Dave of Canada wrote...
Rifneno wrote...
AMEN. So you one of the gray choices you made turned out not to be so gray. Fine. Get over it. Don't tell us we just "don't understand" because we live "comfortable Western lives" without "a kitten that CAN EXPLODE IN YOUR FACE AND TAKE OUT AN ENTIRE CITY BLOCK IF YOU TOUCH IT" (yes, David Gaider actually said that!).
... except that he has a point?
No, he does not have a point. Such a ridiculous over simplification of mages was one of the reasons I had a really hard time taking DA2's representation of the mage/templar conflict serious.
If mages were really that weak and vulnerable to demonic possesion to the point they all become screaming abominations, and were, as Gaider so idiotically put it, kittens that explode on contact and take out city blocks, Thedas would not exist as a civilized continent, period. There would be no nations or empires, because the continent would be overrun by abominations and hoards of demons. Tevinter would have never even existed, because you can't have an uber ebil magocracy if all the magisters are batsh*t abominations.
So no, he doesn't have a point, at least not one that would stand in a rational setting. Hell, during the Broken Circle quest in Origins when you get to Uldred, you see that he has to torture mages and tries forcing demons in them, yet most of them to that point, have resisted.
As others have pointed out, we have Avernus as an example that even a blood mage, if skilled, knowledgedable, and strong enough, can pretty much fight off possesion for centuries, even in an area thats swarmed by demons with a near absent veil.
And I won't even go into the non-Andrastian societies that have other systems in which mages are seen more positively.
Saying every mage is a bad hair day away from becoming an abomination is like saying every man is a bad hair day away from becoming a rapist or sexual predator, simply because he was born with a dick.

<_<