap.

True to the lore? You broke that lore the second you started to play the games.

And lore =/= always good content.

Modifié par Someone With Mass, 27 juillet 2011 - 07:19 .

[Xivai]

Example A. This is an indoctrinated human children, please don't stare at the poor soul. It's a rude thing to do.

[Fixers0]

Someone With Mass wrote...

Fixers0 wrote...

I rather have only 1 ending that is both consistant lore and that is supported by logic the 10 endings full off ' coolsz bros dudz'' crap.

True to the lore? You broke that lore the second you started to play the games.

And lore =/= good content. Not always.

I never broke the lore, i'm not the designer, but feel free to ask your friends at bioware how the manage do it so many times without realising it.

And please explain me what the point is of establishing the lore if you're not going to hold on to it?

[Spartanburger]

Fixers0 wrote...

Humanoid_Typhoon wrote...

Their argument is that there should only be 1 ending and that BW is wrong.

I rather have only 1 ending that is both consistant lore and that is supported by logic the 10 endings full off ' coolsz bros dudz'' crap.

Tell me, oh master-of-space-and-time-who-can-see-all-possible-outcomes-of-a-came-thats-still-many-months-from-release, are there any endings that are simply "coolsz bros dudz?"


Oh wait. You haven't played the game. You don't know for sure what the ending(s) will be like.

[Humanoid_Typhoon]

Fixers0 wrote...

Someone With Mass wrote...

Fixers0 wrote...

I rather have only 1 ending that is both consistant lore and that is supported by logic the 10 endings full off ' coolsz bros dudz'' crap.

True to the lore? You broke that lore the second you started to play the games.

And lore =/= good content. Not always.

I never broke the lore, i'm not the designer, but feel free to ask your friends at bioware how the manage do it so many times without realising it.

And please explain me what the point is of establishing the lore if you're not going to hold on to it?

Welcome to the realm of science fiction.

[Fixers0]

Spartanburger wrote...

Fixers0 wrote...

Humanoid_Typhoon wrote...

Their argument is that there should only be 1 ending and that BW is wrong.

I rather have only 1 ending that is both consistant lore and that is supported by logic the 10 endings full off ' coolsz bros dudz'' crap.

Tell me, oh master-of-space-and-time-who-can-see-all-possible-outcomes-of-a-came-thats-still-many-months-from-release, are there any endings that are simply "coolsz bros dudz?"

If it sells, then sure


Oh wait. You haven't played the game. You don't know for sure what the ending(s) will be like.

But i do know that desingers should't shoot themselfs in the foot by insulting our intelligence base on the previous games.

[Fixers0]

Humanoid_Typhoon wrote...

Fixers0 wrote...

Someone With Mass wrote...

Fixers0 wrote...

I rather have only 1 ending that is both consistant lore and that is supported by logic the 10 endings full off ' coolsz bros dudz'' crap.

True to the lore? You broke that lore the second you started to play the games.

And lore =/= good content. Not always.

I never broke the lore, i'm not the designer, but feel free to ask your friends at bioware how the manage do it so many times without realising it.

And please explain me what the point is of establishing the lore if you're not going to hold on to it?

Welcome to the realm of science Fantasy.

Fixed.

Modifié par Fixers0, 27 juillet 2011 - 07:26 .

[sH0tgUn jUliA]

No Retcon needed.... When we go to Mars, we will find the weapon we need to defeat the Reapers: The Illudium Q-36 Explosive Space Modulator.

[Humanoid_Typhoon]

sH0tgUn jUliA wrote...

No Retcon needed.... When we go to Mars, we will find the weapon we need to defeat the Reapers: The Illudium Q-36 Explosive Space Modulator.

+1 internetz.

[Sgt Stryker]

Fixers0 wrote...

Someone With Mass wrote...

Fixers0 wrote...

I rather have only 1 ending that is both consistant lore and that is supported by logic the 10 endings full off ' coolsz bros dudz'' crap.

True to the lore? You broke that lore the second you started to play the games.

And lore =/= good content. Not always.

I never broke the lore, i'm not the designer, but feel free to ask your friends at bioware how the manage do it so many times without realising it.

And please explain me what the point is of establishing the lore if you're not going to hold on to it?

The lore is not broken. You simply have a misguided belief that it is broken because of your poor comprehension skills.

[Someone With Mass]

Fixers0 wrote...

I never broke the lore, i'm not the designer, but feel free to ask your friends at bioware how the manage do it so many times without realising it.

And please explain me what the point is of establishing the lore if you're not going to hold on to it?

In case you haven't noticed, the established lore in Mass Effect tends to not translate well into gameplay.

Because if it was so true to the lore, Shepard would be able to use his/her biotics about four/five times per battle at best before getting exhausted, and shields wouldn't be able to block punches.

[Someone With Mass]

sH0tgUn jUliA wrote...

No Retcon needed.... When we go to Mars, we will find the weapon we need to defeat the Reapers: The Illudium Q-36 Explosive Space Modulator.

Ha. 

[Fixers0]

Sgt Stryker wrote...

Fixers0 wrote...

Someone With Mass wrote...

Fixers0 wrote...

I rather have only 1 ending that is both consistant lore and that is supported by logic the 10 endings full off ' coolsz bros dudz'' crap.

True to the lore? You broke that lore the second you started to play the games.

And lore =/= good content. Not always.

I never broke the lore, i'm not the designer, but feel free to ask your friends at bioware how the manage do it so many times without realising it.

And please explain me what the point is of establishing the lore if you're not going to hold on to it?

The lore is not broken. You simply have a misguided belief that it is broken because of your poor comprehension skills.

Oh it is, or could please explain to me how joker even surived the attack on the Normany when he was in vacuum.

[TuringPoint]

I find the Reapers fascinating.  There are some good facts to consider in the OP.  
Typically, deciding what to do based on logic results in making stupid decisions.  Submitting ourselves to the Reapers won't let us survive, and it will only help the Reapers.   
Perhaps Earth is doomed, but there are other human colonies. Other ways to fight the Reapers, besides mortal combat, may present themselves.

Modifié par Alocormin, 27 juillet 2011 - 07:36 .

[xassantex]

General User wrote...



Some look at the umpteen-million years the Reapers have been repeating the extinction cycle and are impressed. I am not. I see nothing but a race of tin-can gods stagnating in a system they have long since lost either the will or the ability to break out of. Humanity seems to favored in that we have been choosen to be the instruments of the Reapers destruction. But by us or by others, the Reaper's doom is assured.

that's about what think also. i mean they retreat into dark spacefor 50,000 years and just sit there ? that's dumb . 

[Spartanburger]

Fixers0 wrote...


If it sells, then sure

That's not a confirmation. 
So much for this all-seeing god. *pouts*

Fixers0 wrote...

But I do know that desingers should't shoot themselves in the foot by insulting our intelligence based on the previous games.

Well duuuh.
BioWare have said countless times that they watch the forum and the feedback. They know what people want, they know what the people know. They won't just push everything that we've done and learned aside. They're not stupid. They know that if they did that it would equal ruination for them as a developer.
If you want to complain about developers and designers insulting the fanbase's intelligence, I suggest you go to the GPG forums. There's plenty to complain about.

[Uzrbital]

Let reapers finish off Earth, Reapers leave, destroy mass relay's, make new portable mass relay's. Problem solved?

[Someone With Mass]

Fixers0 wrote...

Spartanburger wrote...

Fixers0 wrote...

Humanoid_Typhoon wrote...

Their argument is that there should only be 1 ending and that BW is wrong.

I rather have only 1 ending that is both consistant lore and that is supported by logic the 10 endings full off ' coolsz bros dudz'' crap.

Tell me, oh master-of-space-and-time-who-can-see-all-possible-outcomes-of-a-came-thats-still-many-months-from-release, are there any endings that are simply "coolsz bros dudz?"

If it sells, then sure


Oh wait. You haven't played the game. You don't know for sure what the ending(s) will be like.

But i do know that desingers should't shoot themselfs in the foot by insulting our intelligence base on the previous games.

So, if it sells, it's crap, but if it doesn't sell and ME3 becomes a financial flop, then it's good?

Oh, yeah, I can totally see the "logic" in that statement.

[Fixers0]

Someone With Mass wrote...

Fixers0 wrote...

I never broke the lore, i'm not the designer, but feel free to ask your friends at bioware how the manage do it so many times without realising it.

And please explain me what the point is of establishing the lore if you're not going to hold on to it?

In case you haven't noticed, the established lore in Mass Effect tends to not translate well into gameplay.

Because if it was so true to the lore, Shepard would be able to use his/her biotics about four/five times per battle at best before getting exhausted, and shields wouldn't be able to block punches.

you think they should have thought that out before they mades the games, coordination between the gameplay and codex teams, make sense,

Unless you are making a cartoonish style video game for the mainstream gamer. then you could as well remove the codex all together.

Also if you played Mass Effect 1  melee attacks bypasses shields, as they should.

[Sundance31us]

Fixers0 wrote...
Oh it is, or could please explain to me how joker even surived the attack on the Normany when he was in vacuum.

You didn't see the mask on his face and the blue barrier you had to walk through to get to him?