ISpeakTheTruth wrote...
First it was the Citadel fleet which had the support of the greatest dreadnaught in the galaxy. Second Sovy was only a target for about 10 secods because he went straight for the Citadel everything else was all Heritics. Thirdly as I said before the major plus on the side of the true Geth is that they are massively more intelligent than the Heritics were because they have more Geth to share data and the more Geth you have the smarter they are. The Heritics had poor soilders becuse they had 5% of the intellect that they use to have. The Core Geth will be 20 times smarter and 20 times stronger, not to mention that Dyson sphere they are building that might just be the Deus ex Machina to defeat the Reapers. If push comes to shuve I'll support the Geth. Bye bye Quarians.
The Alliance fleet was heavily outnumbered, and considering Sovereign already took out several of their larger ships, the Geth swarmed them. That's an example of Geth tactics. True, the more Geth you have in one area, the smarter they are, but organics can learn, adapt, etc., things Geth aren't capable of doing. Geth are self-aware, but higher, more advanced thinking is impossible for them. 100 organics are far more intelligent and self-aware than 100 Geth. And also, the entire Geth army would be "20 times better", but to get that same bonus, you'd have to have every single Geth in one place. Since there's millions of them,
I doubt they would be able to all be in one place, so any advantage is nullified.
AngelicMachinery wrote...
l DryIce l wrote...
Quarians vs. Reapers: Okay
Geth vs. Reapers: Okay
Quarians and Geth vs. Reapers: Win.
Don't forget about the big picture, guys. This conflict is pretty small in comparison with the Reaper threat.
I'm really not sure what the quarians can offer the war effort myself, I may be wrong but there ships aren't particularly combat viable are they?
I think the Quarians' fleet strength comes from the experience and skill of their pilots and crew, not quality of ships.
Modifié par Kaiser_Wilhelm, 04 août 2011 - 12:37 .