MajesticJazz wrote...
I have been gone since before E3 as I want to avoid spoilers. I am still doing that but I decided to post this thread to see what people think.
Think about it, say you NEVER read ME: Revelations and played Mass Effect 1.
Instead you started out by reading ME: Acension, reading those Liara Comics, play ME2, read ME: Retribution, and now 40% of your enemies would be Cerberus.....plus the latest ME novel will feature Kahlee/Anderson going against Cerberus.
With that, you're main villian throughout ME has been Cerberus, not the Reapers. Yes, you may have "heard" of them in a few mentions here and there, but for the most part, Cerberus has been your main protagonist.
This isn't a complaint in any way, I am just curious to see how others feel about Cerberus in terms of who has had the main role of "villian" throughout this trilogy.
Except Cerberus hasn't had the main role of 'villain' throughout the trilogy, and selective interpretation of the series and their still unknown reasons in ME3 is just looking for confirmation bias.
The Trilogy can only refer to three games: ME1, in which Cerberus was neither antagonists or even necessarily villains given that their opposition to Shepard was very much in a 'defend ourselves from the space marines attacking us', ME2, in which Cerberus was our primary benefactor, and ME3, with which we don't know yet and Cerberus groundlings give us someone to shoot at besides, you know, the Reapers who are the real villains. And since Mass Effect is a tactical shooter and not a 'fire at the super-advanced space ships with your assault rifle' sort of game...
In ME1, Cerberus was a minor opponent at most. In ME2, a significant benefactor. We do not know its role in ME3, though nothing but fan-wishing has implied that it's going to overshadow, you know, the Reapers.
What 'the Trilogy' does not refer to is side material like the books and comics. And if you want to go on the basis of them, you might as well as 'has the Mass Effect side material been hijacked by Anderson and Sanders and the Graysons?' Because those four have even greater prevalence and importance in the side stories, regardless of whether you feel Cerberus is the villain in those stories (in Retribution, for example, Cerberus's only act is one of revenge against Grayson, who works for a crimelord and murderer: it's Anderson and Sanders who instigate the critical events that let Reaper-Grayson loose and become a real danger).
That the sidestory writers stick with Anderson, Sanders, the Graysons, and Cerberus rather than choose new persons and new groups is a stylistic choice, not a hijacking by any of the parties in particular.