Aller au contenu

We Can't Save Earth, We Can't Beat the Reapers


2463 réponses à ce sujet

#1376
Humanoid_Typhoon

Humanoid_Typhoon
  • Members
  • 4 735 messages

Saphra Deden wrote...

It isn't worth fighting for the "lives we are used to" because the price of failure is total extinction.

Extinction is never an option.

Yeah but we as a species are extinct if we get goo-ified,this "genetic legacy" you keep talking about isn't really ascension or evolution,it's just us in a can taking orders from Harby,or whoever else is in charge or if the reapers are a hive mind,we just conform to them.


If you killed all the pandas in the world and melted them into genetic paste,then put that paste into a giant panda robot,are the pandas living on?

Or if you just killed all but one and put it in the zoo,is that sole surviving panda the "genetic legacy" of the pandas?

Modifié par Humanoid_Typhoon, 03 août 2011 - 08:30 .


#1377
Twizz089

Twizz089
  • Members
  • 248 messages

Saphra Deden wrote...

It isn't worth fighting for the "lives we are used to" because the price of failure is total extinction.

Extinction is never an option.



What are you basing this on?  If we fight and get "reaped" your assuming that the reapers will be harsher on us then if we willingly give in.  Wheres is your proof?  Prove that there is a difference in fighting and  losing vs surrendering, where is the proof that both options wont lead to our extinction.

#1378
Guest_Saphra Deden_*

Guest_Saphra Deden_*
  • Guests

Twizz089 wrote...

So your admiting that your arguments are based on nothing and your "theories" lack evidence? Oh ok. At least your being honest.


My theories have a degree of speculation to them, but they are not based solely on speculation.

They are also based on obeservations of the Battle of the Citadel, the war with the Collectors, records of space born combat, planetary assaults, documentation of eezo exposures in humans, and the commonly accepted theory for the mass extinctions on Eingana.

#1379
Guest_Saphra Deden_*

Guest_Saphra Deden_*
  • Guests

Humanoid_Typhoon wrote...

Yeah but we as a species are extinct if we get goo-ified,this "genetic legacy"...


What is the human species?

#1380
Shimmer_Gloom

Shimmer_Gloom
  • Members
  • 573 messages

Saphra Deden wrote...

It isn't worth fighting for the "lives we are used to" because the price of failure is total extinction.

Extinction is never an option.


What so the stakes are too high?  It's time to chicken out?  Just when the going gets tough we... roll over, offer our posteriers to the sky and beg them to turn us into genetic goo?

If exstinction is not an option, don't except exstinction.  Fight to the last man woman and child.  And if fighting doens't work, run.  This is the age of FTL travel right?  Its not like the Reapers can catch us?

There are any number of options besides letting the Reapers kill us then make pretty art out of our liqufied corpses.  Why is surrender the BEST choice?  Why is it better than running?  Or fighting?  Or a combination of both?

#1381
Humanoid_Typhoon

Humanoid_Typhoon
  • Members
  • 4 735 messages

Saphra Deden wrote...

Humanoid_Typhoon wrote...

Yeah but we as a species are extinct if we get goo-ified,this "genetic legacy"...


What is the human species?

...Carbon based talking monkies in space.

#1382
Shimmer_Gloom

Shimmer_Gloom
  • Members
  • 573 messages

Saphra Deden wrote...

Humanoid_Typhoon wrote...

Yeah but we as a species are extinct if we get goo-ified,this "genetic legacy"...


What is the human species?


What, doesn't every Cerberus flunky know at least that?

#1383
Guest_Saphra Deden_*

Guest_Saphra Deden_*
  • Guests

Humanoid_Typhoon wrote...

...Carbon based talking monkies in space.


It's a philosophical question so I expect a philosophical answer.

Shimmer_Gloom wrote...

What so the stakes are too high?  It's time to chicken out?


We need to be prepared to do that, yes. We didn't get to the top by being foolish. Compromise and collaboration have their place. Sometimes the best way to survive and advance is to acknowledge the alpha of the pack.

#1384
Humanoid_Typhoon

Humanoid_Typhoon
  • Members
  • 4 735 messages

Shimmer_Gloom wrote...

Saphra Deden wrote...

Humanoid_Typhoon wrote...

Yeah but we as a species are extinct if we get goo-ified,this "genetic legacy"...


What is the human species?


What, doesn't every Cerberus flunky know at least that?

They seem to think that,especially drinking th "Cerberus IS Humanity" kool-aid

#1385
Twizz089

Twizz089
  • Members
  • 248 messages

Saphra Deden wrote...

Twizz089 wrote...

So your admiting that your arguments are based on nothing and your "theories" lack evidence? Oh ok. At least your being honest.


My theories have a degree of speculation to them, but they are not based solely on speculation.

They are also based on obeservations of the Battle of the Citadel, the war with the Collectors, records of space born combat, planetary assaults, documentation of eezo exposures in humans, and the commonly accepted theory for the mass extinctions on Eingana.



I mentioned before that the battle of the citadel cannot be used to gauge or chances of victory since
1.  The combined forces of the galaxy was not there
2. We dont know how Sovereign compares to the rest of the reapers.  (We do know that they vary in size) So how many are as big as Sovereign? we dont know

After I mentioning this you stated that the combined forces will not be enough to "topple the reapers"  When I asked for proof of this, you said nothing.
Your first post was thought out and good, but after that post when people have suggest evidence to the contray, you have not supplied evidence to prove them wrong but instead relied soley on speculations.

Modifié par Twizz089, 03 août 2011 - 08:39 .


#1386
Humanoid_Typhoon

Humanoid_Typhoon
  • Members
  • 4 735 messages

Saphra Deden wrote...
 We didn't get to the top by being foolish.

That's exactly how we got to the top.

#1387
Guest_Saphra Deden_*

Guest_Saphra Deden_*
  • Guests

Twizz089 wrote...

I mentioned before that the battle of the citadel cannot be used to gauge our chances of victory since
1.  The combined forces of the galaxy was not there...


There was also only one Reaper there and its geth allies.

In future battles there will be many Reapers.

#1388
Humanoid_Typhoon

Humanoid_Typhoon
  • Members
  • 4 735 messages

Twizz089 wrote...
Your first post was thought out and good, but after that post when people have suggest evidence to the contray, you have not supplied evidence to prove them wrong but instead relied soley on speculations and insults.

Fixed.

Modifié par Humanoid_Typhoon, 03 août 2011 - 08:40 .


#1389
Twizz089

Twizz089
  • Members
  • 248 messages

Saphra Deden wrote...

Twizz089 wrote...

I mentioned before that the battle of the citadel cannot be used to gauge our chances of victory since
1.  The combined forces of the galaxy was not there...


There was also only one Reaper there and its geth allies.

In future battles there will be many Reapers.



How many? How big? How are you sure that the combine force of the galaxy wont be able to defeat them.  A big part of the reapers previous victory was division and isolation, and then slowly picking apart divided and confused forces.  We still control the relays, our forces are not isolated.  Where is your proof that the reapers can beat a united galaxy when they have only proved that they can beat a divided galaxy in the past?

#1390
Mr Powers94

Mr Powers94
  • Members
  • 134 messages
Seasons don't fear the reaper, nor do the wind, the sun or the rain. If were going down lets take out as many of those bastards as we can! 

Modifié par Mr Powers94, 03 août 2011 - 08:47 .


#1391
Guest_Saphra Deden_*

Guest_Saphra Deden_*
  • Guests

Twizz089 wrote...

How many? How big? How are you sure that the combine force of the galaxy wont be able to defeat them.


I feel that way because what I saw at the Battle of the Citadel was that even one Reaper was more than a match for an small fleet.

#1392
Shimmer_Gloom

Shimmer_Gloom
  • Members
  • 573 messages
@Saphra: "Sometimes the best way to survive and advance is to acknowledge the alpha of the pack."

Right. So that means we should never have gone to war with the Turians? That we should except the council as our Lord and Masters?

Lets say the Aasari decided to wipe Humanity from the face of the Galaxy? Would you line up to have mind sex with them so that our 'Genetic Legacy' would live on?

#1393
Shimmer_Gloom

Shimmer_Gloom
  • Members
  • 573 messages

Humanoid_Typhoon wrote...

Shimmer_Gloom wrote...

Saphra Deden wrote...

Humanoid_Typhoon wrote...

Yeah but we as a species are extinct if we get goo-ified,this "genetic legacy"...


What is the human species?


What, doesn't every Cerberus flunky know at least that?

They seem to think that,especially drinking th "Cerberus IS Humanity" kool-aid


Lets put it this way.  I believe there is more to 'being human' than our mere genetic code...

#1394
Guest_Saphra Deden_*

Guest_Saphra Deden_*
  • Guests

Shimmer_Gloom wrote...

Right. So that means we should never have gone to war with the Turians?


Once we realized just how big and power they were we should have sued for peace. (Edit: fortunately the Council did that for us, allowing us to save face)

They'd have beat the crap out of us.

Modifié par Saphra Deden, 03 août 2011 - 08:54 .


#1395
Twizz089

Twizz089
  • Members
  • 248 messages

Saphra Deden wrote...

Twizz089 wrote...

How many? How big? How are you sure that the combine force of the galaxy wont be able to defeat them.


I feel that way because what I saw at the Battle of the Citadel was that even one Reaper was more than a match for an small fleet.




But how is one reaper (and an army of geth) a good gauge of will happen when all reapers come to fight, if we have no clue how many there are and how many are as big as Sovereign?

And how is a small fleet a good gauge of what the entire galaxy can do?
Also I could argue that even without the reaper the geth army alone would have been a good match for the fleet, can you prove otherwise?  There are alot of variables to consider, which is why the battle of the citadel is not a good measure of a furture battle, you have yet to  use anything to prove otherwise.

Modifié par Twizz089, 03 août 2011 - 08:57 .


#1396
Shimmer_Gloom

Shimmer_Gloom
  • Members
  • 573 messages

Saphra Deden wrote...

Shimmer_Gloom wrote...

Right. So that means we should never have gone to war with the Turians?


Once we realized just how big and power they were we should have sued for peace. (Edit: fortunately the Council did that for us, allowing us to save face)

They'd have beat the crap out of us.


Its a good thing you know your place for humanity then.  We deserve to be on the bottom of the totum pole in the galaxy.  I'm glad you agree.

#1397
Sisterofshane

Sisterofshane
  • Members
  • 1 756 messages
[quote]Saphra Deden wrote...

[quote]Sisterofshane wrote...

Why would the Reapers need us to gather resources?[/quote]

I never said they'd need us to do anything but die.


[quote]Sisterofshane wrote...

Why would they be coming to our galaxy in such a hurry as to expose themselves to a united galactic flleet?[/quote]

The longer they wait the better our chances of victory.

We may get complacent, but we'll also become more technologically advanced. It's bad enough we've got a dead Reaper (or two) to examine and improve ourselves with. We've also got the Collector base or its remains. The tech gab between us and the Reapers is narrowing. If the Reapers wait another thousand years they just might run into an enemy who is as advanced as they are, or worse. Without raw resources at their disposal the Reapers can't do much in dark space but hibernate.

Shepard's not a concern. The Commander is just a fortunate mortal who happens to be in the right place at the right time. He can be killed, the Reapers know this. One victory does not imply another.

Unless the Reapers are genre savvy (like TIM) they have no reason to believe Shepard is anything that exceptional. [/quote]

You missed  my whole point, and actually helped me prove it a bit.  The Reapers can no longer afford to wait.  They are rushing in as a last ditch effort to continue their plans, because I feel that if they wait out in darkspace much longer (even while hibernating), that they will not have enough resources themselves to continue existing.  That's why they need all of our resources.  Or they will just power down.

And they DO believe that Shep is exceptional.  That's why they KILLED HIM/HER ONCE.  He/She just didn't stay dead.  Despite what they say, they are bound to take notice.  This is the first time in the history of their plans that they have been halted in such a manner.  And waiting a thousand years would not be necessary to wait until Shepard is dead or incapable of doing anything.  But, as we have already established, they can't afford to wait.  They are taking the risk.

[quote]Saphra Deden wrote...
[quote]Sisterofshane wrote...

And while Reapers do not need to worry about food or medical supplies, they do need to worry about sustaining damage to themselves.[/quote]

So does your fleet in addition to all the other stuff I mentioned. The Reapers can stop and repair themselves while their brethren continue the pursuit.

The circumstances of the derelict Reaper's demise are unknown. [/quote]

Prove to me that the Reapers can repair themselves.  They are (partially) organic constructs themselves.  Perhaps they would need more of their own creator species to repair themselves.  We know THAT would be impossible for them to do if that were true.

And even though the exact circumstances of the Derelict Reapers death are unknown, we DO know that it was at least partially active so many years AFTER it was damaged.  NO proof that any other Reaper tried to help it, or even tried to REMOVE it so that it wouldn't be discovered so many years later.  So, we can assume that once a reaper sustains ENOUGH damage, it's game over, no other Reapers are coming to help it.


[quote]Sisterofshane wrote...

There are many, many planets capable of sustaining production and supply lines.[/quote]

Not if the Reapers get to them.

Any virgin worlds you find will need to have the infrastructure built from scratch. That takes time and resources. Two things you will not have in any significant quantities.

The Reapers don't need to watch every planet in galaxy at once because you cannot reach every planet in the galaxy at once. They have much longer range than you do and a much better knowledge of the galaxy to boot.

Remember, current civilization has barely explored more than a fraction of the galaxy and an unknown portion of the relay network. The Reapers built the network and thus know every inch of it, every cluster within reach of every relay. There is only so far you can run.

The Reapers need only spread out if you do and spreading out will hurt you more than it will hurt them. A Reaper is far more self-sufficient than any of your fleets.

A nation, independent, free of all weakness.[/quote]

Way to ignore all of my evidence because it contradicts your rebuttal.

It's so highly unlikely that the Reapers will get to all sustainable, known, COLONIZED planets all at once with sufficient force as to completely cripple them immediately, that it borders on the the IMPOSSIBLE.

Even with one Reaper for every cycle that has occured since the oldest known Reaper (37 million years), they would only have enough Reapers to cover the homeworlds in the galaxy, and maybe a few colonies, with sufficient force to cripple them.

And I know you didn't actually read my post because you missed my messed up math, but the numbers still mostly apply.  They are not going to go up against an entire fleet of ships with only a small portion of their own and not expect to sustain damage.  They will withdraw from the planet, and move on to rejoin another part of the Fleet to attain a higher probability of survival.  Leaving the planet free once again, to continue it's production.

I do not believe that the Reapers are as self-sustaining as you might believe.
And they are banking on the fact that they will come in and finish their process with zero collateral damage.
Remember, the Reapers would have to complete one cycle only losing one reaper just to maintain their numbers.  If they would lose two reapers to every reaper created, or lost one reaper and and failed to create another one, the whole process of the cycle would lead to their own eventual extinction.  If we can take out a few Reapers, it might be enough for them to have to reconsider their plan.

[quote]Sisterofshane wrote...

Yes, a lot of infastructure may be lost, but that doesn't necessarily stop military production.[/quote]

Umm... yeah, it does. Without infrastructure you can't produce anything. Period.

The Reapers don't have to cripple all of it. Blocking your access to it is enough and if you are on the run that is exactly what will happen (as you'll be doing it to yourself). Once again, you don't have unlimited range.

By the way, one Reaper would be sufficient to cripple a planet with repeated strikes. A couple of days or weeks is all it would take. One shot per city. Reaper wins.


[/quote]

Stupid generalties do not negate practical historical evidence.
Soviet Russia had no infastructure to support it's people, and yet it still managed to create and sustain a formidable military presence.
And only one Reaper would be able to cripple a planet, ONLY IF there were no other forces opposing it. This will not be the case, and no Reaper would ever think that it would be a possibilty.

#1398
Humanoid_Typhoon

Humanoid_Typhoon
  • Members
  • 4 735 messages

Saphra Deden wrote...
They'd have beat the crap out of us.

And we would have gone down swinging.

#1399
Guest_Saphra Deden_*

Guest_Saphra Deden_*
  • Guests

Shimmer_Gloom wrote...

Its a good thing you know your
place for humanity then.  We deserve to be on the bottom of the totum
pole in the galaxy.  I'm glad you agree.


We don't "deserve" anything. Our place in the food chain will be whatever we make of it.

Twizz089 wrote...

But how is one reaper (and an army of geth) a good gauge of will happen when all reapers come to fight, if we have no clue how many there are and how many are as big as Sovereign?


It is all we have to go on. We got a taste of Reaper weapons and defenses.

Some Reapers may be weaker, sure. However it is not smart to assume they will be weaker. They may very well be equally as strong as Sovereign or even stronger.

This is all self evident.

If one Reaper is more than a match for a fleet then how many fleets will we need to take on many Reapers? Possibly dozens, or hundreds, or even thousands. We'll run out of fleets.

The battle with Sovereign gave us an example of what ou K/D ratio will be.

#1400
Humanoid_Typhoon

Humanoid_Typhoon
  • Members
  • 4 735 messages
S.o.s. I think you just mis-formatted your post,you were just attacking yourself.