Saphra Deden wrote...
TobyHasEyes wrote...
But Saphra Deden, what reason do you have for thinking we could not (in the same theoretical expanse of time with the same theoretical insight) do the same thing with an organic brain?
An organic brain is not a series of algorythms. You could simulate one that way, in theory. However that is not literally what it is. It is complex matter and energy.
A geth is not. A geth is literally those symbols you've written down on the paper.
Symbols and algorythms are a language we use to explaning and describe processes. Software and programming is not literally a series of symbols you would find if you cracked open a computer, it is a series of commands that mean the hardware acts in a certain way
Considering the Geth, their mobile platforms, memory storage, and Legion (the hardware that when brought together achieves the symptoms that would suggest sentience); for that sentience to be real their hardware must be complex matter as well. As we here have never studied the inside of a Geth, we cannot know how complex their hardware is, but given their actions it must be extremely complex. Although the remarkable ability to move those run times (and overall configurations) from one hardware to another gives them a differennt view of that hardware, you couldn't claim that they would continue to exist were every piece of Geth hardware wiped out. As such it is a combination of that sophisticated, extremely complex hardware, and the specific configuration and run times, that bring about the geth sentience, just as in a brain you need the complex matter as well as the genetic code which decides what goes where, and the changes in energy configuration that are memory and learning
The Geth sentience is then defined by the configuration brought about by their run times, as those run times can move from one body to another. In the same way, our mind / consciousness / personality can only be understood as the specific arrangment of that complex hardware that is the brain (its genetic composition and how it has developed over time, changes in memory storage etc.)
If it is a belief of yours that only organic matter can bring about consciousness / subjective experience / emotions etc. then I don't hold that against you, but you should admit that it is a belief.
If you intend to show that by definition the vastly complex matter and energy in a brain can bring about results that similarly vastly complex hardware and energy in a synthetic construct, then you need to state what is about the remaining differences that means one thing can result whereas the other can't. And seeing as though you, or I, or the best neuroscientists in the world don't know what about that complex matter and energy in the brain can bring about consciousness and sentience, I don't rate your choices and being able to point out what bit of organic complex matter and energy can produce the outcome and yet cannot be recreate synthetically using equally complex matter and energy (just different elements)