Nimrodell wrote...
To be honest, Avernus is just one source on this matter. In DA2 we have Tarohne and her evil tomes along with her implanting templars with demons (something that Uldred already tried to do to Warden in DA:O). While I was following these stories it just seemed to be that we actually have simple Tolkien's Catch 22 on power and wanting more power actually leading to diminishing of it by accepting physical manifestation of it. Same actually happened to demon of pride that had possessed the Baroness in Awakening. Baroness is very potent while being in the Fade (she holds the entire Black Marsh village there for who knows how long), but once out, demon itself can't hold on to the corporeal mortal form and is actually less potent - Warden kills him there.
I haven't played DA:A, but from reading the Wiki I got the sense that the Baroness was trying to escape death in the Fade and therefore ended up in the mortal realm, and was actually surprised that she could cross the Veil without possessing a body. The thing is that we've been introduced to the concept of being able to kill spirts/demons in the Fade as well, as we do with the sloth demon in DAO. So, although, I see your point about how too much power might result in corruption in some form, I'm not so sure it could be because of the physical manifestations as you suggest, at least with the example you gave.
Oh I wasn't clear, I didn't mean that Fen'Harel is problematic in that regard. He is problem for me while I'm trying to discern little pieces of 'truth'...
I'm not sure I've asked this before, but couldn't it also be true that Fen'Harel is merely a legend, and similarly the Creators and Forgotten Ones? What we have are accounts of gods by a people - the Dalish - who seemed to have pieced together information from what they think was their past. They do not know the "truth" and by extention neither do we. It is a worldview formed out of their unique persepective (whatever that means) on things. On their belief systems.
That's why I don't trust Chantry version to the end - claiming that Men sin brought corruption into this world and made Maker to leave them. I just think that there was bigger clash between higher powers and that elven side actually confirms it.
I think this is where we differ in our outlooks. I do not think the elven version is any more "real" or "true" than the human one. I simply think both could be legends. And even if one (or both) are true, I don't think we're not going to discover anything about that in the DA games. Although I do not know where these games are driving toward, I do not think that is their point.
And speaking of the taint - I think it is a very real and tangible thing. I'm not even sure whether we're going to discover the source of it; although it appears very much likely - just not 100% certain about it.
Tis just problem that I have with Andrastians and Chantry atm - it resembles very much to Christianity, but one big thing is missing in their philosophy and supposedly monistic concept. So far I didn't find any mention of the greatest catch that Christianity offers (no matter what faction) - free will. Maybe tis just something that I missed in DA world so far, but I didn't find any mention of it (even though Malcolm Hawke did teach his children that they have a choice, the whole Maker/Chantry shenenigan is actually not offering that possibility). Free will, abilitiy to choose is something like corner stone for monistic religions, their greatest weapon in preaching how all sin stems from those who were choosing (and here I mean higher entities like archangels and angels, and Men, but not God, the Creator). I don't know if it is yet to be mentioned in some of dlcs, or spin-off novels, or DA3, but so far, I don't see free will component while accusing Tevinter Mages for initial sin, and that is the problem too when it comes to magic and magic users.
Free will - by that I mean self determination - is implied in the Chant with both the Maker's first and second creations. Consider of the first born:
"There was no word
For heaven or for earth, for sea or sky.
All that existed was silence.
Then the Voice of the Maker rang out,
The first Word,
And His Word became all that might be:
Dream and idea, hope and fear,
Endless possibilities.
And from it made his firstborn.
And he said to them:
In My image I forge you,
To you I give dominion
Over all that exists.
By your will
May all things be done."
It is precisely because they failed to exercise creativity - their will to shape things - that the Maker became dissatisfied with them and abandoned them.
And, of the second born:
"And then the Maker sealed the gates
Of the Golden City
And there, He dwelled, waiting
To see the wonders
His children would create."
It seems to me that there is His creation, viz. everything, but what the beings do within it is their of their own accord. And what they do are what they are judged by. Not doing something is judged harshly, and so, too, is doing something "bad."
While talking to Elthina, Hawke has option to tell her that Maker himself created the mages, and ask her why he is not protecting them. Tis a valid question considering that we don't have confirmation from the Chant of Light yet that there's actually free will involved. But that is also something that connects humans, elves and dwarves and their bits of points of view on what actually happened at the beginning. As we can see, Qunari that follow certainty and Koslun's teachings, bind their mages and that is justified, 'cause there's no free will, it is just asit tal-eb for them - to be (tho being doesn't mean living - it means confirming one's role). In conversations with Arishok, Hawke can question their certainty showing that secular society does believe in free will, but that is not the case with Andrastian religion yet.
Regarding the Qunari, I do not think that it is a case that they don't have free will. They exercise it to a limited degree - in the sense of the professions the Qunari are allowed to choose. It is that they think exercising it would lead to the detriment of society - the society is their organism, living, breating, all important. And everything is subserviant to society for them. A distinctly extreme socialistic outlook.
We however have an example of creatures that lack free will in DA setting. And these are actually the darkspawn. These are soulless beings who are compelled to act the way they do, and they have no control over it. They utterly lack free will; they are programmed beings that go about their lives. And the corruption/taint is what directs them, the song, and ultimately the Archdemon gives them direction. It is nothing inherent within them that allows for them to decide anything. Which is why I think what was introduced in Awakening is somewhat crucial to understanding them - it is the "sentience" or "consciousness" or "soul" (re?)introduced (a-la Matrix) that changes them; that gives them reason to exist beyond their programming - to think, to choose, to act for themselves.
Why am I saying this? Considering Primeval thaig and what it can represent, considering Brecilian Forest ruins, Amgeforn, etc... it seems there was grand plan indeed at the beginning and possible strife between several higher entities. As I said, I don't know how DA story designers will proceed, but so far tis more like having Moirae (ancient Greek) or Usud (old slavic) system at work... and somehow Flemeth and her doings so far do fit in possible grand scheme of things that happened and will happen. Especially 'cause we have prophecies too - Sandal's, Flemeth's and dalish one.
These are difficult to explain at the moment. But the recurring theme for me has been each race's confrontation with some powerful being (demon, perhaps) and their binding of it in lyrium, using some form of blood magic, etc. We see this with the events at Sundermount, for example, when a demon of pride was bound to an idol (by the Magisters, elves?), and held there by means of some magic - which Marethari releases. We see this also with Amgeforn, with the dwarves this time. All kind of hinting at magic gone horribly wrong - the tearing of the Veil and allowing some demon to slip through.
The oddities have been the darkspawn corruption - something unbound, running amok - and the strange variety of lyrium found in the Primeval Thaig and how it resulted in the events in Kirkwall. All perhaps hinting at darker things bound in the past, but somehow unbound by men's, elves', dwarves' quest for power, perhaps in their confrontations with one another.
Do all this however hint at a grander war between gods in the past? Perhaps. But I think that is just one way of considering things.
EDIT: Fixing formatting.
Modifié par MichaelFinnegan, 28 août 2011 - 09:19 .