EmperorSahlertz wrote...
You may not think so. But however you put it, the usage and workings of blood magic is inherently sinister.
The only argument against blood magic being evil that might have any merit is the fact that you have to consort with some sort of demon to access it. Beyond that, I don't think the usage or workings is inherently sinister. The decision to use your own blood to power and maintain your magic is not evil if you are only using your own blood to do so. You are simply giving yourself an advantage of a higher mana pool, but it also counterbalances itself as you are bringing yourself closer to death by using your own health to power your magic.
Using a spell like hemorage and draining a target's blood is not inherently evil either. It's simply a different tactic from, say, freezing your target or raining fire upon them from the skies. Your goal is the same goal as any other class of fighter, be it a warrior or rogue. You are trying to kill your enemy before they kill you, and blood magic is your most effective means of doing so.
I can see an argument of controling a target's blood to make them act as your ally as going one way or the other. The only spell I might consider "evil" within the school of blood magic is the spell that uses your ally's blood to heal yourself, which is why any blood mage character I've played has never used it.
The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...
Where was that last bit ever mentioned? I don't think that was ever mentioned anywhere in the games.Andraste being a blood mage rumor could also be attributed to the effect her emre presence actually had on the people around her. If she truly was a divinity, her presence could possible have been "intoxicating" for mortals, akin to how a blood mage dominates the minds of others. You also need to remember that Tevinter have a very real interrest in spreading propaganda that Andraste was a mage, since if it takes hold, then they will have divine verdict that mages are superior to commoners.
It isn't. It is however a logical political goal for a nation ruled by mages. Which is why I assume that the Tevinters would have a vested interrest in spreading the rumor, that Andraste was a mage.
As for the debate over whether Andraste was a mage and the political liscence Tevinter might take over this, that same argument can be flipped around on the Chantry. If Andraste was in fact a mage, and a blood mage at that, it was very much in the best interest of Orlais and the Chantry to completely deny that fact and effectively erase any evidence of the fact. The only difference would be that one country/religious institution was more succesful than the other.
The point is that there is not any evidence to support one or the other at this junction in time. Except for perhaps the book you find that you can gift to Wynne.
Modifié par iheartbob, 07 février 2012 - 04:06 .





Retour en haut





