Persephone wrote...
If only they did not feel the need to resort to immature jabs at Bioware, marketing tricks and rather obvious manipulation to gain that position, I would like them a whole lot more.
OK, I think that's an unbelievably skewed spin on what amounts to making games that are loved by your customers and releasing timely, extensive and carefully made DLC, often for free in the end.
I think a number of people have made the "if that's manipulation and tricks then you can spank me and call me Shirley too" point, so I won't.
What I will say is that lots of people would rather pay someone who "resorts to" making well-received products then lavishing good (and possibly free) extras on their customers, than someone who adopts what you seem to think is the "far superior position" of having to fire-fight their product's critical lambasting because they decided that
what their customers liked didn't matter, and... well, let's say "not lavish, timely, extensive or free" DLC.
I know, people just have no sense of perspective. The games are exactly the same level of quality "objectively" and everything else is a subjective matter of opinion - just like Apocalypse Now and Showgirls are as good as each other
regardless of what each individual thinks about them, right?
It's just six of one and half a dozen of the other.
Modifié par Gotholhorakh, 17 août 2011 - 11:39 .