Aller au contenu

We Can't Save Earth, We Can't Beat the Reapers


2463 réponses à ce sujet

#2051
TuringPoint

TuringPoint
  • Members
  • 2 089 messages

stysiaq wrote...

Alocormin wrote...

My thoughts are now elaborated in the above post. In more concise form than they were going to be originally.

Extinction is natural. Extinction and continuation of the Reaper legacy somehow doesn't seem to me to be natural. It defies nature. That is what Reapers do.

I believe that humanity is a biological thing. Being human is existential as well.  I believe in my own existence and my existence is important to me.  I do not believe I could continue to exist as a reaper, being a biologically evolved being.   Nor would my culture continue to exist, or any manner of legacy that I had created.  It would only be the Reaper legacy, to exploit and exterminate for the rest of time.


My thoughts:

Extinction is natural.

You can't deny it.

But Reapers extinction cycle is millions years old. Probably older (the derelict reaper is 37 million years old, we don't have info on older times).

So, what I'm trying to say, if something occurs every 50k years for several millions, or even billions of years, then... is that not natural? Are'nt we actually opposing the nature of the [mass effect] universe by resisting? Each moment I think about it, I tend to agree with humanity's fate (or simply this organic lifes generations fate) and their destruction. ('salvation through destruction')

Try to look for a moment at the bigger picture: the organic life, all the species in the universe and their homeworld as a single organism. The body is old and it is necessary to make room for the new, younger generation. We observe it in our lifes as well - older people pass away, new are born, the wheel keeps on turnin.

Why should we end that cycle? Why prevent other species from rising, discovering the Citadel, learning the space travel mechanisms? Should this generation of organic life be the final one?

Of course, single human mind can't accept it. We look at life from our, personal, single-minded viewpoint. We identify life with ours heartbeat, our families, our health. We can accept death more easily when we are terminally ill, or old, but it is impossible, when we are still young and crave for living. We don't 'feel' the feelings of the whole galactic organic civilization. We are individuals. It's sililar to what Legion tells you - you can't truly understand him, because there is no "him", the Legion "are".

And the galactic civilization is old and sick, and the time has come for it to end. The Reapers are the natural cause of death in the universe, and we cannot perceive it that way - for us death is again an individual experience, caused by age and diseases, by 'natural' or rather 'organic' causes. Humanity won't ever accept, that their fate is to die due to machines.

Reapers being (even partially) synthetic is another problem. I'm sure that if the Reapers were fully organic beings able to survive in outer (and dark) space, they would resemble all the human gods that are established in human culture. The death from their hands would seem more 'natural' just because they would look 'natural' to us.

With Reapers being partially synthetic,we cannot accept it. We don't see, that the nature of the universe is both organic and synthetic. They are the nature of this universe - we are just half natural. The geth are also half natural only.

We see the Reapers as synthetics only, and this is our biggest mistake, preventing us from truly understanding.

I think, that the Cycle is ME universes version of evolution, but on a bigger scale. Which makes us the best galactic civilization so far. But not the final one.

These are only my assumptions.
If there will be an option to surrender, I'll do it with one of my Sheps.


Ok.  I don't see the Reapers as synthetics.  To be clear there isn't anything wrong with defying nature; it's part of human existence as much as it is Reaper existence.

What's to say our evolution would be the last one if we killed the Reapers?  Or defeated them, held them off, whatever.

If Synthetic isn't Synthetic, what does natural mean?  Perhaps from a Reaper's perspective "synthetic" is only half the descriptor.  They think they are literal gods.  I'm not sure what you mean by "they're the nature of the universe," although I do think it's possible their rise to being may have been a natural consequence of ascending to a certain technological level, and some organic race would want to defy nature and become more and reaper-ify themselves.  

Plenty of people think themselves gods as it is.  There were ancient rulers who thought themselves gods, descended from gods, ordained by gods.  A lot of people think existence is about being in power.  

If we can defeat them, though, that's not any less natural than their continued existence.  I mean, if their existence is so natural, what does it matter if we defeat them?  We'll become them anyway eventually.

What's to say, if we can become "old and sick," as a galactic society (although we've just recently come into prominence), that Reapers can't become old and sick?  Perhaps they are.  The little cycle they have to keep the galaxy nice and tidy is certainly a little bit sick.  

I think saying "you're just a machine... and machines can be broken" is a tad simplistic, but it's still true.   I think our understanding is beneath them.   I don't think there is any way for us to truly understand them.  I hope that never changes.  It would be like Lucas introducing Midichlorians to Star Wars.

Modifié par Alocormin, 15 août 2011 - 12:13 .


#2052
Someone With Mass

Someone With Mass
  • Members
  • 38 560 messages
If eezo will become so deadly, why don't we move the humans somewhere else while cleaning it up, like, oh I don't know, one or two of the half a dozen human colonies they have?

#2053
SandTrout

SandTrout
  • Members
  • 4 171 messages

Someone With Mass wrote...

If eezo will become so deadly, why don't we move the humans somewhere else while cleaning it up, like, oh I don't know, one or two of the half a dozen human colonies they have?

I've tried this argument already. Apparently, since Saphra cannot (or will not) fathom the numbers, it's an invalid argument.<_<

Modifié par SandTrout, 15 août 2011 - 12:11 .


#2054
Zulu_DFA

Zulu_DFA
  • Members
  • 8 217 messages

Someone With Mass wrote...

If eezo will become so deadly, why don't we move the humans somewhere else while cleaning it up, like, oh I don't know, one or two of the half a dozen human colonies they have?

Because there are too many of them.
[smilie]http://social.bioware.com/images/forum/emoticons/wizard.png[/smilie]

#2055
Someone With Mass

Someone With Mass
  • Members
  • 38 560 messages

SandTrout wrote...

Someone With Mass wrote...

If eezo will become so deadly, why don't we move the humans somewhere else while cleaning it up, like, oh I don't know, one or two of the half a dozen human colonies they have?

I've tried this argument already. Apparently, since Saphra cannot (or will not) fathom the numbers, it's an invalid argument.<_<

Bull**** it is.

Just take the humans that are in the danger zones to Elysium, Terra Nova or Eden Prime. Or all three.

Humanity is undergoing a radical change, anyway, so they can might as well use those colonies for something good for once.

#2056
Darkelefantos1

Darkelefantos1
  • Members
  • 357 messages
Just let them stay on Earth, I say the 5th generation will have adapted to the contamination by evolution.

#2057
TuringPoint

TuringPoint
  • Members
  • 2 089 messages
It would be a logistical difficulty, to say the least.

It would depend on how many ships were available, how many worlds needed to be evacuated. It won't be just Earth under attack, although they may focus their efforts there.

#2058
SandTrout

SandTrout
  • Members
  • 4 171 messages

Someone With Mass wrote...

Bull**** it is.

Just take the humans that are in the danger zones to Elysium, Terra Nova or Eden Prime. Or all three.

Humanity is undergoing a radical change, anyway, so they can might as well use those colonies for something good for once.

Calm down, I was agreeing with you. Reread my post and assume sarcasm.

My bad for not making it clear, I thought the smilie was adequate.

#2059
TuringPoint

TuringPoint
  • Members
  • 2 089 messages
Thing is, I think the rich people would be the first ones to get off the planet. Most people would just die, or suffer the consequences of Eezo exposure.

I do think the races of the galaxy would be able to pull together, at least to some limited extent. Every race profits in their own way the way things currently are, and under duress human beings pull together, as would be the nature of any other sentient species with a communal spirit. There will be selfishness, sure, but no more than human selfishness would rise up on its own in such circumstances. Maybe new factions with multiple races involved will develop.

#2060
Weskerr

Weskerr
  • Members
  • 1 538 messages

Saphra Deden wrote...

Clearly you never understood what my post was about. I would attribute this failure to myself for not getting my point across, but I put work into that post so I'm sure I did my job. Your inability to grasp the point is your own fault.

Moving on.

The Earth being decimated by eezo esposure is just one reason among many that I advocate surrendering to the Reapers. Really I think the argument is largely moot since I don't think we'll be able to beat the Reapers anyway. This means we won't liberate Earth and won't have to worry about the eezo contaminating it.

I explained this a page or two ago but I'll explain it again, just for you.

I included the eezo argument because it is just one more layer of hopelessness we're up against. I point it out because it means that even if by some miracle we do defeat the Reapers we'll be left with a ruined world and a weakened humanity. We will no longer be a giant.

Other species will master Reaper technology and consume themselves with it, and then us. We'll be at their mercy.


Before I respond to this just let me point out that I didn't read the millions of thread posts between your original post and this. So what I say is just based upon your original post.

You said that defeating the Reapers is impossible because 1. They have no territory of their own to defend unlike the spacefaring species, 2. They could always escape a losing battle through FTL.

Addressing your first point, the Reapers not having anything to defend except themselves can actually be a strategic and tactical advantage to us. This means that the only military objective of the spacefaring species is to wipe out the Reapers (their army). If the Reapers are all self-contained and have no means of resupplying themselves, then the destruction of any Reaper is catastrophic to them. The only reason they are attacking the galaxy in the first place is precisely because they cannot subsist alone in dark space for more than 50,000 years at a time. They need the raw resources of the galaxy (natural resources including organic species themselves) as well as aritifical resources (technology created by space-faring species) in order to continue to live and exist. They can survive every other 50,000 years in peace while every other 50,000 years they must reap the galaxy of its resources to continue to live.

If we deprive them of their resources while at the same time destroy their army, then they will be defeated.

As for your second point, if the Reapers have to escape a losing battle in the first place then they are essentially nothing more than hit-and-run guerrila fighters, or at best an army that is not as strong as the army theyr'e fighting against. Especially since they have no means of resupplying themselves (via bases, or planets with natural resources to fix damaged ships or produce new ones), then eventually they will become so few in number (from ships destroyed in battle and from simply starving to death) that their hit-and-run tactics will no longer accomplish anything but bring themselves closer to extinction faster. In the meantime, the spacefaring species can fortify themselves in defensive postions and at the same time resupply themselves with food, water, ammunitions, and material to repair their equipment or produce entirely new equipment. The Reapers are waging an entirely offensive war and cannot sustain that without supplies, industry, and resources to replace their lost or damaged ships (which are not separate from themselves because they are their ships). Unless the Reapers are so overwhelmingly powerful and numerous that they don't need supplies, then they cannot win the war. Their trump card has always been their surprise attacks, catching their enemies completely offguard, and they no longer have that anymore. (The Alliance fleet massing over Europe suggests that they are expecting an attack).

I'll respond to the part of your post that I bolded now. You're saying that even if the Reapers are defeated, humanity is doomed anyway because they'll be so weakened that they won't be able to protect themselves from being dominated by the other space-faring species. You're forgetting that the other species will be just as weakened as humanity if the Reapers are defeated. It's not just humanity that is being attacked, but every space-faring species in the galaxy. Their fleets will be just as decimated, their worlds just as ruined as humanity's.

#2061
azerSheppard

azerSheppard
  • Members
  • 1 279 messages

Zulu_DFA wrote...

Someone With Mass wrote...

If eezo will become so deadly, why don't we move the humans somewhere else while cleaning it up, like, oh I don't know, one or two of the half a dozen human colonies they have?

Because there are too many of them.
[smilie]http://social.bioware.com/images/forum/emoticons/wizard.png[/smilie]


If atleast 50.000 ships survive war, and each have a 500 person loadout in average, it would take 10.000.000.000/500/50.000, approx 400 trips to get em out, now i'm expecting atleast 3/4 of em to be dead when we finaly rescue em, if not more, making it a 100 trips.

SOOO impossible.

Anyway, this whole theory is based around the assumption that the reapers will be blown up and crash into the planet, AND that the people who wrote the planetary info, are of any importance in writing the actual plot of the game.:unsure:

#2062
TuringPoint

TuringPoint
  • Members
  • 2 089 messages

Weskerr wrote...


I'll respond to the part of your post that I bolded now. You're saying that even if the Reapers are defeated, humanity is doomed anyway because they'll be so weakened that they won't be able to protect themselves from being dominated by the other space-faring species. You're forgetting that the other species will be just as weakened as humanity if the Reapers are defeated. It's not just humanity that is being attacked, but every space-faring species in the galaxy. Their fleets will be just as decimated, their worlds just as ruined as humanity's.




Your other points are interesting, but I can only definitely agree with this part.  Every race is getting attacked.  

#2063
Someone With Mass

Someone With Mass
  • Members
  • 38 560 messages

azerSheppard wrote...

Anyway, this whole theory is based around the assumption that the reapers will be blown up and crash into the planet, AND that the people who wrote the planetary info, are of any importance in writing the actual plot of the game.:unsure:


We can always just disable them, like the derelict Reaper, and then take their bodies to a safe place.

#2064
Zulu_DFA

Zulu_DFA
  • Members
  • 8 217 messages

azerSheppard wrote...

If atleast 50.000 ships survive war, and each have a 500 person loadout in average, it would take 10.000.000.000/500/50.000, approx 400 trips to get em out, now i'm expecting atleast 3/4 of em to be dead when we finaly rescue em, if not more, making it a 100 trips.

You forget the Kodiak Combat cockroach, which is magically capable of deep space travel. The Alliance will need just under a billion of those to evac the entire population of Earth at once!

[smilie]http://social.bioware.com/images/forum/emoticons/wizard.png[/smilie]

Modifié par Zulu_DFA, 15 août 2011 - 12:57 .


#2065
Guest_Saphra Deden_*

Guest_Saphra Deden_*
  • Guests

Weskerr wrote...

You said that defeating the Reapers is impossible because 1. They have no territory of their own to defend unlike the spacefaring species, 2. They could always escape a losing battle through FTL.

Blah blah blah blah blah blah stupid stupid stupid stupid.


My reply got eaten so I'm writing this second one in a much worse mood.

Firstly, nobody ever said the Reapers can't resupply themselves. We don't even know what kinds of supplies they actually need. All we can say for certain is that they need fuel and ammunition. Both of which can be obtained by them rather easily without setting up lots of permanent infrastructure.

Their greater knowledge of the galaxy and FTL range enables them to do this in very remote areas where we can't strike back at them.

At the same time they can destory our worlds with impunity because DO NOT NEED THEM. They can destory our worlds faster than we can rebuild them, which will eventually starve our fleets. The Reapers can destroy us without giving us the luxury of fighting a pitched battle.

This has nothing to do with the Reapers being weak. Hit and Run is a tactic used by anybody who wants to fight efficiently. Don't mistake the employ of it as a sign of weakness. That's an incredibly stupid position to take. The Reapers will do it because it works and because we can't counter it, making their victory easier.

Finally, the other races will not be as weakened as we are. I explained this in my last post so I don't know why you would even bring this up unless you didn't read it or you are just dumb.

The other races have far larger economies and populations. Humanity is smaller and more condensed around a single world, that world being Earth. The other races can lose six billion people and barely feel it. Humanity can't. Earth is still central to our civilization and it being decimated will set us back a century or more, which is very bad considering how fast the other races could master and employ Reaper technologies.

#2066
azerSheppard

azerSheppard
  • Members
  • 1 279 messages

Zulu_DFA wrote...
You forget the Kodiak Combat cockroach, which is magically capable of deep space travel. The Alliance will need just under a billion of those to evac the entire population of Earth at once!

[smilie]http://social.bioware.com/images/forum/emoticons/wizard.png[/smilie]


See? In just 5 minutes you came up with an ideal way to save everyone.

#2067
Weskerr

Weskerr
  • Members
  • 1 538 messages

Saphra Deden wrote...

Weskerr wrote...

You said that defeating the Reapers is impossible because 1. They have no territory of their own to defend unlike the spacefaring species, 2. They could always escape a losing battle through FTL.

Blah blah blah blah blah blah stupid stupid stupid stupid.



Just let me get this out of the way before I respond. Ad hominem in no way invalidates any of my points. You have the right to be angry, but saying I'm "dumb" and "stupid" neither invalidates my arguments nor validates yours.

Saphra Deden wrote...
Firstly, nobody ever said the Reapers can't resupply themselves. We don't even know what kinds of supplies they actually need.
All we can say for certain is that they need fuel and ammunition. Both
of which can be obtained by them rather easily without setting up lots
of permanent infrastructure.


You didn't literally say that the Reapers can't supply themsleves, but by saying they have no bases to defend means  that they also have no way of supplying themselves (you can't supply yourself from a base if you don't have a base). Then you say that nobody knows what kind of supplies they need, but then go on to say that that we actually do know what kind of supplies they need because we're certain that they need fuel and ammunition. You contradicted yourself. And then you say that the supplies we know that they need can be obtained "rather easily" without infrastructure. How's that?

Saphra Deden wrote...
Their greater knowledge of the galaxy and FTL range enables them to do
this in very remote areas where we can't strike back at them.

At the same time they can destory our worlds with impunity because DO NOT NEED THEM.
They can destory our worlds faster than we can rebuild them, which will
eventually starve our fleets. The Reapers can destroy us without giving
us the luxury of fighting a pitched battle.


Regarding the FTL, it shouldn't matter where they flee a battle to if FTL travel can't be tracked anyway. Their greater knowledge of the galaxy doesn't give them an advantage when fleeing through FTL travel if a ship using it can't be tracked.

They do not need our worlds and so can destroy them with impunity. You know this for certain? I always thought that they engaged in precise destruction because they didn't want to destroy anything that could be of value to them.  You know, the Reapers reap the galaxy, they don't utterly destroy it. You're also just assuming that the Reapers can destroy us "without giving us the luxory" of defending ourselves. Remember, they don't have the element of suprise that they're used to now. Fighting an enemy that expects you is more difficult than fighting an enemy that doesn't expect you.

Saphra Deden wrote...
This has nothing to do with the Reapers being weak. Hit and Run is a
tactic used by anybody who wants to fight efficiently. Don't mistake the
employ of it as a sign of weakness. That's an incredibly stupid
position to take. The Reapers will do it because it works and because we
can't counter it, making their victory easier.


Hit and run tactics are employed by those who are not strong enough to defeat you in a full scale battle. It does show a qualitative weakness. The Americans used it quite a lot in the Revlutionary War against the British. The Vietnamese used it against the Americans in the Vietnam War. The terrorists/millitants are using it against the Americans in Afghanistan and Iraq. It's employed by those who know they can't destroy the enemy, and with the goal of taking away their will to fight.

Saphra Deden wrote...
Finally, the other races will not be as weakened as we are. I explained
this in my last post so I don't know why you would even bring this up
unless you didn't read it or you are just dumb.


I read your post thoroughly and I didn't see any explanation as to why humanity would be the only spare-faring species to weaken after defeating the Reapers.

Saphra Deden wrote...
The other races have far larger economies and populations. Humanity is
smaller and more condensed around a single world, that world being
Earth. The other races can lose six billion people and barely feel it.
Humanity can't. Earth is still central to our civilization and it being
decimated will set us back a century or more, which is very bad
considering how fast the other races could master and employ Reaper
technologies.


You said yourself that humanity is a giant.

Saphra Deden wrote...
I included the eezo argument because it is just one more layer of hopelessness we're up against. I point it out because it means that even if by some miracle we do
defeat the Reapers we'll be left with a ruined world and a weakend
humanity. We will no longer be a giant.




What gives them this "giant" status if their economies and populations are smaller? How can they support such a powerful navy that rivals the Turians, the Asari, and the Salarians? Also, every other space-faring species has a central world too which will also be attacked. Most of their populations can be wiped out also by just focusing on these central worlds. So every specie's populations would be decimated, not just humanity's.

Modifié par Weskerr, 15 août 2011 - 02:02 .


#2068
Someone With Mass

Someone With Mass
  • Members
  • 38 560 messages
Actually, the Reapers do need our worlds to continue their cycle.

Life can't continue to grow and evolve if the planet is gone.

#2069
Guest_Saphra Deden_*

Guest_Saphra Deden_*
  • Guests

Someone With Mass wrote...

Actually, the Reapers do need our worlds to continue their cycle.

Life can't continue to grow and evolve if the planet is gone.


The planets will recover.

#2070
Guest_Saphra Deden_*

Guest_Saphra Deden_*
  • Guests

Weskerr wrote...

Just let me get this out of the way before I respond. Ad hominem in no way invalidates any of my points. You have the right to be angry, but saying I'm "dumb" and "stupid" neither invalidates my arguments nor validates yours.


I don't claim that it wins the argument, but it does set the tone.

Weskerr wrote...

You didn't literally say that the Reapers can't supply themsleves, but by saying they have no bases to defend means  that they also have no way of supplying themselves...


No, it doesn't. They can "live off the land" so to speak.

Weskerr wrote...

Regarding the FTL, it shouldn't matter where they flee a battle to if FTL travel can't be tracked anyway.


No, but range can be factored in to allow you to narrow down their staging grounds, if any. It's the only way you can attack them.

Weskerr wrote...

Hit and run tactics are employed by those who are not strong enough to defeat...


This is why I called you stupid and I stand by it.

We're done.

#2071
Someone With Mass

Someone With Mass
  • Members
  • 38 560 messages

Saphra Deden wrote...

The planets will recover.


Not according to your own logic and statements.

Way to contradict yourself there.

#2072
Weskerr

Weskerr
  • Members
  • 1 538 messages

Saphra Deden wrote...

This is why I called you stupid and I stand by it.

We're done.


I see that when you either don't feel like arguing a point or can't defend your own arguments with facts, you're content with calling the other person stupid. Talking to someone like you is a waste of time.

#2073
Lotion Soronarr

Lotion Soronarr
  • Members
  • 14 481 messages

Weskerr wrote...

You said that defeating the Reapers is impossible because 1. They have no territory of their own to defend unlike the spacefaring species, 2. They could always escape a losing battle through FTL.

Addressing your first point, the Reapers not having anything to defend except themselves can actually be a strategic and tactical advantage to us. This means that the only military objective of the spacefaring species is to wipe out the Reapers (their army). If the Reapers are all self-contained and have no means of resupplying themselves, then the destruction of any Reaper is catastrophic to them. The only reason they are attacking the galaxy in the first place is precisely because they cannot subsist alone in dark space for more than 50,000 years at a time. They need the raw resources of the galaxy (natural resources including organic species themselves) as well as aritifical resources (technology created by space-faring species) in order to continue to live and exist. They can survive every other 50,000 years in peace while every other 50,000 years they must reap the galaxy of its resources to continue to live.

If we deprive them of their resources while at the same time destroy their army, then they will be defeated.



Wut?
The reapers having no territory to defend an advantage? Do you have any grasp or tactics and logistics at all?

What this means is that tehy can move everywhere at will, attack anywhere in full force. They don't have to guard anything. Unlike us. We have to leave rear guard, protect vital worlds and instalations. All of THEIR assets are mobile and can FTL . Our assets are static and vulnerable.

What this means is that they have complete stratigic dominance. If they hit a planet we must either abandon it or are forced to defend. And they have far superior defences and firepower. If at any times the odds are not in their favor, they can retreat and attakc something else. And since you can't drag the planets behind you, what do you do then? Split the forces? Don't persure? Persue in force?
If you don't persue they'll devastate the other target. If you do persure with all the force, they - being faster and more manouverable - can just double back and glass the unprotected target.
And splitting the forces really ins't an option agaisnt the repaers.

This is just a simpel example, but it shows you how they can play games with us with ease.
Static assets are a massive ball and chain around our defense efforts.




As for your second point, if the Reapers have to escape a losing battle in the first place then they are essentially nothing more than hit-and-run guerrila fighters, or at best an army that is not as strong as the army theyr'e fighting against. Especially since they have no means of resupplying themselves (via bases, or planets with natural resources to fix damaged ships or produce new ones), then eventually they will become so few in number (from ships destroyed in battle and from simply starving to death) that their hit-and-run tactics will no longer accomplish anything but bring themselves closer to extinction faster. In the meantime, the spacefaring species can fortify themselves in defensive postions and at the same time resupply themselves with food, water, ammunitions, and material to repair their equipment or produce entirely new equipment. The Reapers are waging an entirely offensive war and cannot sustain that without supplies, industry, and resources to replace their lost or damaged ships (which are not separate from themselves because they are their ships). Unless the Reapers are so overwhelmingly powerful and numerous that they don't need supplies, then they cannot win the war. Their trump card has always been their surprise attacks, catching their enemies completely offguard, and they no longer have that anymore. (The Alliance fleet massing over Europe suggests that they are expecting an attack).


False assumptions. If the reapers retreat, that doens't have to be becasue they are weak - but because they are smart. They have incredibly powerfull barriers - we saw a STATIC Sovereign take a pounding from two fleets.
That means that have plenty of a safety net when it comes to time to retreat. We saw our ships geting one-shot-killed. They don't have that luxury.
Basicly repaers retreat to preserve their numbers - and every time they retreat, you'll be loosing ships.

Even if we assume we'll be able to take out some of them - how many ships would we loose in exchange? You can't build ships overnight..and shipyards are in space. A big, static target for the reapers.


Also, you're assuming they can't repair or ressuply themselves. that is incorrect. With their husks and indoctrinated slaves, they got everything they need.

What the reapers can do is use Guerila warfare with a vastly superior and more mobile force - if they do that, then even a McGuffin would be hard pressed to help us.

#2074
Guest_Saphra Deden_*

Guest_Saphra Deden_*
  • Guests

Someone With Mass wrote...

Saphra Deden wrote...

The planets will recover.


Not according to your own logic and statements.

Way to contradict yourself there.


I never said or implied any such thing.

Go read my introductory post.

#2075
Someone With Mass

Someone With Mass
  • Members
  • 38 560 messages

Saphra Deden wrote...

I never said or implied any such thing.

Go read my introductory post.


So your little rant about the dangers of eezo poisoning the planets were a complete lie? Good to know.