16 réponses à ce sujet

[dewayne31]

Sorry if the title is misleading. I was curious if we play Hawke in DA3 and are presented with some the major events that happened after hawke disappeared. if something disturb you bout the side you picked at the end DA2. Would you change sides or you set you set in stone with your pick?

For me i don't really if i'm set supporting the mages.yes there need to be reforms. But Meredith was right there were more blood mages. I supported the mages cause i thought the RoA was to far.But the templars did have a good point.

[Ferretinabun]

Nothing's set in stone for DA3 yet. So whether we play Hawke or not is yet to be seen (though I would doubt it).

And given the nature of the games, I would expect big decisions like who we finally side with to be recorded and referenced in DA3, but bearing in mind the epilogue is pretty much identical whatever you choose I can't see the choice will have massive consequences.

[Nodscouter]

The most likely is that we'll play a new character or considering the DA2 feedback, the Warden.

[dewayne31]

Ferretinabun wrote...

Nothing's set in stone for DA3 yet. So whether we play Hawke or not is yet to be seen (though I would doubt it).

And given the nature of the games, I would expect big decisions like who we finally side with to be recorded and referenced in DA3, but bearing in mind the epilogue is pretty much identical whatever you choose I can't see the choice will have massive consequences.

I know nothing is set that why i said if. only reason i asked was i had just beat da2 again today and i found myself questioning myself why do i side with the mages.

[Nodscouter]

In that case no, definitely not.

[dewayne31]

Nodscouter wrote...

The most likely is that we'll play a new character or considering the DA2 feedback, the Warden.

i'll be happy with a new character. but i be one pissed if they go back to warden given how many outcomes there are. sides i think they said the warden was done not in that way but..And i'll go ahead admit i'll probably go preorder da3 no matter what...

[KotorEffect3]

Nodscouter wrote...

The most likely is that we'll play a new character or considering the DA2 feedback, the Warden.

Definitly not the warden.  Not only do I want his story to be done (I liked playing as the warden btw) but how are they going to implement that without going back to our character being a mime?  Not to mention importing dwarven and elven wardens will be tricky because they redesigned both races.

[Nodscouter]

Meh, I don't want it but seeing the uproar after DA2 I'm going to guess they'll try to distance themselves as far as possibly from the game.

[dewayne31]

Nodscouter wrote...

Meh, I don't want it but seeing the uproar after DA2 I'm going to guess they'll try to distance themselves as far as possibly from the game.

I hope they don't i like where the story is heading. but i hope they listen to the fans alittle more especially on combat.

[whykikyouwhy]

dewayne31 wrote...

Sorry if the title is misleading. I was curious if we play Hawke in DA3 and are presented with some the major events that happened after hawke disappeared. if something disturb you bout the side you picked at the end DA2. Would you change sides or you set you set in stone with your pick?

For me i don't really if i'm set supporting the mages.yes there need to be reforms. But Meredith was right there were more blood mages. I supported the mages cause i thought the RoA was to far.But the templars did have a good point.

I think this (covering the post-Act 3 events) would work best as a DLC versus a new game (DA3), covering the span from the end of Act 3 to more or less the time that the Seekers accost Varric.

In whatever scenario something like this would turn up, I wouldn't have qualms about my allegiance decision. I'm happy with it, and have 2 playthroughs for potential importing. Now, if I was really concerned, I would probably change up the last couple of saves, or just do a playthrough that is pro- the other side.

[Sepewrath]

Nodscouter wrote...

Meh, I don't want it but seeing the uproar after DA2 I'm going to guess they'll try to distance themselves as far as possibly from the game.

There was a lot of uproar about ME2 "becoming Gears of War" according to many overly dramatic whiners and they are sticking with the formula for ME3. I don't see them backing down from what they did in DA2 and they shouldn't. Though it will probably be a new character in a different place, they've only done it once so its not like its a precedent. But what is Hawke going to do, follow the situation. I would imagine this whole thing will just be dropped in someone else' lap.

[Sir Ulrich Von Lichenstien]

whykikyouwhy wrote...

dewayne31 wrote...

Sorry if the title is misleading. I was curious if we play Hawke in DA3 and are presented with some the major events that happened after hawke disappeared. if something disturb you bout the side you picked at the end DA2. Would you change sides or you set you set in stone with your pick?

For me i don't really if i'm set supporting the mages.yes there need to be reforms. But Meredith was right there were more blood mages. I supported the mages cause i thought the RoA was to far.But the templars did have a good point.

I think this (covering the post-Act 3 events) would work best as a DLC versus a new game (DA3), covering the span from the end of Act 3 to more or less the time that the Seekers accost Varric.

In whatever scenario something like this would turn up, I wouldn't have qualms about my allegiance decision. I'm happy with it, and have 2 playthroughs for potential importing. Now, if I was really concerned, I would probably change up the last couple of saves, or just do a playthrough that is pro- the other side.

The obvious trouble to some extent with them doing this is... they'd have to build the DLC to allow for it to work no matter the decision at the end, or maybe 2 different stories with the player's choice at the end deciding which one they playthrough.

I don't mind 'The Mansion' being used as the 'Camp' post-campaign even on a Mage-siding playthrough, I just hand-wave it. But if they are going to do stuff that is definitly deemed as 'post-meredith fight' then they need to have the party members commenting on it and what the gang has been doing since, either doing stuff in Kirkwall if Hawke became Viscount/sided with Templars, or doing some thrilling adventures on the run/sided with mages.

As for Hawke being in DA3, well besides him/her there is the question of where the Warden is as well?

That is of course if the latter is with reference to our Warden, seeing as the same scene plays out even for a Ultimate Sacrifice Warden.

I have a feeling DA3 will have us with a new protagonist and Hawke will now just be referenced as 'The Champion of Kirkwall' to cover both possibilities just as the Warden is referred to as 'The Hero of Ferelden'... so new protagonist end up being 'The Saviour of Thedas' perhaps?

[PinkShoes]

i'd like Hawke to be like our warden. Their story finished in DLC.

I want someone new in DA3.

And dear gawd i hope they dont bring back our Warden.

[ElvaliaRavenHart]

If they do want to return to the wardens story their only opportunity will be for DA3. By DA4, all of the Ferelden wardens will be dead due to their calling if they stay true to form and do 5 - 10 year jumps. Or the main Ferelden wardens will be very near their calling.

I'm in the camp I do want to see my warden again. Once again the mechanic is there to adjust your character import with an Eluvian Mirror like in the Black Emporium. If you don't like how your character imported - the mirror fits this solution. As for voice, I'd love a voice for my warden and it doesn't bother me one way or the other. It wasn't like I heard that much of my warden's voice during battle anyway. During battle is the only time that we did hear them, there wasn't much to hear from them.

[jmadsen]

kinda like hawke would like to be the leader of the mages or templares

a new hero would be cool too

[Giltspur]

I would deal with the consequences of my world-altering decision no matter how much I hate the results. Now, if some random comment ended a romance in a manner that I deem unfair, I'm totally reloading an old save to fix that.

[Tremere]

I say, "Why not have Hawke as the protagonist?" Considering the holes left in the ending of DA2, I could see a continuation of the storyline making sense. Of course, BioWare could go a whole other route and let the choice of a protagonist in DA3 depend on the choices we make in either or both DA:O and DA2. For instance, Hawke as the Viscount of Kirkwall, Hawke who sided with the Mages either continuing his fight against the Templars, or concluding that the Imperium is the true threat and helping to form an alliance against them. This would lend credence to why Cassandra was interogating Varric and searching for the Champion. Also, as has been suggested, the child of the Warden and Morrigan. I also have an idea about the Calling that I'm tossing around as an idea for a fan-fict story. Simply put, "There are numerous possibilities".

Modifié par GabrielXL, 02 août 2011 - 10:22 .