The Enkindler Lives! "Remember this... soon, your memory may be all that remains." ~Javik Support Thread~
#2926
Posté 09 février 2012 - 09:24
Not even the quarians wants it.
#2927
Guest_Arcian_*
Posté 09 février 2012 - 09:41
Guest_Arcian_*
Right, like I said, there's always a social stigma to inbreeding. What I meant with it being "okay" is that genetic modification eliminates all the negative aspects of inbreeding, making it "okay" from a biological perspective i.e it ceases being dangerous. People would still be understandably "eeeew" about knocking up their relatives thanks to the Westermarck Effect (and thank god for that!).Someone With Mass wrote...
I doubt inbreeding will ever be considered "okay"
Not even the quarians wants it.
But that's where you have to weigh the options you've got:
1) Save your species through genetic modification and selective and inbreeding (for the sake of reduced ickiness, all the "action" can take place in a lab in a bunch of vials as opposed to the makeshift bed in Fritzl's cellar).
2) Condemn yourself and your species to certain extinction.
What would Prothy choose? I honestly don't know myself. I'd like for him to have hope for his species, but I don't think it's that easy.
Modifié par Arcian, 09 février 2012 - 09:42 .
#2928
Posté 09 février 2012 - 10:00
#2929
Guest_Arcian_*
Posté 09 février 2012 - 10:29
Guest_Arcian_*
The exact quote is "I am the anger of a dead people, demanding blood be spilled for the blood we lost."LTiberious wrote...
"I am the rage of a dead nation" (not exact quote, but willwork) - is a quote of a person who's at peace that his nation died, and does not want it back.
And you can't say he's at peace with the death of his people - if that was the case, why would he crave revenge? If he's so emotional about wanting to bring the Reapers to justice for killing his people, would he not be equally emotional about the chance to bring them back?
#2930
Posté 09 février 2012 - 10:32
A kingdom that has once been destroyed can never come again into being; nor can the dead ever be brought back to life.
But lets put it this way
They are dead. Thats a fact. But i must avenge them.
///
Easier?
#2931
Posté 09 février 2012 - 10:40
#2932
Guest_Arcian_*
Posté 09 février 2012 - 10:46
Guest_Arcian_*
No, but a new one can be built on the ruins of the old and be populated by new generations, and be built to last longer where the old did not.LTiberious wrote...
Sun-Tzu said
A kingdom that has once been destroyed can never come again into being; nor can the dead ever be brought back to life.
"If hope is a weapon in this cycle, then it is a weapon we must wield."
Must avenge them? Why? It's not like they will give him a pat on the back and go "Hey, thanks for avenging us, real nice of you to stay alive for 50k years and maintain that bloodlust all that time. Really appreciate it, man."LTiberious wrote...
But lets put it this way
They are dead. Thats a fact. But i must avenge them.
///
Easier?
He's doing it because it means something to him. Regret. Rage. Sadness. All that emotional jazz.
#2933
Posté 09 février 2012 - 11:08
And the reason is revenge. Not repopulation,recreation etc.
And dammit, never should the death be brought back to life
#2934
Posté 09 février 2012 - 11:44
LTiberious wrote...
"I am the rage of a dead nation" (not exact quote, but willwork) - is a quote of a person who's at peace that his nation died, and does not want it back.
What is the exact quote????
#2935
Posté 09 février 2012 - 11:45
Mayhem br wrote...
LTiberious wrote...
"I am the rage of a dead nation" (not exact quote, but willwork) - is a quote of a person who's at peace that his nation died, and does not want it back.
What is the exact quote????
I am the anger of a dead people
.
My sounds better.
#2936
Guest_Arcian_*
Posté 09 février 2012 - 12:00
Guest_Arcian_*
And how exactly does this justify him not giving a sh!t about trying to bring back his species if it turns out to be possible?LTiberious wrote...
He.created.a.reason.for.himself.
Those are not mutually exclusive. Once the Reapers are dead, he's gotta have something to do. Might as well try and do what he can to restore his people, if it turns out to be possible. It might not.LTiberious wrote...
And the reason is revenge. Not repopulation,recreation etc.
We're not talking Lazarus Projecting his entire species here, but rebuilding it. And if that's what you mean, well, that's just like, your opinion, man.LTiberious wrote...
And dammit, never should the death be brought back to life
#2937
Posté 09 février 2012 - 12:03
Modifié par Someone With Mass, 09 février 2012 - 12:04 .
#2938
Posté 09 février 2012 - 12:04
Arcian wrote...
And how exactly does this justify him not giving a sh!t about trying to bring back his species if it turns out to be possible?LTiberious wrote...
He.created.a.reason.for.himself.Those are not mutually exclusive. Once the Reapers are dead, he's gotta have something to do. Might as well try and do what he can to restore his people, if it turns out to be possible. It might not.LTiberious wrote...
And the reason is revenge. Not repopulation,recreation etc.We're not talking Lazarus Projecting his entire species here, but rebuilding it. And if that's what you mean, well, that's just like, your opinion, man.LTiberious wrote...
And dammit, never should the death be brought back to life
Because he is fine with his nation being dead. They are different paths, the creation and revenge.
They are dead for him, and i repeat - the dead shall not be brought to life. He is alone, and he is fine with that. (there goes my ****ed up logic again)
///
Well, what reasons should he have to rebuild the nation, anyways?
#2939
Guest_Arcian_*
Posté 09 février 2012 - 12:18
Guest_Arcian_*
I'm not sure I'm okay with you taking liberties with deciding what he's fine with and not, especially considering we haven't seen the end result of his writing.LTiberious wrote...
Arcian wrote...
And how exactly does this justify him not giving a sh!t about trying to bring back his species if it turns out to be possible?LTiberious wrote...
He.created.a.reason.for.himself.Those are not mutually exclusive. Once the Reapers are dead, he's gotta have something to do. Might as well try and do what he can to restore his people, if it turns out to be possible. It might not.LTiberious wrote...
And the reason is revenge. Not repopulation,recreation etc.We're not talking Lazarus Projecting his entire species here, but rebuilding it. And if that's what you mean, well, that's just like, your opinion, man.LTiberious wrote...
And dammit, never should the death be brought back to life
Because he is fine with his nation being dead.
Still, not mutually exclusive.LTiberious wrote...
They are different paths, the creation and revenge.
Not the nation, his people. The prothean empire will never rise again, but that does not mean his species should stay extinct if the possibility to save it exists.LTiberious wrote...
They are dead for him, and i repeat - the dead shall not be brought to life. He is alone, and he is fine with that. (there goes my ****ed up logic again)
///
Well, what reasons should he have to rebuild the nation, anyways?
Sure, but just because the Prothean empire will never exist again doesn't mean there shouldn't be protheans in the galaxy. Besides, he even admits the Empire was at fault and that the system of the current cycle is much better.Someone With Mass wrote...
I think he knows that the Prothean empire will never return to the strength it once had. Probably why he wouldn't see the point in it.
And whether or not he will see a point in it... I think this will be an issue of how Shepard steers him in the game, even if the end canon result may and probably will not be rebuilding his species. From what I've read myself, it seems like he discovers an appreciation for life if you steer him towards Paragon.
#2940
Posté 09 février 2012 - 12:20
Why should he? There is no reason for him to do so in my view
#2941
Guest_Arcian_*
Posté 09 février 2012 - 12:30
Guest_Arcian_*
In your view, yes. Your view and Prothy's view aren't necessarily the same.LTiberious wrote...
Okay, lets put it this way.
Why should he? There is no reason for him to do so in my view
If he owed it to his people to stay alive for 50,000 years in order to fight the Reapers all on his own, would he not also owe it to his people to continue their legacy and keep the voice of the prothean people alive if the possibility to do so presented itself? Why would he choose to be the last of his kind and bring the final end to the prothean people if another option existed?
Feels about as stupid to reject a hypothetical new scientific method to regrow your hand after losing it, "just because". It's not going to be the exact same hand, sure, but it's going to be a hand instead of a void.
#2942
Posté 09 février 2012 - 12:34
Liara: Yes, I've always wondered. What sort of government did you have? What were your religious beliefs? What kind of-
Prothean: We are dead now. What does it matter?
#2943
Posté 09 février 2012 - 12:51
Modifié par LetMeW1n, 09 février 2012 - 12:52 .
#2944
Guest_Arcian_*
Posté 09 février 2012 - 12:56
Guest_Arcian_*
Wow. Really, LT? We're discussing a hypothetical development of events after the game where the possibility of rebuilding his species exists, and you use a quote taken from the game in a context where no such solution exists to disprove my theory of what may take place after the game.LTiberious wrote...
Okay.
Liara: Yes, I've always wondered. What sort of government did you have? What were your religious beliefs? What kind of-
Prothean: We are dead now. What does it matter?
I mean, seriously - did you think this through at all?
#2945
Posté 09 février 2012 - 01:06
Arcian wrote...
Wow. Really, LT? We're discussing a hypothetical development of events after the game where the possibility of rebuilding his species exists, and you use a quote taken from the game in a context where no such solution exists to disprove my theory of what may take place after the game.LTiberious wrote...
Okay.
Liara: Yes, I've always wondered. What sort of government did you have? What were your religious beliefs? What kind of-
Prothean: We are dead now. What does it matter?
I mean, seriously - did you think this through at all?
Arcy, to be honest, i am using my life experience as a basis for my judjement. (The one i used in telling how will Prothy looks)
Okay, lets put it this way.
Counting that Prothy is a living thing, and has a living mindset. We can assume that he may wish to do anything, be that babies, pony farming or even a king to the Hanar.
Yes, that is a fact that i may not dissaprove. But its hard for me to see someone, who has Prothy's life philosophy , to wish for babies. Propably because i havent observed that IRL (and i observed a ****load of people).
I beg pardon, for not putting this up straight away
#2946
Posté 09 février 2012 - 01:10
Modifié par Armass81, 09 février 2012 - 01:11 .
#2947
Posté 09 février 2012 - 01:11
Armass81 wrote...
Even if you brought back his race, would that be a good idea? They were a social darwinistic race that had conquered the galaxy prior to this cycle, what would stop them from trying to do that again once they amass enough power?
Them protheans sound like Herr Hitler and his band of N4zis.
#2948
Posté 09 février 2012 - 01:19
Modifié par LetMeW1n, 09 février 2012 - 01:22 .
#2949
Posté 09 février 2012 - 01:21
But that's going to require a lot of funding, genetic modification is illegal, prothy doesn't seem like the attention-seeking type..
Err, then again, no real obstacles to a new prothean nation 50k after their prime. Unless there's something really special about prothean DNA, or somehow cryo f***ed up prothy or something. Idk
EDIT: I meant, tangible obstacles. Skipped a couple of posts and now I see u're arguing moral and ethics. O_O cya
Modifié par LetMeW1n, 09 février 2012 - 01:27 .
#2950
Guest_Arcian_*
Posté 09 février 2012 - 02:16
Guest_Arcian_*
That's not something that's hardwired into their genes, you know. If that was true, Sweden's population would be clamoring for the powers that be to bring back the old days of the Swedish Empire during the 16th and 17th centuries.Armass81 wrote...
Even if you brought back his race, would that be a good idea? They were a social darwinistic race that had conquered the galaxy prior to this cycle, what would stop them from trying to do that again once they amass enough power? Small group of them already tried to present themselves as "gods" and take power that way, through social manipulation.
We don't, obviously.
And really, if we're going to go down this route of debate, we could argue why we let any species exist - even our own - since each and every one of them could potentially pose a threat to galactic stability.
I'm personally going to give them the chance if the opportunity even presents itself in the game. They are not animals who cannot ignore their nature, but intelligent beings who make a choice. Of course, you can just go renegade and kill them all if the idea frightens you.
EDIT: Forgot to say this earlier, but the reason they wanted to "play god" with the lesser species was not because they were hungry for power, but because they needed a reliable way to unite the galaxy for the next Reaper invasion.
Modifié par Arcian, 09 février 2012 - 02:33 .





Retour en haut





