I disagree.Sisterofshane wrote...
Otherwise it just sounds like Daffy Duck and Bugs Bunny going "Yes", "No", "Yes", "No" back and forth. It's about as much fun to participate in as it is to read, and serves no purpose other then to make the offenders look like three-year olds on the playground.
KnightofPhoenix wrote...
Sisterofshane wrote...
In your situation above, if and ONLY IF there was some sort of undeniable assurance that she wouldn't turn around the day after victory and try to force me into subjugation/eliminate me with the same weapon. What would be the point of helping her save her house if she would just turn around and destroy mine anyway?
As for the friend thing, no contest. My friends help IS the resource, and I would trust her/him to in turn help me defend my home as payment.
Hence why, while helping her, you'd also try to undermine her and steal her tech. It's much easier to do that if you are allied, instead of just leaving her to die. Pardon the cliche but it's a case of "keeping your enemies closer".
Of course hence why, were I Cerberus / alliance, I would not share everything I have at my disposal.
Welcome to the messy world of politics.
But what if your friend can't help? What if he is mortally wounded and has nothing to offer? Wouldn't that be wasting ressources on him and risking both your lives, instead of just his?
Modifié par Humanoid_Typhoon, 15 août 2011 - 10:17 .
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
Sisterofshane wrote...
LOL, can't get more "morally grey" then stealing from supposed allies, can we?
And I'm willing to venture to suggest that the army they've mustered overnight is mainly composed of the Alliance reservists, indoctrinated - in the actual sense of the word - by the Terra Firma party activists.ddv.rsa wrote...
It looks that way. The Alliance is fighting the Reapers, and Cerberus is allied with the Reapers (at least Cerberus troops have been seen supporting a Reaper). I take that to mean they're allied against the Alliance.Zulu_DFA wrote...
Where?ddv.rsa wrote...
In ME3 they seem to be openly warring against the Alliance.
BW have also stated Cerberus troops make up 40% of the enemies you'll face, with husks making up another large chunk. With them as the main organic enemy I'm will to venture they're against the Alliance.
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
What if TIM had actually been building that army for year in...wait for it...secret...bum bum bumZulu_DFA wrote...
And I'm willing to venture to suggest that the army they've mustered overnight is mainly composed of the Alliance reservists, indoctrinated - in the actual sense of the word - by the Terra Firma party activists.ddv.rsa wrote...
It looks that way. The Alliance is fighting the Reapers, and Cerberus is allied with the Reapers (at least Cerberus troops have been seen supporting a Reaper). I take that to mean they're allied against the Alliance.Zulu_DFA wrote...
Where?ddv.rsa wrote...
In ME3 they seem to be openly warring against the Alliance.
BW have also stated Cerberus troops make up 40% of the enemies you'll face, with husks making up another large chunk. With them as the main organic enemy I'm will to venture they're against the Alliance.
Modifié par Humanoid_Typhoon, 15 août 2011 - 10:23 .
KnightofPhoenix wrote...
Sisterofshane wrote...
LOL, can't get more "morally grey" then stealing from supposed allies, can we?
There are many more ways to actively undermine allies too (what the USA did to Britain in WW2), so yea
Saphra Deden wrote...
I answered that question, Typhoon, many times. In even answered it (just not in a direct reply) only a few posts ago in that thread.
You are refusing to clearly state your position in order to avoid being confronted on it. This is called 'evasion'.Saphra Deden wrote...
SandTrout wrote...
I'd settle for evidence that Eingana scale ecological damage would reasonably cause the extinction of the human species.
Well, good luck with that.
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
SandTrout wrote...
You are refusing to clearly state your position in order to avoid being confronted on it. This is called 'evasion'.
Saphra Deden wrote...
SandTrout wrote...
You are refusing to clearly state your position in order to avoid being confronted on it. This is called 'evasion'.
1.) No
2.) Why don't you take this back to the other thread?
Evadin' like a ninja.
Sisterofshane wrote...
KnightofPhoenix wrote...
Sisterofshane wrote...
LOL, can't get more "morally grey" then stealing from supposed allies, can we?
There are many more ways to actively undermine allies too (what the USA did to Britain in WW2), so yea
I so want this to be apart of ME3 now! Although it kind of supports my theory on why the council should not trust a Cerberus-Aligned humanity....
Modifié par KnightofPhoenix, 15 août 2011 - 10:23 .
because you jumped thread to avoid answering.Saphra Deden wrote...
SandTrout wrote...
You are refusing to clearly state your position in order to avoid being confronted on it. This is called 'evasion'.
1.) No
2.) Why don't you take this back to the other thread?
Guest_Saphra Deden_*
SandTrout wrote...
because you jumped thread to avoid answering.
That's exactly what I mean. Former Alliance servicemen, mobilized by the Terra Firma (a political party in the Alliance) = TIM's army built in secret.Humanoid_Typhoon wrote...
What if TIM had actually been building that army for year in...wait for it...secret...bum bum bumZulu_DFA wrote...
And I'm willing to venture to suggest that the army they've mustered overnight is mainly composed of the Alliance reservists, indoctrinated - in the actual sense of the word - by the Terra Firma party activists.ddv.rsa wrote...
It looks that way. The Alliance is fighting the Reapers, and Cerberus is allied with the Reapers (at least Cerberus troops have been seen supporting a Reaper). I take that to mean they're allied against the Alliance.Zulu_DFA wrote...
Where?ddv.rsa wrote...
In ME3 they seem to be openly warring against the Alliance.
BW have also stated Cerberus troops make up 40% of the enemies you'll face, with husks making up another large chunk. With them as the main organic enemy I'm will to venture they're against the Alliance.
SandTrout wrote...
because you jumped thread to avoid answering.Saphra Deden wrote...
SandTrout wrote...
You are refusing to clearly state your position in order to avoid being confronted on it. This is called 'evasion'.
1.) No
2.) Why don't you take this back to the other thread?
Zulu_DFA wrote...
And I'm willing to venture to suggest that the army they've mustered overnight is mainly composed of the Alliance reservists, indoctrinated - in the actual sense of the word - by the Terra Firma party activists.
Sisterofshane wrote...
SandTrout wrote...
because you jumped thread to avoid answering.Saphra Deden wrote...
SandTrout wrote...
You are refusing to clearly state your position in order to avoid being confronted on it. This is called 'evasion'.
1.) No
2.) Why don't you take this back to the other thread?
LOL...
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No....
fix'd.Saphra Deden wrote...
If the some wadheads (formerly) with the Alliance need to be fought to save humanity then so be it.
KnightofPhoenix wrote...
Sisterofshane wrote...
SandTrout wrote...
because you jumped thread to avoid answering.Saphra Deden wrote...
SandTrout wrote...
You are refusing to clearly state your position in order to avoid being confronted on it. This is called 'evasion'.
1.) No
2.) Why don't you take this back to the other thread?
LOL...
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No....
As a newcomer to the ME3 section, I am confused.
Modifié par Sisterofshane, 15 août 2011 - 10:30 .
Sisterofshane wrote...
Sorry, I was laughing because earlier I decided to stop responding to another poster because it was turning into a "Bugs Bunny"-esque type fight.
Now said poster is doing it again with another person...
I had to point out the irony of it all....
Seboist wrote...
My Shepard voted for Terra Firma and was the spokeswoman for Charles Saracino's candidacy like the noble patriot she is.
Retour en haut