1170 réponses à ce sujet

[The h0bb1t]

I don't get all the hate about MP. Because Co-op would suite ME really well.. IMO.

[Mustang678]

The h0bb1t wrote...

I don't get all the hate about MP. Because Co-op would suite ME really well.. IMO.

Seriously. Is it possible for Bioware to do anything without these people flipping **** and crying RUINEDFOREVER?

Modifié par Mustang678, 06 août 2011 - 01:44 .

[Sir Ulrich Von Lichenstien]

Mustang678 wrote...

The h0bb1t wrote...

I don't get all the hate about MP. Because Co-op would suite ME really well.. IMO.

Seriously. Is it possible for Bioware to do anything without these people flipping **** and crying RUINEDFOREVER?

Course not, but don't hate on them too much, they can't help not being able to understand how companies have 'teams' working on various things.

I mean, take the constant use of 'Dragon Age 2' as a means for them to claim 'Mass Effect 3' is following the same path, even though are worked on by different teams.

[Wittand25]

The h0bb1t wrote...

I don't get all the hate about MP. Because Co-op would suite ME really well.. IMO.

Co-op does not make much sense, especially with some of the things we saw so far. Like the railway shooter sequence when fighting the walking reaper, or the huge amount of dialog.
Also in a story heavy game co-op makes plot progression near impossible. What happens e.g. if one of the players walks into a cut-scene starting area while the other two are still fighting. Or how would it be handled if one of the companions, who is controlled by a human has to do/say something in the level ?

A co-op arena, or the option to select a map from the main game to be played co-op would be OK I guess as long as it does not hog to many resources, but in the main game co-op creates more problems that the feature is worth.

[Johnsen1972]

Coop wont make it into the game, thats for sure.

If there is a MP part, then it will be like in Uncharted 2, completley seperated from the SP game, probably a few maps where you can take over companions and shoot yourselfs.

[DCopeland]

It's like Assassins creed: Brotherhood all over again.

[javierabegazo]

Neofelis Nebulosa wrote...

Rumours, rumours, rumours. I swear, the videogame magazines and the communities are worse than some bored teenagers chatting about "the latest I heard s/he did was [insert rumour]".

Patience is soo dead.

Yup.

[Captain Crash]

I just want to point out that I bought June's issue of XBox World because the plastic cover stated "New Mass Effect content" then once opened the actual cover had nothing about it on. When I start reading all they did was a timeline review of ME up to Arrival. 


Its an unofficial magazine and I fell for their cheap trick (which verged on lies).  They just use it to sell a couple of extra copies and I wont be fooled again.


I highly doubt this magazine has anything at all.

Modifié par Captain Crash, 06 août 2011 - 02:28 .

[squee365]

You guys just love being in denial. Multiplayer is happening and theres nothing that can stop it.

[Ianamus]

Modifié par EJ107, 06 août 2011 - 03:09 .

[Icinix]

The problem with a lot of rumours, is in the gaming world, they do seem to end up being accurate.

[Mister Mida]

Wow, 29 pages for a thread that's not even a day old.

*notices a lot of talk about MP*

Oooh, that explains it.

[Davie McG]

This has kind of been argued to death now.

The only things we can say for certain at this point is that multiplayer has been rumoured to be in ME3 in the forms of 3 player co-op and a horde mode.

The source of every story I've seen is an article by Eurogamer which It's self even states that it is a rumour and failed to name a reliable source, and confirmed that Bioware hasn't announced multiplayer.

So far there hasn't been one shred of evidence that multiplayer will Definently be included and all story's to the contrary are ones who's source has based their article on rumour and conjecture.

This isn't to say ME 3 will definitely be a single player only experience, or that I myself wouldn't enjoy a co-op mode in ME3. My point is that there is no evidence strong enough to support the theory that ME3 will definitely be a multiplayer game at this point in time.

[Lumikki]

The h0bb1t wrote...

I don't get all the hate about MP. Because Co-op would suite ME really well.. IMO.

Actually, it would fit fine in ME game what is design for MP from start, but not in ME3.

Hole Shepard story is design for single player consept. Every dialog and everyting is for single player perspective as player been Shepard and only Shepard. Maybe it's because from ME1 to ME3 it's Shepards story.

Modifié par Lumikki, 06 août 2011 - 02:53 .

[MrAndree]

Oh come on people. Even if there is a multiplayer, they obviously won't do a story coop, because that's impossible. You can import your character and with it your earlier decisions and they will play a huge role in ME 3 (and that's not a rumor, that's confirmed). Now imagine that I killed Kaidan, my friend killed Ashley, we want to play coop, which one of them would be alive? Like I said, impossible. So no story coop. So it's either a competitive MP, that doesn't really bother me, I won't play it. Or it is coop but it's some kind of shorter parallel coop storyline (like in the newest Splinter Cell or in Portal 2). Now that would actually be pretty cool.

[JukeFrog]

I would be perfectly fine with a co-op horde mode that was completely separate from the main story. It would give ppl a chance to show-off their Shepards in action. Also, the only skill that would need to be balanced is AR (since it affects in-game time).

[Gatt9]

Sir Ulrich Von Lichenstien wrote...

Mustang678 wrote...

The h0bb1t wrote...

I don't get all the hate about MP. Because Co-op would suite ME really well.. IMO.

Seriously. Is it possible for Bioware to do anything without these people flipping **** and crying RUINEDFOREVER?

Course not, but don't hate on them too much, they can't help not being able to understand how companies have 'teams' working on various things.

I mean, take the constant use of 'Dragon Age 2' as a means for them to claim 'Mass Effect 3' is following the same path, even though are worked on by different teams.

They decide they're making the game on one budget,  and every feature comes out of that budget.  Putting a whole second team on a feature means that feature is even more expensive than if the primary team had added it.

It's not like they're going to spend several million above and beyond what they originally budgeted the game at just to implement their used-game-drm. 

What happened to DA2 isn't an isolated incident,  it's not like they accidently made DA2,  the decisions were made by the same bosses that run the ME3 team.  The designers have lunch with the same people who thought up the Awesome Button. 

People don't understand that there's no difference in leadership,  and no matter who's working on a feature the money's coming from the same pool.

But what's *really* scary is if it's "Co-op",  because as posters earlier said,  looks to be part of EA's Online Pass system.  Which means they'll make it very integral to the plot in order to force the used-gamers to pay them.  So,  if you want the whole story,  you'll now be forced to do multiplayer in a single player game.

As I said,  this is going to end badly.

[Davie McG]

MrAndree wrote...

Oh come on people. Even if there is a multiplayer, they obviously won't do a story coop, because that's impossible. You can import your character and with it your earlier decisions and they will play a huge role in ME 3 (and that's not a rumor, that's confirmed). Now imagine that I killed Kaidan, my friend killed Ashley, we want to play coop, which one of them would be alive? Like I said, impossible. So no story coop. So it's either a competitive MP, that doesn't really bother me, I won't play it. Or it is coop but it's some kind of shorter parallel coop storyline (like in the newest Splinter Cell or in Portal 2). Now that would actually be pretty cool.

The co-op discussed in the eurogamer article was of the dedicated co-op missions variety.

I could also see room for it in certain combat missions, but as you say a true co-op experience wouldn't make an enormous amount of sense.

Unless they go the halo route and have a bizarre situation where there are two Shepards but only player one appears in scripted scenes.

[Funkcase]

The h0bb1t wrote...

I don't get all the hate about MP. Because Co-op would suite ME really well.. IMO.

It's becuase ME3 is the end of the trilogy, and the ME series has done great without the need for multiplayer. Alot of people are worried including it now may take from the single player expierence. This is the end of Shepards story, so we want the most of it. I'm not against multiplayer, but I really dont want it included if it's going to affect the singleplayer in any way. Without multiplayer they could spend more time polishing the game, adding more side quests, ect.

[MarchWaltz]

Probably has been said, but unless Casey actually says "NO MULTIPLAYER GUYS, NONE AT ALL. THERE WILL ABSOLUTELY BE NO MULTIPLAYER, AT ALL. NO STRETCH OF THE IMAGINATION AT ALL. A" (I added the last 'a' because he is Canadian), then it seems multiplayer is not at all that big of a false rumor.

All we can do is wait and see.

[Lumikki]

Gatt9 wrote...

But what's *really* scary is if it's "Co-op",  because as posters earlier said,  looks to be part of EA's Online Pass system.  Which means they'll make it very integral to the plot in order to force the used-gamers to pay them.  So,  if you want the whole story,  you'll now be forced to do multiplayer in a single player game.

How is this different from DLC's, where to get full story you have to buy DLC's?
(Yeah, I know MP vs SP, but in general perspective too)

As I said,  this is going to end badly.

I agree.

Modifié par Lumikki, 06 août 2011 - 03:10 .

[Ianamus]

http://www.computera...sions/?site=cvg

"Eurogamer reports that the much-rumoured multiplayer feature will include "competitive elements" and "will not compromise" the single-player portion of the game.



A reliable development source has since informed CVG that the Mass Effect 3 multiplayer feature will be built around "original missions made for online", which will be totally unique from the solo campaign. 

Our mole added there would "only be a handful" of co-op missions which have been created with the intention of being "played and played again".

Reports have suggested that the online offering will come in the form of a Horde-style mode, but our source was quick to play down the notion.

Bioware's Montreal studio is said to be behind the co-op side, and was seen to be recruiting for "multiplayer" staff last year.

"Mainstream penetration is a major goal for Mass Effect 3 and those high up feel online co-op is the answer they're looking for," our source said. "EA's keen to push the multiplayer side of the game to help spread word of mouth - so it's not just going to rehash stuff from the campaign. It's going all out."

Officially BioWare's refusing to confirm the Mass Effect 3 online antics, but when pressed on the matter last week, co-founder Ray Muzyka told CVG that the studio is "exploring" multiplayer for all of its games."

Modifié par EJ107, 06 août 2011 - 03:09 .

[SolidisusSnake1]

Man you people are ****ing stupid and quick to hate on **** you have not even seen.

"OH NOES MULTIPLAYERZ IN ME, GAME SUX NOW!!"

STFU! Stop hating on something that is not even confirmed nor have you even seen. If they were to add some sort of multi-player on top of an already stellar SP campaign, how is that bad. Now if I found out that a good amount of SP was affected by this new MP, such as making the campaign shorter or cutting **** out, then that is reason to get angry. But if its just icing on the cake well then STFU!

No wonder they dont respond on the forums too often.