bobobo878 wrote...
TheBlackBaron wrote...
Wouldn't negative zero loop back around to 100, though?bobobo878 wrote...
Geeze, tough crowd today. I would have given it a -0, but a no? That's just mean.LPPrince wrote...
Baron? On a scale of 1-100, that was a no.
assume that a=b
a=b
97a=97b
97a-100a=-100a+97b
-3a=-100a+97b
-3a+3b=-100a+100b
3(-a+=100(-a+
3=100
Um, nope, it looks like the number table loops back to 100 at 3, if you've already reached -0, you've missed your last exit. There are no U turns in spacetime.
Computer Science student here.
Actually, -0 has the same value of 0. They are just redundant representations, and the reason modern computers use B2-1 numbering instead of just plain B2.
/buzzkill





Retour en haut












