49276 réponses à ce sujet

[Volus Warlord]

DominusVita wrote...

Spike is not a pony.

It's besides the point - your point, which is being deflected. "They need to realize that the show is for children and grow the hell up." No, Spike is not a pony. The vast majority of MLP's cast list is in the Mare/Stallion category, outside of a few outlier species like Dragons/Changeling/etc. And yet a choice has been made to regularly read and post on the Official My Little Pony Thread? You don't have to like ponies to like My Little Pony. I never watched the previous versions of MLP in the past, either.

It takes a real man to watch My Little Pony in his spare time. Just saying.

Uh BS. 

A real man would cut Rarity into bacon.

[Inquisitor Recon]

Volus is an undercover agent, cut him some slack.

[Gravisanimi]

Volus Warlord wrote...

A real man would cut Rarity into bacon.

How would you make bacon from a marshmellow? 

I do like Rarity though, like my 4th favorite adult; Twilight, Fluttershy, and Luna are tied for first.

She loses to Scootaloo real quick.

[Volus Warlord]

Gravisanimi wrote...

Volus Warlord wrote...

A real man would cut Rarity into bacon.

How would you make bacon from a marshmellow? 

I do like Rarity though, like my 4th favorite adult; Twilight, Fluttershy, and Luna are tied for first.

She loses to Scootaloo real quick.

I thought they weren't adults.

[LPPrince]

The ponies are young adults.

[Volus Warlord]

LPPrince wrote...

The ponies are young adults.

So mid to late teens. Aka not adults.

[Jarl Johnnie Walker]

Volus Warlord wrote...

LPPrince wrote...

The ponies are young adults.

So mid to late teens. Aka not adults.

But what if they think like adults? o:

[LPPrince]

I could be way off base but I believe the ages compared to humans were oh hell let me look it up

ahh here we go.

18-22 in human years.

[LPPrince]

My guess, I'd say Pinkie's probably the youngest, Fluttershy is canonically a year older than Pinks, the older ponies are likely to be AJ and Rarity, with Twilight and Dash somewhere in the middle.

[Volus Warlord]

LPPrince wrote...

I could be way off base but I believe the ages compared to humans were oh hell let me look it up

ahh here we go.

18-22 in human years.

So for all practical purposes not adults. 

[LPPrince]

Young adults are still adults, but if you disagree, whatever floats your canoe.

[TheBlackBaron]

Volus Warlord wrote...

LPPrince wrote...

The ponies are young adults.

So mid to late teens. Aka not adults.

No, as in, 18+ to early twenties. 

Legally speaking, they're adults. 

[ObserverStatus]

Horses are usually considered to be adults between the ages of 4 and 5.

[LPPrince]

Yeah, Lauren Faust said that the ponies were around 4 years old in actuality, which some folks converted to the human equivalent as far as maturity years ago, which lead to the 18-22 years old grouping.

So, young adults it is. Perfect that way.

[TheBlackBaron]

bobobo878 wrote...

Horses are usually considered to be adults between the ages of 4 and 5.

Horses aren't magical technicolor equines, though. 

Like, if we're going full throttle on this, you'd probably have to consider the ponies a seperate species of horse. Equus sapiens or something (actually if you type that into google it'll pull up pictures from the show), if not an entirely sperate genus within the family Equiade. It would then logically follow that they would have a different physiology, including structural differences (such as having larger heads and eyes, and a more human mouth structure), and presumably an elongated life span compared to Equus ferus caballus.

You can also just say, **** it. Ponies, man, how do they work!? 

Or, alternatively: it's magic. I don't gotta explain ****. 

[LPPrince]

Baron? On a scale of 1-100, that was a no.

[ObserverStatus]

LPPrince wrote...
Baron? On a scale of 1-100, that was a no.

Geeze, tough crowd today.  I would have given it a -0, but a no?  That's just mean.

[LPPrince]

Yeah, but I'm sweeter than Sweetie Belle, so its all good. Baron knows whats up.

[TheBlackBaron]

bobobo878 wrote...

LPPrince wrote...
Baron? On a scale of 1-100, that was a no.

Geeze, tough crowd today.  I would have given it a -0, but a no?  That's just mean.

Wouldn't negative zero loop back around to 100, though? 

[LPPrince]

Ask a math pony.

[LPPrince]

Actually, Twilight would know the answer to that. Duh.

[ObserverStatus]

uh... let me think, this might take a few minutes.

[TheBlackBaron]

You know what, I'm bored, I'm tired, and I feel like messing with the clopquisition tonight.

Have some of whatever the hell this is.

[ObserverStatus]

TheBlackBaron wrote...

bobobo878 wrote...

LPPrince wrote...
Baron? On a scale of 1-100, that was a no.

Geeze, tough crowd today.  I would have given it a -0, but a no?  That's just mean.

Wouldn't negative zero loop back around to 100, though? 

assume that a=b

a=b
97a=97b
97a-100a=-100a+97b
-3a=-100a+97b
-3a+3b=-100a+100b
3(-a+=100(-a+
3=100

Um, nope, it looks like the number table loops back to 100 at 3, if you've already reached -0, you've missed your last exit.  There are no U turns in spacetime.

Modifié par bobobo878, 02 janvier 2013 - 08:04 .

[Inquisitor Recon]

Stop trying to justify the cloppers with your age theories.

Negative zero tears a hole in the space time continuum which leads to Xen. Didn't you people play the Half Life series? Basic stuff here.