3618 réponses à ce sujet

[Xilizhra]

Longsword-83 wrote...

Saphra Deden wrote...

Xilizhra wrote...

Why do you believe I'm misguided for having my favor lie slightly with the asari?

It indicates a lack of any desire for procreation and self-preservation. These are essential traits which allowed humanity to survive. Organisms which don't have them die out.

Wait, he doesn't want to continue the legacy of humanity just because he treats the asari as equals?

I don't think that's how it works.

FYI, it's "she."

[SandTrout]

Longsword-83 wrote...

Huh. Just realized something about myself.

I'm normally a full Paragon player, but here I am endorsing the idea of Human superiority.

Guess I'm a little Renegade after all.

Don't let the anti-humans fool you. Us paragons can be just as pro-human as a Renegade. Of the rational ones, there are relatively small differences in opinion that result in drastically different in-game action due to how the game was designed.

[SandTrout]

Humanoid_Typhoon wrote...

SandTrout wrote...
You should be careful who you're criticisizing and why, Lotion. On a forum, your reputation is all you have, after all.

Being reasonable is apparently trolling

Oddly enough, in certain context, it is...

[Xilizhra]

Saphra Deden wrote...

Xilizhra wrote...

The way the whole melding thing works is that part of me will live on in Liara...

No, it won't. This is a stated fact in the ME universe. You impart nothing to the asari. Nothing.

Go read the codex if you don't believe me, or better yet, talk to the bartender (the Matriarch one).

Not genetically, but in a part of my mind being preserved in her own memories.

[Kaiser Shepard]

Xilizhra wrote...

FYI, it's "she."

I'm still having trouble swallowing that; I've always seen Saph as a guy...

Modifié par Kaiser Shepard, 15 août 2011 - 05:48 .

[Humanoid_Typhoon]

Kaiser Shepard wrote...

Xilizhra wrote...

FYI, it's "she."

I'm still having trouble swallowing that; I've always seen Saph as a guy...

Because of the name calling?

Perhaps the immaturity?

Modifié par Humanoid_Typhoon, 15 août 2011 - 05:49 .

[Lotion Soronarr]

SandTrout wrote...

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

Saphra Deden wrote...

Humanoid_Typhoon wrote...

Reasonable debate is accepting BOTH sides of the argument as plausable,but disagreeing

No, it isn't. You don't have to accept an argument as plausible/reasonable if it is not plausible/reasonable.

Shh...don't tell H_T that.
It might cause an aunerism when he/she tries to figure it out...

You should be careful who you're criticisizing and why, Lotion. On a forum, your reputation is all you have, after all.

Meh... I frequent many forums and my reputation is prefectly fine.

And if on some forum my reputation were to drop. So what?
Reputation is basicly "what other people tell others about you". If there's quite a few "other people" that are stupid or just don't like you, bad rep may spread, deserved or not.
I'm only concerned about what people I respect say about me. The oppinions of everyone else are irrelevant.

Not to mention that I mostly come here to see if there's any news, and sometimes if I'm bored. So I'm not worried..at all.

[Xilizhra]

Kaiser Shepard wrote...

Xilizhra wrote...

FYI, it's "she."

I'm still having trouble swallowing that; I've always seen Saph as a guy...

Oops. Sorry, I was talking about me. I'm reasonably sure Saph is male.

[Someone With Mass]

If you don't help the aliens, why the hell should they help you?

[Lotion Soronarr]

SandTrout wrote...

Longsword-83 wrote...

Huh. Just realized something about myself.

I'm normally a full Paragon player, but here I am endorsing the idea of Human superiority.

Guess I'm a little Renegade after all.

Don't let the anti-humans fool you. Us paragons can be just as pro-human as a Renegade. Of the rational ones, there are relatively small differences in opinion that result in drastically different in-game action due to how the game was designed.

I never undersand why people define themselves as "paragon" or "renegade". It's very...limited and shoe-horned...artificial you might say.

[Kaiser Shepard]

Xilizhra wrote...

Kaiser Shepard wrote...

Xilizhra wrote...

FYI, it's "she."

I'm still having trouble swallowing that; I've always seen Saph as a guy...

Oops. Sorry, I was talking about me. I'm reasonably sure Saph is male.

Wait, you're a woman as well? My entire world is falling down around me...

[SandTrout]

Lotion Soronnar wrote...

I never undersand why people define themselves as "paragon" or "renegade". It's very...limited and shoe-horned...artificial you might say.

It's just a means of quickly communicating the majority of choices that they've made in game. I, for instance, don't really hold myself to being a paragon, even though my personal canon falls into that category.

I think that its funny that a lot of people on the boards not familiar with me guess that I'm a Renegade because I present logical arguments, though. I think it says a lot about them.

[SalsaDMA]

Saphra Deden wrote...

Someone With Mass wrote...

If you don't help the aliens, why the hell should they help you?

'cause if they don't they're all going to die. Either by the Reaper's hand, or by mine.

From the sounds of it, you wanted to kill them anyway, so no difference there...

[In Exile]

I think if I had a style, I'd be "Illusive man." Like when he says "diplomacy is great... when it works." Which is how I play my Shepards. Paragon... until **** needs killing. In which case, on with the killing. Balak? He needed killing. Fist? Needed killing. Eclipse merc on Ilium? Needed killing. Krogas? Don't need killing, but do need the genophage. For altruistic reasons, so that their species can finally grow out of the dark ages. 

I'm also a greatest good kind of guy, and some of the renegade choices are clearly greatest good. 

Modifié par In Exile, 15 août 2011 - 06:01 .

[Kaiser Shepard]

Saphra Deden wrote...

I just want humans to have as much power as possible to keep them as free as possible from alien influence.

Reapers aren't an alien influence, then?

[Xilizhra]

Hah! According to your own assessment, Saphra, Shepard isn't even capable of human procreation. So this is the only thing close I have left.

[SandTrout]

Saphra Deden wrote...

Kaiser Shepard wrote...

Reapers aren't an alien influence, then?

They are. I'd prefer it if we destroyed the Reapers utterly and then repurposed their technology to suit our own needs.

However I just don't think that's a realistic outcome. So I'm left with a choice: total extinction or the repurposing of the human species into a new entity. I'll go with the new entity since it is at least something of humanity that will live on. Better that than broken plastic shards thinly strewn across a fossil bed.

I'd actually agree that Reaper > Extinction. However, I apparently view our chances against the Reapers as greater than you do. If it comes to the point where our extinction is garaunteed, I would surrender to the Reapers. Available data, however, does not reflect a near 100% (IE: 99.9%) chance of loosing to the Reapers.

Even if we have a 5% chance of victory, the risk-benefit analysis of fighting the Reapers favors fighting. I consider continuing as a species 1000 times better of a scenario than becoming a Reaper.

[In Exile]

Saphra Deden wrote...
They are. I'd prefer it if we destroyed the Reapers utterly and then repurposed their technology to suit our own needs.

Doesn't that end with us as reaper slushee anyway?