132 réponses à ce sujet

[Darkelefantos1]

Well, since the Batarians are Reaped as the first race, I don't have any hard feelings about letting him leave.

[LiquidLogic2020]

marshalleck wrote...

DaringMoosejaw wrote...

marshalleck wrote...

Derp.

You made your choice when you let him escape, deal with it

Because when criminals escape, it is 100% impossible for them to ever get caught again.

The galaxy is a big place. What are the odds after two years Shepard will run into Balak again?

OP didn't want Balak simply caught, he wanted to do the catching. Even though he already had the opportunity and declined. It's unlikely that Balak will come back to life if a Renegade killed him, so I don't see why a Paragon should get a do-over.

Somebody has quite the chip on their shoulder, it's a game with a well written yet weakly connected plot stop etting self righteous about it. 

[Ben800000]

Darkelefantos1 wrote...

Well, since the Batarians are Reaped as the first race, I don't have any hard feelings about letting him leave.

I wouldn't be surprised if he's found half turned into a husk, begging Shepard to kill him.

[SandTrout]

Ben800000 wrote...

Darkelefantos1 wrote...

Well, since the Batarians are Reaped as the first race, I don't have any hard feelings about letting him leave.

I wouldn't be surprised if he's found half turned into a husk, begging Shepard to kill him.

I like this. +1

[Agamo45]

That's why you don't negotiate with terrorists. You let him go to save a few hostages, deal with it.

[Sir Ulrich Von Lichenstien]

DaringMoosejaw wrote...

marshalleck wrote...

DaringMoosejaw wrote...

marshalleck wrote...

Derp.

You made your choice when you let him escape, deal with it

Because when criminals escape, it is 100% impossible for them to ever get caught again.

The galaxy is a big place. What are the odds after two years Shepard will run into Balak again?

OP didn't want Balak simply caught, he wanted to do the catching. Even though he already had the opportunity and declined. It's unlikely that Balak will come back to life if a Renegade killed him, so I don't see why a Paragon should get a do-over.

What are the odds that Shepard runs into most people he already did? Pretty damn good, it seems.

Ok then but now Paragons face an even bigger dilemna...

Paragons now have to choose with letting him escape (again) or shooting him but at a cost of a planet being destroyed that has one of Shepard's favourite squadmates or their LI on it.

I wonder how many people would then go back to ME just to stop that situation

[goofyomnivore]

If he comes back I want it to have a consequence. For example, say he kills thousands of Earth refugees before Shepard encounters him.

[krzimmer]

^^ He should totally come back as a reaper agent, being used as part of the reapers' plans to do whatever it is they are planning to do with humans. He would be an easy win for the reapers, considering his hatred of humans.

Modifié par krzimmer, 09 août 2011 - 05:18 .

[Zulu_DFA]

Arcian wrote...

marshalleck wrote...

Maggot4everr wrote...

Jumping all over the OP there, aren't ya?

Paragon sense of entitlement is annoying.

As is Renegades'.

Wait, when was the last time we demanded to Lazarus Kate Bowman?

[Zulu_DFA]

Arcian wrote...

Zulu_DFA wrote...

Wait, when was the last time we demanded to Lazarus Kate Bowman?

Every time you open your mouths. You guys practically never shut up about it.

Care for a link?

What we ask for is that your stupid choices (like letting Balak go) come bite you in the arse (like a Citadel News report about Balak killing a thousand autistic children en route to a elcor gay pride parade). But that ain't happenning. Moreover, by my own theory, sparing Balak might actually come with a bonus in ME3, when it turns out that except for Cerberus, only the Batarians can procure some anti-reaper technology.

[CrazyCatDude]

You know, the thing that always amazed me about it is, if you let him go, he doesn't kill the hostages. I've never let him go, even on my Paragon play throughs, because my Shepards always assume he'll gank the hostages either way.

[Zulu_DFA]

The Big Bad Wolf wrote...

Zulu_DFA wrote...

Arcian wrote...

Zulu_DFA wrote...

Wait, when was the last time we demanded to Lazarus Kate Bowman?

Every time you open your mouths. You guys practically never shut up about it.

Care for a link?

What we ask for is that your stupid choices (like letting Balak go) come bite you in the arse (like a Citadel News report about Balak killing a thousand autistic children en route to a elcor gay pride parade). But that ain't happenning. Moreover, by my own theory, sparing Balak might actually come with a bonus in ME3, when it turns out that except for Cerberus, only the Batarians can procure some anti-reaper technology.

Sounds like a butthurt renegade player.

Your point?

[Izhalezan]

marshalleck wrote...

Gabey5 wrote...

also the whole irony of us tossing an asteroid to kill a bunch of batarians, when he was doing the same to humans.. although we had different ends, would make for a good conversation

My colonist Shepard approves.

[bucyrus5000]

Only thing better than killing Batarians is killing Vorcha and Batarians.

[DaringMoosejaw]

Saphra Deden wrote...

Arrival should have been a total inversion of BDTS. Instead of the project personnel becoming indoctrinated the base should have been attacked by a batarian team lead by heroic leader who can argue against Shepard and make the player feel guilty for killing them and the other batarians in the system.

Such a waste.

Weeeeell Terra Nova wasn't about to spawn a fleet of ancient machine horrors that would've killed everyone on the planet anyway.

[Izhalezan]

bucyrus5000 wrote...

Only thing better than killing Batarians is killing Vorcha and Batarians.

No, the only thing better than killing a Batarian is killing it with fire.

[Zulu_DFA]

The Big Bad Wolf wrote...

Zulu_DFA wrote...
Your point?

That it's the same people complaining about these types of things.

Which is, butthurt renegade players.

Ah.

Paragons should say "indignant" though.