Ir al contenido

Foto

Grand Cleric Elthina


  • Por favor identifícate para responder
386 respuestas en este tema

#1
Masako52

Masako52
  • Members
  • 320 mensajes
Anyone else thought she kind of had it coming?

I didn't like her at all. I think some of the blame for the whole Mages vs. Templars massacre has to be put on her. This is Elthina's "impressive" resume...
  • Refused to mitigate a continuously heating situation between Mages and Templars, when she had the power to influence and at least lessen the tension, even if she couldn't stop it all together (also debatable)
  • Justified this prior to Act 3 by claiming she just wants to focus on religion, when she is in charge of Meredith's Templars and they are duty-bound to obey her.
  • Justified this in Act 3 with a wishy-washy "I thought after the Qunari everyone would want peace, so I didn't expect other groups to try to take power even though the Viscount was killed!" Um, Politics 101, lady. Or more like Reality 101...
  • She also does nothing to publicly denounce the behavior of the Templars or Meredith, even when it's clear how militant the order has become in Kirkwall.
  • Housed the murderer Mother Petrice. I don't know what's worse, if Elthina was aware that Petrice was using her name to justify inciting hatred against the qunari (and very clearly jeopardizing, even destroying lives in the process) or if Elthina was stupid enough to not be aware of it. Especially since it was going on for YEARS, and Petrice was even PROMOTED by Act 2. Petrice ONLY gets kicked out of the Chantry when Hawke catches her red-handed murdering the Viscount's son.
  • When the Divine send Leliana to evaluate the situation in Kirkwall, once they had heard things were getting out of hand, Elthina has you go and assure them that everything is just peachy and they don't need to intervene.
Everything she says and does makes me want to slap her. Were we actually supposed to like her? I don't have a problem with her being a character, but I still wanted to brofist Anders when he blew up the Chantry because of her alone. :whistle: It's cute that she refused to flee to Orlais because she wanted to stay with the people of Kirkwall, but I think by being a lame duck grand cleric she already failed them, with her inaction resulting in countless deaths.

Also, my Warden would have been personally offended at her line "The Maker stopped the Blight." If the Maker was helping out, he could have at least made those damn crossbows stop jamming during the final battle with the Archdemon. :innocent:

#2
ReiSilver

ReiSilver
  • Members
  • 749 mensajes
I don't think she deserved death but she was a huge part of the problem by allowing a terrible status quo to continue just because she and the upper echelon of society had no problems with it. If she didn't want to take the responsibility her position gave her then she's in the wrong job.
Hearing her say how 'yeah the mages are being abused and oppressed everyday, I acknowledge that and it makes me sad. Am I going to do anything about it? LOL no. I' m sure if we all ignore it the problem will go away.' made me want to scream

Masako52 wrote...
Also, my Warden would have been personally offended at her line "The Maker stopped the Blight." If the Maker was helping out, he could have at least made those damn crossbows stop jamming during the final battle with the Archdemon. :innocent:


I had a Dalish Warden who was very anti Chantry so yes, he would have taken serious issue with that, though he wouldn't be surprised at the chantry taking something he, his friends and the Dalish did and making it all about The Maker *shakes fist*

#3
Masako52

Masako52
  • Members
  • 320 mensajes

ReiSilver wrote...

I don't think she deserved death but she was a huge part of the problem by allowing a terrible status quo to continue just because she and the upper echelon of society had no problems with it. If she didn't want to take the responsibility her position gave her then she's in the wrong job.


Well, I mean it sort of in a poetic justice kind of way and taking literary perspective of the game. As a person, no, of course she didn't deserve to die (irl I'm really anti death-penalty and Elthina's not even a criminal (per se, jury's still out on whether she actively tolerated Petrice's crimes)). I just mean, she sat on the stove and didn't budge one way or the other, and consequently, her ass got burned.

The very least she could have done, if she wanted to only focus on Andrastian doctrine, was step down as Grand Cleric, and just be a Reverend Mother or something. Sometimes inaction is even worse than taking a bad action.

#4
jamesp81

jamesp81
  • Members
  • 4.051 mensajes
I think Elthina's only real crime was being bad at politics. In truth, she should only have to know religion and stay clear of wielding political authority. Unfortunately, the situation in Kirkwall didn't permit that and she dropped the ball at the political game. She was also not willing to drop the hammer on anyone when it needed to be done.

She really was a good priest, but terrible at politicking. I don't think she was a bad person, just not cut out for the situation she found herself in.

#5
Knight of Dane

Knight of Dane
  • Members
  • 7.446 mensajes
[*]Refused to mitigate a continuously heating situation between Mages and Templars, when she had the power to influence and at least lessen the tension, even if she couldn't stop it all together (also debatable)
Agreed, she should have done Something.


[*]Justified this prior to Act 3 by claiming she just wants to focus on religion, when she is in charge of Meredith's Templars and they are duty-bound to obey her.
That is very easy to say for you, it's pretty much emplied throughout the game that no one besides Hawke really got the guts to go against Meredith's word.


[*]Justified this in Act 3 with a wishy-washy "I thought after the Qunari everyone would want peace, so I didn't expect other groups to try to take power even though the Viscount was killed!" Um, Politics 101, lady. Or more like Reality 101...She does seem to lack acceptance of those two Immagine inviata


[*]She also does nothing to publicly denounce the behavior of the Templars or Meredith, even when it's clear how militant the order has become in Kirkwall.
Look at the second answer.


[*]Housed the murderer Mother Petrice. I don't know what's worse, if Elthina was aware that Petrice was using her name to justify inciting hatred against the qunari (and very clearly jeopardizing, even destroying lives in the process) or if Elthina was stupid enough to not be aware of it. Especially since it was going on for YEARS, and Petrice was even PROMOTED by Act 2. Petrice ONLY gets kicked out of the Chantry when Hawke catches her red-handed murdering the Viscount's son.
Petrice is dedicated, like Sebastian is, even if she's freaking insane, Elthine will have seen a sister that loved her religion, that's what promoted Petrice. Up until the point where Hawke tells her about her seal being used it slao only rumors to her ears, she cannot act on that alone, the chantry is too big a insitution. Petrice does not get kicked out, you are very vague here. Elthina intends to have her arrested by the guards, that's why she will not "you stand with the guard captain" if Aveline is present instead of "You speak for the viscount."
Elthina is not a judging authority but a guiding one, she cannot make a decition to kill Petrice, it's not her place.


[*]When the Divine send Leliana to evaluate the situation in Kirkwall, once they had heard things were getting out of hand, Elthina has you go and assure them that everything is just peachy and they don't need to intervene.
And what would your solution be? Let the Divine's armies march into Kirkwall likely slaughtering alot of "would be" mages in the progress? She is not stopping a police investigation, she's stopping bloody war.

----------

All in all i agree that Elthina is far from a optimal Grand Cleric, she doesn't speak up, she doesn't favor one side, but she does stall it becasue she favors peace, she's just too late for that.

You kind of base this upon what you think of her and not what she is. A thing DA:2 does very badly is that it doesn't show is how important the chantry is to the people. They are to blame for many bad things throughout the game. In DA:o we see people fleeing there, what is important is them, and not Hawke's pride or Anders' mage justice, peace should always be favored, but Anders looses the grasp of time, or rather, justice does so and murders the people in there.

You can mean what you will of chantry people, i don't favor them any more than mages or someone else in general, but because you think they are wrong or that they are insufficient for their role doesn't give you the right to blow them to bits in a attempt to show favor for a faction of people.

The ends does not always justify the means, except when there is no alternative.

#6
Wulfram

Wulfram
  • Members
  • 18.938 mensajes
Elthina constantly tried to mediate between mages and templars.

#7
Gespenst

Gespenst
  • Members
  • 544 mensajes

Masako52 wrote...

Elthina's not even a criminal


Can you have gross negligence genocide?

jamesp81 wrote...

I think Elthina's only real crime was being bad at politics. In truth, she should only have to know religion and stay clear of wielding political authority. Unfortunately, the situation in Kirkwall didn't permit that and she dropped the ball at the political game. She was also not willing to drop the hammer on anyone when it needed to be done.


The problem is, in theory at least, she's in charge of Meredith. She doesn't do anything other than tell her to stop making a scene and assume that everyone will work it out. She doesn't get involved even though she's already right in the centre of it.

Varric said that Hawke was the second most powerful person in Kirkwall but that's not entirely true. Elthina was the only person that Meredith couldn't touch. At all. If she tried to arrest or kill the Grand Cleric she wouldn't have lasted five minutes.

#8
OLDFARTKEYWESTER

OLDFARTKEYWESTER
  • Members
  • 26 mensajes
I suspect Elthina dislikes Meredith as much as virtually everyone else, though even she dare not cross the Knight Commander by openly siding with the mages. I practically choked on my cola in the beginning of act III when she says "That's enough, Meredith! Go back to the Gallows and calm down, like a good girl!" You could see the malice behind Meredith's mask as she bowed and complied!

#9
Gervaise

Gervaise
  • Members
  • 4.506 mensajes
Also depending on which order you talk to people in Act 3 it can appear she is doing something behind the scenes. I went to her and asked her to do something. She avowed she couldn't take sides. Then I went to talk to Meredith and she complained that the Grand Cleric was taking sides and favouring the mages. Also that hard line Templar claimed that Meredith has applied directly to Orlais for permission for a RoA - going over the Grand Cleric who is clearly standing in the way of such a drastic action. This being the case, Meredith whilst appearing shocked by the bomb, may well be secretly pleased that the only person with the authority to stop her is now dead.
In any situation like this you can state a person is being inactive when in fact they are working hard behind the scenes because clearly with someone like Meredith, publicly humiliating them is only going to make them worse - and in fact telling her to go back to the gallows "like a good girl" is terribly patronising. Contrast this with her gentle repremand to Orsino and instructions to the Templars to treat him well. It is true that she is not a worldly person - she has lived her whole life in the Chantry - but she doesn't condone what Petrice does and in fact does not object when the Qunari take the law into their own hands - clearly she feels that justice has been done and probably more so than if it had gone to trial, given the anti-Qunari feeling among the populace.
Trying to justify the bomb on the basis of her inaction is wrong. Anders thinks it a justification but then he lays into everyone for inaction because he no longer cares if innocent people die just so long as he gets his revolution. He knows very well that not only will he kill Elthinia and anyone else in the Chantry but his action will likely push Meredith over the edge, she will strike out against the mages and they will have no choice but to defend themselves. He has a rant at Orsino about his attempts to compromise to avoid bloodshed earlier in Act 3, which is why he makes pointed reference to the fact that he has removed the possibility of compromise.
There was an interesting conversation between him and Isabella when she makes this very point - what if your actions cause innocent people to suffer and die, don't they deserve justice too? At no point does he ever express regret for any of the lives lost as a consequence of his actions and that includes the lives of innocent mages who didn't turn to blood magic, become abominations or summon demons.
The main problem is that according to how you play the game, who you support, who you save from death, who you kill and who you talk to, you get a different set of information. Each scenario is different and so you can't say the Grand Cleric did or didn't do something because it is only true of your version of events, not someone else's. For example, today Sampson told me that the mages with Thrask are openly using blood magic and he turns a blind eye to it - because I deliberately made a dialogue choice that I hadn't done before. My opinion of Thrask and his conspiracy are thus altered from what they were in previous playthroughs. Some things only come from extra content that not everyone has so again you cannot judge a character in the game on this basis.
Some things do not change, though, and one of them is Anders and his bomb, another is Meredith calling for the RoA as a consequence of it and the fact that all mages, good and bad, are now about to die as a result of the death of the Grand Cleric, which they weren't when she was alive. The very fact that Orsino wanted to appeal to the Grand Cleric and Meredith wanted to prevent him would suggest to me that the Grand Cleric was stopping Meredith from taking much action that she wanted to, even if not actively, then simply by her presence in the city and unwillingness to condemn the mages out of hand. Had the bomb not occurred, who knows if Elthinia would not have supported Orsino against Meredith?

#10
jamesp81

jamesp81
  • Members
  • 4.051 mensajes

Gespenst wrote...

Masako52 wrote...

Elthina's not even a criminal


Can you have gross negligence genocide?

jamesp81 wrote...

I think Elthina's only real crime was being bad at politics. In truth, she should only have to know religion and stay clear of wielding political authority. Unfortunately, the situation in Kirkwall didn't permit that and she dropped the ball at the political game. She was also not willing to drop the hammer on anyone when it needed to be done.


The problem is, in theory at least, she's in charge of Meredith. She doesn't do anything other than tell her to stop making a scene and assume that everyone will work it out. She doesn't get involved even though she's already right in the centre of it.

Varric said that Hawke was the second most powerful person in Kirkwall but that's not entirely true. Elthina was the only person that Meredith couldn't touch. At all. If she tried to arrest or kill the Grand Cleric she wouldn't have lasted five minutes.


That is true enough.  I don't know what tradition to draw from here for a parralel, be it a legal, religious, or military tradition.  In a religious tradition, a priest shouldn't concern herself with politics anyway, or at least not involve her ecclesiastical authority in such discussion (personal involvement is fine, to the chagrin of many).  In the military tradition, however, the picture is quite different.

In most western armies, commanding officers are considered to be responsible for the actions of those under their command without exception.  Under this tradition, Elthina would be as responsible for Meredith's crimes as Meredith herself.  Viewed in that light, Anders's "blow up the chantry" plan doesn't look so bad anymore.  As Meredith's "commanding officer" she permitted Meredith's abuses and thus is legally liable for them.  These same abuses that precipitated a war and being part of the chain of command, Elthina herself becomes a legitimate military target.

Editado por jamesp81, 09 agosto 2011 - 07:44 .


#11
Knight of Dane

Knight of Dane
  • Members
  • 7.446 mensajes
Bravo Gervaise, i thoroughly enjoyed reading that, you are very right! :)

#12
jamesp81

jamesp81
  • Members
  • 4.051 mensajes

OLDFARTKEYWESTER wrote...

I suspect Elthina dislikes Meredith as much as virtually everyone else, though even she dare not cross the Knight Commander by openly siding with the mages. I practically choked on my cola in the beginning of act III when she says "That's enough, Meredith! Go back to the Gallows and calm down, like a good girl!" You could see the malice behind Meredith's mask as she bowed and complied!


The problem with Elthina is that this is about as harsh as she's willing to be.  Understandable, as harsh action doesn't seem to suit her that well.  A much more aggressive posture with Meredith and a tighter leash may have avoided problems.

Or, it may have gotten her thrown out as Grand Cleric, and the Divine might've installed someone with a viewpoint much more amenable to that of Meredith or Alric.

#13
Sinaxi

Sinaxi
  • Members
  • 527 mensajes

Gervaise wrote...

Also depending on which order you talk to people in Act 3 it can appear she is doing something behind the scenes. I went to her and asked her to do something. She avowed she couldn't take sides. Then I went to talk to Meredith and she complained that the Grand Cleric was taking sides and favouring the mages. Also that hard line Templar claimed that Meredith has applied directly to Orlais for permission for a RoA - going over the Grand Cleric who is clearly standing in the way of such a drastic action. This being the case, Meredith whilst appearing shocked by the bomb, may well be secretly pleased that the only person with the authority to stop her is now dead.
In any situation like this you can state a person is being inactive when in fact they are working hard behind the scenes because clearly with someone like Meredith, publicly humiliating them is only going to make them worse - and in fact telling her to go back to the gallows "like a good girl" is terribly patronising. Contrast this with her gentle repremand to Orsino and instructions to the Templars to treat him well. It is true that she is not a worldly person - she has lived her whole life in the Chantry - but she doesn't condone what Petrice does and in fact does not object when the Qunari take the law into their own hands - clearly she feels that justice has been done and probably more so than if it had gone to trial, given the anti-Qunari feeling among the populace.
Trying to justify the bomb on the basis of her inaction is wrong. Anders thinks it a justification but then he lays into everyone for inaction because he no longer cares if innocent people die just so long as he gets his revolution. He knows very well that not only will he kill Elthinia and anyone else in the Chantry but his action will likely push Meredith over the edge, she will strike out against the mages and they will have no choice but to defend themselves. He has a rant at Orsino about his attempts to compromise to avoid bloodshed earlier in Act 3, which is why he makes pointed reference to the fact that he has removed the possibility of compromise.
There was an interesting conversation between him and Isabella when she makes this very point - what if your actions cause innocent people to suffer and die, don't they deserve justice too? At no point does he ever express regret for any of the lives lost as a consequence of his actions and that includes the lives of innocent mages who didn't turn to blood magic, become abominations or summon demons.
The main problem is that according to how you play the game, who you support, who you save from death, who you kill and who you talk to, you get a different set of information. Each scenario is different and so you can't say the Grand Cleric did or didn't do something because it is only true of your version of events, not someone else's. For example, today Sampson told me that the mages with Thrask are openly using blood magic and he turns a blind eye to it - because I deliberately made a dialogue choice that I hadn't done before. My opinion of Thrask and his conspiracy are thus altered from what they were in previous playthroughs. Some things only come from extra content that not everyone has so again you cannot judge a character in the game on this basis.
Some things do not change, though, and one of them is Anders and his bomb, another is Meredith calling for the RoA as a consequence of it and the fact that all mages, good and bad, are now about to die as a result of the death of the Grand Cleric, which they weren't when she was alive. The very fact that Orsino wanted to appeal to the Grand Cleric and Meredith wanted to prevent him would suggest to me that the Grand Cleric was stopping Meredith from taking much action that she wanted to, even if not actively, then simply by her presence in the city and unwillingness to condemn the mages out of hand. Had the bomb not occurred, who knows if Elthinia would not have supported Orsino against Meredith?


You forget that Meredith is slowly losing her mind (even more than she alread had lost it) when she acquires the relic. Even Cullen comments on the fact that she has grown increasingly paranoid and sees enemies where there are none. I've never heard her say that in my game about Orsino or the Mages, but if she did I don't chalk much up to it. Elthina didn't do anything to outright stop Meredith, and I highly doubt that when push came to shove she would have even made an actual decision. If she did, I'm hesitant to say that she wouldn't stand behind the Chantry.

It is mentioned that the Divine herself is considering leading an Exalted March on Kirkwall. Saying those Mages wouldn't have died if Elthina was alive is just blatant speculation, since regardless of what you think she "may have been doing behind the scenes" in the scenes we see in game she is not doing anything. All she says is "Oh, can't get involved. I feel bad, but I'm not supposed to get involved" which I know is total BS considering Meredith is supposed to directly answer to her.

I disagree with you about Anders not having regret for what he did. He does have regret for them, but he felt it was necessary. This is why he has no problem if Hawke decides to kill him because he knows it will give the people he killed justice. Even the tone in his voice is one of sadness when you accuse him of murdering them. As far as Mages dying, mages are already dying and being turned Tranquil. Like he says, a quick death now or a slow one later. This is how he views it, it's not "oh I just don't give a damn about the Mages that are inevitably going to die from what I did" because Anders himself is accepting of death. Does that mean it's okay that he pushed Mages into this position? No. But it also has to do with what your own stance is on the subject. He felt there would never be a compromise between the Chantry and Mages, and I for one, think he is correct. The Chantry has been oppressing Mages for quite a long time and it's highly unlikely one day they are just going to go "hey! Okay, you guys are all free. We won't constantly stalk your lives and make you stay in this tower!"

That's why I hate when people are all "omg I can't believe Anders killed this really nice lady" okay? She might have been nice, but I don't see how her being kind mattered when in the long run all she could apparently do was uh...do nothing. Her inaction is what led to increasing hostility between Meredith and Orsino, if the Chantry hadn't been blown up they would have still been getting into the exact same arguments. Cullen would have been a better Knight-Commander replacement to Meredith so if Elthina honestly felt like Meredith was getting out of hand, she could have easily replaced her. She didn't. By not speaking out against Meredith, it only makes me believe that some part of her must have condoned Meredith's actions since she did nothing to stop her or her Templar's antics. Her answer is "I'm going to pray to the Maker and hope things sort themselves out." UHHH, THANKS for, once again, doing absolutely nothing. I'm not saying this in some way "justifies" her death, but when people use that "she was so nice" line it is always amusing to me.

As far as Isabela goes, despite what she says to Anders (which I also agree is a good conversation) she agrees with what he did. She specifically states "Bold plan. At least I thought so." If you side with Templars I think she makes a remark like "Oh yes, how dare those Mages rebel!" and there are several other times in the game where she makes her distaste for Mages being imprisoned in the Circle known. She does it in front of the Grand Cleric at one point. Hawke asks why a Tevinter slave building is being used to hold Mages, and GC is all:

Grand Cleric: Short answer was, it was a building, a large one. Should it have sat empty? The Chantry found a use for what was once a horror.
Isabela: Once a horror? Yes, I'm sure it's filled with flowers and sunshine and happiness now!

But, whatever. Just my opinion on that. I have no love for the Grand Cleric (as is obvious) and think if she couldn't do her own job then she should have been replaced. It was her, after all, that pretty much promoted Meredith to the position of Knight-Commander. Even in Act 1 when Hawke first arrives to Kirkwall, the guard is all "Uh, well the Knight-Commander is the real power in this city..." and Hawke is like "Er, isn't that a Templar title?" Once the Viscount dies Elthina I guess just allows Meredith to have Kirkwall placed under martial law. Considering Meredith isn't letting anyone assume the position of Viscount and Elthina is doing nothing about it. But that's what she does the whole game, so yeah....not much else I can say.

To clarify what I mean though: I do think Elthina's mere presence has stopped Meredith from doing some
ultra drastic things, but I doubt it would have taken long for her to go completely nuts and just outright ignore anything and everything the Grand Cleric said. She was looking for an excuse to declare the RoA. Elthina is the kind of person who I consider like...she claims to be against things, and hate what's going on, but doesn't take actual action. The only time I consider her taking action is when someone directly comes to her to ask her something. Such as "Hey, I want to declare RoA" so of course she is just like "What? Why? No!" Other than that, it's apparent she does nothing (and most of the time just talks around subjects instead of choosing a side) Meredith also might have gone behind her back just because she didn't want to deal with asking her at all, since Elthina was likely to say no given Meredith's utter lack of reasoning for declaring.

Editado por Tidra, 09 agosto 2011 - 09:17 .


#14
Wulfram

Wulfram
  • Members
  • 18.938 mensajes

jamesp81 wrote...

The problem with Elthina is that this is about as harsh as she's willing to be.  Understandable, as harsh action doesn't seem to suit her that well.  A much more aggressive posture with Meredith and a tighter leash may have avoided problems.

Or, it may have gotten her thrown out as Grand Cleric, and the Divine might've installed someone with a viewpoint much more amenable to that of Meredith or Alric.


Or it might have been the spark that made Anders unnecessary.  Subsequent events show us that Chantry control over the Templars was weak.

#15
jamesp81

jamesp81
  • Members
  • 4.051 mensajes

Wulfram wrote...

jamesp81 wrote...

The problem with Elthina is that this is about as harsh as she's willing to be.  Understandable, as harsh action doesn't seem to suit her that well.  A much more aggressive posture with Meredith and a tighter leash may have avoided problems.

Or, it may have gotten her thrown out as Grand Cleric, and the Divine might've installed someone with a viewpoint much more amenable to that of Meredith or Alric.


Or it might have been the spark that made Anders unnecessary.  Subsequent events show us that Chantry control over the Templars was weak.


Possibly, that's a question that will never be answered with any certainty.

Certainly it seems Chantry control over the templars was...lacking.  Considering that, maybe Elthina feared Meredith?  I know that technically Elthina exercises authority over Meredith, but let us be realistic.  If Elthina try to relieve Meredith of command and her troops sided with her, there's nothing Elthina could do and she'd be lucky if she survived with her head still attached to her shoulders.

#16
Sepewrath

Sepewrath
  • Members
  • 1.141 mensajes

jamesp81 wrote...

I think Elthina's only real crime was being bad at politics. In truth, she should only have to know religion and stay clear of wielding political authority. Unfortunately, the situation in Kirkwall didn't permit that and she dropped the ball at the political game. She was also not willing to drop the hammer on anyone when it needed to be done.

She really was a good priest, but terrible at politicking. I don't think she was a bad person, just not cut out for the situation she found herself in.

Its not a crime, because she's a priest or whatever their suppose to be. She's not a politican, so it should not be expected of her to behave like one. I wouldn't send a priest to the Geneva convention and I wouldn't expect her to be able to handle this situation any better. She was put in an unfortunate position, where everything was being dropped in her lap, like she was suppose to make everything better, when it was impossible for her to do so. First off Meredith's power was far above her station, she listen Elthina because she chose to, not because she had to.


Also Elthina did not have the power to overturn Chantry laws or even make sure the conditions of the Gallows improved. The Templar's are her hands, if they are the ones who are doing wrong, what can she do, send a bunch of mothers in there to watch them? She didn't do anything wrong, or anything to deserve what she got. She's not a queen, she's not a general or senator or anything like that, she is a priest, her place is praying with people or whatever it is that she does. not writing treaties. So no she didn't deserve what she got.

#17
Sinaxi

Sinaxi
  • Members
  • 527 mensajes

Sepewrath wrote...

jamesp81 wrote...

I think Elthina's only real crime was being bad at politics. In truth, she should only have to know religion and stay clear of wielding political authority. Unfortunately, the situation in Kirkwall didn't permit that and she dropped the ball at the political game. She was also not willing to drop the hammer on anyone when it needed to be done.

She really was a good priest, but terrible at politicking. I don't think she was a bad person, just not cut out for the situation she found herself in.

Its not a crime, because she's a priest or whatever their suppose to be. She's not a politican, so it should not be expected of her to behave like one. I wouldn't send a priest to the Geneva convention and I wouldn't expect her to be able to handle this situation any better. She was put in an unfortunate position, where everything was being dropped in her lap, like she was suppose to make everything better, when it was impossible for her to do so. First off Meredith's power was far above her station, she listen Elthina because she chose to, not because she had to.


Also Elthina did not have the power to overturn Chantry laws or even make sure the conditions of the Gallows improved. The Templar's are her hands, if they are the ones who are doing wrong, what can she do, send a bunch of mothers in there to watch them? She didn't do anything wrong, or anything to deserve what she got. She's not a queen, she's not a general or senator or anything like that, she is a priest, her place is praying with people or whatever it is that she does. not writing treaties. So no she didn't deserve what she got.


It's not a crime you say, but then this is the exact reason why the Chantry should have zero business in any "government" affairs that include governing a specific group of people and keeping them locked up in a Circle....and this is the exact reason why the Chantry shouldn't have an army under their command.  So, uh, okay? Yes, I expect her to behave like a politician and use her power accordingly. She didn't. She was given a position that is second only to the Divine in Orlais, and Meredith actually is supposed to report to her. But she doesn't because Elthina is incompetent and doesn't do her job. If she couldn't control Meredith then she should have informed the Divine of this, and had something done about it...instead she decides to act like everything is peachy-keen in Kirkwall for fear that the Divine will just go on a rampage Exalted March. (Which doesn't say much about the Divine aside from that their answer to everything is "KILL THE MAGES!")

I don't care that she's a priest, I care that she & the Chantry as a whole are actively in control of a militant organization...so I expect them to ACTUALLY control them. The Chantry is who is "governing" the Circle of Magi, so when their "hands" (The Templar Order) are going off the rails they should DO something about it.

Which is why now that all hell has broken loose we find out that the Divine has another group of people that report to her, the Seekers...that have to act as a check and balance to the Templar Order. It just keeps getting better and better.

Side note: This is why religion and politics are not supposed to mix. Since they are currently mixing in Thedas though, I expect Elthina to behave like she has a few brain cells...but apparently she doesn't.

Editado por Tidra, 09 agosto 2011 - 10:30 .


#18
Reznore57

Reznore57
  • Members
  • 6.095 mensajes
Well , she did try to prevent an Exalted March.
The Divine wanted to get rid of the mages threat anyway , so she couldn't tell Meredith to stop her madness.All she could hope for was Meredith dealing with the mage problem and then try to make things better.
It's not like she could go to all the apostate rebel group and plead for them to calm down a bit neither.

I mean look at Hawke ,the only group of templars and mages walking hand in hand end up in a blood bath and our hero (even when you don't choose a side)got his/her relatives kidnapped...

I'm not saying that's she shouldn't have done something , she surely did some mistakes .But i think she didn't deserve to die that way.

#19
CulturalGeekGirl

CulturalGeekGirl
  • Members
  • 3.280 mensajes

Sepewrath wrote...
Its not a crime, because she's a priest or whatever their suppose to be. She's not a politican, so it should not be expected of her to behave like one. I wouldn't send a priest to the Geneva convention and I wouldn't expect her to be able to handle this situation any better. She was put in an unfortunate position, where everything was being dropped in her lap, like she was suppose to make everything better, when it was impossible for her to do so. First off Meredith's power was far above her station, she listen Elthina because she chose to, not because she had to.

Also Elthina did not have the power to overturn Chantry laws or even make sure the conditions of the Gallows improved. The Templar's are her hands, if they are the ones who are doing wrong, what can she do, send a bunch of mothers in there to watch them? She didn't do anything wrong, or anything to deserve what she got. She's not a queen, she's not a general or senator or anything like that, she is a priest, her place is praying with people or whatever it is that she does. not writing treaties. So no she didn't deserve what she got.


The Chantry is undoubtably a political entity: it declares wars, demolishes countries, proclaims religions illegal, and creates centuries long international systems of apartheid. You can't do all that and say "oh no, I'm not involved in... politics!" You can't have your neutrality and eat it too... either you are a military and political force that dictates political policy attacks other countries or you stop having a military force, dictating political policy, and attacking other countries!

Elthina is a second rank officer in the dominant military and political force in all of Thedas. The fact that she doesn't feel like doing that part of her job is irrelevant. it's part of her job. It's part of the organization she's a high-ranking member of. It's reality. The Chantry is a political force. If they wanted to be immune from political interference, they'd stop having a standing army and declaring marches.

Chantry supporters are always trying to have it both ways, claiming Elthina isn't a politician when she is the only person in all of Kirkwall who has direct control over the Knight Commander. That's like setting someone up to command your military and declaring that your enemies can't attack them because they're "a civilian." If you have command over an active armed force you lose all claim to neutrality in any conflict involving that armed force.

Did she deserve to die? Maybe not, but few people in Thedas get what they deserve. She deserved to die more than Karl deserved to be made tranquil. She deserved to die more than Anders deserved a lifetime of imprisonment. She deserved to die more than the elves deserve to live in ghettos. Elthina had a responsibility and she shirked it. Because of that hundreds of people died or were made tranquil and a city state was driven to madness and ruin. I don't know if that technically means she deserves to die, but if she does I'm not going to be too upset.

Editado por CulturalGeekGirl, 09 agosto 2011 - 11:26 .


#20
Sinaxi

Sinaxi
  • Members
  • 527 mensajes
Tidra: +100 Friendship for CGG.

The banter between Sebastian & Anders has always summed up just how I feel about Elthina.

  • Anders: How can you keep standing up for her?
  • Sebastian: Who?
  • Anders: That doddering old biddy of a Grand Cleric.
  • Sebastian: How dare you! Elthina is everything a grand cleric should be. She's holy, wise—
  • Anders: Spineless... hesitant. She's clay in Meredith's hands.
  • Sebastian: In the face of danger, sometimes the bravest thing is to stand back and trust that the Maker will see justice done.
  • Anders: Well if doing nothing sums up your religion, then Elthina is perfect. Personally, I'd prefer a Chantry that favors action over sloth.
Also lol @ the fact that Sebastian says that...but when you don't kill Anders he freaks out and declares "war" on Kirkwall and Anders in the name of "justice".

Editado por Tidra, 09 agosto 2011 - 11:33 .


#21
berelinde

berelinde
  • Members
  • 8.282 mensajes

Wulfram wrote...

Elthina constantly tried to mediate between mages and templars.

Sure she did. If by "mediate," you mean "ignore." Her solution to everything was to send Meredith and Orsino back to their rooms. She did not ask questions about the accusations by one against the other, let alone try to find out if they were true. She probably thought she was helping, but all she was really doing was stalling. She struck me as a nice old lady who probably should have retired years before. Back when she still cared what people were doing behind her back.

#22
Masako52

Masako52
  • Members
  • 320 mensajes
Fact: The Chantry IS a political entity. It may be a religion, but considering it's a religion with military, social and financial power, with an elected leader, whose army is what is terrorizing Kirkwall... damn straight Elthina is morally obligated to not just sit there like a fat hen. It's all nice to say "separation of church and state" but this isn't modern day United States. This is Kirkwall, which very well has theocratic elements in its government.

Fact: Elthina was the one who appointed Meredith to be Knight-Commander in the first place. I'll buy that Meredith wasn't always as crazy as she is in Act 3, but key word is "as". She is noted for always being militant and strict, and almost merciless in her treatment of the mages.

Fact: Elthina could have at least tried to mediate the situation, but she did not. Elthina's shining moment? Telling Meredith to go home "like a good girl." And Meredith is forced to listen. That's it. That's all the mitigating that Elthina was willing to do. Again, the Templars are honor-bound to obey the Chantry, and Elthina is well-known and (for some reason that I cannot fathom) apparently well-loved by the people. Disobedient Templars would undoubtedly draw the fury of the Divine.

Fact: Elthina would have to be a bloody idiot to not notice Petrice is insane and dangerous for all those years, even going so far as to promote her. More likely, she hates conflict so just ignored Petrice's radical behavior until she was forced, with Hawke as witness, to relinquish protection of her.

The reason Anders blew up the Chantry was because compromise was impossible. Really, because the Chantry (read: Elthina) was useless and utterly refusing to try to compromise. I daresay the situation went on long enough with Elthina deliberately pretending she didn't see anything happening. She may as well have handed Anders the ingredients to make the bomb for all the good she did.

#23
Sepewrath

Sepewrath
  • Members
  • 1.141 mensajes
Yes the Chantry is a political entity as a whole, there is no denying that, but that doesn't make everyone in it a senator. Lets look at it like this, a lot of political ideals the world over come from religion, yet I don't see ministers arguing about the national debt or priest deciding who can and who cant have nukes. Just because she is in the Chantry doesn't mean she's a politician, its a church first and foremost, I doubt they choose people based on their political acumen. To expect someone who had devoted their lives to praying to some invisible force, whose suppose to be ignoring them and reading a song out of book, is some kind paragon of politics who can stomp their feet and have everyone stand at attention is a ridiculous concept.

You say that the Chantry can march armies on people and all that and they can, but I doubt Elthina can. I doubt Elthina is the one trading for Lyrium with the dwarves, so she can shoot up the Templars. I doubt Elthina is one writing the rules for Templar training and how the Circle is suppose to be run. Call me crazy, but I think she's just a priest.

CulturalGeekGirl wrote...
Did she deserve to die? Maybe not,
but few people in Thedas get what they deserve. She deserved to die more
than Karl deserved to be made tranquil. She deserved to die more than
Anders deserved a lifetime of imprisonment. She deserved to die more
than the elves deserve to live in ghettos. Elthina had a responsibility
and she shirked it. Because of that hundreds of people died or were made
tranquil and a city state was driven to madness and ruin. I don't know
if that technically means she deserves to die, but if she does I'm not
going to be too upset.


This part I would comment towards directly, the same way you say she deserves to die, because she didn't do what you thing she should have done, that applies to Karl. He was made Tranquil, because he didn't adhere to the behavior that was expected of him, hell they could have taken him the middle of the Gallows and pulled a Julius Ceaser on him and it would be no different than what you said about Elthina. Guess what it doesn't stop there, the Elves got what they deserved because they didn't adhere to the behavior the humans expected of them. By your logic, the mages being locked up is fine, because to someone, they aren't doing what's expected of them. So she deserves to die, just as much as they deserve that to happen to them. If they don't deserve that, then she doesn't deserve to die either.

#24
Gespenst

Gespenst
  • Members
  • 544 mensajes
^ Except that Karl had passed his Harrowing. It's a violation of chantry law to make him Tranquil - and that's another thing mages were being randomly tranquilised for six years before everything finally kicked off. Good work there.

It's not about what CulturalGeekGirl thinks Elthina should have done but about the responsibilities of her office. She is in charge of Meredith. She doesn't take responsibility - even when she's violating holy laws.

#25
CulturalGeekGirl

CulturalGeekGirl
  • Members
  • 3.280 mensajes

Sepewrath wrote..

You say that the Chantry can march armies on people and all that and they can, but I doubt Elthina can. I doubt Elthina is the one trading for Lyrium with the dwarves, so she can shoot up the Templars. I doubt Elthina is one writing the rules for Templar training and how the Circle is suppose to be run. Call me crazy, but I think she's just a priest.


Ok, you're crazy. Or at least uninformed.

She appoints the Knight Commander. It's directly stated multiple places that the Grand Cleric is responsible for appointing the Knight Commander, who reports directly to her. She could logically then appoint a new KC at any time. So no, not just a priest... If she were "just a priest" she wouldn't have the power to appoint a military leader.

I didn't say she deserves to die. I said she deserves to die more than Karl deserves to be made tranquil. There's a difference there. Neither of them "deserve" whatever happened to them... but other than in OZ, there are very few fantasy worlds where people generally get what they deserve, and even OZ exists as a commentary on the fact that true Utopia is impossible.

She didn't deserve to die because she failed to do what was "expected of her." I feel she did wrong because she took a job that included the responsibility for the command of one group of people and the well-being of another, and under her watch hundreds of those people were tortured or killed. She took on a responsibility and then allowed atrocities to happen. Allowing atrocities is a bad thing.

No matter how good your intentions are, if someone you appointed committs atrocities, and you know about this and allow them to continue to commit those atrocities, that is at least partially your bad.

There's absolutely nothing in my argument about expectations. It's all about responsibilities.

Editado por CulturalGeekGirl, 10 agosto 2011 - 01:14 .