1170 réponses à ce sujet

[Ace of Dawn]

hhh89 wrote...

The Spamming Troll wrote...

ME1 never needed a multiplayer, because it was an excelent game. there doesnt need to be any mroe of an explanation.

ME2 sucked balls, and ME3 looks like ME2:episode 2, so im not surprised bioware went for multiplayer. it certainly is a game that needs something more. im not dissapointed because i gave up on ME1 showing up in ME3 about the same time i fired that pistol on the lazerouse station. atleast i know what im getting when i rent ME3.

WTF happened to my ME?

Simply, it's not yours. Bioware decided to change the direction of the IP. Good or bad the decison was, they have every right to change their IP if they want.

Thank you. Like it or not, it was never yours to begin with. And
saying they should put *your* happiness above *their* happiness is just
plain silly.

At any rate, only time will tell on how this pans out. Hoax? Exaggeration? Who knows? I don't really care. I'll give it a shot and form my opinions from there (I know it won't detract from the story, because the people you have design multiplayer stuff aren't typically the same people you have design singleplayer stuff. Seperate teams, people).

Though, I will be pissed if the article goes on to say that the multiplayer isn't really multiplayer at all, and just something that only slightly can be classed as such. Cause then the magazine is just doing stuff to get attention.

[Saberchic]

What is this craziness about? I check back in hours later and peple are arguing about multiplayer?

It's not happening. See the links that people have provided.

The magazine used "multiplayer" to attract readers. I liken it to comics who show the hero or group of heroes lain dead on the cover or two good guys duking it out.

On the inside,  nothing like that even happens. The cover is supposed to draw get your attention.

[Dionkey]

LuPoM wrote...

Dionkey wrote...

GreenSoda wrote...

Dionkey wrote...

The Big Bad Wolf wrote...

Merchant2006 wrote...

Anyway I won't rage, because Casey Hudson did clearly state there is no MP in ME3.

Where did he actually say "no multiplayer"?

He never did, he just says "We have nothing planned at this time" or "We don't plan to have multiplayer in ME3". In reality, he just avoided the question.

No he did get more concrete at one point.

But when has he ever flat out said "NO, there will be absolutely no multiplayer in ME3"? He always leaves the smallest bit of breathing room so he isn't locked to a promise, that's what worries me.

IF you would just read the post above, you would read this:

Here: 

He clearly states "no multiplayer, focusing on single player experience, we tried to fit it in since the frist Mass Effect but it never worked" and "it's a good thing to explore for the future of the franchise"
The question comes after the Samsung Galaxy Tab AD and it's the second one.

It never worked, this doesn't mean they can't get it to work. PR talk has many loopholes to get around stuff like this.

[Inutaisho7996]

Ruud333 wrote...

The PLC wrote...

If this turns out to be true, this forum is going to explode.

That is a bit of an understatement

I know it is not nice to laugh at people who are upset about something, but there are so many arrogant, highly strung and pompous people on these forums, it is hard not to have a bit of a giggle at their posts. 

I miss the original ME forums when everybody was all excited about the game and the majority of the discussion (apart from release date threads) was friendly and positive.  I'm not trying to imply that 'veteran' forum members are in any way better than newer ones, it is just that the forums back in 2007 generally seemed more pleasant, probably because people only have something to b*tch about once the game has been released

We should play 'forum bingo' (EDIT: assuming MP is actually confirmed) and see how many of the following posts/threads we can spot:

·         EA has ruined ME.
·         BW has betrayed their hardcore fans.
·         The inclusion of MP is the fault of younger/console/casual gamers.
·         I’m going cancel my pre-order for ME3.
·         I’m going cancel my pre-order for ME3 and sell my copies of ME1 and ME2 (I have actually seen somebody post that they would do this if MP was confirmed).
·         BW has sold out and I will never buy another one of their games.

This really needs to become a real game, stat.

[Ace of Dawn]

Inutaisho7996 wrote...

Ruud333 wrote...

The PLC wrote...

If this turns out to be true, this forum is going to explode.

That is a bit of an understatement

I know it is not nice to laugh at people who are upset about something, but there are so many arrogant, highly strung and pompous people on these forums, it is hard not to have a bit of a giggle at their posts. 

I miss the original ME forums when everybody was all excited about the game and the majority of the discussion (apart from release date threads) was friendly and positive.  I'm not trying to imply that 'veteran' forum members are in any way better than newer ones, it is just that the forums back in 2007 generally seemed more pleasant, probably because people only have something to b*tch about once the game has been released

We should play 'forum bingo' (EDIT: assuming MP is actually confirmed) and see how many of the following posts/threads we can spot:

·         EA has ruined ME.
·         BW has betrayed their hardcore fans.
·         The inclusion of MP is the fault of younger/console/casual gamers.
·         I’m going cancel my pre-order for ME3.
·         I’m going cancel my pre-order for ME3 and sell my copies of ME1 and ME2 (I have actually seen somebody post that they would do this if MP was confirmed).
·         BW has sold out and I will never buy another one of their games.

This really needs to become a real game, stat.

I was going to say that should be a drinking game, but I just realized that by doing so, too many people would die from alcohol poisoning...

[Ghost-621]

The Big Bad Wolf wrote...

Ghost-621 wrote...



*snipped, I know what I said*
 

And now you are passing off your opinion as fact. Every game you mentioned got good reviews (except Dungeon Siege 3). So what it really  is that you're just butthurt that the gaes aren't the way you want them. Boo f*cking hoo.

They got good reviews because they're payed to do so by the big-name publishers. I'm butthurt because they're no the way I want them? You're an idiot. Plain and simple. The games were of their own type and quality, but were mashed into the same, linear & corridor gamplay qualities because that's the new hot thing to do. I'm not "butthurt," I'm just smart enough to see the decline and I'm dissatisfied.

You're all butthurt because I dare challenge the crap that runs out of your mouth. Right back at you buddy<3

Also, Crysis 2 DOES look worse than Crysis 1. Here is some proof:

 

[The Elder King]

Niddy' wrote...

hhh89 wrote...

The Spamming Troll wrote...

ME1 never needed a multiplayer, because it was an excelent game. there doesnt need to be any mroe of an explanation.

ME2 sucked balls, and ME3 looks like ME2:episode 2, so im not surprised bioware went for multiplayer. it certainly is a game that needs something more. im not dissapointed because i gave up on ME1 showing up in ME3 about the same time i fired that pistol on the lazerouse station. atleast i know what im getting when i rent ME3.

WTF happened to my ME?

Simply, it's not yours. Bioware decided to change the direction of the IP. Good or bad the decison was, they have every right to change their IP if they want.

>hurrrr I'm a moron and going to literally interpret that you think you own Mass Effect.

If you cannot see that ME has shifted in paradigms you're willingly ignorant.

I don't own ME. Bioware owns it. And about MP any more than you, My poin is that it's not me who decide what will be present in ME3, it's Bioware. If they're willing to listen to their fans about MP and don't put it, good for me. Otherwise, I'll be disappointed and  I'll express my concern in a polite manner about it and don't use the feature.

[JamieCOTC]

The PLC wrote...

Why the **** would you introduce multiplayer in the 3rd game of a singleplayer trilogy?!

Money. 

[Niddy']

hhh89 wrote...

>hurrrr I'm a moron and going to literally interpret that you think you own Mass Effect.

If you cannot see that ME has shifted in paradigms you're willingly ignorant.

I don't own ME. Bioware owns it. And about MP any more than you, My poin is that it's not me who decide what will be present in ME3, it's Bioware. If they're willing to listen to their fans about MP and don't put it, good for me. Otherwise, I'll be disappointed and  I'll express my concern in a polite manner about it and don't use the feature.

You clearly lack reading comprehension.

You were replying to that guy by essentially saying this,

">hurrrr I'm a moron and going to literally interpret that you think you own Mass Effect."

You also clearly have no idea what perceived identity is either.

Modifié par Niddy', 05 août 2011 - 11:55 .

[Ghost-621]

JamieCOTC wrote...

The PLC wrote...

Why the **** would you introduce multiplayer in the 3rd game of a singleplayer trilogy?!

Money. 

[DTKT]

jreezy wrote...

I've never heard of this magazine. And the multiplayer thing is false.

You seem to be slightly delusional. 

[Shockwave81]

Reading these posts and threads over and over and OVER is probably similar to the effects of indoctrination.

Can this thread, and any of its demonic brethren in the coming months please be allowed to die quickly and with as little noise as possible!?

The best thing about Mass Effect 3 is that I may finally stop visiting the forums within a few weeks/months of finishing it. Then this place can dissolve into some kind of bubbling blood and pus-coloured soup for all I care.

[DTKT]

http://twitter.com/#...629370158755840

Yep, it's real.

[Dionkey]

jreezy wrote...

I've never heard of this magazine. And the multiplayer thing is false.

>Never heard of a magazine
>This somehow holds the credibility of it's statement below EA/Bioware

Good one, Chuck.

[PsychoWARD23]

"http://twitter.com/#!/miladesn/statuses/99629370158755840

Yep, it's real."

inb4the****storm

Modifié par PsychoWARD23, 06 août 2011 - 12:02 .

[Personality Disorder]

DTKT wrote...

http://twitter.com/#...629370158755840

Yep, it's real.

Strap in, this is going to be hell of a ride!

[SomeKindaEnigma]

PsychoWARD23 wrote...


"http://twitter.com/#!/miladesn/statuses/99629370158755840

Yep, it's real."

inb4the****storm

Oh man, you are definitely about to stir up the sh*t storm now

*Sits back to watch the fuming begin <3*

Modifié par SomeKindaEnigma, 06 août 2011 - 12:04 .

[Jaron Oberyn]

JamieCOTC wrote...

The PLC wrote...

Why the **** would you introduce multiplayer in the 3rd game of a singleplayer trilogy?!

Money. 

Exactly. Ever walk into an EA studio before? I can't confirm as I haven't been to one, but rumor has it that this song plays all day every day. Money Money Money Money... Monnaaay


-Polite

[Ruud333]

SomeKindaEnigma wrote...
Lol I love this idea, count me in on the forum bingo 

The game is open to everybody

Ace of Dawn...

Inutaisho7996 wrote...

This really needs to become a real game, stat.

I was going to say that should be a drinking game, but I just realized that by doing so, too many people would die from alcohol poisoning...

Yeah, best not to risk it

On topic:  it looks like this is a UK magazine, so I'll see if I can pick it up tomorrow (unless anybody else gets there first).

EDIT:  May not need to buy the mag after all now somebody has posted that tweet  (not sure how official it is though...)

Modifié par Ruud333, 06 août 2011 - 12:09 .

[emanziboy]

Ghost-621 wrote...

Also, Crysis 2 DOES look worse than Crysis 1. Here is some proof:

 

You sure about that? Open the first video in your post and read the description. The poster compares them, and for the most part, he thinks that Crysis looks better, and it was taken before the high res and DX11 patches.

[AlphaJarmel]

The multiplayer announcement really needs its own thread either that or the name of the thread needs to be changed.

Modifié par AlphaJarmel, 06 août 2011 - 12:10 .

[SomeKindaEnigma]

AlphaJarmel wrote...

The multiplayer announcement really needs its own thread either that or the name of the thread needs to be changed.

This is more or less that thread...

[Nozybidaj]

Robhuzz wrote...
Would be dumb to ignore the massive majority of fans who simply don't want multiplayer in ME3..

For the folks just tuning in the games are geared to entice the folks who aren't already fans in hopes of making them fans.  EA certainly thinks MP is one way of doing that since, you know, CoD has MP.  I won't be shocked at all when they announce MP for ME3.