786 réponses à ce sujet

[xXljoshlXx]

LilyasAvalon wrote...
All you need for multiplayer is two player with or/and against. 

LilyasAvalon wrote...
...Wait, seriouis? What kind of c%$# multiplayer system is that then?

I could care less if it crappy multiplayer system all it has to do is prove my point

LilyasAvalon wrote...
 <_< Mass Effect has such huge potential of a diverse and open multiplayer system...

Not the point

LilyasAvalon wrote...
and THAT'S what you want? Sheeh.

I don't believe have ever said I wanted multiplayer for Mass Effect.

Modifié par xXljoshlXx, 15 août 2011 - 04:21 .

[Leonia]

Casey is the first guy to basically deny the rumours.

[Dragoonlordz]

xXljoshlXx wrote...

derp derp derp

"Easy" isn't it?

When I make a comment about something you done, you replying in essence 'moving the goal posts' is irrelevant regardless of whether you care about it or not. My initial comment/reply was about what did in first place not what you did after that reply.

[xlI ReFLeX lIx]

I am neither for or against multiplayer. If there isn't... cool, campaign keeps me occupied. If there is... sweet I needed a mp game and mp ME is awesome.

But IF, repeat IF there is mp, it'll most likely be like Dead Space 2 and Assassins Creed Brotherhood. Which IN NO WAY affected the single player game.

So everyone.... just relax.

[Bourne Endeavor]

Savber100 wrote...

If EA/Bioware had planned a MP mode from the start of developing ME3, EA would have invested MORE money as a result rather than just detracting from the original budget of a single-player only ME3. (I hope that makes sense)

The devs on the SP remains while ANOTHER team will create the mp mode with the extra money given from EA.

Basically, 

No MP = No Bigger Budget

While

Having a MP= EA will invest thousands more dollars into the ME3 project to apply this feature. 

I seriously doubt EA would come up to the ME team and give them the exact same budget that they got for ME2 while asking for a big game feature like MP. 

So I doubt not having a MP would make any difference on the current design team for ME3.  Come on.. it didn't ruin Dead Space 2 or Assassin's Creed: Brotherhood... why would it ruin anything in ME3? 

Dead Space's 2 multiplayer was lynched by the fanbase and detested from the onset, likewise while I have heard decent things about Assassin's Creed MP. It seems more of a mixed feeling at its absolute best. Regardless, neither title is a fraction of the length or scope the Mass Effect series is. If memory serves both games do not eclipse ten hours on their single players. So there is a remarkable difference between the two. The final nail in the proverbial coffin is excluding pure FPS titles, EA has garnered a lousy record for multiplayer games.

BioWare has made bold claims they wish to rival the success of Halo and Call of Duty. They cannot possibly have the enough arrogance to think stuffing a MP in Mass Effect 3 will be a selling feature to challenge the aforementioned. Those are games designed to incorporate arguably some of the best MP in gaming, and BioWare is going to emulate that with a tenth of the development time, a full on thirty hour campaign to handle and all in entails, while having never worked on true masss MP before? Right...

Modifié par Bourne Endeavor, 15 août 2011 - 04:23 .

[charmingcharlie]

LilyasAvalon wrote...
I never said boss man didn't like messing with our heads. I swear, Casey likes making us squirm.

yeah what I should have said is :-

Even when the boss man says so himself he will say it in such a way that it does not confirm nor deny said thing so should they change their mind they can go "yeah well we never said we would or we wouldn't did we ? oh and did I say this is the start of the galatic war and the third game is the best place to start a trilogy at ?"

At the end of the day if they announce MP for ME 3 I have just got to the point where I am past caring.  I will just ignore the tacked on crap and laugh when it dies a death after about a month.

[Someone With Mass]

Phaedon wrote...

So, wait, until now, all of the articles, but one cite BSN, Twitter and XBOX 360 World as a source.

Other than this one:
http://www.iamgamer....rtenden-spiele/

Which explicitly says:
"AUSZUG DER ZU ERWARTENDEN SPIELE"

and "Ein Auszug der zu erwartenden Spiele findet sich hier:"

Which translates into: "EXCERPT OF EXPECTED GAMES"


and "An excerpt of the anticipated games is here:"

So...umm, how is this official, or how is this rumor more valid than the rest?

Uhm....HYPE! HYPE! 

[Phaedon]

Johnsen1972 wrote...
Edit: No its not!  And stop editing my posts! I didnt do anything wrong! EA announced a pressconference about ME3 Multiplayer!

I laughed a bit at this. No offence.

The "excerpt of expected games" from a random online magazine is not a press conference. The press conference is tomorrow.

[Jussylein]

wait until tomorrow, why should we justify our German users if it is with us everywhere. the exhausting really slow, Chris also said there was no Kasumi and what they had come as DLC, I think it just so little.

[xXljoshlXx]

Dragoonlordz wrote...

xXljoshlXx wrote...

derp derp derp

"Easy" isn't it?

I found that quite funny

[CroGamer002]

Jorina Leto wrote...

Wouldn't be the first time Bioware "changes" combat.

*cough* *cough* Mass Effect 2 *cough*

I guess you didn't seen ME3 Demos.

*cough* Dragon Age II *cough* *cough*

Combat is same as in DA:O, only animations are faster.

Modifié par Mesina2, 15 août 2011 - 04:25 .

[LilyasAvalon]

@xXljoshlXx: ...Now you've just confused me, what are you arguing FOR? Co-op or Multiplayer?

[Jorina Leto]

Someone With Mass wrote...

Jorina Leto wrote...
Wouldn't be the first time Bioware "changes" combat.

*cough* *cough* Mass Effect 2 *cough* *cough* Dragon Age II *cough* *cough*

I think ME2 was a major improvement over ME1's combat (which was the snore-fest of the century once you got Colossus armor and Spectre weapons) and I like that ME3 is following that route.

You're confusing items with the combat system.

Slow health regenerating is far more tacitcal than cover and after five seconds you're fine.
And thermal clips suck.



But for multiplayer they would have to remove the pause function. That's why multiplayer would suck.

[Captain_Obvious]

xlI ReFLeX lIx wrote...

Captain_Obvious wrote...

xlI ReFLeX lIx wrote...

People need to understand that multiplayer can be added without affecting single player. If the single player experience is finished and good, you can add multiplayer features and the single player experience will be the same. I'm seeing alot of "everything spent on multiplayer is money that could've been spent on single player" well you are seeing it the wrong way.

Its not money is being put into multiplayer instead of single player, its just BioWare is spending more money. I have no idea how much it is to make a game but for example, instead of BioWare spending 2 million on the game, their spending 3 million.

So what you're saying is that games like Call of Duty have complex and intricately crafted single player campaigns?  They have a wealth of content that does not require an additional subscription fee for career tracking?  They do not rely on the multiplayer component to market the game?

Of course multiplayer can be added without affecting single player.  However, there is a correlation between more multiplayer and less single player content once a game franchise starts to insert multiplayer into a game.  I don't believe multiplayer will be in ME3, so I don't think we need to worry either way.

*sigh*

 Sometimes I question the intelligence of people on these forums. Do not, EVER compare ME3 to Call of Duty. Tell me where I said anything about CoD my friend. ME3s main focus will be single player. If multiplayer is added.. It'll be like AC Brotherhood. Call of Duty games focus on multiplayer becuz they're mp games. Have u ever heard someone say "I cant wait for the new CoD to finish the campaign story!" CoD is made for multiplayer. The campaign is just a little add on. As will be the mp for ME3, inverse the rolls of mp and sp. ME3s campaign will be the focus and the mp will be extra. Perfect example is Assassins Creed Brotherhood.

Sometimes I question the reading comprehension of people on these forums.  What part of "there is a correlation between more multiplayer and less single player content once a game franchise starts to insert multiplayer into a game" do you not understand or disagree with?  I already stated I don't have a concern for ME3.  My concern is that inserting multiplayer will, in future iterations of the ME franchise, make the game more about multiplayer and less about single player. 

[Phaedon]

Lady Of Darkness wrote...

wait until tomorrow, why should we justify our German users if it is with us everywhere.

You don't have to explain German to us. 

You have to explain why you can't understand German when it's your native language. 


At least don't take advantage of non-German-speaking users next time and don't spread misinformation.

[Dragoonlordz]

LilyasAvalon wrote...

@xXljoshlXx:  ...Now you've just confused me, what are you arguing FOR? Co-op or Multiplayer?

Niether he's baiting.

[Johnsen1972]

Phaedon wrote...

Johnsen1972 wrote...
Edit: No its not!  And stop editing my posts! I didnt do anything wrong! EA announced a pressconference about ME3 Multiplayer!

I laughed a bit at this. No offence.

The "excerpt of expected games" from a random online magazine is not a press conference. The press conference is tomorrow.

They officially announced the press conference about ME3 Multiplayer. Gamescom is just the host, EA gave them the info about that press conference and the titles they will announce.

That could certainly mean that they will announce that there is NO multiplayer. But why should they announce a conference with that title? Just to tell everyone that the rumors are wrong? 

Dunno, I dont care, dont believe what the german press interpreted into that announcement.

Modifié par Johnsen1972, 15 août 2011 - 04:30 .

[LilyasAvalon]

charmingcharlie wrote...

LilyasAvalon wrote...
I never said boss man didn't like messing with our heads. I swear, Casey likes making us squirm.

yeah what I should have said is :-

Even when the boss man says so himself he will say it in such a way that it does not confirm nor deny said thing so should they change their mind they can go "yeah well we never said we would or we wouldn't did we ? oh and did I say this is the start of the galatic war and the third game is the best place to start a trilogy at ?"

At the end of the day if they announce MP for ME 3 I have just got to the point where I am past caring.  I will just ignore the tacked on crap and laugh when it dies a death after about a month.

If they can pull it off real good without sacrificing singleplayer elements I'm all for it. But previous records and resource limits, both data and money wise, ain't on their side.

Besides, wouldn't it make MORE sense to release multiplayer as a seperate, payable function? They'd get more money out of it for one thing.

[Phaedon]

Johnsen1972 wrote...
They officially announced the press conference about ME3 Multiplayer.
That could certainly mean that they will announce that there is NO multiplayer. But why should they announce a conference with that title? Just to tell everyone that the rumors are wrong?

Dunno, I dont care, dont believe what the german press interpreted into that announcement.

As I said in the PM.

iamgamer=/=Gamescom=/=EA

EA never had a press conference. This is explicitly said to be a list of "expected" games.

[xXljoshlXx]

Dragoonlordz wrote...

LilyasAvalon wrote...

@xXljoshlXx:  ...Now you've just confused me, what are you arguing FOR? Co-op or Multiplayer?

Niether he's baiting.

1.Im not Baiting
2.Baiting or Not you can still argue my points
3. Co-op is multiplayer 

[Jussylein]

Phaedon wrote...

Lady Of Darkness wrote...

wait until tomorrow, why should we justify our German users if it is with us everywhere.

You don't have to explain German to us. 

You have to explain why you can't understand German when it's your native language. 


At least don't take advantage of non-German-speaking users next time and don't spread misinformation.

Ok Phadeon Thanks:) when The Gamescom in Usa, than have The Englisch Guys The Info From Multiplayer, the Gamescom is i Germany, and you have The German Press The Info^^

[Clonedzero]

leonia42 wrote...

Casey is the first guy to basically deny the rumours.

companies, developers and so on always deny deny deny until they're ready to officially announce.

nintendo denied the Wii U existed till they announced it. the developers denied halo 4 was being made until they announced it. and so on. denying it means nothing

[Someone With Mass]

Jorina Leto wrote...

You're confusing items with the combat system.

Slow health regenerating is far more tacitcal than cover and after five seconds you're fine.
And thermal clips suck.



But for multiplayer they would have to remove the pause function. That's why multiplayer would suck.

It is?

I think it's just a waste of time. If I have the option to either regain full health over thirty seconds or five seconds, I'm going to pick five seconds, because it's better.

And I have no problem with thermal clips. They're easy to get, contrary to what some people are saying, who apparently can't even devote three seconds/steps to the right to pick some up.

And multiplayer doesn't belong in Mass Effect at all. Then again, EA apparently have lobotomized retards at the helm and think that multiplayer will bring them more money if they shove into anything.

[LilyasAvalon]

...****, Halo 4 announcement just made me realize something. Bioware has always said Mass Effect 3 would be the last of Shepard's story...

...until recently at least when they were asked such a question and merely said something along the lines of 'We know, but you don't'.

WHY DO YOU DO THIS TO ME, BIOWARE!?