Ice Cold J wrote...
1. What the hell is the difference between a "lore error" and a "plot hole?"
If it was explicitly stated in the game that hardsuits have recording software and Shepard actually used said suit recording software
on-screen to record Saren admitting he's a bad guy, after which he goes to the Council to bring Saren's crimes to their attention and they ask if he has any evidence to submit, and he says he has none - that's a plot hole. Not only does the recording technology exist, he outright used it on-screen and never lost the recording on his way to the citadel - it just disappeared in the narrative. Such a thing can't even be handwaved away.
Conversely, a lore error would be if an old wizard character fell to his death over a cliff while, in the background lore, there's implicitly stated that the first thing a wizard learns is to levitate objects, including himself - meaning he should have been able to cast levitate on himself to prevent his death. Such an error can be handwaved by saying he forgot to use it while panicking on his way down. Is it a smooth solution? No.
Repeated lore errors of the same nature does make up a plot hole when piled up on each other, such as a warrior having a Sword of Undead Slaying but never actually using it where it would be appropriate.
I also made a mistake in my earlier reply to your "plot holes". The things I called lore errors aren't even that, in fact.
Mind-melding with the asari councilor and Ash having "recordings" of Saren and Sovereign aren't plot holes in the story, but holes in your arguments. Let me explain:
First of all, the councilor can't just go around and meld with anyone - she is in a position of power threatened by dissidents and assassins, and melding with someone requires a relationship of trust that simply does not exist between her and Shepard.
Secondly, mind-melding would have proved nothing, seeing how neither Shepard nor Ashley actually spoke to Saren - his guilt was implied by a dockworker whose tesimony was discarded from the start. That was the only thing Shepard and Ash saw besides geth, and it was not circumstantial evidence.
Which, of course, brings the same issue to the suit recordings - how would Ash have recorded Saren on Eden Prime if she never met him? And Sovereign? The Normandy had recordings of Sovvy that was forwarded to the Citadel, and they discarded it as a geth dreadnaught.
As for melding with Shepard to find out about the Reapers, well... that could have provided some interesting responses, but it's near-impossible that she would have agreed to it anyway.
Ice Cold J wrote...
2. I said "IF," didn't I? Pay attention. Hell, you even bolded it yourself. I'm not gonna do the goddamn research on something I'm trying to avoid until the game comes out.
Then perhaps you shouldn't complain about it until the game comes out. And you definitely shouldn't be in this thread, because it's one of the, if not THE, most spoiler-heavy threads in the character section.
Ice Cold J wrote...
I'm guessing and offering my opinion. Apparently, since you're such a big expert on a game that hasn't come out yet, he's not part of the Ilos team. Fine then. Maybe his forced story arc will make sense. 
I've read the leaks, yes.
Ice Cold J wrote...
I wasn't looking up a confirmed Prothean squadmate when I first checked this thread.
I thought the big
****SPOILER WARNING**** in the title was obvious.
Ice Cold J wrote...
I thought it was a "support" thread like every other character seems to have.
It is. It's also a spoiler minefield.