Aller au contenu

Photo

Dragon Age II OVERHAUL


235 réponses à ce sujet

#126
Guest_Fandango_*

Guest_Fandango_*
  • Guests

Mr.House wrote...

Fandango9641 wrote...

Good grief Persephone, you appear to have so much invested in being a Bioware apologist that I’m actually left feeling a little embarrassed for you! CDPR are a phenomenal studio with a great attitude and certainly have my support, but then I’m not an irrational nutjob. Astonishing thread!

Reported.


****!

#127
Kothoses Rothenkisal

Kothoses Rothenkisal
  • Members
  • 329 messages

Persephone wrote...

Uzzy wrote...

Zanallen wrote...

Uzzy wrote...

Yes, EA, being as we all know, a tiny little indie games publisher, and Bioware, being a new start up developer, couldn't possibly hope to pay for distribution. The cost would cripple them! Why, they'd go bankrupt.


Publicly traded companies rarely toss out large sums of money without the expectation of some form of compensation. The logistics just aren't there to support large scale alterations to a console game.

CDP are the darlings of the RPG community for this. The less said about EA/Bioware's reputation the better.


If only they did not feel the need to resort to immature jabs at Bioware, marketing tricks and rather obvious manipulation to gain that position, I would like them a whole lot more. Let's talk again in.....say a decade and see what precious CDPR will be like by then. You know, when the comparison is actually fair?


Im afraid this is not really a good argument, considering the Marketing Tactics that EA have gotten involved in for their releases in the past (Look up Dead Space 2, your mother wont like it).  The Jabs were not immature, they said "Our game is better than DA 2" and to -most- people they delivered on that.  You can call it immature I would call it setting your self up, Look at Biowares Marketing for ToR a lot of their interviews have Cited wow as their target, market leader and competition, its said with respect but they also go out of their way to point out their product is better.

Battlefield 3 VS MW 3 with the online features same bag, its called setting your self up to be better than the competiton and its not immature per say especially when its done with respect.  The CDPR Interview where they said TW 2 was better than DA 2 they also stated that they are Bioware fans and take a lot of inspiration from early Bioware titltes.

To call it manipulative, well if PR is manipulative then please explain what the claims that "Legacy is Bioware listening to its fans" is I mean seriously "Hi we listened to you, give us another £5 and we will prove it!" now I am not saying Bioware are the devil, I have said many times I am prepared to write DA 2 off as a mistake and forgive them IF They deliver on DA 3.  But what I dont see the point of is hating on a company that has proven with both of its releases that they are focused on delivering a customer forcused service and a high quality product (Seriously the tutorial / Introduction in TW 2 has more meaningful choices than any act of DA 2).  The fact is a lot more time effort and quality went into TW 2.  That doesnt invalidate Bioware, it doesnt make anyone a bad person for liking DA 2 it simply means the bar was set with DA : O and TW 2 and DA 2 did not meet it.  Had DA 2 come from any other company but Bioware it would simply have faded into oblivion by now, but its Bioware, that name means quality and we the customer expect that in EVERY release.

But seriously TW 2 is not a perfect game, it has its issues same as Origins did, but I would rather play those two for the next ten years, than ten NEW DA 2 style games.

#128
Midz

Midz
  • Members
  • 83 messages
[quote]csfteeeer wrote...

[quote]Persephone wrote...
If only they did not feel the need to resort to immature jabs at Bioware, marketing tricks and rather obvious manipulation to gain that position, I would like them a whole lot more. Let's talk again in.....say a decade and see what precious CDPR will be like by then. You know, when the comparison is actually fair?
[/quote]

I'm Sorry, What Jabs are you talking about?
And BTW, i don't consider giving tons of extra Content for FREE as manipulation, and if is, then it's a good one.

[/quote
  You can say anything you like  but what CDPR will say is still not known, just a lot of speculation  based on a few comments  made at the show.

 Which  to summarise is ...Ver 2   which will  be the next patch
                                           Dark mode .a harder  difficulty level with  items ...DLC like there.
                                          Arena system where can place scores on FB.   very RP  so far I see

                                         any  more will wait  till Sunday.

  Not   yet a massive DLC ot expansion  maybe  but to say claim it  is  is very  fanboi and   premature.

 

 
 

#129
Uzzy

Uzzy
  • Members
  • 210 messages

Persephone wrote...

Uzzy wrote...

Zanallen wrote...

Uzzy wrote...

Yes, EA, being as we all know, a tiny little indie games publisher, and Bioware, being a new start up developer, couldn't possibly hope to pay for distribution. The cost would cripple them! Why, they'd go bankrupt.


Publicly traded companies rarely toss out large sums of money without the expectation of some form of compensation. The logistics just aren't there to support large scale alterations to a console game.

CDP are the darlings of the RPG community for this. The less said about EA/Bioware's reputation the better.


If only they did not feel the need to resort to immature jabs at Bioware, marketing tricks and rather obvious manipulation to gain that position, I would like them a whole lot more. Let's talk again in.....say a decade and see what precious CDPR will be like by then. You know, when the comparison is actually fair?


If by 'rather obvious manipulation', you mean putting out a great game, then saying 'we'll overhaul it to improve the gaming experience for free'..

CDP are getting a good reputation the right way, by actually improving the playing experience. This is fundamentally a great thing, and EA/Bioware should be doing the same. Heck, all gaming companies should.

#130
Gotholhorakh

Gotholhorakh
  • Members
  • 1 480 messages

Persephone wrote...

If only they did not feel the need to resort to immature jabs at Bioware, marketing tricks and rather obvious manipulation to gain that position, I would like them a whole lot more.


OK, I think that's an unbelievably skewed spin on what amounts to making games that are loved by your customers and releasing timely, extensive and carefully made DLC, often for free in the end.

I think a number of people have made the "if that's manipulation and tricks then you can spank me and call me Shirley too" point, so I won't.

What I will say is that lots of people would rather pay someone who "resorts to" making well-received products then lavishing good (and possibly free) extras on their customers, than someone who adopts what you seem to think is the "far superior position" of having to fire-fight their product's critical lambasting because they decided that what their customers liked didn't matter, and... well, let's say "not lavish, timely, extensive or free" DLC.

I know, people just have no sense of perspective. The games are exactly the same level of quality "objectively" and everything else is a subjective matter of opinion - just like Apocalypse Now and Showgirls are as good as each other regardless of what each individual thinks about them, right?
It's just six of one and half a dozen of the other. :wizard:

Modifié par Gotholhorakh, 17 août 2011 - 11:39 .


#131
John Epler

John Epler
  • BioWare Employees
  • 3 390 messages
Some people need to learn to disagree without resorting to insults and childish jabs. Let's try and keep this civil.

#132
Gotholhorakh

Gotholhorakh
  • Members
  • 1 480 messages

Uzzy wrote...

Persephone wrote...

Uzzy wrote...

Zanallen wrote...

Uzzy wrote...

Yes, EA, being as we all know, a tiny little indie games publisher, and Bioware, being a new start up developer, couldn't possibly hope to pay for distribution. The cost would cripple them! Why, they'd go bankrupt.


Publicly traded companies rarely toss out large sums of money without the expectation of some form of compensation. The logistics just aren't there to support large scale alterations to a console game.

CDP are the darlings of the RPG community for this. The less said about EA/Bioware's reputation the better.


If only they did not feel the need to resort to immature jabs at Bioware, marketing tricks and rather obvious manipulation to gain that position, I would like them a whole lot more. Let's talk again in.....say a decade and see what precious CDPR will be like by then. You know, when the comparison is actually fair?


If by 'rather obvious manipulation', you mean putting out a great game, then saying 'we'll overhaul it to improve the gaming experience for free'..

CDP are getting a good reputation the right way, by actually improving the playing experience. This is fundamentally a great thing, and EA/Bioware should be doing the same. Heck, all gaming companies should.


Agreed. I really do find it hard to see a negative side to their behaviour.

I suppose there has been the odd slightly off vibe coming off about DA2, but to be honest I would expect anyone who cares about computer RPGs and is a real fan of them, to have noticed DA2 and the furore that's surrounded it.

Perhaps I seem too forgiving of them in a way lots of people aren't with Mr Laidlaw, but in my defense I would say I don't particularly give a rat's behind about CDPR, and I certainly don't think they're up to the (usual) standard of BioWare fantasy RPG so I'm not likely to come out batting for The Witcher.

Modifié par Gotholhorakh, 17 août 2011 - 11:35 .


#133
dragonfire100

dragonfire100
  • Members
  • 258 messages
John has a point dont be sassy to each other im not trying to be a moderator but in this site they dont like fighting or isulting so for the sake of bioware please dont insult?

#134
Yrkoon

Yrkoon
  • Members
  • 4 764 messages

Mr.House wrote...

Yrkoon wrote...

Persephone wrote...
If only they did not feel the need to resort to immature jabs at Bioware, marketing tricks and rather obvious manipulation to gain that position,

I'll say it again.   if massive FREE DLC  to an already good game  = Manipulation, then  Please CDPR:  keep Manipulating me!

What massive free dlc? Troll and harpy dlc? Those where fun but not enough content to warrent a price, more so if you compare it to say OWB, LotSB and Legacy.

2.0 is not dlc, it's marly fixing alot of issues, re-doing things and maknig the game enjoyable for people who did not have a good time ON the PC version. Also this 2.0 will be with every new version of TW2, so it's again, not really "dlc"

2.0 does quite a bit more than just fix issues.  it adds arena competition, and Dark mode.  And dark mode isn't just a difficulty setting...  it's a *game play* setting, adding tons of new, themed items.

And you say that doesn't warrant a price?  Really?  Perhaps you should go tell Bioware to make their DA2 item pack free, then.

Modifié par Yrkoon, 17 août 2011 - 11:57 .


#135
AtreiyaN7

AtreiyaN7
  • Members
  • 8 398 messages

Dubya75 wrote...

So why is BioWare refusing to do the right thing?


Probably because as a mainstream company, they have investors and others that they are accountable to and can't just do things at their whim, including spending money on a complete overhaul of a finished product. I think that quote should really be:

"So why is BioWare refusing to do what I unrealistically demand that they do?"



#136
Gunderic

Gunderic
  • Members
  • 717 messages

Mr.House wrote...

Yrkoon wrote...

Persephone wrote...
If only they did not feel the need to resort to immature jabs at Bioware, marketing tricks and rather obvious manipulation to gain that position,

I'll say it again.   if massive FREE DLC  to an already good game  = Manipulation, then  Please CDPR:  keep Manipulating me!

What massive free dlc? Troll and harpy dlc? Those where fun but not enough content to warrent a price, more so if you compare it to say OWB, LotSB and Legacy.

2.0 is not dlc, it's marly fixing alot of issues, re-doing things and maknig the game enjoyable for people who did not have a good time ON the PC version. Also this 2.0 will be with every new version of TW2, so it's again, not really "dlc"


It is DLC. Patch 2.0 includes:

- A 'Dark Mode' difficulty setting with extra rewards that adds replayability to the game.

- An 'arena mode'.

- Also includes all the previous DLC like item packs, an 'exclusive' item shop etc., things which BioWare charged for with games like Dragon Age 2 and Mass Effect.

Modifié par Gunderic, 18 août 2011 - 12:11 .


#137
Ariella

Ariella
  • Members
  • 3 693 messages

AtreiyaN7 wrote...

Dubya75 wrote...

So why is BioWare refusing to do the right thing?


Probably because as a mainstream company, they have investors and others that they are accountable to and can't just do things at their whim, including spending money on a complete overhaul of a finished product. I think that quote should really be:

"So why is BioWare refusing to do what I unrealistically demand that they do?"


Amen...

No offense, Dubya, but CDPR can pull this off because of various things already discussed, but they aren't going to be able to do it forever. At some point, there's not going to be an EE edition of a CDPR game that's free anymore, and when that happens, unhappy fans are going to abound.

Personally, I see this as rope to hang themselves with, unfortunately, when that day does come. Either that or Atari will pull the plug as their publisher and they'll have to find someone else.

#138
Deganis76

Deganis76
  • Members
  • 124 messages
I don't understand the people who are upset about paid DLC. You have a very simple option, if you are against DLC that you pay for, then don't buy it. Exercise your right as a consumer by not purchasing something you don't consider to be worth it, but don't lambast a company for attempting to generate revenue.

#139
Uzzy

Uzzy
  • Members
  • 210 messages

AtreiyaN7 wrote...

Dubya75 wrote...

So why is BioWare refusing to do the right thing?


Probably because as a mainstream company, they have investors and others that they are accountable to and can't just do things at their whim, including spending money on a complete overhaul of a finished product. I think that quote should really be:

"So why is BioWare refusing to do what I unrealistically demand that they do?"


Because their direct competitors are, and my future purchasing habits might very well be influenced by this?

#140
AtreiyaN7

AtreiyaN7
  • Members
  • 8 398 messages

Uzzy wrote...

AtreiyaN7 wrote...

Dubya75 wrote...

So why is BioWare refusing to do the right thing?


Probably because as a mainstream company, they have investors and others that they are accountable to and can't just do things at their whim, including spending money on a complete overhaul of a finished product. I think that quote should really be:

"So why is BioWare refusing to do what I unrealistically demand that they do?"


Because their direct competitors are, and my future purchasing habits might very well be influenced by this?


Yeah, I think someone's missing the point - BW has actual obligations and budgets. See above about having responsibilities towards investors, etc. You do know that they've got the behemoth of TOR to deal with, ME3 and the future DA3, plus DLC for DA2 - and, I would assume, DLC for ME3 eventually, riught? That's in addition to apparently running sodding Warhammer Online too now.

There are multiple projects for them to deal with, not just one game that they can devote all their time and money on. They can't just snap their fingers and summon up millions of dollars and say hey, let's just totally make over the game because people without any sense of how difficult things are think we should.

If you can't deal with it, nobody's stopping you from taking your dollars elsewhere. Do it. Just realize that what you want is almost completely unrealistic. And if CDP ever has to juggle three or more balls at one time, I'd very much like to see if they're still doing these massive overahauls of theirs.

#141
Uzzy

Uzzy
  • Members
  • 210 messages

AtreiyaN7 wrote...

Uzzy wrote...

AtreiyaN7 wrote...

Dubya75 wrote...

So why is BioWare refusing to do the right thing?


Probably because as a mainstream company, they have investors and others that they are accountable to and can't just do things at their whim, including spending money on a complete overhaul of a finished product. I think that quote should really be:

"So why is BioWare refusing to do what I unrealistically demand that they do?"


Because their direct competitors are, and my future purchasing habits might very well be influenced by this?


Yeah, I think someone's missing the point - BW has actual obligations and budgets. See above about having responsibilities towards investors, etc. You do know that they've got the behemoth of TOR to deal with, ME3 and the future DA3, plus DLC for DA2 - and, I would assume, DLC for ME3 eventually, riught? That's in addition to apparently running sodding Warhammer Online too now.

There are multiple projects for them to deal with, not just one game that they can devote all their time and money on. They can't just snap their fingers and summon up millions of dollars and say hey, let's just totally make over the game because people without any sense of how difficult things are think we should.

If you can't deal with it, nobody's stopping you from taking your dollars elsewhere. Do it. Just realize that what you want is almost completely unrealistic. And if CDP ever has to juggle three or more balls at one time, I'd very much like to see if they're still doing these massive overahauls of theirs.


Bioware are a massive company atm, with over 800 employees according to the ever reliable source of Wikipedia. They have divisions all over the place set up for their different games. Don't try and act like it's one small studio doing three games at once. Yes, they have multiple projects to deal with, projects that they themselves took on. These were not forced upon them, with the exception of WAR. If they aren't able or willing to give the resources necessary to DA2 to get a finished, polished product, then that speaks rather ill of what they think of the DA franchise internally, or at least what the money men think of DA.

Yeah, CDP are able to give the resources needed to improve the already great game that they've put out, but that's because they've carefully marshalled their resources to allow them to do just that. Stuff like that does make me want to go purchase more games from them, as I know fully well what level of support to expect.

Yes, I can go take my pounds elsewhere. I may very well do that. It's the only real impact I can have.

#142
jds1bio

jds1bio
  • Members
  • 1 679 messages

Kothoses Rothenkisal wrote...

But seriously TW 2 is not a perfect game, it has its issues same as Origins did, but I would rather play those two for the next ten years, than ten NEW DA 2 style games.


That's too bad.  That means, over the next ten years, you don't think that a game can be developed in the "style" of DA2 that can nail the story, be more that the sum of its RPG and combat parts, and become a classic.  Well, I hope a game will come out over the next decade that will change your mind.

#143
Atakuma

Atakuma
  • Members
  • 5 609 messages

Uzzy wrote...

Bioware are a massive company atm, with over 800 employees according to the ever reliable source of Wikipedia. They have divisions all over the place set up for their different games. Don't try and act like it's one small studio doing three games at once. Yes, they have multiple projects to deal with, projects that they themselves took on. These were not forced upon them, with the exception of WAR. If they aren't able or willing to give the resources necessary to DA2 to get a finished, polished product, then that speaks rather ill of what they think of the DA franchise internally, or at least what the money men think of DA.

Let me put it simply for you. The cost of a complete overhaul of DA2 for 3 different platforms would be astronomical, and giving it away for free would be tantamount to throwing all that money away.

Modifié par Atakuma, 18 août 2011 - 01:30 .


#144
AtreiyaN7

AtreiyaN7
  • Members
  • 8 398 messages

Uzzy wrote...

Bioware are a massive company atm, with over 800 employees according to the ever reliable source of Wikipedia. They have divisions all over the place set up for their different games. Don't try and act like it's one small studio doing three games at once. Yes, they have multiple projects to deal with, projects that they themselves took on. These were not forced upon them, with the exception of WAR. If they aren't able or willing to give the resources necessary to DA2 to get a finished, polished product, then that speaks rather ill of what they think of the DA franchise internally, or at least what the money men think of DA.

Yeah, CDP are able to give the resources needed to improve the already great game that they've put out, but that's because they've carefully marshalled their resources to allow them to do just that. Stuff like that does make me want to go purchase more games from them, as I know fully well what level of support to expect.

Yes, I can go take my pounds elsewhere. I may very well do that. It's the only real impact I can have.


I never said they were a small studio, in fact, I said quite clearly that BW is a mainstream company with investors and obligations, etc. Or do I have to repeat that yet again? They have a lot of employees and lot of projects - and all those employees are working on these projects. This is stuff that you plan for in advance. They do not have the luxury to do what you want of them like a smaller independent such as CDP.

You say CDP has carefully marshaled their resources, and I'm sure that that's so very easy when you're not spending hundreds of millions on developing a new MMO and have your (large) staff working on multiple projects. Where do you expect BW to draw the manpower and money from? Out of their heinies? Have fun with CDP.

#145
Uzzy

Uzzy
  • Members
  • 210 messages

Atakuma wrote...

Uzzy wrote...

Bioware are a massive company atm, with over 800 employees according to the ever reliable source of Wikipedia. They have divisions all over the place set up for their different games. Don't try and act like it's one small studio doing three games at once. Yes, they have multiple projects to deal with, projects that they themselves took on. These were not forced upon them, with the exception of WAR. If they aren't able or willing to give the resources necessary to DA2 to get a finished, polished product, then that speaks rather ill of what they think of the DA franchise internally, or at least what the money men think of DA.

Let me put it simply for you. The cost of a complete overhaul of DA2 for 3 different platforms would be astronomical, and giving it away for free would be tantamount to throwing all that money away.


I think you are seriously overestimating the cost of such an endeavour, as well as assuming that a 'complete' overhaul is needed. To me that implies something close to a whole new game, which yeah, is a huge undertaking. But an overhaul on the scale of the current TW2 one? Or even the enhanced edition? Yeah, it'd cost a fair bit, but it'd be far from the astronomical figure you're suggesting.

And actually no, it wouldn't be tantamount to throwing all that money away. In any such exercise, you look at the good will generated by your gesture, and when done right, you can be reassured that any good will generated will translate into more sales of future products. Heck, Neverwinter Nights had six years of patches, many of which added substantially to the game, especially the later ones (released after the sequal had one expansion already out). For me, personally, this generated huge good will. I figured that any Bioware games would have considerable support post launch, if not at the same level of NWN, then something close at least. 

#146
Uzzy

Uzzy
  • Members
  • 210 messages

AtreiyaN7 wrote...

Uzzy wrote...

Bioware are a massive company atm, with over 800 employees according to the ever reliable source of Wikipedia. They have divisions all over the place set up for their different games. Don't try and act like it's one small studio doing three games at once. Yes, they have multiple projects to deal with, projects that they themselves took on. These were not forced upon them, with the exception of WAR. If they aren't able or willing to give the resources necessary to DA2 to get a finished, polished product, then that speaks rather ill of what they think of the DA franchise internally, or at least what the money men think of DA.

Yeah, CDP are able to give the resources needed to improve the already great game that they've put out, but that's because they've carefully marshalled their resources to allow them to do just that. Stuff like that does make me want to go purchase more games from them, as I know fully well what level of support to expect.

Yes, I can go take my pounds elsewhere. I may very well do that. It's the only real impact I can have.


I never said they were a small studio, in fact, I said quite clearly that BW is a mainstream company with investors and obligations, etc. Or do I have to repeat that yet again? They have a lot of employees and lot of projects - and all those employees are working on these projects. This is stuff that you plan for in advance. They do not have the luxury to do what you want of them like a smaller independent such as CDP.

You say CDP has carefully marshaled their resources, and I'm sure that that's so very easy when you're not spending hundreds of millions on developing a new MMO and have your (large) staff working on multiple projects. Where do you expect BW to draw the manpower and money from? Out of their heinies? Have fun with CDP.


Well, out of their parent company that has enough money to put together a moon shot, perhaps. Or perhaps rather then going full speed ahead with DA3 so early, they could work on DA2 some more.

Should I feel sorry that Bioware chose to engage in multiple projects and now don't have the ability to give proper support to their existing games? Really?

#147
devSin

devSin
  • Members
  • 8 929 messages

Uzzy wrote...

Heck, Neverwinter Nights had six years of patches, many of which added substantially to the game, especially the later ones (released after the sequal had one expansion already out). For me, personally, this generated huge good will. I figured that any Bioware games would have considerable support post launch, if not at the same level of NWN, then something close at least.

I'll just say, before letting you all get back to arguing BioWare business practices and finances, that NWN is the only game BioWare has ever even looked at that has had admirable post-release support.

When it comes to post-release support, you might expect BioWare to be at the bottom of the barrel, given their past efforts. But the truth is that you have to actually empty and lift up the barrel, and they can be found underneath it. (Not to harsh on them too much; they have lots of company under there.)

If you were expecting anything more, you really haven't been paying attention.

#148
Uzzy

Uzzy
  • Members
  • 210 messages

devSin wrote...

Uzzy wrote...

Heck, Neverwinter Nights had six years of patches, many of which added substantially to the game, especially the later ones (released after the sequal had one expansion already out). For me, personally, this generated huge good will. I figured that any Bioware games would have considerable support post launch, if not at the same level of NWN, then something close at least.

I'll just say, before letting you all get back to arguing BioWare business practices and finances, that NWN is the only game BioWare has ever even looked at that has had admirable post-release support.

When it comes to post-release support, you might expect BioWare to be at the bottom of the barrel, given their past efforts. But the truth is that you have to actually empty and lift up the barrel, and they can be found underneath it. (Not to harsh on them too much; they have lots of company under there.)

If you were expecting anything more, you really haven't been paying attention.


And to be fair, they did spend some time talking about support for Dragon Age, using the NWN mold. A toolset and two years of DLC were promised.

Yes, more recent games haven't really had anything like the level of post release support, but I really appreciated the NWN post release support, and it got me in a good mood about Bioware games. That's the benefit of doing things like this. It is far from 'throwing money away'

#149
devSin

devSin
  • Members
  • 8 929 messages
Except that NWN was the exception. Baldur's Gate had a little support. KotOR had no support. JE had no support. Mass Effect has a little support.

Origins should have had support, but they farted out a patch, abandoned the toolset, and released some short DLC.

Maybe support will come for DA2, but if you're expecting it, then you're an odd duck. Because they certainly have never given more than a single reason (NWN) for you to do so.

Modifié par devSin, 18 août 2011 - 02:45 .


#150
Morroian

Morroian
  • Members
  • 6 396 messages

Atakuma wrote...

Uzzy wrote...

Bioware are a massive company atm, with over 800 employees according to the ever reliable source of Wikipedia. They have divisions all over the place set up for their different games. Don't try and act like it's one small studio doing three games at once. Yes, they have multiple projects to deal with, projects that they themselves took on. These were not forced upon them, with the exception of WAR. If they aren't able or willing to give the resources necessary to DA2 to get a finished, polished product, then that speaks rather ill of what they think of the DA franchise internally, or at least what the money men think of DA.

Let me put it simply for you. The cost of a complete overhaul of DA2 for 3 different platforms would be astronomical, and giving it away for free would be tantamount to throwing all that money away.


Yep, anyone who expects that from a public company is in la la land. You know it occurs to me that CDP have yet to release the console version of TW2, maybe the console port is clunky and whatever overhaul they are doing is in fact to make it work better on the consoles with the side benefit of improving the PC version.